10 Lessons on Radio Usage for SHTF from the Chechen Wars đź§µ
1. “Chechens—shift frequencies during radio transmissions to avoid intercepts; Russians—continually scan all frequencies while retaining active ones already intercepted.”
"In addition to not using cryptography, they did not regularly change frequencies because of the logistics challenges of synchronizing the process among every unit. U.S. forces, by comparison, change their communications format every 24 hours."
2. “Chechens—misinformation and overt intelligence “give-aways” used to fool federal forces and conceal real intentions; Russians—focus attention on “conventional words” and specific terminology used along with the bait.”
“Russian forces also were subjected to massive onslaughts of disinformation. Dilegge reports that Russian units, were almost frozen, by confusion sowed in part by the Chechens. In one case in 1996, Chechens broadcast fake radio traffic from imaginary units in the clear for the Russians to deliberately hear.”
3. "Chechens—use more than one language when transmitting to confuse listeners; Russians—keep several interpreters on duty at any one time.”
“…the Chechens had a native form of secure communications. While virtually every Chechen speaks Russian, almost no Russians speak Chechen. By adding a few simple code phrases, the rebels could communicate in the open without fear of interception in a manner similar to that of the U.S. Army's Navaho code talkers in the European theater. In addition, most of the Chechen radio operators recognized each other by voice.”
4. “Chechens—place radio sets and antennas in operational mode on trees as repeaters to avoid detection and remain intact if fired upon by artillery; Russians—use additional course and bearing indicators mounted on helicopters to locate more than one point of transmission.”
5. “Chechens—use deep ravines and canyons as natural corridors for radio waves to make intercepts impossible; Russians—place radio intercept equipment on vectors of transmissions on axes of ravines and canyons in plateau areas of Chechnya.”
6. “Chechens—use radios as auxiliary facilities only for notification of when and where to meet a messenger with information; Russians—pay particular attention not only to contents of transmission but to location of both respondents.”
7. “Chechens—constant change of nicknames and call-signs to produce uncertainty as to who is on the air; Russians—learn not only frequencies and nicknames but also personal linguistic traits of respondents.”
"...Russian forces ignored many other basic communications security procedures. […] Chechen officials claim that they could intercept Russian tactical communications on their own commercial off-the-shelf radios. Code phrases used by the Russians in open communications were easily deciphered and understood."
8. “Chechens—intercept federal forces transmissions to gain intelligence; Russians—use alternative media and channels unavailable to insurgents.”
“…Chechen officials, who also equipped women and children with these radios for intelligence purposes, say these handheld units were so valuable that they would have equipped every rebel with one if they could have afforded it."
9. "The Chechens also had six large Motorola base relay stations, which they placed on the high ground. The Russians could see the sites and their antennas during the day, but they only risked attacking them at night. By then, Chechen forces would have moved the sites. The Chechens claimed that they were in radio communications at distances of up to 100 kilometers (65 miles)."
10. "[Chechen forces were] equipped with a new commercial Motorola handheld radio purchased abroad. Russian forces, on the other hand, were using tactical radios as old as 30 years [...] 'at the tactical level, the Chechens had better communications than the Russians.'”
How to Spot IEDs, a guide. đź§µ
With the recent news of an American rancher being blown up by a roadside bomb in Mexico, plus the talk of going after the cartels, & the potential for leftist violence in the Trump 2.0 era, let's learn about spotting and mitigating potential IEDs.
Bombs may not be what you expect. For instance, take this photo. ⬇️The car below exploded shortly after this photo was taken; both father and child survived. (Omagh bombing)
IED's in Mexico aren't new, but the threat might be ramping back up again. While you might not be a rancher who could be explosed to this stuff along the border in smuggling prone areas, out-of-control gang violence could mean it happening in urban areas. foxsanantonio.com/newsletter-dai…
PRIMARY INDICATORS
The primary indication of an IED will be a change in the baseline (something new that was not there the previous day).
· Unusual behavior patterns or changes in community patterns, such as noticeably fewer people or vehicles in a normally busy area, open windows, or the absence of women or children.
· People videotaping ordinary activities or military actions. Enemies using IEDs often document their activities for use as recruitment or training tools.
· Markers by the side of the road, such as tires, rock piles, ribbon, or tape that may identify an IED location to the local population or serve as an aiming reference for the enemy triggering the IED (such as light poles, fronts or ends of guardrails, and road intersections).
· New or out of place objects in an environment, such as dirt piles, construction, dead animals, or trash.
Neighbors are organizing their own anti-looting patrols. However, cell networks are down and/or coverage is very bad. That means that neighbors, who often don't know each other well these days, can't communicate. They can't reach police. Here's an easy no-license solution: đź§µ
Handheld radios are the solution for neighbor coordination. GMRS & FRS radios are comparatively cheap and easy to use. They're essentially license-free and will cover most neighborhoods right out of the box. They don't need programming and many households already have them.
Most people have a cheap pair of bubble-pack radios, which are FRS (Family Radio Service). These are license free and have about a 1/2 mile range. They share 22 channels with GMRS. That means the little cheap radios can talk with the higher-power sets.
HOW TO SURVIVE DEATH STORM 2025 (and what to buy). đź§µ
So it's gonna get COLD in places that don't get super cold. Like the 2021 Texas Freeze taught us, the grid can go down, in whole or in part. You might be stuck in a dark, chilly box that isn't prepared for freezing temps.
So while we can't add insulation or protect pipes from freezing or breaking, you can shelter-in-place to overcome the worst of it. If you need to buy stuff, buy it now before shortages happen and shipping is impacted.
Short term large-scale effects will be power outages and supply shortages. Empty store shelves, long lines at gas stations, etc. Transportation will be affected by snowy/icy roads. Plan on 1-2 weeks of major disruption. First 3 days of a disaster you're on your own. The following week there is help available, but it's difficult to get and life isn't comfortable. By 2 weeks, supplies are flowing again and life is returning to normal, but there's some residual disruption.
Here's the reality about shooting down drones with shotguns: You are probably gonna fail at it. Most people can't shoot well enough and it's easier for the drone to evade. But let's talk about shooting down drones anyway: đź§µ
Hitting a flying or elevated target with a rifle requires more skill than busting clay pigeons. A direct hit is dependent on the skill of the shooter and requires a high volume of fire.
Shotgun drone shootdowns are not uncommon. Drones engaged in combat operations will try to remain as distant and undetected as possible and should evade upon initiation of a downing attempt, making a gun-based kill more difficult.
Good news: drones are designed to be lightweight and thus quite fragile. They can be easily damaged by high velocity projectiles. Any impact may cause the drone to lose orientation and crash, the more violent the impact the better.
What is a “sad ham”? It’s the amateur radio operator you love to hate. Officious, condescending, and always ready to dominate the airwaves with tales of surgeries and bowel movements. These relics of ham radio's golden age monopolize the hobby, discourage newcomers, and sometimes, in rare cases, escalate things to violence. 🧵 @dolioj @TheNotARubicon @Brushbeater @BlackthornDF
Meet Walter and Vivian Langley, a CB-radio-obsessed couple from Southern California whose overpowered transmitter and penchant for petty feuds turned their quiet hobby into a near-deadly confrontation. Their story begins in the early 1990s when CB radio still thrived as the no-license-required, Wild West of airwaves.
CB radio in its heyday was a free-for-all. No licenses, no rules, and plenty of colorful characters. Walter Langley was one of them. Known for his illegal high-powered transmitter, he caused chaos in his neighborhood, from scrambled TV signals to blasting over phones and radios.
July 6, 1991: The Langleys tuned into Channel 38, where Vivian, aka “Little Rock Gal,” found herself locked in battle with young CBers who mocked her. Frustrated, she switched to Channel 22, a popular local frequency, and retaliated by holding the mic open and playing music, effectively jamming the channel.