10 Lessons on Radio Usage for SHTF from the Chechen Wars đź§µ
1. “Chechens—shift frequencies during radio transmissions to avoid intercepts; Russians—continually scan all frequencies while retaining active ones already intercepted.”
"In addition to not using cryptography, they did not regularly change frequencies because of the logistics challenges of synchronizing the process among every unit. U.S. forces, by comparison, change their communications format every 24 hours."
2. “Chechens—misinformation and overt intelligence “give-aways” used to fool federal forces and conceal real intentions; Russians—focus attention on “conventional words” and specific terminology used along with the bait.”
“Russian forces also were subjected to massive onslaughts of disinformation. Dilegge reports that Russian units, were almost frozen, by confusion sowed in part by the Chechens. In one case in 1996, Chechens broadcast fake radio traffic from imaginary units in the clear for the Russians to deliberately hear.”
3. "Chechens—use more than one language when transmitting to confuse listeners; Russians—keep several interpreters on duty at any one time.”
“…the Chechens had a native form of secure communications. While virtually every Chechen speaks Russian, almost no Russians speak Chechen. By adding a few simple code phrases, the rebels could communicate in the open without fear of interception in a manner similar to that of the U.S. Army's Navaho code talkers in the European theater. In addition, most of the Chechen radio operators recognized each other by voice.”
4. “Chechens—place radio sets and antennas in operational mode on trees as repeaters to avoid detection and remain intact if fired upon by artillery; Russians—use additional course and bearing indicators mounted on helicopters to locate more than one point of transmission.”
5. “Chechens—use deep ravines and canyons as natural corridors for radio waves to make intercepts impossible; Russians—place radio intercept equipment on vectors of transmissions on axes of ravines and canyons in plateau areas of Chechnya.”
6. “Chechens—use radios as auxiliary facilities only for notification of when and where to meet a messenger with information; Russians—pay particular attention not only to contents of transmission but to location of both respondents.”
7. “Chechens—constant change of nicknames and call-signs to produce uncertainty as to who is on the air; Russians—learn not only frequencies and nicknames but also personal linguistic traits of respondents.”
"...Russian forces ignored many other basic communications security procedures. […] Chechen officials claim that they could intercept Russian tactical communications on their own commercial off-the-shelf radios. Code phrases used by the Russians in open communications were easily deciphered and understood."
8. “Chechens—intercept federal forces transmissions to gain intelligence; Russians—use alternative media and channels unavailable to insurgents.”
“…Chechen officials, who also equipped women and children with these radios for intelligence purposes, say these handheld units were so valuable that they would have equipped every rebel with one if they could have afforded it."
9. "The Chechens also had six large Motorola base relay stations, which they placed on the high ground. The Russians could see the sites and their antennas during the day, but they only risked attacking them at night. By then, Chechen forces would have moved the sites. The Chechens claimed that they were in radio communications at distances of up to 100 kilometers (65 miles)."
10. "[Chechen forces were] equipped with a new commercial Motorola handheld radio purchased abroad. Russian forces, on the other hand, were using tactical radios as old as 30 years [...] 'at the tactical level, the Chechens had better communications than the Russians.'”
The 70s Rhodesian Bush War was a revolution led by Black guerillas against the white minority gov & population. Their goal? Ruin the agriculture-based economy by driving white farmers off the land. How did the farmers survive the war?*
*Yes, we know RHODESIA didn't survive the war but quite frankly neither did Zimbabwe, which is a hellhole.
It sucked to live on a rural farm. Many were far from settlements or cities and extremely isolated. This is important to note because living far away from everyone isn't always the solution. Isolated rural properties need large numbers of defenders.
Rhodesian farms might get 1-2 guards to supplement the family that lived there, but often it was up to basically the dad and maybe his eldest son. The wife was expected to pitch in and carry a gun.
The goal of these attacks was to terrorize white farmers off the land and to prevent Africans from cooperating with the government. I believe that attackers in America’s troubled times ahead will want to capture and possess isolated properties that can sustain them.
Farm workers were coerced into helping the terrorists or were in league with them. How do you think Hispanics would do if cartels started putting pressure on them to help sabotage their employers?
How did average Rhodesians survive the Bush War under constant threat of ambush, sabotage, and assassination? What can Americans take from it if they fear SHTF? American preppers should stop romanticizing survival and start understanding it.
Perimeter Awareness Is Everything
Bush war farmers patrolled their fence lines. Not just for property upkeep, but to look for cut wires, buried mines, or signs of human passage. You must do the same. Walk your land. Check for disturbed earth, fresh footprints, broken branches, or tripwires.
Dogs Are Your First Alarm System
Nearly every Rhodesian farmer had dogs, and not yappy little ankle biters either. Big, alert, loyal dogs were often the difference between life and death. Dogs can sense human movement, detect strangers, and raise hell faster than you can fumble for a flashlight. Train them, keep them healthy, and alert. Dogs were often poisoned before attacks, so don’t leave their food unattended.
Basically protesters get illegal* Class 3B lasers cuz Ebay/Amazon & China don't care. They aim them at cops' or defenders eyes to distract, dazzle, or blind them.
For these high-power lasers direct or undiffused reflections may cause permanent eye damage in more than 1/100th of a second, faster than the blink reflex. Usually with visible light you look away before any blindness can occur.
The real danger is from infrared lights. As IR light is not perceived by the human eye, a victim will not know they are being exposed nor will their protective reflexes kick in. With IR lasers, you might feel pain or go blind if they hit your eye long enough before you notice.
No one product can block all laser types. You must identify the most likely laser threat and buy or wear protection adequate for that. Based on examples from protests, green and blue lasers are the most popular. Blue-green-infraredlenses like the Stingerhawk FT-2 takes care of the most likely and dangerous threats but will likely be akin to a very dark pair of sunglasses. In any case, the lenses must protect against infrared.
How to Spot IEDs, a guide. đź§µ
With the recent news of an American rancher being blown up by a roadside bomb in Mexico, plus the talk of going after the cartels, & the potential for leftist violence in the Trump 2.0 era, let's learn about spotting and mitigating potential IEDs.
Bombs may not be what you expect. For instance, take this photo. ⬇️The car below exploded shortly after this photo was taken; both father and child survived. (Omagh bombing)
IED's in Mexico aren't new, but the threat might be ramping back up again. While you might not be a rancher who could be explosed to this stuff along the border in smuggling prone areas, out-of-control gang violence could mean it happening in urban areas. foxsanantonio.com/newsletter-dai…
PRIMARY INDICATORS
The primary indication of an IED will be a change in the baseline (something new that was not there the previous day).
· Unusual behavior patterns or changes in community patterns, such as noticeably fewer people or vehicles in a normally busy area, open windows, or the absence of women or children.
· People videotaping ordinary activities or military actions. Enemies using IEDs often document their activities for use as recruitment or training tools.
· Markers by the side of the road, such as tires, rock piles, ribbon, or tape that may identify an IED location to the local population or serve as an aiming reference for the enemy triggering the IED (such as light poles, fronts or ends of guardrails, and road intersections).
· New or out of place objects in an environment, such as dirt piles, construction, dead animals, or trash.
Neighbors are organizing their own anti-looting patrols. However, cell networks are down and/or coverage is very bad. That means that neighbors, who often don't know each other well these days, can't communicate. They can't reach police. Here's an easy no-license solution: đź§µ
Handheld radios are the solution for neighbor coordination. GMRS & FRS radios are comparatively cheap and easy to use. They're essentially license-free and will cover most neighborhoods right out of the box. They don't need programming and many households already have them.
Most people have a cheap pair of bubble-pack radios, which are FRS (Family Radio Service). These are license free and have about a 1/2 mile range. They share 22 channels with GMRS. That means the little cheap radios can talk with the higher-power sets.