Some simple science that everyone should learn:
Masks with FFP2 or N95 rating trap particles by using the electrostatic properties of the fibres in the mask.
They don't catch things like a net.
They catch things *like a magnet* - except not just metal objects. Anything tiny.
There's a bullshit bit of disinformation going round that these masks can't trap viruses because viruses are too small.
That's just wrong. It's like claiming that planes can't fly because they're not birds.
It's just wrong on so many levels.
The people who claim that masks can't trap particles that small are either:
ignorant
or
malicious
So they either need to
learn
or
shut up
FFP2+ and N95+ rated masks trap small particles by the use of electrostatic charge.
It's this effect 👇, but on a microscopic scale.
As particles pass through the mask fibres, they are drawn to the fibres and stick there.
Other particles the same size as virus particles in floating water droplets are also trapped by the masks.
Dust particles from ground stone or fabric can be that small and they're trapped.
Broken fragments of pollen that size can get trapped by them.
Bacteria, mould and fungal spores.
Toxic smoke and smog particles.
Tiny ones.
FFP2+ and N95+ masks, fitted well, work for all of those.
Because of the simple physical properties of the universe...
... recorded and understood by scientists.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm just a random seabird who did all my graduate and postgraduate study in humanities, so I'm hugely indebted to the people with the test tubes who do the hard fricking science like this 👇🔥
But I can translate this viral research into everyday English for you.
This is one of those really serious studies with really serious implications.
If you've been following the whole covid saga, you may recall that one of Covid's nasty acute tricks is to cause something called a cytokine storm - in 2020 and 2021, these were common and could cause massive damage to the body, especially the lungs.
I've changed roles since those days, but when I was younger, big old companies used to hire me to evaluate their health and safety policies.
That's why one moment in particular from this week's UK Covid Inquiry testimony haunts me.
It's the moment a professor specialising in the treatment of long covid said that he couldn't fathom why covid was removed from the list of diseases that require reporting here under 'riddor' regulations.
"Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations"
It's an essential system for tracking the actual harm caused by hazards across the whole of industry.
There's been an odd feature in the data published by the ONS in their 'deaths registered weekly' in the last few releases.
I don't know what it means, or whether it's a glitch in the data, a change in their practices, or a mistake in my method, but it's something a little unusual, that it might be good for someone professional to look at.
I don't have the data for exactly how old everyone is when they die here.
But we do have the weekly releases of registrations of deaths.
Someone covid cautious messaged me about making a a large funeral safer, and although that's incredibly hard, I thought I'd share a few tips for them, and share them here now.
First off, grief sidesteps rational thought.
When we're grieving we don't think rationally.
So plan ahead and think through every step *before* you're in those rooms and situations.
I've recently had a family funeral (that I wasn't responsible for arranging) that did sadly involve covid spread. It was incredibly depressing, but there could have been more, and I think that some of my actions may have helped keep it down slightly.
I've tested myself over 900 times.
Never even a vaguely faint line.
That's not conclusive, but it's part of the evidence I base my opinion on.
And I've not been ill in five years in any way. Not a sniffle.
I had one nasty headache in 2022, but I think that was from craning my neck backwards to fit a bat box in a tree.
Again, that's not conclusive, but it adds to the evidence.