“Writing ‘f*ck you Boeing’ is free speech and fully protected; preventing Boeing from discussing jobs with students is not. Calling someone a ‘kapo’ is offensive, but protected speech; breaking through a police line is not.”
Cornell President Kotlikoff explains free speech:
🧵
Referring to the disciplinary measures taken against students who disrupted a career fair, a
student asked him:
“Why are you punishing students for free speech?”
He explained the difference protected speech and illegitimate violations of the rights of others.
“Speech that constitutes a direct threat to others, or violates the rights of others to speak or attend events (‘heckler's veto’), is never protected, since its function is not to share thoughts and ideas, but to silence them.”
The student’s response?
“Boeing kills babies.”
This perfectly illustrates how anti-Israel protestors don’t really understand or care about free speech.
Kotlikoff: “That is not a free speech argument, but rather one that asserts a moral justification for violating the rights of others; that assumes the right to decide what activities other students may pursue, what conversations they may have and with whom they may have them.”
He continues: “No student at Cornell has been punished for expressing their beliefs. Neither will any student be permitted, whatever their feelings of moral righteousness, to forcibly deny others the rights that are central to our mission at Cornell.”
“At first I was stunned. I found it hard to believe that a book…could be blacklisted simply because of the…word ‘Israel’ on its cover.”
“But here we are. It seems that no Jewish author, no one remotely connected to Judaism, is safe from this kind of exclusion.”
—@BHL
“Curbing this hate begins by going to the source. That’s why I will soon visit North American university campuses most impacted by this disgraceful rhetoric and violence and plead not only for Israel, but for the defense of free speech.”
I enjoyed listening to @BHL speak about his book in NYC a month ago, and I’m glad he’ll be visiting American campuses soon. wsj.com/opinion/my-fir…
🧵Harvard Librarian Martha Whitehead on libraries as sanctuaries:
“Libraries are cherished as the soul of our colleges and universities.”
“Outside the library walls, information and viewpoints constantly rush towards [students]. Inside, they pursue their own lines of inquiry.”
“Opposing perspectives routinely confront each other in our collections.”
“Libraries are places where everyone should feel both welcome and able to focus on their own pursuits.”
“Even when there is no noise, an assembly of people displaying signs changes a reading room from a place for individual learning and reflection to a forum for public statements.”
“While a reading room is intended for study, it is not intended to be used as a venue for a group action, quiet or otherwise, to capture people’s attention.”
NEW: The task force on Antisemitism and Anti-Israeli Bias at UCLA surveyed 428 Jewish faculty, students, and staff.
The results are devastating.
“Two-thirds of respondents reported that antisemitism is a problem or a serious problem at UCLA and three-quarters reported that anti-Israeli bias is a problem or serious problem.”
“Three-quarters of respondents felt that antisemitism is taken less seriously than other forms of hate and discrimination at UCLA.”
“There were over 100 reports of individuals experiencing a physical attack or physical threat.”
”Nearly 40% of respondents (N=394), noted that they experienced antisemitic discrimination at UCLA.”
”Almost half (49%) of the undergraduate student respondents reported that teaching assistants engaged in behaviors that included offensive comments, verbal attacks, or discrimination, and 76% reported that their peers engaged in these behaviors.”
“One-third of respondents indicated that they had made an informal or formal complaint to UCLA because of mistreatment or discrimination based on their Jewish or Israeli identity.”
And the NYT gives the signal. It’s officially over for the campus protestors in the court of public opinion:
“The pro-Palestinian group that sparked the student encampment movement at Columbia University in response to the Israel-Hamas war is becoming more hard-line in its rhetoric, openly supporting militant groups fighting Israel and rescinding an apology it made after one of its members said the school was lucky he wasn’t out killing Zionists.”
“The group’s increasingly radical statements are being mirrored by pro-Palestinian groups on other college campuses, including in a series of social media posts this week that praised the Oct. 7 attack. They also reflect the influence of more extreme protest groups off campus, like Within Our Lifetime, that support violent attacks against Israel.”
🧵NEW: Claremont students marked Oct 7 by occupying and vandalizing a building at Pomona College.
They disrupted classes and injured a public safety officer.
A Jewish girl said she was trapped inside and too afraid to try to leave.
Others escaped through a second floor window:
This is what the Jewish girl said: “We couldn’t leave because they were in the building blocking the doors and everything. I wasn’t going to walk through the middle of it… I wouldn’t have felt very safe walking through hundreds of people yelling things that [I] especially as a Jewish student don’t align with or feel safe around.”
According to the Claremont Independent, the protestors pushed through two administrators to enter the building and then took over several classrooms
“One Campus Safety official was injured as the students poured in, rolling her ankle.”