This is how it was calculated... let's get geeky🤓...
It's based on this table in today's IEA report.
Solar is x100 coal because...
- SOLAR: 2GW x 17% utilisation x 40 years = 120TWh
- COAL: 150kt x 8MWh/t = 1.2TWh (note this *energy* content of coal; you'd need x300 as many ships for the same *electricity* content as a ship of solar panels)
Notes on solar:
- The "40 years" and "17% utilisation" is what i've used to backcalculate their x100 calculation and show they are reasonable calculations.
- A container ship is assumed as 15000TEU, far short of the largest container ship at 25000TEU.
- 2GW across 15,000TEU means there's 133KW of solar panels in a container. Useful to know:)
NEW: The rise of global solar this year was significantly underestimated. AGAIN.
Of the 6 major forecasters out there, all of them have been scrambling to update their forecasts through this year..
We forecast 2024 solar additions will be 593GW, a rise of 29%.
At this point in the year, there is enough data whereby uncertainty is now relatively small. (BTW, this was a MAJOR undertaking for us🫣)
Even at the start of 2024, the IEA, WoodMac, Rystad and (initially) S&P Platts forecasted that there would be LESS solar installed in 2024 than was actually installed in 2023 🤷♂️
(in part because they underestimated 2023 itself, rather than explicitly forecasting a y-o-y fall)
Only 33% of EU's electricity was from fossil in 2023.
However, that hides that hour-by-hour, it ranged from 15% to 50%.
To get to 0% fossil, we need 0% in EVERY HOUR.
Here's a long thread on flexibility 🧵
Let's start with seasonal flexibility, all the way through to millisecond flexibility..
The EU doesn't need a lot of seasonal flexibility. Wind delivers more in winter, complementing solar in summer. Even the swings by month are not huge.
Yes, this will get bigger as the EU electrifies heat, and winter demand grows - so it's a great job that EU is still building sooo much wind, even as solar so often steals the headlines.