THREAD: Israel’s sweeping evacuation orders and strikes across Baalbek today are yet more evidence of its systematic targeting of Lebanon’s Shia community, reinforcing concerns of an intentional ethnic cleansing campaign. This is not confined to Baalbek; it’s part of a broader strategy that combines direct ethnic cleansing with ethnic cleansing by proxy, as Israel reportedly employs right-wing Christian groups and militias to enforce Shia expulsion—and repeated secondary displacement—on its behalf. 1/
Israel’s actions go far beyond issuing evacuation orders or targeting overwhelmingly Shia areas in Lebanon, like the South and Beirut’s Dahyeh. Entire historic cities like Baalbek and Tyre have faced both evacuation orders and direct strikes, while entire villages along the border have been leveled through controlled demolitions to ensure they remain uninhabitable, preventing any chance of return—a core element of ethnic cleansing. Residential buildings housing displaced Shia communities across various regions of Lebanon are also under direct attack, underscoring the expansive and deliberate nature of this campaign. 2/
The scale and specificity of these actions point to intentions that surpass both military objectives and targeted displacement, indicating a calculated effort to alter Lebanon’s demographic landscape permanently. For Lebanon’s Shia community, this war has become existential—they are the direct targets of Israel’s campaign, facing Netanyahu's declared vision of a "New Middle East" in which they have no place. 3/
In Gaza, Israel’s strategic objective is the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, with Hamas perceived as an impediment to this aim due to its role in defending the population. In Lebanon, Hizbullah’s signifcantly greater power and capabilities makes it harder to eliminate directly, so Israel is now focusing on uprooting its foundation—the Shia “resistance community” itself. After repeated unsuccessful attempts to weaken Hizbullah by decapitating its entire military and political leadership and maiming and blinding thousands of its cadres, Israel has shifted to dismantling the community that underpins its support. 4/
This campaign also relies on ethnic cleansing by proxy as Israel seeks to incite and terrorise others to carry out Shia displacement on its behalf. By preying on legitimate fears among Lebanese communities that buildings or areas housing Shia refugees may be deliberately targeted, and tapping into right-wing Christian agendas, Israel deepens internal strife. Misinformation—such as false claims of Hizbullah stashing money under hospital buildings—exemplifies this tactic. A recent Financial Times report revealed that some landlords are sending the names of potential Shia tenants to Lebanese Army Intelligence to verify if they belong to Hizbullah, creating a new phenomenon of racial profiling the Shia. 5/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD: Israel has committed a significant number of war crimes in Lebanon over the past 72 hours, facilitated by U.S. political cover. This was demonstrated through Amos Hochstein’s visit to Beirut yesterday and Antony Blinken’s trip to Israel today, once again showing how the U.S. wields diplomacy as a weapon of mass destruction. 1/
Hochstein’s proposal has been roundly condemned as a "surrender deal," offering Lebanon de facto Israeli occupation, by tightening the noose on Hizbullah and effectively placing the country under indirect Israeli control, in exchange for an ultimately unsustainable cease-fire. 2/
As revealed by al-Akhbar newspaper, Hochstein's plan would extend US and Israeli control over Lebanon by making significant revisions to UN Resolution 1701. The plan would broaden the authority of “international” forces — meaning allies of Israel—beyond the Litani River, granting them the power to inspect and patrol without Lebanese consent. It calls for more troops, increased foreign surveillance of Lebanon’s borders, ports, and airports, and allows these forces to enter private property with the Lebanese army. 3/
THREAD: Tomorrow, October 17, will mark one month since Israel launched its war on Lebanon, that was set off with the mass casualty terrorist attack on over 4000 pager users, and escalating to the carpet bombing of southern Lebanon, culminating in the assassination of Hezbollah's entire military leadership and Seyyid Hasan Nasrallah. Instead of causing the anticipated collapse of the movement, these very harsh blows which occurred in quick succession, only seem to have invigorated it, and demonstrated its anti-fragility. What was intended to weaken Hizbullah has spectacularly backfired, highlighting how Israel fundamentally misread the group and, even after 42 years of close surveillance, still clearly does not understand its enemy. 1/
Had any other state in the region, including Israel, been confronted with a similar scenario, it would have likely spiralled into chaos, civil war, and succumbed to invasion. Far from collapsing like many states would, Hizbullah’s asymmetric advantage enabled it not only to reconstitute itself organisationally and maintain its command, control, and operational continuity but also to inflict substantial losses on the Israeli military. 2/
These tactical victories include, among others, a strike on the elite Golani Brigade in Binyamina on Sunday, which killed 4 and injured 67, as well as today’s close combat clashes in the Ramia–Aita Al-Shaab–Qawzah triangle, where Hizbullah's ambush resulted in over 49 injuries so far. This is over and above dozens of similar incidents over the past few weeks which have resulted in dozens of Israeli casualties. All of this occurred while Hizbullah was still reeling from the impact of these monumental losses, and the displacement of most of its support base. 3/
THREAD: US and Israeli officials are already discussing plans for “the day after" or a “post-Hizbullah phase” in Lebanon, as if the outcome of Israel's campaign of state terrorism against the country is a foregone conclusion. Reports on the US’ “regime change” efforts effectively signal a push toward de-democratization—replacing one of the region’s most democratic state with another authoritarian US client regime. 1/
While this may seem like an effort to gain political capital by projecting false confidence in Hizbullah's weakness, the Resistance’s strong battlefield performance, preventing any Israeli incursions along 4 different axes for nearly two weeks, suggests it's more likely a US-Israeli attempt to compensate for the lack of military success on the ground. 2/
US officials are pushing to eliminate Hizbullah politically and reshape the country’s political landscape, framing the current crisis as a crucial opportunity for radical change. They seek to end Hizbullah’s alleged control over state institutions, encouraging its right wing Christian, and self-styled “independent” and “reformist” political rivals to prepare for a new phase without the movement. As part of this broader strategy, they are advocating for both new parliamentary elections and breaking the presidential deadlock, with a focus on installing the army chief as their preferred candidate to shift the political balance in their favour. 3/
THREAD: Israel's actions in Lebanon do not embody the Dahyeh Doctrine but rather, the Gaza Doctrine, as starkly demonstrated by Netanyahu’s ultimatum yesterday to “free” Lebanon from Hizbullah or “face destruction and suffering like we see in Gaza.” The key distinction between the two doctrines lies in the Gaza Doctrine's genocidal and ethnic cleansing aims, which are now beginning to manifest in Lebanon. But unlike Gaza, Lebanon's deep social and political divisions are being exploited by Israel to fuel internal conflict and use it as an additional strategic tool. 1/
Given the Sunni community's sympathy towards Gaza and the Resistance, Israel is focusing on right-wing Christian political leaders and primarily Christian host communities, where hundreds of thousands of displaced Shia are seeking refuge. Rather than the unrealistic goal of defeating Hizbullah internally, Netanyahu’s rhetoric is aimed at bogging down Hizbullah in a protracted internal war, provoking right-wing Christians and others to take up arms and fuelling broader anti-Shia violence. 2/
This genocidal, ethnic-cleansing discourse against the Shia was also evident in former Israeli PM Naftali Bennett’s almost comical claim last month that “many Shia in Lebanon have a unique revenue stream: In their home they have a special ‘Rocket Launcher Room.” This accusation implicitly frames the entire Shia community as a legitimate target for Israeli attacks. The same discourse was echoed by Israeli Channel 14, which displayed photos of Israel’s hit list of predominantly Shia leaders, including Iraq’s Ayatollah Sayyed Ali al-Sistani, a globally revered Shiite religious figure who holds no position or role in the Resistance Axis. 3/
THREAD: The US and other Western powers' designation of Hizbullah as a terrorist organization has effectively empowered Israel to escalate its campaign of state terrorism in Lebanon, shifting from the Dahyeh Doctrine to the far more extreme Gaza Doctrine—a new model of warfare that is unprecedented in its brutality 1/
The blanket proscription of Hizbullah, including its civilian and political branches, has created a direct conflict between domestic and international law. By criminalizing these non-military elements, it provides Israel with cover to blur the critical distinction in international law between combatants and non-combatants, enabling it to act with impunity. 2/
The US and Western criminalization of all of Hizbullah’s political and civilian institutions has paved the way for Israel to target these entities directly. This was showcased by Israel’s strike on Hizbullah’s Islamic Health Unit, along with separate incidents where many other paramedics and healthcare workers were killed while attempting to rescue victims of Israel's attacks. It was also shown by Israel’s pager attacks on Hizbullah cadres, most of whom were members of its mobilization unit (off-duty reservists and thus noncombatants), healthcare workers, and other civilians, including innocent bystanders with no formal ties to the organization. 3/
THREAD: Some preliminary thoughts on this new phase in the war focusing on key developments: 1) Israel’s act of state terrorism which killed Seyyid Hasan Nasrallah and its impact on Hizbullah, 2) The impact of Israel’s elimination of Hizbullah’s military command, 3) The current transition phase and Hizbullah’s strategic recalibration 1/
It’s evident that Israel, with the full backing and partnership of the US, aimed to dismantle Hizbullah in one decisive strike. This effort began with the assassination of Fuad Shukr in late July, followed by the pager attacks, but it was Nasrallah’s killing that served as the key trigger intended to spark Hizbullah’s expected implosion. While Israel's push for a regional war seems evident, it's still uncertain whether the US is fully prepared to commit to such a course 2/
It is difficult to quantify the magnitude of Nasrallah's loss for Hizbullah and the Axis as a whole. However, this does not mean Hizbullah is anywhere near the verge of collapse. Israel and the US misunderstand the nature of his leadership—people didn’t support the cause because of him; they supported him because he personified their cause of justice and liberation, and while he was a revered figure, the cause he embodied will outlive him. Nasrallah will live on not just as a model of resistance or political consciousness, but as a rationality—a kind of 'Nasrallah raison' 3/