1/ The National Institutes of Health hired an activist who claims:
-obesity doesn't cause poor health
-safe weight loss isn't possible
-poor outcomes for obese people are caused by fatphobia, and anti-fat bais
America's largest Health organization is captured by activists/🧵
2/ These ideas come out of an academic field called "Fat Studies," which has it's own academic journals. The ideas from Fat Studies come almost entirely out of Critical theory and Postmodernism.
Those who work in Fat Studies call themselves "Fat Scholars" and "Fat Activists."
3/ Fat Studies is postmodern, and as such is accepts the postmodern idea objective absolute, universal truth does not exist.
Postmodernism says all truth claims are socially constructed, and are thus polluted by the biases, interests, and agenda's of the people who created them.
4/ Postmodern thinker believe every claim reflects the values, interests, prejudices, and biases of the people who made that truth claim, and for that reason truth claims are not objective propositions that accurately reflect reality, they are subjective claims disguised as fact
5/ For this reason, postmodern thinkers reject the idea that science produces objective facts. They instead believe that health science "privileges" thinness, so health tests, experiments, and studies are systemically biased and prejudieced against fat people.
6/ This means someone at the NIH used science rejecting arguments from "Fat Studies" to tell people that obesity is not harmful, that safe weightloss is not possible, and that poor health outcomes for obese people are the fault of stigma and bias, not the result of obesity itself
7/ And here is the big point:
The article was written by Erin Foxworthy - A woman with no scientific training, who has a BA in Religious Studies and who had worked in the St. Mary's College of Maryland Gender and Sexuality Studies Department as a Peer-Mentor.
That means...
8/ An activist trained in Social Justice academic fields Hijacked the DEI blog at the National Institutes for **HEALTH** and used it to undermine science, tell people losing weight safely is impossible, and claim poor health outcomes for obesity are caused by anti-fat bias.
9/ This is what we are talking about when we talk about government institutions and agencies getting hijacked by activists.
A Social Justice/woke activist hijacked the NIH blog and undermined trust in well established science in order to advance her "Social Justice" ideology.
10/ This sort of thing is happening all over the U.S. Government.
Critical Social Justice/woke activists are taking up positions in the government, redirecting government resources away from their mission, and using government institutions as vehicles for advancing woke ideology
11/ This undermines trust in the government, institutional trust, trust in science, and takes resources from important goals and ideals of American society.
Hijacking government institutions for ideological ends is a subversion of democracy and needs to be stopped.
/fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ To show you how captured by wokeness Government institutions are, here's a list of insane things published by *JUST* the National Institutes for Health. /🧵
They hired a "fat activist" to write about "fatphobia, and say there's no evidence for safe weight loss.
2/ The NIH has an article about "Hari discrimination" and the prospect of living with "Black Hair in an Unjust Society"
3/ They have a 3 part series on "intersectionality," a term coined by Critical Race Theorist Kimberlee Crenshaw.
The entire series is about how institutions are systemically biased against women in various ways, and how employees ought to advance DEI as a way to fix this.
1/ Critical Social Justice (woke) activists don't see legitimacy as a product of competence, knowledge, merit, and and high standards rigorously and consistenly applied
They think legitimacy is a form of social capital that allows privileged people to accrue prestige and status
2/ According to wokeness, legitimacy is not given to institutions, ideas, or people because they have met the objective standards of merit, competence, knowledge, and truth
Rather, legitimacy is a social convention that gatekeeps access prestige, status, power, and resources.
3/ Woke activists accept the postmodern idea that there are no objective standards for knowledge, truth, merit, rationality, and competence.
They think all standards of judgement are socially constructed according to the interests amd values of the people who constructed them...
But she is responsible for more DEI policy in the U.S. government than any other bureaucrat. What she does is called "Policy Entrepreneurship," and it's how activists subvert democrcy🧵
2/ This letter from at the time Director Francis Collins outlines the extent the which Chew was able to build a huge apparatus of DEI withing the National Institutes of Health.
The sheer volume of DEI infrastructure she created has to be seen to be believed👇
3/ -Debra championed a change to the NIH mission statement
-she led the effort to re-engineer the former NIH Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity Management.
-Through her advocacy for the Sexual and Gender Minority (SGM) population at the NIH, Debra launched a Safe Zone Training (a form of safe space training)
-. She also led the trans-NIH committee effort to standardize workforce categories for diversity. Beyond NIH
-Debra launched a new, centralized Reasonable Accommodation Program for the NIH
-Debra’s team drafted and finalized NIH Reasonable Accommodation procedures,
-She recruited a team of Accessibility Consultants were to provide technical guidance.
All of this was done in the service of EDI programming at the NIH
1/ The National Institutes of Health is racially segregating employee communications.
This article, "A Note For Employees of Color," is about 'code switching' and "creating a psychologically safe space" for people of color.
The NIH is captured by DEI administrators,
A Thread🧵
2/ The article is written by Kiana Atkins, the Principle Strategist for the Black Employment Portfolio, and Patricia Sauceda Kramer who is that Principle Hispanic Portfolio Employment Strategist.
These DEI administrators write employee communications for people based on race.
3/ This sort of Critical Social Justice/woke oriented DEI writing is all over the place at the NIH.
Zulekha Sayyed, Program Analyst at the National Cancer Institute, who contributed to the NIH a blog post about her experience with "microagressions."
Male physical intervention into conflict escalates the conflict. The man she refers to was being rude and such, if a man intervenes to stop him, the subway harasser likely becomes *violent*
These women do not understand what that means....
2/ There is no "margine for error." Almost nobody (save for pro UFC fighters) has the strength, power, and skill set to easily subdue someone. A man who becomes criminally violent will often not stop until he is stopped by being knocked unconscious or severely wounded. And...
3/ The man who tries to stop a violent criminal may be killed if he doesn't use enough force and is overpowered by the criminal
And the gap between "getting killed because you didn't use enough force to stop the criminial" and "using so much force the criminal dies" is small...
2/ To understand what's happening today we need to understand how the 2007 housing crisis happened.
Once we do that I'll show you how what's going on in America's elite institutions today perfectly mirrors what happened in the housing market during 2007
Let's begin
3/ To begin, we need to know what a Mortgage-Backed Security (MBS) is.
The bank take mortgages from different markets, packages them together, and then sell them. The buyer makes money collecting the mortgage payments the bank makes a profit selling mortgages.