We had a flurry of new polls in PA today that net out to an effective tie.
Those who know me well know I’m not much of an optimist.
But gather ‘round the campfire. Let me explain why I’m bullish on Harris in PA — and it has nothing to do with polls or early/mail voting.
🧵
Let’s start with what happened in 2020.
In its highest turnout election since 1992 (76.5%) — due largely to COVID/mail voting — Biden beat Trump by 1.2 points (50.0 - 48.8), or 80,555 votes.
He racked up huge margins in Philly and its suburbs & Allegheny (home to Pittsburgh).
From 2016 to 2020, Philly actually shifted right by 4 pts.
This was due mostly to Latino-heavy — predominantly Puerto Rican — neighborhoods (mostly in North Philly) shifting right, costing him ~10K votes
This was a trend that we saw in nearly every major city across the country
Biden won about 95% of Black voters in Philly (slight right shift from 2016) but turnout dropped 20%, costing him ~5,000 votes — another common theme across areas with large urban Black populations across the country.
Biden put up some of his best numbers in the growing, highly educated, blue-trending Philadelphia suburbs in the southeast corner of the state — or as local politicos call it, SEPA.
He also improved upon Clinton’s performance in northeast PA and Allegheny County (home to Pitt).
Trump dominated in the rural parts of the state, but his margins were somewhat muted there by a lot of of those areas having small college towns/urban centers.
And he didn’t improve much on his 2016 performance in those counties (held steady/slightly regressed in many).
Ok enough history. Let’s talk about 2024.
Southeast PA (Philly suburbs) will likely keep growing in vote share & keep trending left
The exurbs will continue to shift right, but they are less populous, and unlikely to offset those losses in SEPA.
I wouldn’t be surprised if rural turnout was high, but in 2020 Trump likely squeezed most of what he could get out of those areas, unless he starts making inroads into those college towns/small urban centers — which would be something of a realignment.
I know I said I wouldn’t talk about polls, but one exception — the district polling we have shows Harris slightly improving/holding steady w/ Biden in rural counties like Carbon in northeast PA. TBD on if it's true, but there's nothing super alarming about a big rural backslide.
So how does Trump make the math work? The answer is probably a combo of:
- Exurbs/rurals have disproportionately high turnout & shift right
AND
- Trump makes sizable gains among POC voters in Philly & Latino-heavy areas like Allentown (tougher after Puerto-Rico-garbage-gate)
But the way I see it, there are four possible outcomes, and Trump loses in three of them:
depolarization in Philly and
The way I see it, there are four scenarios, and Trump loses in three of them.
1) 2024 looks a whole lot like 2020 in terms of turnout and vote share by region. Trump likely loses.
2) Trump nets a bit more votes in the exurbs/rurals, but it’s canceled out by leftward shifts in suburban leftward shifts (especially SEPA). Trump likely loses.
3) Exurbs/rurals stay static, suburbs shift left. He loses by more than he did in 2020. Trump likely loses.
4) Exurbs/rurals shift right and some racial depolarization happens + suburbs stay stagnant or slightly erodes. Trump likely wins.
In other words, given the political geography and demography of the state, Trump needs a lot to go right for him for carry Pennsylvania
He can absolutely win it, but based on the fundamentals I outlined above — polling & early voting notwithstanding — I’d rather be Harris there
Yikes, missed this in the copy editing.
Forgive me.
But wait, there’s more!
Based on some back-of-the-napkin math — based on minor party polling & past underperformance — Trump (or Harris) will need a minimum of ~49.6% of the vote in PA to win.
Trump did not crack 49% in 2020 or 2016, and he’s catering mostly to his own base.
And in a razor thin election, ground game matters.
There are no real hard metrics on that, but folks that I trust on both sides to speak candidly tell me Harris’ ground game/voter turnout operation is much stronger than Trump’s.
And we’re well past the point of ad saturation.
As always, a huge thank you to The Keystone Whisperer @blockedfreq for gutting checking all this to make sure I didn’t sound like a complete idiot.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The first reaction I’m seeing: “not great for Harris!”
I get that. And to some extent I agree with it.
Biden won by 4.5 pts in 2020 & won the Electoral College by the skin of his teeth (tipping point state, WI, was D+0.6).
Clinton won the popular vote in 2016 but lost the EC.
There’s been a pretty consistent indication in polling that R bias in the Electoral College bias will be less than it was in 2020, but no one truly knows by how much.
Most smart people I follow expect it to be a ~2 pt delta between the national PV and the tipping point state.
You may not like every decision she’s made or stance she’s taken, but it’s worth acknowledging how remarkable Harris’ campaign has been
Campaign continuity, ground game, raising her net favorability from -16 to -1, gaining 5-7 pts in every swing state — all in less than 100 days
Like you (and I) would be lying if you thought her campaign operation would be anywhere near this good even 4 months ago — especially after her 2019 presidential campaign
It was high-risk high-reward swapping out the presumptive nominee so late, and it ended up being the latter
It’s a 50-50 race and she may end up coming up short.
If she loses, people will criticize and second guess her decisions after the elections. Hindsight is always 20/20.
But her and her team had an impossible job under unprecedented circumstances and they absolutely executed.
WI is too close to call & we wait on mail ballot drops in razor thin AZ & NV
You think: “shit maybe I should’ve actually volunteered instead of obsessing over tiny polling shifts”
I get that we all want to know what will happen in advance, and we (mistakenly) look to polling to give us some level of certainty around that.
I get that it’s easier to obsess about polling shifts online than to spend time knocking or donors or making phone calls.
There are so many things in life that you don’t have control over.
But let’s say the race is decided again by <50K votes.
That’s a situation in which people acting collectively *can* make a difference if they choose to engage rather than be armchair experts on the sidelines.
Newly released oversample of Latino voters from the NYT/Siena’s most recent national poll (9/29-10/6, n=902 LVs)
🔵Harris 56%
🔴Trump 37%
Per an avg of post-election estimates from Catalist/Pew/AP VoteCast, Trump’s matching his 2020 vote share but Harris is lagging Biden’s by 5
I’ve been aggregating crosstabs of high-quality non-partisan national polls since Nov 2023
Similar to Black voters, Harris has improved decently on Biden’s vote share among Latinos (55-58% range)
Trump ranges from 36-43%
The high water mark for an modern R is Bush 2004 (44%)
We’re seeing a *very* stark gender divide among Latinos, w/ Harris leading by 31 pts among women but just 3 pts among men
There are also stark divides by age and education, with young Latinos being more likely to back Trump & non-college Latinos being more likely to be undecided