Tyler Austin Harper Profile picture
Nov 1 12 tweets 3 min read Read on X
I wrote about the question on everyone’s mind: are black men really going to vote for Donald Trump? 

White Democrats imagine minorities as half-saints, half-superheroes who they team up with to fight fascism. But the pesky truth is many minority men have Trump-ish beliefs.🧵
For almost ten years, liberal politicians and pundits have spotlighted and relentlessly attacked Donald Trump’s open bigotry. And remarkably, these efforts didn’t just fail. They coincided with black and brown Americans moving in ever greater numbers toward the bigot’s party. 2/
These trends have been particularly acute among black men, whose support for Democratic presidential candidates has steadily decreased since 2012. Over the last year, polls have suggested Trump could get historic levels of support from black men. That wouldn’t be surprising. 3/
Black Democrats often have significantly more conservative views on immigration, gender, abortion and religion than other Dem racial demographics. A Pew poll this summer found black Dem voters were twice as likely as whites to say emphasizing family makes society better off. 4/
64% of Black Dem voters said gender is determined by birth sex compared to 32% of whites. 53% said belief in God is required for morality vs 8% of whites. Another Pew poll found HALF of black men AND women think the government promotes abortion to control the black population. 5/
This isn’t just Black men: a recent poll found that 44% of young Hispanic men support Trump, and another found that OVER HALF of Hispanic men support deportations (51%) and building the wall (52%). They’re twice as likely to say Trump helped them personally compared to Biden. 6/
And it’s not just culture. Black voters also tend to have views on foreign policy that clash with the Democrats: they’re generally less supportive of sending money to Ukraine and Israel and more supportive of ceasefires. These are also views that don’t mesh well with the Dems. 7/
Is it that surprising that Trump is polling so well with black voters, especially even more conservative black men? However, some political scientists told me that I shouldn’t take polls showing black men supporting Trump too seriously because the sample sizes are too small. 8/
They also argued that black discontent with the Democratic Party wasn’t new, neither were polls showing black men moving to the GOP. They felt these warning signs appear every four years, but typically fail to materialize on Election Day. These arguments are not unreasonable. 9/
But in my view they also discount the fact that Dems HAVE been bleeding black men for over a decade. And while many polls do sample small numbers of black people—and thus have higher error rates—that doesn’t explain why all the “errors” would be in one direction: to Trump. 10/
If we are in a racial realignment, it’s hard to see how Harris’ strategy will win these GOP-curious black men back (even if most black men still vote Dem). No matter how much she promises to expand the border wall, she can’t outflank Trump on conservative culture issues. 11/
So what can the Dems do? Black voters are perhaps the most conservative element of the Dem coalition, but they are also among the most progressive on economic issues. The key to winning these voters back is in my view the same as working-class white voters: it’s populism, stupid.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tyler Austin Harper

Tyler Austin Harper Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Tyler_A_Harper

Oct 9
The AAUP statement insisting that mandatory DEI statements are compatible with academic freedom—and not political litmus tests—is ridiculous. DEI is not a neutral framework dropped from the sky, it’s an ideology about which reasonable people—including people of color—disagree. 1/ Image
I have benefited from and support affirmative action, and there are some things that fall under the rubric of DEI that I agree with. But pretending that DEI is not a political perspective or framework—when only people of one political persuasion support DEI—is a flagrant lie. 2/
Evaluating a professor’s teaching with respect to their adherence to a DEI framework is a clear violation of academic freedom. DEI is not some bland affirmation that diversity is important and all people deserve accessible education. It’s a specific set of ideas. 3/
Read 8 tweets
Aug 19
I wrote about the choice before Kamala Harris: to fully embrace the populist turn, continuing down the path beaten by Joe Biden, or to listen to the punditry and succumb to Obama nostalgia, re-upping the kind of technocratic centrism that voters have spent a decade rejecting. 🧵
That Harris needs to moderate has congealed into common sense among the commentariat, who seem hell-bent on ignoring the last decade of American politics: the Sander insurgency, the Trump ascendancy, and Biden's presidency. The voters are done with neoliberal governance. 2/
Harris is plainly not a populist at heart. She has ample corporate + tech connections and is cut in the Obama mold: a multiracial children-of-immigrants establishment technocrat. But as her VP options and economic rollout suggest, she is smart enough to read the tea leaves. 3/
Read 7 tweets
Aug 14
The debates about whether the media is anti-Trump or wants him reelected mirror the debates about whether academia is liberal or conservative. Same basic dynamic: largely liberal workers nestled in institutions that often have financial incentives inimical to liberal aims. 1/
In academia's case, the right insists that academia is a "far left" hotbed, and they point to the ideas taught in certain departments + the relative absence of conservative profs. Meanwhile, those "far left" universities are debt machines that ruthlessly exploit their labor. 2/
As for the media, journalists skew liberal and you have places like MSNBC where anchors provide a nonstop drip of anti-Trump hysteria. But of course, if Trump is elected – and I DO NOT think Maddow secretly hopes Trump wins – MSNBC will profit immensely from TV-glued boomers. 3/
Read 7 tweets
Aug 11
It’s worth exploring why this line that dems are “anti-family” seems believable for so many people even as Republicans are doing shit like—literally—bringing back child labor. Vance has an interesting slip of the tongue here that sheds some light on what’s going on. Long 🧵
When Bash hits Vance for calling Harris a “childless cat lady” even though she has step-children, he says “I criticized Kamala Harris for being part of A SET OF IDEAS…that is anti-family.” He’s using Harris as a vehicle for an *idea*: standing in for a type of dem we all know 2/
Democratic policies are not anti-family. They’re light years better for families than GOP policies. However, a lot — not a majority, but a lot — of college educated dems are anti-child and view having a family as a threat to their all-important “freedom” to do what they want. 3/
Read 18 tweets
Aug 9
Dems got into a jam with Biden because journalists failed to exercise basic curiosity about the oldest President in history even as he visibly declined. Pushing Harris to outline a policy agenda isn’t “helping Trump.” That’s the same mindset that led to the mess with Biden.
If journalists had done their jobs ages ago when Biden started showing obvious signs of being on the decline, and had done even a modicum of investigative reporting, we could have had a strong primary process. Journalists not doing journalism on dems they like is bad for dems!
The fact that we just went through that with Biden — a near disaster caused by a lack of journalistic scrutiny — and now those same people who freaked out over Biden age questions are also freaking out when Harris is subject to scrutiny is maddening. No lessons learned.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 23
I wrote about the woke style in American politics.

For months, talking heads have debated whether or not we are past so-called "peak woke." Many commentators seem to believe the hysteria of 2020 is settling into the rearview. But wokeness didn't peak, it became bipartisan. 🧵
If you see "wokeness" as a set of specific progressive beliefs about anti-racism, gender, masking, etc., it makes no sense to say the right became woke. But if you think of wokeness as a hermeneutics – a style of interpreting the political world – a different picture emerges. 2/
As a style of political interpretation, wokeness filters all problems through the matrix of identity, views identity-related issues as always systemic, and assumes said problems can only be solved through institutional upheaval and identity-based bureaucratic counter-measures. 3/
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(