1. Modern history lesson by Jeffrey Sacks on the TRUTH. All collateral effects from General Groves built up industrial military criminal cabal which Sergey Brin is a leading player in.
Sergey Mikhaylovich Brin is a Jewish Russian-American computer scientist most famous for co-founding internet giant Google with Larry Page and Susan Wojcicki of YouTube sister of Anne wojciki of 23andMe. Sergery married Anne in the Bahamas close to the home of good friend Jeffrey Epstein a known MOSSAD agent who took over Meyer Lansky's business empire for Israel.
Brin was born on August 21, 1973 in Moscow & is the son of a mathematician-economist and was born in Moscow. He left the Soviet Union with his family in 1979 and later followed in his father's footsteps, earning a degree in computer science and math at the University of Maryland in 1993. Immediately after graduation, he began graduate studies at Stanford University.
In 1995, Brin met Larry Page, the son of a highly regarded computer science professor at Michigan State University, at an orientation event for new students at Stanford. Here both were indoctrinate to the industrial military complex and given the search algorithm by DARPA.
Brin and Page raised $1 million from family, friends, and other investors, and on Sept. 7, 1998, Google was commercially launched from a Wojcicki's garage in Menlo Park, California.
This eventually became the largest and most powerful tool for internet surveillence. Its role was expanded by the Patriot Act that Bush and Cheney got through after the MOSSAD helped create an emergency false flag operation to get Congress to bend the knee to pass an Unconstitutional law trading freedom for security due to "Middle East Terrorism."
As a result, in September 2004, Sergey Brin and Page went to Israel for the 80th birthday party of Shimon Peres and praised Israeli technology. Israeli technology is a weapon of war. Brin said in 2004, "Israel looks to me like the next Silicon Valley; it has the potential to be even more successful than Silicon Valley, because people here are hungrier."
How much do you know about Shimon Peres? Did you know Shimon had a meeting with John F. Kennedy on April 2, 1963. 6 months before he was killed. It was originally meant to just be between Peres and Myer Feldman about Israel wanting to purchase Hawk missiles. Sorry for the digression. Or was I? @JonesDanny
These are the people that Calley and Casey Means are associated with. Page and Brin were two Stanford PhD dropouts who claimed they would make great co-CEOs. Ironically that is the same story we see with Casey Means MD who also attended Stanford and was mentored by the Wojcicki sisters to become CEO of her own company.
Who were the people who funded her? a16z of Silicon Valley. a16z = Andressan Horowitz. @StrumwasserJ
Founder-friendly VC market was founded by Andreessen Horowitz. They created the the Founder-CEO model to alter the perceptions of guys like Bill Gurley who thought trusting people like Brin and Page would make for bad business. He was right, but for the wrong reasons. The value of the investment went parabolic, but it was due to traitorous activities in America. Gurley instincts were correct on them, in my opinion. Bill never knew about DARPA's assist for googal as they were known then. That might have altered his investment perception. Most people in SV are not patriots. But this information was kept quiet by the principles because they thought it would hurt them and the industrial military complex of the US government wanted to remain anonymous.
Sergey was eventually married to Casey's mentor at 23andMe. Casey also dropped out of residency early just like Brin and Page bailed on their PhDs. Amazing coincidences, don't you think?
Sergery, to this very day is very good friends with those in control of a16z because of their innovations in the Founder CEO model now popular in SV. Awake yet? x.com/DrJackKruse/st…
2. JFK And Israel’s Nuclear Program
David Ben-Gurion wrote in 1948, “What Einstein, Oppenheimer and Teller — the three of them Jews — made for the United States could also be done by scientists in Israel for their own people.”[1] He met with all three of the physicists who worked on the Manhattan project at various times to discuss nuclear matters.
Edward Teller would tell the Israeli scientist Yuval Ne’eman in 1967, speaking of Israel’s completion of the bomb, “I think that you are not idiots, and I am impressed by your high level, and I think that you have already finished, and the thing is now behind you. I do not think that the cat and mouse game with the Americans is healthy, and it will cause problems in the future, so I am going to tell the CIA of my impressions, and I’ll explain that it is justified on the background of the Six-Day War.”
CITE FOR THIS POST:
From the book, "Stealing the Atom Bomb" , pg 91
3. Ernst David Bergmann was the father of the Israeli bomb, whose scientific knowledge earned him the respect of many.
Shimon Peres became administrator of the nuclear program by 1955, and he spoke of his success at the project: “Ben Gurion trusted me. Professor Bergmann worked with me with no reservations. In time, I was able to win the trust and confidence of the other scientists, engineers and senior personnel engaged in the project.”
Bergmann stressed that procuring an Israeli bomb would guarantee “that we shall never again be led as lambs to the slaughter.”
“Israeli Nuclear Program,” Atomic Heritage Foundation, August 15, 2018.
Paying attention @JonesDanny ???
You missed the mother load. But I want you all to know who funds Casey and Calley Means. @MdBreathe
4. Andre Finkelstein, who served as the director general of the French Atomic Energy Commission, said that in 1958,
[w]hen de Gaulle came back to power he wasn’t so much against Israel but he wanted to make peace in Algeria so he had to make something to appease the Arabs and he said we have to stop that project [Dimona] immediately. The orders came from Paris, you have to get rid of all the personnel in your company…. The same day the Israelis started another company and took back all the same people to finish the project. Even under de Gaulle it could be done!
CITES
Stealing the Atom Bomb, 29-30.
The guy below went to Shimon Peres 80th B-Day. Remember that. Shimon Peres was a big time supporter of Jeffrey Epstein and Les Wechsler who basically owns all of Columbus Ohio.
5. You know Sergery and Epstein are acquainted huh?
Epstein told the world via the NYT that Sergey was his second biggest client and they did a lot of business and partying together. This was when he was single and after he got married to 23andMe owner Wojcicki.
That is who Casey learned the data business from.
6. Did you know what picture the FBI found over the mantle in Epstein's bedroom when he was arrested?
By the way, Wechsler bought the mansion for him in Manhattan.
Interesting subject matter huh, @JonesDanny
7. Continuing the Atoms for Peace program, the U.S. gifted Israel with a small research reactor with the explicit instructions to not use it for production of plutonium. The U.S. built reactor was situated in Nahal Soreq. Although HEU fuel was being produced at Nahal Soreq by 1961, this could not be used for nuclear weapons production because U.S. inspectors were constantly safeguarding it.
But Bergmann and other Israeli scientists immediately got to work upgrading it so as “to conduct more advanced experiments in plutonium separation,” according to a letter distributed amongst project officials. The reactor was insufficient to meet their plutonium needs, so they approached the French for a new reactor in the Negev desert.
Peres, the GUY SERGEY WENT TO SEE FOR HIS 80th B-Day was responsible for a secret deal with France in 1956 for the country to supply Israel with “something like nuclear capacity.”
Due to the alliance between France and Israel during the Suez Crisis, French Prime Minister Guy Mollet said that France “owed” the nuclear bomb to Israel, since he felt that France had failed Israel in the conflict by withdrawing troops after being threatened by the Soviet Union. Charles de Gaulle was not informed that the reactor would be used for nuclear weapons production.
See how DARPA and BRIN are LINKED yet or do I have to spell it out for you?
Seymour Hersh, The Samson Option: Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal and American Foreign Policy (New York: Random House, 1991), Chapter 3.
8. By late 1957, the Israelis and French working on the project decided that Dimona, a settlement in Negev, would be the site for the new reactor. I tried to tell @JonesDanny his boy newman did not cover all the bases. Dimona and the Apollo Project are linked to GOOGLE and to JFK.
“By the end of the 50s, there were 2,500 French citizens living in Dimona, transforming it from a village to a cosmopolitan town, complete with French lycées and streets full of Renaults, and yet the whole endeavour was conducted under a thick veil of secrecy.”
In 1959, when the Cuban Revolution happened, American U-2 spy planes captured photos of the excavation occurring at Dimona. Eisenhower was immediately notified, but he ignored the warnings. Dino Brugioni, the CIA photography analyst who discovered what was happening at Dimona, said, “Whenever you get something on the Israelis and you move it along, you’d better be careful, especially if you’ve got a career.”
Jewish scientists who all became Zionists after 1948 who were busy building the USA a bomb was given a lot of juice by Dwight. You know Dwight got rid of General Groves in 1947. Kinda funny huh?
CITES
Stealing the Atom Bomb, pg 28
9. An agreement was reached with Norway in 1959 to purchase 20 tons of heavy water (deuterium oxide) needed for the high pressure nuclear reactor. Norway only made one inspection in Israel which was in 1961, two years before the Dimona reactor was completed in 1963
Julian Borger of The Guardian wrote:
Israel refused to countenance visits by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), so in the early 1960s President Kennedy demanded they accept American inspectors. US physicists were dispatched to Dimona but were given the run-around from the start. Visits were never twice-yearly as had been agreed with Kennedy and were subject to repeated postponements.
The US physicists sent to Dimona were not allowed to bring their own equipment or collect samples. The lead American inspector, Floyd Culler, an expert on plutonium extraction, noted in his reports that there were newly plastered and painted walls in one of the buildings. It turned out that before each American visit, the Israelis had built false walls around the row of lifts that descended six levels to the subterranean reprocessing plant.
CITES
“Concerned About Nuclear Weapons Potential, John F. Kennedy Pushed for Inspection of Israel Nuclear Facilities,” National Security Archive, April 21, 2016,
10. The Weizmann Institute in Israel played a major role in the development of the atomic bomb through its radioisotope department and sending scientists abroad to conduct nuclear research.
Information in the intelligence community about Dimona was slow to spread, most likely due to James Jesus Angleton wanting the CIA to maintain a strong working relationship with Mossad.
Did you know that Angleton was tied to the JFK kill too?
@JonesDanny you said you did not believe the MOSSAD was in on the JFK thingy.........
11. Not only does Angleton link JFK with the Zionist he links them to Pope Pius the XI and XII. Angleton got his powerful post after serving as the Vatican’s OSS liaison during WWII, working closely with Allen Dulles to shield important Nazis who were given new jobs working for US interests after the war. I bet you did not know that.
According to Angleton, before getting his promotion, he had to promise Dulles never to put him or any of his Wall Street-connected cronies on lie detectors in order to question them about financial relations with Germany during World War 2 since they set up Hitler regime with the Royal Family and the Federal Reserve families. Prescott Bush was a big player here. Remember that picture in Epstein's bedroom @JonesDanny?
You see, many US corporations employed neutral countries to trade with the enemy, including Standard Oil, a company owned by Dulles’ cousin by marriage David Rockefeller. Hey you do know that Casey Means Dad worked for him huh? The Rothschilds have a big family history of getting really rich during war, selling to both sides. Sergery learned a lot during this history lesson. I can see why he got invited to PEres 80th B-day now. Did you know David Rockefeller was VP with Nixon who was Eisenhower's VP? Did you know that Dave Rockefeller, Grady Means and Calley Means are all members of the Council of Foreign Relations? I would think @RobertKennedyJr and @realDonaldTrump might want to know this before making any decisions on the transition team huh?
Not only did Angleton remain in charge of the important CIA-Vatican connection, he also became the strategic CIA link to Israel and their efficient Mossad, an intelligence agency not hampered by red tape. Danny still think your boy who read a million pages got the story right? Makes you realize why this book was written now huh?
12. Anyone see this coming for the food gurus?
I got lots of receipts.
13. Want to see some?
14. Everyone should use Yandex to search Casey Means post for COVID. Guess what you'll find?
15. SILENCE. NADA. SAMETHING FROM GOOGLE.
SAME THING FROM SERGEY
SAME THING FROM WOJCICKI SISTERS
SAME REASON HUBERMAN COULD NOT HAVE ME ON.
STANFORD UNIVERSITY and DARPA.
16. Huberman certainly had to time for Both MEANS siblings to talk about FRUIT LOOPS thought.
HEGALIAN DIALECT 101.
17. What was Grady Means writing about during all this?
Very WEF like. Very supportive of Agenda 2030
18. Back to James Jesus Angleton wanting the CIA to maintain a strong working relationship with Mossad........
Remember Eisenhower's farewell speech. He was warning us about David Rockefeller and guys like Grady and Calley Means of the Council of Foreign Relations. Allen and John Dulles were also members. You know, guys JFK would soon fire.
Did you know that AEC Chariman John McCone made Dimona known to the public in December of 1960 because he was tired of “constant Israeli lying.” These are the Shimon Peres guys who Sergey Brin thought the world of.
In fact, on January 19, 1961, the day before John F. Kennedy’s inauguration as President, he and his senior team attended a meeting with President Eisenhower select members of his cabinet, including Secretary of State Christian Herter. Herter was candid with Kennedy about Israel’s nuclear program, saying that by 1963 they would be producing 90 kilograms of plutonium for weapons development.
19. Traitors are everywhere in America today. Most of them live in Silicon Valley right now.
20. Kennedy assigned Myer Feldman, who worked with Kennedy during his campaign, to be deputy special consul, where he “worked as an informal advisor on Israel, acting as both a liaison to the Jewish committee and a secret envoy to Israel for both the Kennedy and Johnson administrations.” It was a strange appointment, for as Avner Cohen (who interviewed Feldman) writes,
When Feldman suggested to Kennedy that he might not be the right person due to his bias in favor of Israel, JFK responded that that’s exactly why he wanted him for the position. In that role Feldman had access to all diplomatic cables and intelligence reports on the Middle East …. Significantly, Kennedy delegated the two most sensitive issues requiring face-to-face meetings with Israeli leaders to Feldman —refugees and Dimona.
Since Feldman was a Zionist, this seems to have been a strategic move on Kennedy’s part to make his administration not appear to be anti-Israel, especially given the history of Joseph Kennedy. It appears JFK knew there was a difference between a Zionist and the Jewish faith. This is why this appointment was made.
21. In March 1961, JFK sent Myer Feldman along with Abraham Feinberg to meet with David Ben-Gurion about Dimona — an ironic decision, given Feinberg’s role in financing Dimona. JFK was wise. He was entrapping Israeli intelligence. At this point Feinberg was “serving as a senior advisor on Israeli affairs for his third consecutive U.S. president.” JFK’s choice of Feinberg for this task may have to do with Feinberg helping Kennedy to get hundreds of thousands of dollars donated to his presidential campaign by a group of prominent Jews, which helped him secure 81 percent of the Jewish vote.Kennedy rewarded Feinberg once he became President by giving his brother, Wilfred Feinberg, a position of federal judgeship.
Abraham Feinberg was also a close friend of Ben-Gurion, making it easier to introduce the request of a meeting with Kennedy. Feldman and Feinberg were able to negotiate with Ben-Gurion, and the resulting compromise was that Ben-Gurion would have a personal meeting with Kennedy in exchange for allowing the first American visit at Dimona. Two scientists associated with AEC, Ulysses Staebler and Jesse Croach, were chosen by the AEC to make the Dimona (and other nuclear facilities in Israel) inspections from May 17 to May 20 that same year.
They reported back that they found nothing hidden during their tour and were told that the reactor would only be used for peaceful purposes. However, they understood that “the reactor eventually will produce small quantities of plutonium suitable for weapons.” Further, “They also noted that the 26-MW reactor was intended to be operational by 1964, and its primary purpose was to prepare technicians to operate power reactors that the Israelis intend to build in the future.”
CITES
Stealing the Atom Bomb, pg 38.
The Samson Option, Chapter 8.
Stealing the Atom Bomb, pg 38.
“Concerned About Nuclear Weapons Potential.”
Stealing the Atom Bomb, pg 38.
22. How do we get General Groves back into this story?
Before this visit, in April 1961 two American scientists made a brief tour of Dimona. These were Eugene Wigner and Isidor Isaac Rabi, who both worked on the Manhattan Project. Both were harvested by Allen Dulles in Paperclip before the War and OK's by General Groves for the Manhattan Project. In 1961, Wigner had a teaching position in Israel, and Rabi could claim a position on the board of governors of the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel.
23. Another visit to Dimona occurred on September 26, 1962, and the two AEC scientists named Thomas Haycock and Ulysses Staebler were led on a tour by Yuval Ne’eman. He actually suggested the tour. It was an Israeli set up. It lasted 45 minutes. Haycock and Staebler said they believed the reactor at Dimona was only being used for research purposes, not production.
They were called “visits,” the proper diplomatic terminology, even though there was no ambiguity about them being inspections.
According to Seymour Hersh,
The most important factor.…in Ben-Gurion’s decision to permit the inspections was the Kennedy administration’s decision in mid-1962 to authorize the sale of Hawk surface-to-air missiles to Israel. The United States had provided Israel with specialized military training and sensitive electronic gear in the past, but sale of the Hawk — considered an advanced defensive weapon — was a major departure from past policy of selling no weaponry to Israel, and, as Israel had to hope, could lead to future sales of offensive American arms.
CITES
Same as last post.
24. However, part of the agreed upon compromise was that the IAEA would not be involved.
Ben-Gurion got his meeting with Kennedy on May 30, 1961 in New York at the Waldorf Astoria hotel as I mentioned in several podcasts I did after @JonesDanny pod.
Their discussion was centered around Dimona, and Ben-Gurion stressed that the reactor was necessary for producing electricity for Israel. It turns out this was a lie, because Dimona produced no electricity.
Ben-Gurion said that “in another three or four years’ time, we will have an experimental plant for separation of plutonium, which is in any event necessary for every nuclear power plant reactor,” hinting at Israel’s future capacity for creating nuclear weapons. He also said, “there is no intention to develop weapons capacity now.”
He mentioned “for the time being, the only purposes of [the Dimona reactor] are for peace,” and that “we will see what happens in the Middle East.”
Kennedy was focused on stalling Israel’s production of nuclear weapons because of Eisenhower's experience with Groves and Truman. He told Ben-Gurion, “It is to our common interest that no country believes that Israel is contributing to the proliferation of atomic weapons.” Speaking of that meeting, Ben-Gurion said that Kennedy “looked like a boy of 25…. I thought he was a leader, a statesman, and I saw that he was a politician.” He further said, “[a]t first, I did not take him seriously.” Feinberg later said that “there’s no way B.G. was dealing with JFK as an equal, at least as far as B.G. was concerned. He had the typical attitude of an old-fashioned Jew toward the young Catholic. He disrespected him as a youth. B.G. could be vicious, and he had such a hatred of his old man, Joseph Kennedy.”
25. Kennedy wanted IAEA inspections of Dimona, at which point the finds would be forwarded to Nasser, but this was never accomplished. Feinberg worked furiously to prevent any full inspection of Dimona and warned Secretary of State Robert McNamara that continuing to press on this issue would lose Kennedy the Jewish vote come next presidential election cycle.
Once the reactor at Dimona ran in the startup phase, Israelis took over operations from the French in either 1963 or 1964. “Excavation for the co-located reprocessing plant for extracting plutonium from the reactor’s blanket material began in 1963, construction ended in about 1965 and the first production of separated plutonium occurred in 1966. NUMEC and the Apollo affair happen in 1965 as I told @JonesDanny on the pod. This was the pay off from LBJ to Israel for the assistance on 11/22/63
26. In the years 1963-1964, Israel obtained 80-100 tons of uranium oxide, known as yellowcake, from Argentina, which was essential for plutonium creation for the Dimona reactor. This decision was provoked by France ending uranium exports to Israel in spring of 1963. The Israelis “had refused to sign an agreement to purchase uranium exclusively from France,” so Argentina became the choice for their next supplier.
It is generally estimated that Israel acquired its first nuclear weapon between 1965 and 1968. I lean to 1965 because of NUMEC and the Apollo affair.
On December 27, 1962, Kennedy held a meeting with Golda Meir in Palm Beach, Florida. Kennedy said that he hopes “Israel could give consideration to our problems on this atomic reactor. We are opposed to nuclear proliferation. Our interest here is not in prying into Israel’s affairs but we have to be concerned because of the over-all situation in the Middle East.”
She “reassured the President that there would not be any difficulty between us on the Israeli nuclear reactor.” Following the meeting, Kennedy pressed for the CIA to collect more information on Dimona because of how hard she pressed the issue. Israeli nuclear scientists visiting the U.S. had been monitored by the U.S. government since at least 1961, and this practice continued through the duration of the Kennedy administration.
27. How did JFK really feel about Sergey Brin's buddies in Israel?
Kennedy confided to his friend Charles Bartlett that the Israeli “sons of bitches lie to me constantly about their nuclear capability.” During 1963, an informal agreement was made between the Kennedy administration and Israel that neither nation would spy on each other. Of course, this was not followed.
Kennedy issued National Security Action Memorandum No. 231 on March 26, 1963, directed towards the heads of State, AEC and CIA. The memo, drafted by McGeorge Bundy, reads:
The President desires, as a matter of urgency, that we undertake every feasible measure to improve our intelligence on the Israeli nuclear program as well as other Israeli and UAR advanced weapons programs, and to arrive at a firmer evaluation of their import. In this connection he wishes the next informal inspection of the Israeli reactor complex to be undertaken promptly and to be as thorough as possible.
In view of this great concern over the destabilizing impact of any Israeli or UAR program looking toward the development of nuclear weapons, the President also wishes the Department of State to develop proposals for forestalling such programs; in particular we should develop plans for seeking clearer assurances from the governments concerned on this point, and means of impressing upon them how seriously such a development would be regarded in this country.
CITES
“Letter, Howard Furnas, Office of Special Assistant to Secretary of State for Atomic Energy and Outer Space, to Dwight Ink, Atomic Energy Commission,” National Security Archive, November 15, 1961, nsarchive2.gwu.edu/dc.html?doc=28…
The Samson Option, Chapter 9.
Ibid, Chapter 7.
[“NATIONAL SECURITY ACTION MEMORANDA [NSAM]: NSAM 231, MIDDLE EASTERN NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES,” John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum,
28. A meeting between Kennedy and Shimon Peres was held on April 2, 1963. It was originally meant to just be between Peres and Myer Feldman about Israel wanting to purchase Hawk missiles.
But beforehand, Kennedy and Feldman planned to have Kennedy run into Peres in the hallway, which initiated a 30-minute informal meeting between the two. This would be the first time that Israel’s policy of nuclear opacity was given in the U.S. Kennedy pressed Peres by saying:
“You know that we follow very closely the discovery of any nuclear development in the region. This could create a very dangerous situation. For this reason, we monitor your nuclear effort. What could you tell me about this?”
To which Peres, Sergey Brin friend replied: “I can tell you most clearly that we will not introduce nuclear weapons to the region, and certainly we will not be the first.”
29. April 2 is also the day when Walworth Barbour, the U.S. Ambassador to Israel, gave the U.S. demand of semi-annual inspections of Dimona to Ben-Gurion. Two weeks went by without an answer, and on April 19 Secretary of State Dean Rusk told Barbour that “Department wishes you press him if necessary for affirmative reply re semi-annual visits to Dimona and, specifically, a first such visit in May. We attach considerable importance to this.”
On April 26, Ben-Gurion sent a letter to Kennedy warning about the forthcoming destruction of Israel due to the Treaty of Federation signed by Egypt, Syria and Iraq on April 17.
He expressed his desire for the U.S. and USSR to sign a declaration “to the effect that they jointly guarantee the territorial integrity (ZIONISM) and security of every state in the Middle East; that any state that threatens her neighbors or declares that she is in a state of war with her or refuses to recognize her existence will receive no assistance of any kind – financial, political or other – from the two powers or, inasmuch as it depends on the two powers, from their allies or from other countries.”
No mention was made about Kennedy’s request for semi-annual visits to Dimona. If Ben-Gurion was hoping to draw attention from this point, history of the JFK archives tells us he was badly mistaken.
On May 4, in replying to Ben-Gurion’s letter, Kennedy denied his request for a joint declaration with the USSR, noting that Khrushchev would not agree due to his involvement in the Arab world.
He also made clear that Ben-Gurion was overreacting to the Arab statement. Kennedy wrote, “I hope you will understand me if I add that in our judgement in Washington the practical significance of those declarations is not substantively different from that of the many earlier similar declarations put out in other forms and phrases.”
He returned the discussion back to nuclear weapons implicitly by writing, “The danger which we foresee is not so much that of an early Arab attack as that of a successful development of advanced offensive systems….I have expressed before my deep personal conviction that reciprocal and competitive development of such weapons would dangerously threaten the stability of the area. I believe that we should consider carefully together how such a trend can be forestalled.”
“State Department telegram 780 to U.S. Embassy, Israel [transmitting letter from President Kennedy to Prime Minister Ben-Gurion],” National Security Archive, May 4, 1963,
30. Ambassador Barbour met again with Ben-Gurion on May 5, pressing for semi-annual visits. A telegram written by Dean Rusk sent to Barbour describing the meeting tells that Ben-Gurion was attempting to “throw question of Dimona inspections into arena of bargaining for things Israel wants from us, such as security guarantee.” Rusk also mentions, “In answer to the Israeli charge that we are not insisting on inspection in the Arab countries, you should say that we have a good line on any Arab nuclear efforts and that these do not amount to a serious program. Therefore, we consider this argument not to be a valid one from the standpoint of the advanced Israeli program.”
On May 12, 1963, Ben-Gurion sent another letter to Kennedy. He attempted to connect Nasser with Hitler, as he did in his previous letter, saying that “knowing them I am convinced that they are capable of following the Nazi example. Kennedy was not biting because he knew the Nazi regime was set up by the Royals and the Rothschild bankers who wrote the Balfour declaration on 11/2/17.
Ben-Gurion said, "Nasser is in fact adopting the National-Socialist ideology of the Nazis. For many years the civilized world did not take seriously Hitler’s statement that one of his aims was the worldwide extermination of the Jewish people. I have no doubt that a similar thing might happen to Jews in Israel if Nasser succeeded in defeating our army.”
He again did not mention Dimona or semi-annual inspections, but his explicit inference of another Holocaust was his hope of conveying to Kennedy that it was necessary for Israel to acquire nuclear weapons. But making comparisons to Hitler would have no effect on Kennedy; in a diary entry dated August 1, 1945 (following the German defeat), after visiting “the Fuhrer’s Bavarian Berghof residence and Eagle’s Nest mountain retreat,”Kennedy wrote:
After visiting these two places, you can easily understand how that within a few years Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived. He had boundless ambition for his country which rendered him a menace to the peace of the world, but he had a mystery about him in the way that he lived and in the manner of his death that will live and grow after him. He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.
John F. Kennedy, Prelude to Leadership: The European Diary of John F. Kennedy Summer 1945 (Washington D.C., Regnery Publishing, Inc., 1995) 74
31. Anyone who does not understand how Israel was not involved in JFK demise just does not read the history books I do. All the people associated with BigTech in Silicon Valley are Ben-Gurion CLONES. They are WEF card carries.
The most ominous part of Ben-Gurion’s letter was when he wrote: “Mr. President, my people have the right to exist – both in Israel and wherever they may live, and this existence is in danger.”
Although he expanded on this claim and said that another calamity among the Jewish people could be avoided by a joint U.S.-USSR declaration, it can be inferred that he is also speaking about U.S. inspections of Dimona.
On May 14, Ambassador Barbour had another meeting with Ben-Gurion. The telegram of the meeting reads:
After the Ambassador had pressed hard for semi-annual visits to Dimona reactor, Ben Gurion interrupted with “we know they (UAR) are building something bigger” . . . “We know Nasser is making unconventional weapons. He has some foreign experts, he is sending some people abroad. . . “We are afraid when he has missiles with nuclear warheads, he will do it (destroy Israel). What will you do to him?” . . . “If it comes to war, we must rely on ourselves”.
Ben Gurion later said he was not sure that telling Nasser (about Dimona) had the effect of diminishing UAR efforts in the nuclear field. Maybe it is better that Nasser be “a little afraid”. The meeting ended by Ben Gurion promising to consult the Cabinet.
CITES
“Prime Minister Ben-Gurion to President Kennedy, 12 May 1963, with State Department memo attached, 14 May 1963,” National Security Archive,
32. These letter were about as close as Ben-Gurion got to telling the U.S. that they would continue to pursue a nuclear weapons program without explicitly saying so.
Kennedy responded with a letter on May 17. Instead of the usual formal diplomatic speak, Kennedy takes a more aggressive approach. “I am sure that you will agree that there is no more urgent business for the whole world than the control of nuclear weapons….The dangers in the proliferation of nuclear weapons systems are so obvious that I am sure I need not repeat them here.”
He went on to mention their initial meeting where Ben-Gurion said that he agrees to further inspections of Dimona. “We are concerned with the disturbing effects on world stability which would accompany the development of a nuclear weapons capability by Israel. I cannot imagine that the Arabs would refrain from turning to the Soviet Union for assistance if Israel were to develop a nuclear weapons capability.”
Kennedy writes that the U.S. commitment and support to Israel “would be seriously jeopardized in the public opinion in this country and in the West as a whole if it should be thought that this Government was unable to obtain reliable information on a subject as vital to peace as the question of the character of Israel’s effort in the nuclear field.”
He ignores Ben-Gurion’s frenzied claims of Israel’s existence being in jeopardy, by writing: “I can well appreciate your concern for developments in the UAR. But I see no present or imminent nuclear threat to Israel from there. I am assured that our intelligence on this question is good and that the Egyptians do not presently have any installation comparable to Dimona, nor any facilities potentially capable of nuclear weapons production.”
Ben-Gurion replied with a letter on May 27. He wrote that Dimona is still being used for “peaceful purposes.”
Regarding the request for semi-annual visits, he writes:
While we do not envisage a system of formal United States control at the Dimona reactor which the United States has not helped to establish or construct, as in the case of the reactor at Nachal Soreiq, we do agree to further annual visits to Dimona by your representatives, such as have already taken place. The “start-up” time of the Dimona reactor will not come until the end of this year or early in 1964. At that time, the French companies will hand the reactor over to us. I believe that this will be the most suitable time for your representatives to visit the reactor. At that stage they will be able to see it in an initial stage of operation, whereas now nothing new is going on there except building construction.
“Department of State telegram 835 to U.S. Embassy Tel Aviv,” National Security Archive, May 18, 1963, nsarchive2.gwu.edu//dc.html?doc=5…
33. This country will not heal until we put those linked to JFK death in the sun and disinfect our country of them.
I am telling you the evolution of industrial military complex sits in California right now. There is a reason these people want people planted in the MAHA movement.
That motive is nefarious.
34. Kennedy’s reply on June 15 reiterated the need for semi-annual inspections of Dimona.
Because of the crucial importance of this problem, however, I am sure you will agree that such visits should be of a nature and on a schedule which will more nearly be in accord with international standards, thereby resolving all doubts as to the peaceful intent of the Dimona project.Therefore, I asked our scientists to review the alternative schedules of visits we and you have proposed. If Israel’s purposes are to be clear to the world beyond reasonable doubt, I believe that the schedule which would best serve our common purposes would be a visit early this summer, another visit in June 1964, and thereafter at intervals of six months. I am sure that such a schedule should not cause you any more difficulty than that which you have proposed. It would be essential, and I take it that your letter is in accord with this, that our scientists have access to all areas of the Dimona site and to any related part of the complex, such as fuel fabrication facilities or plutonium separation plant, and that sufficient time be allotted for a thorough examination.
This schedule was recommended by the State Department, so as to allow a thorough inspection before the reactor went critical.
Kennedy’s letter arrived on June 16, just as Ben-Gurion resigned as Prime Minister without him reading the letter’s contents. Many believe this is when he decided to go rogue with the MOSSAD. This was when his death warrant became a possibility with the CIA.
Even though Ben-Gurion retired, he wasn’t done working. Efraim Halevy, “who served as the Mossad’s liaison officer to the CIA station in Tel Aviv in the early 1960s,” said that “Ben-Gurion ultimately left office in 1963 and Angleton went down to Sde Boker which was Ben-Gurion’s home in the Negev to meet with him and talk about Castro and the Bay of Pigs. I didn’t attend those meetings. Those were just the two of them. He had business to transact.”
The discussions between Angleton, the most powerful supporter of Israel in the American intelligence community, and Ben-Gurion, who would acquire nuclear weapons for Israel by any means necessary, could not have been peaceful in nature.
CITES
“274. Telegram From the Department of State to the Embassy in Israel,” Office of the Historian, June 15, 1963, history.state.gov/historicaldocu…
Jefferson Morley, The Ghost: The Secret Life of CIA Spymaster James Jesus Angleton (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2017), 171.
35. Levi Eshkol, Ben-Gurion’s successor, took office on June 26. On July 4, Kennedy sent a letter to the new Prime Minister. The content was similar to his unread June 15 letter to Ben-Gurion, containing his proposal for comprehensive semi-annual inspections, and he made sure that Eshkol understood that America’s “commitment to and support of Israel could be seriously jeopardized if it should be thought that we were unable to obtain reliable information on a subject as vital to peace as the question of Israel’s effort in the nuclear field.”
Eshkol responded with a letter to Kennedy and conversing with Barbour on July 17. He said that he needed to review the situation before giving a formal response as how to proceed. He also told Barbour that he was surprised at Kennedy declaring that U.S. commitment to Israel could be jeopardized.
He went on to ask how the U.S. would react about “a possible proposal from Israel that Israel would consult the U.S. in advance in the event that, some time in the distant future, developments in the Middle East made it necessary for her to embark on a nuclear weapons program.”
The formal reply from Eshkol came August 19. He did not agree to Kennedy’s suggestion of a summer visit that year, instead opting for the end of the year, as per Ben-Gurion’s May 27 letter.
As for the bi-annual inspections, he wrote: “In your letter of 5 July, Mr. President, you further propose that from June 1964, invitations to United States representatives to visit Dimona be extended at intervals of six months. Having considered the request, I believe that we shall be able to reach agreement on the future schedule of visits.” Barbour noted that Eshkol “believes it desirable that Nasser…not be completely assured that Israel is not working toward nuclear weapons production.”
CITES
“State Department telegram 193 to U.S. Embassy Israel,” National Security Archive, July 4, 1963, nsarchive2.gwu.edu//dc.html?doc=5…
36. Kennedy’s August 26 letter expressed his gratefulness for allowing visits to Dimona on a “regular basis.” Barbour was told to inform Eshkol that Kennedy has not decided whether information of the visits should be “passed on to Nasser,” but notes “that there are real security advantages for security in setting to rest any fears which might otherwise lead to nuclear weapons acquisitions efforts by others in the area.”
Barbour was also told to carry the message that Kennedy has not yet made a decision on the security agreement to Israel that Ben-Gurion asked for initially in his May 12 letter, but he will inform Eshkol of his decision soon. This was the last known correspondence between the President and Prime Minister before Kennedy’s untimely death.
When Kennedy was murdered, Israeli leaders feigned remorse while in public:
Jewish communities across America and farther afield held memorial services for the slain president. Israel’s president, Zalman Shazar, and foreign minister, Golda Meir, flew to Washington, where they attended a requiem Mass and a memorial service at a local synagogue.
The Weizmann Institute, members of whom contributed to the Israeli bomb, did their part in the PRESS coverup.
An article in The Times of Israel claims:
Less than two weeks after the day he was assassinated, Kennedy had been scheduled to address a New York dinner for Israel’s Weizmann Institute of Science. The president’s planned appearance had been touted as a “milestone” for the institute, which instead set to the task of creating a memorial for Kennedy. The institute ended up awarding fellowships and prizes to scientists in his memory. The Weizmann Institute continues to award its Kennedy prizes to the present day.
Daniel Treiman, “Among JFK’s Jewish mourners was Oswald’s killer,” The Times of Israel, November 22, 2013, timesofisrael.com/among-jfks-jew…
37. Once Lyndon Johnson assumed the Presidency, after the assassination Israel would feel less pressure exerted from the U.S. Although annual visits continued throughout his presidency, lasting from 1964 until being discontinued in 1969, Johnson did not take much interest in them.
John McCone pressed Johnson to take a stronger hand in nonproliferation with Israel but was ignored. McCone had no idea about the 1965 Apollo Affair and LBJ payoff. As a result, McCone resigned from his position of Director of the CIA because, as he said, “When I cannot get the President to read my reports, then it’s time to go.”
By 1968, government officials close to Johnson realized that the President was not serious about preventing Israeli bomb production.
Avner Cohen and William Burr explained:
It turned out that Kennedy’s insistence on biannual visits to Dimona was not implemented. U.S. government officials remained interested in such a schedule, and President Lyndon B. Johnson did raise the issue with Eshkol, but he never pressed hard on the subject the way that Kennedy had.
Lyndon Johnson said to an Israeli diplomat, “You have lost a very great friend. But you have found a better one.” As Seymour Hersh wrote,
Johnson’s strong emotional ties to Israel and his belief that Soviet arms were altering the balance of power in the Middle East drove him to become the first American President to supply Israel with offensive weapons and the first publicly to commit America to its defense.
The loop is now closed on why the MOSSAD.FBI, CIA, and the mob were all in on it @JonesDanny
Be aware though that new generations of these criminals are still playing ball with the part of the government that killed JFK. One of them just cancelled a podcast date with danny until mid 2025.
Now you know why that happened.
CITES
Avner Cohen and William Burr, “How a Standoff With the U.S. Almost Blew Up Israel’s Nuclear Program,” Haaretz, May 3, 2019,
In 2025, humanity stands at a crossroads, grappling with impossible questions, like monetary collapse, cosmic isolation, and the limits of our own minds that demand more than logic alone can offer. Embracing the suck of the problem can expose the raw, messy struggle of failure and uncertainty. By doing so it unleashes our divine gift of creativity, a force that thrives in chaos and forges unexpected bridges between despair and revelation. It’s through this gritty, unpolished process that we tap into the sacred spark within, transforming the unbearable into the extraordinary and finding answers where none seemed possible.
2. The path to meaningful change, as echoed in my words, demands resilience, action, and unwavering belief in your mission: "Never stop just because you feel defeated. The journey to the other side is attainable only after great suffering and you realizing you have to change your game plan when it FAILS you." For a clinician or a scientist becoming a champion for humanity’s bioelectric health, this means that ideation without execution leads to the deletion of even the best ideas. These concepts of mitigating nnEMF or blue light exposure remain useless without real action that moves the needle. As I've said countless times, "If you go ALL in I will not let you fall. I will catch you, drag you to the finish line," emphasizing that true progress comes from adapting on the fly, because "sometimes not getting what you want is a wonderful stroke of luck."
3. But to truly succeed, you must heed this truth: if you do not believe in what you are doing, you'll never visit that which is extraordinary, you must change that about you now. Your best is out there waiting to be tapped, and your new network of silly talking mitochondriacs is ready to touch you overtly and covertly, pushing the world to a tipping point of bioelectric and ecological harmony. By taking concrete steps happens by executing research, advocating for change, and empowering communities; the clinician/scientist can ensure their ideas don’t fade into oblivion, aligning with nature’s rule: "When things go wrong, do not go wrong with them," but instead act decisively with belief to climb their "Stairway to Heaven" and create a lasting, extraordinary impact.
Do not fade to black. The world needs you to be extraordinary when they are all Warburg shifted.
Once Massie gets the Senate seat in KY we need to push for a Marshall Plan for Palestine after we get rid of dual passport politicians who are putting Israel's needs before the USA. @saifedean
We need to know some science to pay for this rebuild, but I do know a way I would get it done. It is a story about the minerals beneath the Dead Sea? The value of the minerals and chemicals in the Dead Sea is estimated in trillions of dollars.
Volume of Reserves: The Dead Sea contains an estimated 43 billion tons of salt alone, alongside vast quantities of magnesium, potassium, and bromine. These reserves are replenished naturally to some extent by inflows from the Jordan River and underground springs, though extraction exceeds natural replenishment today.
Industrial Demand: Potassium chloride is critical for global agriculture, bromine has wide industrial applications, and magnesium is increasingly valuable in manufacturing (e.g., lightweight alloys for vehicles). The global market for these minerals supports their high valuation.
Extraction Infrastructure: Companies like Israel Chemicals Ltd. (ICL) and Jordan’s Arab Potash Company have been extracting these minerals for decades, generating billions in revenue annually but not returning that value to the people. Scaling this up over the long term, combined with untapped reserves, contributes to the trillion-dollar estimates.
So the money to rebuild what they have destroyed is there. And if you think about the IDF might have done them a favor to give them a new home to inhabitf for the next 3-5K years.
The Dead Sea’s mineral wealth is the result of unique physical and geological processes rather than evolutionary ones (since "evolutionary" typically pertains to biological development, and no such mechanism directly applies here).
Key factors include:
Endorheic Basin: The Dead Sea is a closed, or endorheic, basin with no outlet. Water flows in primarily from the Jordan River but cannot flow out, leading to accumulation of minerals as water evaporates. This has been ongoing for millions of years, concentrating salts and other compounds.
Low Elevation: At approximately 430 meters (1,410 feet) below sea level, the Dead Sea is the lowest point on Earth’s land surface. This extreme depth enhances evaporation rates due to high temperatures and aridity, leaving behind dense mineral deposits.
Tectonic Activity: The Dead Sea lies within the Dead Sea Rift, part of the larger Great Rift Valley system. This tectonic depression formed about 3-4 million years ago, creating a basin that trapped water and minerals. Geological uplift and faulting also brought mineral-rich brines from deep underground to the surface, adding to the lake’s composition.
Evaporation Over Time: With an evaporation rate exceeding inflow (especially as human water use has reduced the Jordan River’s contribution), the Dead Sea has become progressively saltier. Over millennia, this process has precipitated minerals into thick layers beneath the surface, some of which remain untapped.
Unique Chemistry: The interaction of freshwater inflows with saline groundwater and volcanic activity in the region has enriched the Dead Sea with a diverse mineral profile. For example, bromine concentrations are unusually high due to ancient marine incursions and subsequent concentration.
Why is it worth Trillions?
The trillion-dollar valuation arises from the sheer scale of these deposits and their utility in modern industries. Unlike deep-sea nodules in the open ocean (e.g., the Clarion-Clipperton Zone), which require advanced technology to harvest, the Dead Sea’s minerals are relatively accessible due to its shallow depth (averaging 300 meters) and proximity to land-based infrastructure. This accessibility, combined with global demand for fertilizers, chemicals, and metals, underpins the economic hype. However, environmental challenges—such as the Dead Sea’s shrinking size due to water diversion—could limit future extraction, casting doubt on the full realization of such estimates.
In summary, the Dead Sea’s mineral wealth is a product of its unique geological setting: a tectonically formed, low-lying basin with no outlet, subjected to intense evaporation for millions of years. @RepThomasMassie @RealCandaceO
2. The Rothschild's purchased the land under Palestine before WW1 directly from the Ottoman Empire when they still existed.
They established the Palestine Jewish Colonization Association (PICA) in 1924, which acquired over 125,000 acres (50,586 ha) of land and set up business ventures. Most of you are ignorant of history.
3. Baron Edmond de Rothschild, a member of the prominent Rothschild banking family, began purchasing land in Ottoman Palestine in the 1880s to support Jewish settlement. His efforts were part of a broader movement to establish Jewish agricultural colonies in the region, which was then under Ottoman control.
While the Rothschilds did not purchase "the land under Palestine" as a whole (implying all of it), they did acquire significant tracts of land from various landowners, including absentee landlords like the Sursock family, rather than directly from the Ottoman Empire itself in a single transaction.
The Ottoman government often restricted Jewish land purchases and immigration, but Edmond de Rothschild worked through intermediaries and organizations to secure properties legally under Ottoman law. By the time of his death in 1934, he had supported the reclamation of nearly 500,000 dunams (approximately 125,000 acres) of land and the establishment of nearly 30 settlements.
IVF doesn't solve infertility it bypasses Nature's laws that control the process. Modern humans have no idea how their tech world is causing it. They have created their own asteroid and I see it everyday in my clinics.
My Integrated Decentralized Narrative: From GOE to Modern Extinction
Let’s weave the dopamine circuitry findings into the evolutionary framework, highlighting how environmental light changes are affecting sex, fertility, and fecundity:
GOE (2.4 Billion Years Ago): Hypoxia and cooling favored the Warburg metabolism, with melanin degradation into L-DOPA providing dopamine for stress responses. Early mTOR-like pathways regulated growth but were not yet light-sensitive.
Evolution of Complex Life (Post-GOE): Neuropsin evolved, linking UVA light (380 nm) to mTOR and dopamine synthesis. Dopamine began regulating reward and movement, setting the stage for sexual behavior in complex organisms.
K-T Extinction (66 Million Years Ago): Darkness suppressed neuropsin and mTOR, reducing dopamine synthesis and shifting metabolism to glycolysis. Hypoxia increased catecholamine production, prioritizing survival over reproduction.
Post-K-T Mammalian Evolution: UVA light reactivated mTOR and dopamine pathways, supporting mitochondrial efficiency, circadian rhythms, and sexual behavior. Rhythmic dopamine in the vsNAc (modulated by acetylcholine) optimized ejaculation timing, enhancing fertility and fecundity in diurnal environments.
Primates and Humans: Dopamine in the vsNAc, driven by UVA light via neuropsin and mTOR, fine-tuned sexual behavior and supported sex steroid synthesis via CYP enzymes. This underpinned the evolution of complex social and reproductive behaviors.
Modern Extinction Event (Today): Reduced UVA exposure (from ALAN, indoor living) suppresses neuropsin, mTOR, and dopamine synthesis, leading to:
Quick Ejaculation: Dysregulated dopamine rhythmicity in the vsNAc causes premature ejaculation, reducing reproductive success.
Decreased Fertility and Fecundity: Impaired mTOR activity reduces CYP function, lowering sex steroid production and gamete quality. Intracellular hypoxia and mtDNA damage further exacerbate infertility.
Circadian Misalignment: Disrupted circadian clocks (via PER, CRY) impair dopamine and metabolic regulation, contributing to reproductive dysfunction.
Metabolic Regression: A shift to Warburg metabolism reduces ATP efficiency in gametes, impairing sperm motility and oocyte maturation.
2. Predictions and Implications
Reproductive Health Crisis: The decline in fertility and fecundity, driven by light disruption, suggests a modern extinction event. Restoring natural light exposure (e.g., increasing UVA at 380 nm) would reactivate neuropsin, mTOR, and dopamine pathways, improving ejaculation timing, sex steroid synthesis, and gamete quality.
Therapeutic Interventions: SunLight therapy at 380 nm could enhance mTOR activation and dopamine synthesis, addressing ejaculatory dysfunction and infertility. Targeting acetylcholine-dopamine interactions in the vsNAc (as shown in the research) may also offer treatments for sexual dysfunction.
Environmental Solutions: Reducing ALAN and promoting natural light exposure could re-synchronize circadian rhythms, mTOR activity, and dopamine signaling, mitigating the reproductive and metabolic consequences of modern light environments.
3. Conclusion of the Fertility/Extinction Lesson
The integration of dopamine circuitry into the evolutionary framework reveals how deeply light has shaped sexual behavior, fertility, and fecundity across billions of years. From the GOE to the K-T extinction, UVA light (via neuropsin, mTOR, and dopamine) optimized reproductive success in mammals. Today, the loss of natural light exposure disrupts these ancient pathways, leading to quick ejaculation, reduced fertility, and a potential extinction event. By understanding mTOR’s absorption and emission spectra and the dopamine-acetylcholine axis in the vsNAc, we can develop strategies to restore light-driven reproductive health and prevent further decline in human fecundity.
Many things are impossible to centralized medicine.
When they say it, believe them.
It is impossible for them to do it.
But it is possible when your framework is not constrained by biochemistry.
Mainstream centralized medicine operates within a narrow biochemical lens: think enzymes, receptors, and pharmaceuticals, while largely ignoring the deeper physics of biological systems. Blue light damage to the eye, for instance, is a great example: they’ll talk about retinal degeneration or oxidative stress, but the conversation rarely touches on how light interacts with cellular water or electron dynamics. Centralized medicine tends to see these as "impossible" to reverse because their toolkit doesn’t account for the underlying mechanisms I pointing to.
My framework, though built on quantum mechanics and the biophysics of water, shifts the game entirely. The idea that water isn’t just a passive solvent but an active player, responding to temperature, pressure, pH, and ions like phosphorus, aligns with some cutting-edge thinking in biophysics.
Water’s coherent domains having structured regions where it acts almost like a liquid crystal, is obviously being used to be sensitive to salt levels and iodine, as a result, so is cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) because it is an ultrafiltrate of blood plasma.
The choroid plexus tweaking the chemistry of blood plasma into CSF is a solid observation; it’s a filtration system that’s more dynamic than most give it credit for. If salt modulates the physics of those coherent domains, I'm implying it would and should influence the brain’s redox potential, its balance of oxidation and reduction, which is a bold and provable claim. It’s like saying the brain’s electrical environment is tuned by water’s quantum properties. The physics says it is allowed.
The leap to “water electricity” powering cells and the universe is where I'm using physics to really push biochemical boundaries. I've suggesting for 20 yrs that sunlight-driven proton and electron currents in water, both inside cells and across extracellular spaces act as a photo-bioelectric messaging system for redox status. This isn’t far off from what some researchers explore with mitochondrial bioenergetics or the role of structured water in protein folding and enzyme function. Gerald Pollack’s work on the “fourth phase” of water, for instance, supports the idea that water near cell membranes can hold charge and drive biological processes. That work is supported by the work of physicists Preparta and Del Guidice. No one in biochemistry has any idea of this work, yet all their biochemicals only work if they are hydrated. That is their hypocrisy. I’ve been reversing diseases for 20 years using this lens by manipulating light exposure, hydration, or ion balance. It’s a testament to how practical this can be, even if it’s dismissed as impossible by the mainstream.
Centralized medicine’s paradigm doesn’t deny possibility out of malice; it’s just shackled by its own assumptions. They can’t “fix shit” because they don’t see the variables I'm playing with. My decentralized approach, open to probabilities and rooted in quantum effects, sidesteps those constraints.
2. @Charmd8888 reports significant vision improvement from 20/1000 to 20/400 in one month, defying her doctor’s claim that recovery from blue light-induced retinal damage is impossible.
Her approach aligns with my decentralized medicine model, using sunlight, red light therapy, and other methods i'd advocate for reversing such damage.
A 2023 study in the original thread confirms blue light (160 lx, 3–6 hours) collapses the inner blood-retinal barrier (iBRB) via claudin-5 degradation, supporting my biophysics-based explanation of retinal damage.
Red light therapy, as noted in a 2020 pilot study from the web results, can improve retinal function in people over 40, potentially by reducing oxidative stress and stabilizing tight junctions like claudin-5.
Charlotte describes her visual disturbance as a “beautiful intricate” pattern of purple-lavender with gold outlines, suggesting biophoton emissions or neural misfiring, which directly ties into my model of chaotic biophoton spread from retinal damage. Centralized medicine does not even know much less learn mtDNA transforms energy to light during mtDNA metabolism.
Her mention of the pattern becoming “smaller, lighter, and more transparent” indicates restoration and renovation of retinal coherence, likely aided by my protocol’s focus on light spectrum modulation and water coherence. Sounds like what Becker did in bone.
A cursory web search by an autodidact results in finding out that highlight cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sodium rhythms peak in early morning and late afternoon, which would be expected to exacerbate retinal stress during those times, especially under blue light exposure. No eye doctor seems to know this. This is why renovation of the retina is impossible for them.
My quantum perspective on water as an electron and proton donor easily explains why Charlotte’s protocol likely involving hydration and light, Would should and could restore cellular redox balance in the retina.
3. What do I do to centralized medicine on X? I show normies how the real science of Nature operates in them at a level they cannot fathom.
Every day I am hearing bleeding the freak they believe in.
In 1860 Oliver Wendell Holmes, dean of Harvard Medical School, wrote that “if the whole materia medica, as now used, could be sunk to the bottom of the sea, it would be all the better for mankind—and all the worse for the fishes.” He was a prophet.
His Word are Historical Echoes to Modern Medicine: Just as mercury and bloodletting were standard in 1860, modern medicine has its own examples of widely used interventions later found to be harmful. For instance, the mRNA platform. Has killed more people in the USA than two World Wars. The advice you got from the Columbia Drug Cartels were better than Centralized medicine's advice. How about statins for high cholesterol because no one goes out in the sun any longer and is inside addicted to screens.
Opioid Crisis: In the late 1990s and early 2000s, pharmaceutical companies like Purdue Pharma aggressively marketed opioids like OxyContin, claiming they were safe for chronic pain. This led to widespread overprescription, addiction, and overdose deaths—over 500,000 opioid-related deaths in the U.S. from 1999 to 2020, according to the CDC. Like the toxic remedies of Holmes’ era, these drugs were pushed despite limited evidence of long-term safety. All because of screens and 24/7 LED lights that destroyed beta endorphin release from POMC.
Polypharmacy in Chronic Disease: Today, patients with chronic conditions like diabetes or hypertension often take multiple medications, often leading to adverse interactions. A 2019 study in JAMA Internal Medicine found that 42% of older adults in the U.S. were taking five or more prescription drugs, increasing the risk of side effects and diminishing quality of life. today the number is over ten Rx. BigHarma business model is a cartel for pseudoscience.
2. Can you fill a cup that is topped? Is a mind truly open if it is filled with facts that inconsequential? It is only when we are ready to give up on some things in our lives that we could receive new things. Unlearn to relearn today. Decentralize your thinking to leave the stagnation of centralized healthcare behind.
For instance, a doctor might know the exact protocol for managing type 2 diabetes with metformin but be unaware of how insulin resistance is influenced by environmental factors like blue light exposure at night, a concept Kruse frequently discusses. These "facts" are inconsequential if they don’t lead to better patient outcomes.
Diabetics have been managed on drugs for 100 years and the incidence and prevalence is not going down, it is getting worse.
No has a drug or supplement deficiency. The have a deficiaincy in their thinking.
3. Unlearning in Medicine: Doctors and patients alike may need to unlearn certain assumptions. For example:
For Doctors: Unlearning the idea that chronic diseases like obesity or diabetes are purely genetic or inevitable, and instead exploring environmental factors like light exposure, sleep, and electromagnetic fields (EMF).
For Patients: Unlearning the passive role of simply following a doctor’s orders and instead taking an active role in their health, such as experimenting with sunrises to stimulate time-restricted eating or grounding (earthing) to improve well-being.
Receiving New Things: By letting go of outdated paradigms, new approaches can emerge. For instance, the growing field of decentralized medicine focuses on root causes rather than symptom management, often incorporating lifestyle changes that conventional medicine overlooks. A 2021 study in Frontiers in Nutrition found that a decentralized medicinal approach, including personalized light diet and light stress management, significantly improved outcomes for patients with irritable bowel syndrome compared to standard care.
Patients navigating the highways of centralized medicine are on the road to nowhere and they're trying to escape. The escape route is through their environment.
THE SUN MANDATES IT. LET THERE BE LIGHT IS A TRUE STATEMENT REFLECTING A BIOPHYSICAL FACT. Every 150 million years, the Sun loses roughly the mass of Earth due to the solar wind, or about 30 Earth masses over the entire lifetime of the Sun so far. The whole of the living history of Earth, over 4.6 billion years, has consumed just 30 Earth masses of solar mass.
This volume shows just how much information is buried in sunlight. It also shows that DHA was critical in tapping the information in the light to make it useful. It explains why conditions of existence were and are more important than natural selection.
It explains the paradox of the Cambrian explosion from evolutionary theory. Light completes Darwin's ideas; DNA and genes do not. The Cambrian explosion happened 600 million years ago, and photosynthesis was innovated 50 million years before the Cambrian explosion.
When you divide 650 million years by 4.6 billion years, you will see that complex life found on Earth has only used 14% of the 30 Earth masses of sunlight. Around six masses of Earth created everything humans have ever known about life. THIS SHOULD FLOOR YOU. Everything ever created on Earth came from this amount of light. It shows us definitively how much more critical light is than anything else. However, to use this small amount of light, photosynthesis had to innovate DHA to make the sun's helpful light 600 million years ago. This shows you just how powerful the electromagnetic force is. It has unlimited range and power. DHA has been the master of DNA since the beginning of animal evolution because it made light useful from an information theory. It explains why I believe Darwin was very wrong. CITES threadreaderapp.com/thread/1894822…
2. The rise of entropy in aging is inevitable but negotiable. My tweak is that entropy isn’t just éR or ROS/RNS; it’s the loss of mitochondrial fractal coherence, where IMM potential (ΔΨm) frays under nnEMF and hypoxia. Graceful agers don’t deny this; they adapt to it. Photobiomodulation (PBM) restores ΔΨm by 20-30% (per Hamblin’s work), while methylene blue (MB) shunts electrons to Complex IV, cutting reductive stress. Our rejection of cosmetics or melotan for bioenergetics is pure savagery because sunscreen blocks UV-A’s mitochondrial benefits, and sunglasses kill melanopsin signaling. My tribe won't do dumb shit like this below.
3. My curiosity-driven tribe wants to learn biophysics, circadian rhythms, or new skills because it aligns with my view of mitochondria as adaptive learners. Melanin hydration and heme function hinge on light spectra (red/IR upregulate, blue dysregulates), and the curious grasp this.
They don’t just reject nnEMF norms; they hack their colony with red light therapy from the sun or panels (600-1000 nm), which downshifts HIF-1α and restores PER2 periodicity. This isn’t passive action; it’s mitochondrial rewiring via passion.