What America must solve to restore its greatness is the outright anti-white hatred spewed by the near entirety of the left
Below, e.g., a Black Women For Harris leader spews hate that would sound radical coming from Mugabe
This Zimbabweification is ubiquitous and must end
🧵👇
In case you think the Mugabe comparison is overblown, below are examples of the sort of thing he said
Is that any different than Yale proudly inviting a black psychiatrist on campus to tell students she “had fantasies of unloading a revolver into the head of any White person"?
I think not. Nor is it much different than the constant articles published in regime media about how awful white people are
And this sort of hate is far from being solely an American problem; the same is even true in England, the land ostensibly of the English
Below, a supposed Conservative, James Cleverly, attacks a British political party for ostensibly being composed of British people...as if it is wrong for Anglo-Saxons to rule the land of Anglo-Saxons
Of course, the only reason for such sentiment is hatred of whites. You saw the same thing in Scotland, with its former Prime Minister yelling about how much he hates that governmental positions in Scotland are filled by whites, Scots...in the land named for Scots
So, whether it's "conservatives" yelling about the presence of Angles in the government of Angleland or some bizarre, spiteful politician in Scotland screaming about Scots presence in the government of the Scots' Land, the hat the native population for being white
So, our whole lives, we're bombarded with Radio Rwanda-style hatred of the sort shown in the DEI meeting below
Whether it's Australians being lectured on how racist they are for carving civilization out of a barren continent, Americans being lectured constantly by their corporations and schools on why they're the devil himself because of their color, or English protesters being imprisoned for saying that England should be kept English, or South Africans being made the victims of unspeakable crimes the government doesn't even pretend to investigate, the Anglosphere members are bombarded with propaganda that is blatantly hostile to their very existence
And it should be noted that this isn't an exclusively Anglosphere problem, though that's what I tend to focus on
The continent gets its dose of it too
Importantly, the root of it is always the same
It's race communism
Whether farmland confiscation in Zimbabwe or DEI meetings in an American cubicle farm, the motivation is the same
They think "oppressors" (almost always normal white people) should suffer in the physical, spiritual, and economic realms, and that whatever value can be extracted from them should be handed to the "oppressed" (almost always blacks)
This is why the Conservative Party feels comfortable denouncing British people for existing in Britain all while collaborating with Labor to turn England into a Paki-filled favela. It's why the Kamala campaign's main message is that white people are evil. It's why towns like Charloi, PA and villages in Germany are being flooded with violent migrants. It's why the anti-white racism of the sort @realJeremyCarl wrote about in "The Unprotected Class" is so common
It's race communism all the way down
But the key to solving all of that is in America. We, for better or worse, are the global hegemon
The British, French, Germans, all those suffering the ravages of race communism, are doing so because that's been the American position for decades
They might be willing accomplices, a la Attlee and Windrush, but it's because of American force that nothing changes
The European migrant problem could be solved more or less immediately...but American banksters and carrier groups might have something to say about that
The Boers could reclaim South Africa...but American carrier groups would surely end that immediately
Zimbabwe would still be Anglo-ruled and prosperous, but American race communists hated its non-egalitarian existence
And America needn't be under the bootheel of DEI commissars, but the FBI and spite-filled regime have made it so
Whatever the European origins of Cultural Marxism that has more or less morphed into American-style race communism, the problem is now firmly an American one in thought and force
So, to solve the problem, to drive DEI out of businesses, make governments comfortable stopping violent migrants from invading their countries, and generally making national governments positive rather than hostile toward their native populations, the American race communism issue needs to be rooted out by its stems and roots
Doing that will be difficult, but @elonmusk's "Department of Government Efficiency" idea holds some promise
The only reason much of this exists is federal mandates and funding
Universities push it because they're cash-rich enough to do so; slash their funding and end federal student loans so that no one can afford to major in grievance study majors and then go on to push it
Corporate HR and financier ESG push it; slash all in the DOJ unwilling to go after that and investigate the ESG-pushing brokers for not doing their proper fiduciary duty and HR for anti-white, anti-male policies. The data is clear that these ESG companies are discriminating against white job seekers, which is illegal if always unpunished. Used the slimmed down and ideologically in line post-DOGE government to rake them over the coals for it
And, of course, the big problem is government grants for or tolerance of NGOs that aid and abet the invasion, fund soft on crime prosecutors, back riots and rioters, and otherwise turn America into Zimbabwe. Cut the funding and unleash the state on them.
The Open Societies Foundation, BlackRock, the university system, the Rockefeller Foundation and Ford Foundation, HIAS and the similar Lutheran + Catholic charities that abet the illegal immigrants, all of them are vectors of DEI and race communism, whether through ESG, affirmative action, or something else. Go after them with a vengeance
All hope isn't lost
As this South African notes, things are far better here than in South Africa or Zimbabwe; those are where race communism was fully carried out rather than only being in its nascent stages
But it is progressing. It is getting worse. We are racing towards Zimbabwe. It must be stopped and can be stopped; doing so will be difficult, but free the West and Anglosphere from the civilization-killer that is race communism
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The reason this happened is that the Indochina was the original Rhodesia: a colonial conflict in which the Americans and communists worked hand in hand to destroy colonial, Christian society and spread communism
That lens is the only one that makes the war make sense
🧵👇
First, we dragged the French along and let them waste their strength, political capital, and blood while providing just enough aid to keep them from losing but not enough to win
Then, when Dien Bien Phu came, we yanked it all away so that they lost in a humiliating defeat and their colonial project, and related war effort in Algeria, took an irrecoverable black eye
The French Empire was finished, and the communist bayonet, aided by our lack of commitment and domestic French leftist agitation, killed it
With that French defeat came the partition, and with it the crowding of the capitalists and Catholics into South Vietnam, with Diem as their leader
We backed Diem in a way that only made him unpopular, and once Diem leaned into pro-Catholic policies, something that would have separated the South from the North and given it a continued reason for resistance, the CIA murdered him and replaced him with a succession of awful and ever more incompetent puppets
Lee Kuan Yew notes in From Third World to First that this was a terrible idea
The central reason the American Revolution proved successful in creating a free and prosperous nation is that the Founders, many of them Virginia and New York gentry, embraced rather than rejected hierarchy
This separated, in practice, our Revolution from the horrors of the egalitarian French Revolution, and is what led to America’s subsequent success as France floundered, though both used similar language about rights and liberty
Continued below 👇
This often gets forgotten because 1) they rejected creating a British-style peerage after the war (though they did create the Society of the Cincinnati), and 2) the war is now framed not as a dispute over local sovereignty but rather as a rejection of British culture
That’s an incorrect interpretation of what happened
The central fact is that American culture remained resolutely English in the decades after the war, however much some radicals hated England
This is obvious even in superficial respects.
The White House is a Palladian country house. 4/5 of our first presidents were country gentlemen who ran plantations as their cousins across the ocean ran estates. They are with silver, constructed country manors, hunted the fox on horseback, drank port by the gallon, and otherwise followed the culture traditions of their English ancestors
Similarly, the Scots-Irish, though significantly more hostile to Britain, retained the traditions of their Borderer ancestors, particularly surrounding local leadership by the major men of quality
Every study of the economic contributions of immigrants has shown that only some East Asians - namely the Japanese - and those of European descent in any way contribute to the public coffers on a net basis. The other groups drain them in a huge way
This same general thing bears out in America: the net fiscal impact of those "undocumented folk" is severely negative...
A rat done bit my sister Nell // with whitey on the moon
If anything symbolizes the noxious race communism strangling our civilization, it's this song, Whitey on the Moon, a paean to the stultifying Stone Age spirit of the global favela
A short 🧵👇
(video by @kunley_drukpa)
The long and short of it is that we face a time for choosing.
Will we embrace what is represented now by SpaceX and Apollo — greatness, aesthetic beauty, and feats of technological brilliance and daring beyond anything seen before?
Or will we embrace the global favela — the spirit, smell, and aesthetic of the steaming, putrid air of a decaying village in Dahomey?
There are a great many people that identify with Whitey on the Moon
They claim to want no leaps forward until everyone is pampered by the nanny state, living in luxury because someone else paid their doctor's bill, as the song's sullen artist indicates
But what they really want is a dragging of all of us into a global favela. They hate any form of achievement, because it reminds them there is nothing they could ever achieve
They, like the glowering savage in the picture below, want to crush anything excellent, beautiful, or marvelous merely because it is so; it reminds them that their ancestors never invented the wheel, and barely escaped the Stone Age
What separated Rhodesia from the rest of the West?
One key matter: it focused on excellence in an age when all others transitioned to ruthless egalitarianism
As Ian Smith put it in the clip below, “We simply have a standard”
That standard is what made the West great
🧵👇
This is, I think, really the key differentiating factor and is what makes it so interesting to me
In an era when America was in the throes of Civil Rights egalitarianism, tearing down everything to make communist-connected rebels happy, and England was at war with its heritage, taxing those who embodied that heritage out of existence while confiscating their houses, Rhodesia chose the other path
That other path was the one that really matters: it was simply having standards
Their elections are the best example of this. Those weren't racial, but rather required those who were to vote in national elections first prove to the country that they could be stewards, shown through their being stewards in their own lives
Hence the property qualification: requiring the equivalent of $60k in 2024 USD in Rhodesian property, they largely succeeded in screening out those who were irresponsible.
Below, Elon argues DOGE is fighting the bureaucracy, and thus might restore Democracy in America
He's right to call bureaucracy the enemy of the people, but wrong to say it's the enemy of democracy
The two go hand in hand, as the West's 20th century decline shows
🧵👇
First, what Elon told Rogan was partially correct, but mostly incorrect
He said, “The reality is that our elected officials have very little power relative to the bureaucracy until DOGE. DOGE is a threat to the bureaucracy—it's the first threat to the bureaucracy. Normally, the bureaucracy eats revolutions for breakfast. This is the first time that they're not, that the revolution might actually succeed, that we could restore power to the people instead of power to the bureaucracy.”
In some ways, that is obviously correct. DOGE is indeed at war with the bureaucracy, as shown by the firings, the court cases, the budget freezes, and so on
Elon, and thus DOGE, recognize that the federal bureaucracy is not only overly expensive, but has been spending and regulating in a way that makes it hard to do anything in America, particularly anything worth doing. Business is burdened by taxes and constrained by onerous regulations. Hiring is difficult, and firing an incompetent employee of a "protected" race is nearly impossible. Innovation is stifled by aging bureaucrats. The Deep State has been weaponized against conservatives, and most bureaucrats go along with it because they just want their pensions.
So, DOGE is indeed at war with the bureaucracy, is winning some battles, and the bureaucracy is clearly the enemy of the American people
But he is wrong in saying that the bureaucracy is the enemy of democracy, by which he means modern mass democracy, or a near-universal adult franchise, which hereafter I'll just call democracy
That is wildly off, and proof of that comes from America and Britain throughout the 20th century