👇Reports from BBC Persian & other sources indicate that this incident involving a young Iranian woman was a tragic mental health crisis.
After removing her underwear, she was detained & reportedly taken to a psychiatric facility.
Per BBC Persian:
"Two eyewitnesses, who were present during the incident, shared details with BBC Persian that differ from accounts of an altercation with security. They said the girl ‘unexpectedly entered several classrooms holding a mobile phone, as if she was recording students.’ According to them, an instructor, upset by her unauthorized entry, sent a student to ask her intentions. However, one witness reported that upon encountering students, she ‘started screaming.’
One of the witnesses told BBC that when they reached the courtyard, they saw the girl had undressed. According to these witnesses, there was ‘no confrontation between the girl and security.’ However, they only witnessed the girl’s unexpected entrance into classrooms. They said they are unaware of what transpired before she entered the classrooms or what occurred between her exit from the building and her undressing in the courtyard.
These eyewitnesses arrived after she had removed her clothes in the courtyard. According to them, the girl told students inside the building, ‘I came to save you.’ A social media user on X, who appears to be a university student, posted that she said, ‘I came to save you.’
University and Iranian Media Response
Amir Mahjoub, the Public Relations and Protocol Manager of Azad University, denied any confrontation between the girl, whom he referred to as a student, and university security in a post on X. Mahjoub stated that he was present at the police station after her arrest and reported, ‘Her physical condition was confirmed as fully stable by emergency responders.’
Mahjoub then explained:
‘Investigations reveal that due to a mental health issue, she began filming her classmates and instructor, prompting objections. This has happened before. When faced with protests from students and security, she quickly reached the courtyard and acted disrespectfully... What actually transpired indicates that her indecent behavior was not due to hijab enforcement but resulted from students and security objecting to her unauthorized filming and photographing, violating the privacy of students and instructors.’
Iranian media, including ISNA, also reported that this ‘student,’ after filming students, faced objections and subsequently undressed in response to these objections. They cited Azad University, stating that ‘this student is under severe psychological distress and has been transferred to a treatment facility.’”
2/ A fellow student who witnessed the incident tweeted yesterday, "I hadn’t even been able to digest the "foursome" yet when suddenly a girl was completely naked in the middle of Science and Research :))"
(the "foursome" refers to a separate viral incident😄)
This woman adds>
3/The fellow student & witness responded to someone claiming "they tore her clothes," saying:
"My dear, it wasn’t a protest action. She came into the classrooms, filmed the students, and when the professors objected, she started cursing, went outside, and suddenly took off all her clothes. Why do you all make it sound so dramatic?"
4/ The student’s account, "Sushi @Soniaqvti," appears to have been deactivated following a wave of abuse, mainly from monarchist opposition accounts. However, her account was legit (and contained anti-government comments going back years) & aligns with BBC's reporting.
5/ This cached image of her account also confirms that she is a student at Tehran's Islamic Azad University of Science and Research and had a history of activism critical of the government—adding credibility to her account of what she witnessed.
6/ Another user on X, who also claims to be a classmate of the woman involved in this incident and appears credible based on her post history, writes: “There was no attack. Ms. A.D., my classmate in French Literature, does not have stable mental health. She has numerous disciplinary records at the university and has caused significant physical and psychological disturbances for us and other students.”
She further explains, “The last time, I lost one of my friends because of her. She secretly recorded a video of him shaking hands and took it to security, saying, ‘They’re not related; why are they shaking hands?’ According to what she herself has shared in class and the arguments she would start, she’s divorced from her husband, and this man is her temporary husband.”
7/ To clarify, based on the available facts, witness reports, and video evidence, this incident appears to be a mental health crisis rather than an act of protest where she was beaten and undressed in defiance.
That said, it’s important to acknowledge the connection between mental health struggles and the broader repression and pressures faced by women in Iran. No one can claim to fully understand her state of mind.
My focus here, however, is on addressing the specific claim that she was beaten over her hijab, prompting her to remove her clothes in protest. I have not seen any credible evidence to support this claim.
8/ The original claim that she was beaten then undressed in protest came from a Telegram channel with about 10k followers.
This channel has also posted IDF kill charts, praised Israeli assassinations, made racist remarks about Afghan migrants, and spread baseless claims like "Hamas" and "Hashd al-Shaabi" students taking over Iranian universities.
Make of that what you will.
Link to their original post claiming this narrative as an "exclusive": t.me/EEAUT/8921
@never_oppressed
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A new “Shia nationalism” appears to be taking shape in Iran—an explicitly hybrid identity promoted by the state that sees the foreign enemy as a point of unity.
It claims lineage from both Cyrus and Karbala, defending the homeland and the faith as one.
2/ Historically, there was no contradiction between being Iranian and being Muslim.
The tension between “Iranian” and “Islamic” identity is a modern construction—shaped by colonial legacies, orientalist frameworks, and post-colonial ideological & state-building battles.
3/ Both secular nationalists and Islamists have, at times & to various degrees, treated these identities as mutually exclusive.
But in practice, most Iranians have long inhabited both—drawing pride from pre-Islamic heritage and Shi’a tradition without seeing a contradiction.
1) torpedo U.S.-Iran diplomacy; 2) drag Washington into conflict; 3) take out Iran’s nuclear and missile programs; 4) trigger regime change.
If the ceasefire Trump just announced holds—and is paired with serious U.S.-Iran diplomacy—it would mark a strategic defeat for Israel in launching this war.
Netanyahu took his shot. A desperate Hail Mary. And none of it has worked up until now.
Fordow was evacuated. The site may very well be intact.
And in any case, Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile and advanced centrifuges are now hidden, with a stronger covert breakout ability than ever.
The Iranian public has rallied in defense of the country and against foreign aggression.
If the government channels this unity into a new social contract, it could be transformative. If not, the old polarization may return.
Meanwhile, Iran has hit Israel hard over these 12 days: Tel Aviv, Haifa, the north, south, and other cities have seen major destruction. Military and intelligence sites damaged. Energy and research infrastructure hit.
Israel’s vaunted air defenses failed the test. Its reliance on the U.S. has never been clearer.
Netanyahu saw the costs of a war of attrition and blinked.
But for Iran, can any ceasefire be trusted?
Unless it’s tied to credible U.S. diplomacy—not maximalist demands—and unless Israel halts covert attacks and assassinations and continued airstrikes (a la Lebanon and Syria), this truce will likely collapse.
Trump helped create this mess by enabling Netanyahu.
If he truly wants to stop the region from being “destroyed,” as he just said, he’ll have to restrain Netanyahu and force a ceasefire in Gaza too.
Lasting peace is impossible until Netanyahu and his war-first approach is gone for good.
2/ REMEMBER: Netanyahu explicitly said Israel’s military operation in Iran would continue “for as long as it takes” to eliminate what he called the "existential threat of Iran’s nuclear program and arsenal of ballistic missiles."
That hasn't happened! Far from it.
3/ As the Economist noted: Israel wanted "at least" 2 weeks to destroy Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities.
It achieved neither.
Without regime change or capitulation, the war “makes sense only if it can set back” Iran’s nuclear program by years — and it hasn’t.
Iran’s missile strategy appears to be working: initial heavy missile (& drone) barrages drained Israeli interceptors, and now fewer launches are landing more hits.
This points to better accuracy, degraded defenses, and a shift to inflicting long-term attrition on Israel.
And from what I’m hearing from well-placed sources in Washington: Iranian missiles are hitting key military and intelligence targets in Israel.
Targets we don’t see footage of.
Behind the scenes, Israeli officials are reportedly reeling.
Reportedly, Iran launched 23 missiles at Israeli targets today—with all 23 appearing to hit.
Some were Sejjil-class, others reportedly new types unfamiliar to Israel.
No visible sign of interceptions.
Clear indication of growing precision and capability.
Israel isn’t like Taiwan or Ukraine—small states on the frontlines against a US great power rival (which Iran isn’t).
It’s a pariah state with impunity: dragging the US into self-defeating quagmires, trampling international law, and weakening America in great power competition.
If Israel attacks Iran, the US should absolutely stay out.
It’s a war with zero benefit to American interests—only costs.
Our key regional & global partners oppose it.
The American people don’t want it.
It would hand China & Russia a gift, and wreck Trump’s agenda.
2/ Masoud Daneshmand, head of Iran's National Association of Transport Companies:
-"The explosion at Rajaei Port will not harm the import of essential goods; because less than 15 percent of our imports come through this port
-"No damage occurred to the docks in this explosion"
3/ Emerging facts: Separate explosions at Bandar Abbas hit containers 500–700 meters apart with no physical link, pointing more to sabotage than an accident based on the information we have at this stage.