When I was on a menswear forum, I once debated the same four guys for like eight months straight, arguing every day online, about how oxfords should be worn. In the end, one conceded that the only people he sees doing what I recommend are old guys at his church.
I hold that there was something special about the way tailored clothing was worn prior to the 1980s. First, the quality of the tailoring was higher; second, things were put together more tastefully (to my eye). This was true across racial and social classes
The book Black Ivy: A Revolt in Style by Jason Jules is about how Black men during this time wore things such as three-roll-two suits, rep stripe ties, and oxford button-down collars to both fit into and challenge the status quo. Think: jazz musicians, MLK Jr, Sidney Poitier, etc
In fact, Miles Davis was a famous patron of The Andover Shop, a menswear institution that sold Brooks Bros styled clothes to Harvard students. They also dressed famous Black figures such as Ralph Ellison, Albert Murray, and Bobby Short.
To me, this form of dress is quite beautiful. Here's Ralph Ellison. Notice that when he wears a jacket without the matching pants, it's a sport coat (e.g., tweed, blazer) and not a suit jacket. He pairs them with tasteful rep striped ties and a splaying Johnny collar.
Here's Richard Wright. Men today insist on wearing clothes so shrunken, they look like they're about to burst from their jacket. But Wright shows how elegant you can look in more comfortable cuts. The small details, such as the bow tie and reversed watch, are pretty great.
Many will feel these outfits are too conservative or "establishment." So how about James Baldwin? Even when he wears tailoring in a subversive way—such as a silk scarf jauntily tied around his neck—he still knows the difference between a suit jacket and sport coat.
Or Andre Leon Talley, who absolutely would have known that the jacket in the third slide has to be worn with the matching trousers, where as the jacket in the second slide can be worn with pants cut from a different cloth. Doesn't he look great?
Today, men across social classes wear tailoring in more "modern" ways. Some of these ways can be quite cool. Many of the ways look very ugly to me.
For years, people said that I simply don't "get" Daniel Craig's modern outfits and I was too old fashioned. Personally, I think he looks better now in a cut that's more classic. Jacket would be even better in a slightly mottled wool-silk-linen blend.
Same with Lebron. Twenty years ago, outfits like the one on the left were considered "modern." Now we look back and laugh. I suspect the outfit on the right will be considered cool for decades.
I also suspect most people will like this photo of Arthur Ashe taken ~50 years ago. Why? Because it follows some basic principles: shape and drape; sport coat (not suit jacket) worn with velvet pants; use of texture and pattern.
Unsurprisingly, this photo of Colman Domingo went viral some years ago. And look, it exhibits the same principles as Ashe's outfit. Silky, smooth fabric designates this as a suit, so jacket and pants are worn together. Shape and drape; use of texture in the overcoat.
I think it's a fair criticism to say that my taste in tailoring runs "old." So perhaps you will look like an "old man" following my advice. Personally, I don't understand why "old" is a pejorative, as many older men look great to me. IMO, this is very high level of taste:
I see younger men of all backgrounds wearing clothes using these same principles, and they always look great to me.
IMO, successful experimentation requires knowing a bit about the "rules." Notice here: none of these are just swapping out suit jackets for different suit pants. It's someone who's deeply familiar with the language of classic tailoring and can play with it in sophisticated ways.
Black velvet blazer teamed with a blue turtleneck and grey houndstooth trousers? Fantastic. Your blue suit jacket paired with your black suit pants and a white shirt with no tie? One wonders if you have a light in your bedroom.
Anyway, I agree that this is a generational thing. If you think there was something special about the way Cary Grant (and people of that generation) dressed, then I think the same principles can be used today to create classic and modern outfits in a way that's appealing
Please don't attack the OP, as my intent is not to create stress for anyone. But I thought their tweet was a good prompt to talk about how I think there was something special about an older way of dressing, and it hold some lessons that can be used today.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Twitter has a character limit, so I assume (intelligent) people will read context and know I'm talking about interior design and fashion, which today are coded as "gay interests" for men. Not painting or architecture, which carry no such stigma.
IMO, it's absolutely true that American Protestants were uniquely against certain forms of ornamentation, including fashion. For instance, the Quakers deliberately shunned adornment and extravagance in dress, stressing the importance of simplicity.
In his book "The Suit," Christopher Breward writes about how Quakers would talk about "troubling lapses into self-fashionableness by wayward members" during meetings. However, the Quakers were small in number and often seen as unusual by their fellow non-Quaker community members
I believe this jacket is from Dobell, a company that produces their tailoring in Turkey. I'll show you some telltale signs of quality and where you can buy a tailored jacket made in Britain. 🧵
I don't think there's anything wrong with buying clothes made abroad (I believe in free trade). However, I think it's strange when people rail against "globalism" and free trade, while benefitting from these things. Talk is cheap; one should put their money where their mouth is.
I asked Lee where he bought his jacket, but have thus far received no word. However, we can guess whether this is a high-end or low-end garment from two things.
I disagree that this is an aesthetically pleasing photo. Tristan's outfit ruins it and I'll tell you why. 🧵
I'll assume Tristan is telling the truth when he says he used Photoshop and not AI. If so, this is a very impressive Photoshop job. By removing the scaffold tarp, you reveal more of the building. By removing the other cars, you also achieve more aesthetic coherence.
What is aesthetic coherence? It's the idea that things based on shared history or spirit go together. For instance, I've long said that the Cybertruck could look very cool if you wore certain outfits (futuristic techwear) and lived in a Brutalist home.
Some people are incredulous that you can wear certain shoes without socks, such as leather loafers. Much depends on your body and climate. But I'll tell you one reason why you find this difficult to believe: you buy low quality footwear. 🧵
It's absolutely possible to wear certain shoes without socks. As mentioned in an earlier thread, men have been doing this for over a hundred years. Going sockless makes sense if the outfit is semi-casual (not business clothes).
In fact, if you wear socks with certain footwear styles, such as espadrilles, you will look like you don't know what you're doing.
Tim is right and wrong here. I'll tell you where he's right and where he's wrong. 🧵
It's perfectly fine to wear slip-on shoes without socks. Those who suggest otherwise are simply ignorant and unaware about the history of men's dress.
You don't have to take my word for it. We can go back to Apparel Arts.
Apparel Arts was an early 20th century trade publication that taught men how to dress well. It was sent to clothiers and tailors so they could smartly advise their clients, but it later became a public-facing publication under the title "Esquire."
I get this sort of comment all the time, often about bespoke suits or mechanical watches. "These things are boring," "This is only for rich people," or "Who cares?"
Let me tell you a story. 🧵
Before the age of ready-to-wear, men had clothes made for them, either in the home or, if they could afford one, by a tailor. Ready-made clothing was limited to simple workwear, such as what was worn by sailors or miners.
Tailoring shop, 1780:
In this older method, a tailor would measure you, sometimes using a string (before the invention of tailor's tape). Then they'd use those measurements to draft a pattern, cut the cloth, and produce a garment. This process is called bespoke.