1/ It's basically impossible for a children's or young adult's book to get published without input from a 'sensitivity reader'.
These are EDI professionals who scour books for any hint of themes which might attract controversy.
2/ They come at books looking for ways to be offended. Most of them time they find problems. As a result, most books published today are sanitised, politically correct, and wooden.
@CartoonsHateHer has written interestingly on her experience of the modern publishing process
3/ Authors aren't even allowed to have villains who could come across as sexist / racist / homophobic / transphobic / culturally appropriative.
Children aren't pathetic and thin skinned. They can handle nuance and complexity. But publishers refuse to acknowledge this
4/ Directly from a sensitivity reader's mouth: I found this passage from the Cambridge Latin Course Textbook's 'EDI Reader' equally fascinating and shocking.
Even textbooks have to be edited to ensure depictions of the ancient world live up to the standards of modern feminism.
5/ Not even the classics are safe. Sensitivity readers have scoured through treasured children's books.
Take a look at what they did to Roald Dahl's 'The Witches'. Which version would you rather read for pleasure?
6/ Reading a book like this isn't pleasurable. Children know when they're being lectured - this is now the modern reading experience.
Kate Clanchy has written brilliantly on how sensitivity readers slowly and systematically tore her book to pieces.
7/ Authors have also spoken out about the desire of publishers to put out 'political' stories.
Gone are the days of 'Just William' and 'Adrian Mole' charting the lives of the average schoolboy.
Children's literature has been turned into political hectoring.
7/ A survey of some of the titles currently being aggressively marketed to children (of all ages)
The Pronoun Book
I am Jack (story of a transgender YouTube human rights campaigner)
No Ballet Shoes in Syria (story of a Syrian refugee fighting to stay in the UK)
8/ Give children 'Ballet Shoes', 'The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe', 'The Famous Five', anything by Tolkien, or the Railway Children and I guarantee they'll read them.
Give them sanitised slop, and I really can't blame them for turning to other activists.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Birmingham bin strike has reached its fifth week. Rubbish is piled high, rats are infesting the streets, and experts are concerned about Weil's disease.
🧵on how the Equality Act contributed to this, and how it may cause similar strikes across the country.
1/ In 2012, 174 former Birmingham Council employees brought an equal pay appeal to the Supreme Court.
They argued Birmingham City Council had provided lower pay to women in predominantly female jobs (cooks, cleaners & care staff) compared to refuse collectors and road workers.
2/ They won their case.
Birmingham Council was found to have contravened equal pay legislation because they failed to provide bonuses to cooks, cleaners, catering and care staff, but did offer them to bin men, street cleaners, and grave diggers.
Shakespeare's Birthplace Trust are "decolonising" their collection. They think the artefacts in their care are "racist, sexist, homophobic, or otherwise harmful".
In 2023 they received £948k from the taxpayer. In 2020, £5.69 million.
🧵on historical vandalism at the site
1/ On Sunday, the news broke that the trust tasked with conserving Shakespeare's birthplace would be "decolonised" following claims the author was being used to promote "white supremacy".
This is ridiculous, and raises serious concerns about their ability to conserve the site.
2/ The Esmee Fairbairn Foundation have given the trust funding to work with researchers "from South Asian diaspora communities in the West Midlands" to re-examine what Shakespeare's work "can teach us about the impact of colonialism".
Victims of grooming gangs were described by the police as "child prostitutes". In some cases, they were arrested instead of the perpetrators.
No one has been arrested for this negligence.
🧵of girls failed by the institutions which were meant to protect them.
After being groomed and trafficked by a violent sexual predator, an assessment by the Police and the Children's Social Care authority blamed a 13 year-old girl for "placing herself at risk of sexual exploitation and danger"
A 14 year-old girl's mother voiced concerns that her daughter was being groomed. Her social worker concluded that the mother "was not able to accept her growing up".