Michael Nadeau | The DeFi Report Profile picture
Nov 5 7 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Ethereum's Roadmap is under fire.

But have we truly grasped the *economic* ripples that every proposal sets in motion?

Each pivot, upgrade, and idea impacts more than just the blockchain itself.

It shapes the experiences, challenges, and fortunes of:

1. Developers
2. Users
3. Validators
4. Service Providers
5. And Investors

That’s why I created a dashboard on @tokenterminal breaking it all down.

Past. Present. And Future.

A 🧵with some insights from the dashboard + a link at the end for those looking to go deeper 👇

Starting with EIP1559 in August of '21:

$12.4b has been “burned” or bought back since it’s implementation.

1/7Image
Shifting to ETH 2.0 and the move to Proof of Stake in Sept. '22:

Annual issuance dropped 88% overnight.

Impact on Validators:

1. Now compensated with tips from users (fees paid in excess of the base fee for block inclusion) + new issuance.

2. Compensation from new issuance was reduced by 88% overnight (from roughly 13.5k ETH/day to 1.7k ETH/day).

3. Overhead costs (energy) reduced by 99.9%.

4. Compensation from fees + new issuance is now determined by the validator's portion of ETH staked pro-rata to the amount of ETH staked on the network.

[see dashboard for impact on ETH holders]

2/7Image
Moving on to The Shapella Upgrade (staking withdrawals) in April of '23:

Validators increased 58% in the first 6 months post-Shapella.

Impact:

1. Validators: decrease in yield
2. Tokenholders: drop in yield can impact demand for ETH
3. Network security: more validators = more secure network.
4. Applications: @LidoFinance was the largest beneficiary.

3/7Image
March '23 EIP4844: Introduction of “Blobs,” a new data structure that lowered costs for L2s.

Impact:

1. Users: reduced transaction fees on L2s an order of magnitude.

2. L1 Validators: the reduction in L2 fees has reduced the fees paid to L1 and the yield paid to validators/stakers.

3. L2 Sequencers: fees are down while transactions are up. Transaction volume will need to increase exponentially to backfill the loss in revenue from a lower avg. cost to transact.

4. Tokenholders: the reduction in fees at the L2 has also decreased fees at the L1 level, reducing burned ETH and yield paid to validators/stakers.

5. L2 Margins: increased from roughly 75% to 99%.

6.Applications/Developers: reducing costs on L2s can enable use cases that were previously not possible.

4/7Image
The result? Ethereum is scaling as designed.

90% of transactions within the ecosystem now come from L2.

5/7 Image
But the million-dollar question remains: Where will the most value accrue?

The market still values the L1 at 13x the combined valuation of the top L2s.

6/7 Image
Want to go deeper and come to your own conclusions? 👇

Please tear it up and leave your comments below so that we can make it even better 🤝

7/7tokenterminal.com/terminal/studi…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Nadeau | The DeFi Report

Michael Nadeau | The DeFi Report Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JustDeauIt

Oct 31
So many bad takes on the timeline regarding Ethereum vs Solana right now.

It's about time we cut through the noise with a data-driven approach.

That's why I created an absolute banger of a dashboard comparing the economics of the two networks across:

1. Go-To-Market Strategy
2. Value Accrual
3. Total Economic Value
4. Cost to Produce $1 Fee Revenue
5. Network Fundamentals
6. Performance & Valuation

It's both quantitative and qualitative.

A quick 🧵with some takeaways + a link to the dashboard via @tokenterminal at the end 👇

Takeaway #1: It's now about 50% cheaper to transact on Arbitrum than Solana. In fact, it's cheaper to transact on half of the top L2s.

1/7Image
Shifting to Total Network Fees:

Takeaways:

1. Ethereum + the top L2s have done nearly $20b in all-time fees

2. 97.5% has come from the L1 ($479m from the top L2s)

3. Solana has produced $495m in all-time fees, with 87% of that coming this year.

4. The trend is the friend of Solana, which has produced 41% of Ethereum's top-line network fees over the last 90 days (not including MEV)

5. Why am I including L2s? Because they create demand for ETH + settle transactions down to the L1. We'll stop including them if those two economic ties are severed.

2/7Image
Next is Protocol Revenue (burned tokens, which accrue value to non-stakers):

Takeaways:

1. 64% of Ethereum's all-time transaction fees ($12.4b) have been burned, accruing value to ETH tokenholders.

2. 50% of Solana's all-time transaction fees ($247m) have been burned (2% of Ethereum).

3. L2s have no value accrual mechanism for tokenholders today.

3/7Image
Read 7 tweets
Sep 6
. @Uniswap did 81% of @coinbase trading volume in Q2.

It did 65% of @RobinhoodApp's volume.

Meanwhile, Uniswap has just 3% of Coinbase's workforce and 4% of Robinhoods.

A 🧵on @Uniswap's market share within crypto across 6 different KPIs using @tokenterminal new dashboard feature.

___

Starting with Fees - Uniswap currently controls a 55% market share. Notably, the protocol generated $45m for Uniswap Labs via it's interface fee over the last 6 months.

That's 9% of what was paid to Uniswap LPs ($503m) over the same period.

*please note all data excludes Solana DEXs (coming soon)

1/7Image
In terms of active users, @Uniswap currently has a 60% market share — twice as high as one year ago.

Uniswap had over 9 million active users in August. For reference, Coinbase has 8 million monthly active users. Robinhood has 13.7m.

Data: @tokenterminal

2/7 Image
In terms of trading volume, Uniswap currently has a 42% market share across crypto DEXs (excludes Solana)

In August the DEX did $52b (down from $90b in March).

Again, Uniswap did 81% of Coinbase's volume in Q2 and 65% of Robinhood's volume.

Data: @tokenterminal

3/7 Image
Read 7 tweets
Jul 25
1/8 A quick 🧵on stablecoin activity on @ethereum & L2s

Starting with all-time transfer volume:

@circle the clear leader with over $10t of all-time volume on the L1. USDC volume was up 14% on the qtr and 37% on the year.

USDT saw zero growth in Q2 and was up 37% on the year.

DAI was the big winner in Q2 in terms of volume -- with 39% market share and $843b of value transferred.

Data: @artemis__xyzImage
2/8 Shifting to volume on L2s:

@circle dominating all time volume on L2s as well with 3.8x the volume of USDT.

USDC volumes were up 41% in Q1 and 127% on the year.

USDT saw 12% growth in Q2 and 74% for the year at the L2 level.

*DAI volume was down 30% on the qtr and 25% on the year on L2s.

Data: @artemis__xyzImage
3/8 Moving on to supply on ETH L1:

USDT leading the pack here with $52b as of 6/30. Balances grew just 5% in Q2 and 33% on the year.

USDC is #2 with $24b. Balances on L1 dropped in Q2 by 11% and 5% for the year.

The fastest growing stablecoin on ETH L1? @PayPal's PYUSD at 124% for the qtr, but with a balance of just $423m as of 6/30.

*Binance's BUSD has basically left the Ethereum ecosystem.

Data: @artemis__xyzImage
Read 8 tweets
Jul 17
Every quarter I spend a few days combing through onchain data to compile Ethereum's financial performance so that you don't have to.

A 🧵on the L2 sector performance in Q2:

Active users: L2s now have 6x that of the L1 (up from 3x last qtr)

Data: @tokenterminal Image
Active addresses/users on L2 only:

@arbitrum averaging more than Ethereum now.

@base in the number 2 spot.

Data: @tokenterminal Image
Fees: ETH vs L2s

ETH Fees dropped $679m in Q2 due to EIP4844 👀

Activity on L2s increased, but with fees dropping due to tech upgrades, sequencer revenues were flat for the qtr.

Data: @tokenterminal Image
Read 16 tweets
Apr 18
Every qtr I spend a week writing The Ethereum Investment Framework while combing through hundreds of KPIs throughout the Ethereum Ecosystem.

10 insights from the Q1 update which was published yesterday.

Shout out to @artemis__xyz for supplying the data.

A 🧵
Newer blockchains may be stealing some mind share from Ethereum, but in terms of where the value still sits, the King still rules:

- 5x higher TVL than the second-largest L1
- 10x higher TVL than #3 Image
As of 3.31, Ethereum has over 118 million non-zero wallet addresses, a KPI that has been growing at a compound annual rate of 40% since 2018. At 3.31, Ethereum has over 2.3x more non-zero wallets than the Bitcoin network. Image
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(