(((Michael Koplow))) Profile picture
Nov 5 12 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Netanyahu firing Galant is not a surprise. Given the bad blood between them and Netanyahu's desire to squelch any and all dissension within the coalition ranks, it was inevitable. But the timing is notable for a few reasons.
First, it comes on the heels of Galant yesterday approving a round of 7,000 new draft orders for Haredi conscripts. This is after 3,000 draft notices for Haredim were issued earlier this year, and only 230 of them reported to the IDF induction center.
Drafting the ultra-Orthodox is front and center in Israel this week, and today Bibi pulled a bill from the Knesset that would have guaranteed daycare subsidies for Haredi draft dodgers because it could not command a majority. Galant was its leading opponent in the coalition.
The Haredim pulling out of the coalition is Bibi's nightmare, and that possibility increased today when Bibi was not able to wrangle his coalition to pass an incredibly unpopular bill opposed by nearly every non-Haredi Israeli. He's hoping firing Galant removes one big obstacle
Second, the other big news this week is the arrest of 5 people, including a Bibi spokesman, for stealing classified info and leaking it to reporters to squelch support for a hostage deal. Also investigation into Bibi's aides altering the minutes of war cabinet meetings afterwards
Anything that changes the conversation and draws attention away from the leak investigation and Bibi's inner circle is good from his perspective, and this will definitely do that, at least temporarily. Bibi excels at flooding the zone to distract from bad news.
Third, when he tried to fire Galant the first time during the judicial overhaul, it drove hundreds of thousands of Israelis to the streets. My guess is that this time, it won't. Israelis are exhausted, there's war in Lebanon that has widespread support, protests have petered out
If ever there was a time to risk firing Galant, this is it. Bibi is gambling that there will be a loud but brief outcry that he will weather, and he can then move along with a defense minister that he can control (assuming he doesn't end up keeping the portfolio himself)
Lastly, the Election Day timing is not the prime motivator, but it's a factor. Galant is the administration's favorite and most trusted interlocutor. There will be lots of upset people in the WH and Pentagon over this move, and Bibi does it on a day when the US is most distracted
The staggering recklessness of this should not be understated. The U.S. is working with Israel to resolve Lebanon and keep Iran from responding to the October 26 strikes. We are also about a week away from the Blinken-Austin deadline for Israel to improve the Gaza aid process
So at a time when U.S. assistance is most needed and also when a real blowup between the U.S. and Israel is at its highest possibility, Bibi fires the person at the vortex of managing both of these issues, and also the person the U.S. likes best.
And even leaving this all aside, he decides to fire his defense minister with a war in Gaza, a war in Lebanon, maybe an imminent war with Iran, and the West Bank in horrific shape. It's Election Day here, but it's never been clearer how badly Israel needs its own election

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with (((Michael Koplow)))

(((Michael Koplow))) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mkoplow

May 15
Surreal to watch March 2023 play out again in May 2024, with Galant publicly challenging Netanyahu over the central policy issue facing Israel. Last time, it was judicial overhaul. This time, it is Israeli strategy in Gaza and whether Israel will reoccupy the territory.
Last time, Netanyahu fired Galant, and then backtracked after furious protests. Calls to fire Galant abound this time too, and protests in Israel have already been heating up in recent weeks, so we may get a repeat. Here are some possible scenarios:
1. History repeats and Netanyahu fires Galant, which some of his ministers are now demanding. Protests are baked into the equation at this point, so the people who will be angriest about this in the streets are unlikely to shift the equation. But if Galant goes, he won't be alone
Read 14 tweets
May 9
There's a lot of obfuscation on all sides about what's really going on and what's really at stake in argument over Rafah and the Biden decision to withhold weapons from Israel. A few points to keep in mind:
1. Restricting assistance to Israel while attempting to get Hamas to agree to a hostage deal absolutely creates a Hamas incentive to hold out. No reason for Sinwar to think that he won't get an effective ceasefire—or at least a real limit to IDF operations—for free now
At the same time, every time Netanyahu says that a Rafah operation will happen irrespective of any negotiation, it has the exact same effect from the other direction. No reason for Sinwar to agree to anything when Israel repeatedly pledges no possibility for a permanent ceasefire
Read 13 tweets
Jul 24, 2023
I wrote the below thread two weeks ago on why the reasonableness standard is a big deal, so no need to rehash it. But now that the bill has become law, a few additional thoughts 1/
Leaving aside the implications of the law itself, what makes this moment very scary for Israel is the way in which this has gone down. It was not only done in the face of widespread (and likely majority) opposition, but is being celebrated because of that opposition 2/
For the govt, the fact that this is so deeply opposed by so many different segments is proof of its correctness. It is more about an identity politics struggle than about the law itself and the changes it will bring. A certain segment is against it, so it must be good 3/
Read 6 tweets
Jul 11, 2023
Israel is erupting today over the Knesset passing the first reading of a bill to abolish the Supreme Court's use of the reasonability test in order to judge whether government action is valid or not. It's hard to see why this is a big deal, but it is 1/
If Israel had a constitution and a bill of rights, arguing that the courts shouldn't have the ability to strike down govt action that is "extremely unreasonable" would make more sense. But Israel has neither of these things, which is why the reasonability standard is important 2/
There are very few checks on the govt in Israel's system. Without the reasonability standard, there is nothing to prevent completely arbitrary actions against individuals since there is no bill of rights. There's little to prevent obvious corruption on the part of ministers 3/
Read 5 tweets
Mar 26, 2023
After all of the chaos, protests, reservists quitting, and Galant being axed, reports that finally Netanyahu is considering pausing things until late April. Important to understand what this and what it isn't.
It isn't a decision to drop the overhaul. If Netanyahu reversed course, he'd lose his coalition 3 seconds later. It is a tactical move that relies on two things: a pledge from protesters that they will suspend protests too, and a bet that their momentum will dissipate as a result
The ultra-orthodox parties aren't going to desert Netanyahu whatever he decides, but Religious Zionism will. So the plan is put things on ice through Passover and the Israeli civil holidays (Memorial and Independence Days), hold some "talks" with the opposition, and then resume
Read 7 tweets
Jan 7, 2021
This is going to be an unusually personal thread but bears putting out there. It relates to the people who have been expressing in different ways their realization after yesterday that their dismissal of those who warned about Trump’s authoritarianism was wrong or naive. THREAD
I used to be a very politically active conservative Republican. Weekly Standard subscription almost from the very beginning, worked for NY GOP campaigns (Pataki, D'Amato, Dennis Vacco for AG), college Republicans, founding member of NYU Law's libertarian law journal, etc.
I was a passionate supporter of the Iraq War, which was launched my first year in law school, because I was committed to the neoconservative vision of bringing democracy to the Middle East. This led to arguments with classmates that increased as the U.S. occupation went on
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(