The View Hysterically MELTS DOWN Over Trump’s Landslide Victory
Thank God people like this lost in a landslide. Take a moment to sit back and enjoy their spectacular defeat.
🧵 THREAD
Today’s unforgettable episode of ABC’s The View opened up with a teary-eyed Whoopi Goldberg and a miserable-looking Joy Behar admitting defeat.
After a long opening pause, broke the silence, asking the panel, “So, how do you feel?”—to which Joy Behar offered a somber, funeral-like response.
“People spoke. This is what people wanted. I vehemently disagree with the decision that Americans made... We should protest if the situation arises that we need to protest, which I’m sure it will. And I’ve been through this before with Nixon. It’s been very difficult, but boy, oh boy, do we have a country if we can keep it.”
Political commentator Alyssa Farah Griffin followed Behar’s melancholy comments, describing Trump’s massive, crushing victory as “beyond Reagan.”
“I didn’t expect it to be this resounding,” she said with astonishment. “And I think there are some lessons from it.”
In a surprising twist, Griffin dropped an unexpectedly good take about why the American people rejected the Democrats this November.
“I think we forget about rural America. I think the working class feels left behind. They feel like the powerful, the elite, only care about themselves and their power,” Griffin explained.
“And he [Trump] spoke to them. We may not have liked his words, but they turned out for him. I mean, the map was beyond Reagan what we saw last night. And I think we need to start listening more to the concerns of everyday Americans who feel like this system is failing.”
Sunny Hostin interjected with a complete meltdown, blaming “cultural resentment” for Trump’s landslide victory.
“I was so hopeful that a mixed-race woman married to a Jewish guy could be elected president of this country. And I think that it had nothing to do with policy. I think this was a referendum of cultural resentment in this country,” she lamented.
While Hostin blames YOU, enjoy this moment while it lasts. What you’re witnessing is the death rattle of the corporate media.
Ana Navarro, who attended Kamala’s election watch party last night, described the atmosphere as a “very sad scene.”
“I’m, uhh... I’m obviously very disappointed. I’m very sad. I was at the Kamala Harris headquarters yesterday in Washington, and it was a very sad scene. The mood turned immediately.”
Speaking like a true sore loser, Whoopi Goldberg openly disrespected Trump supporters by refusing to say his name, vowing never to speak it again.
“She [Kamala] did what she did. She was everywhere. She talked to everybody, and people didn’t come out. I don’t know why. And it doesn’t even matter. He’s now the president. I’m still not gonna say his name. That’s not gonna change.”
While you’re here, don’t forget to follow (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more threads like this one.
ABC News political director Rick Klein stunned the panel when he described Trump’s landslide victory as a “major statement” from the American people.
“The country was speaking pretty loudly... And I think it was a major statement about the state of the country,” he said.
Trump crushed Kamala Harris in the popular vote by nearly 5 million votes nationwide.
Sunny Hostin got a rude awakening when her co-host, Alyssa Farah Griffin, confronted her over her degrading remarks about female Trump supporters.
SUNNY HOSTIN: “So why do you think that uneducated white women voted against their reproductive health freedoms? And why do you think Latino men voted in favor of someone that's going to deport, says he's going to deport, the majority of his community?”
ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: “I don't think women like being called uneducated white women. I think the economy matters, national security matters, but when you put people in these boxes, I think that's a takeaway from this phrase.”
This is a jaw-dropping moment. For years, the corporate media has enabled the smearing of white people. Now, it's finally becoming socially unacceptable to do so. Good.
The View panel went into full coping mode when Whoopi Goldberg and Sunny Hostin claimed Kamala ran a “flawless campaign” despite the devastating defeat.
“She kicked his butt all over the country over the course of those two months...How much more could she have done?” Whoopi asked.
What Whoopi doesn’t realize is that Kamala had too much time to campaign.
She performed much better when she avoided media interviews and hid in the basement. But when people finally saw Kamala Harris and heard her speak, they were reminded why they never liked her in the first place.
After lacking the self-awareness to reflect on what the Democratic party got crushed at the ballot box, the show reached a fitting end when panelists Joy Behar and Sara Haines openly admitted their hate for the First Amendment.
Haines went as far as to call @ElonMusk’s 𝕏 a “rogue corporation” while pushing for social media regulation.
JOY BEHAR: “In Finland, kids in nursery school are learning to discern between fake news and real news. They should be teaching that in this country.”
SARA HAINES: “Well, it would help if we could regulate social media... They have not been able to do one thing in regard to the rogue corporations on social media.”
Thank God these people like this lost in a landslide. What a disaster that would have been.
@elonmusk Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this post, please do me a quick favor and follow this page (@VigilantFox) before you go.
And while you’re here, check out these 29 other truth-tellers to keep you informed over the next four years.
REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment.
Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells.
On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months.
This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans.
But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions.
Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line?
If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
#ad: The digital ID financial nightmare isn’t coming someday. It’s already here.
Once a single identity becomes the gateway to your money, your work, and your ability to participate in everyday life, compliance is no longer a choice.
That’s why Genesis Gold Group created the free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide.
It breaks down the real risks of digital ID and explains how physical gold and silver allow you to operate outside the system.
Digital dollars leave you exposed. Gold and silver can’t be frozen, tracked, or turned off.
Get your free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide right now at GoldandFreedom.com, before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear.
DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.
In other news, Republicans and Democrats are backing a bill that opens the door to mandatory Digital ID for every American.
It’s called the “Kids Off Social Media Act.” But it doesn’t just target kids. It targets you.
The bill bans anyone under 13 from having a social media account. Sounds reasonable—until you realize enforcement means scanning your face, checking your ID, or tracking your device… just to prove you’re old enough to speak online.
The bill doesn’t have to say “Digital ID.” The logic demands it. And once those systems are in place, they won’t stop at children. They’ll be used to control what you can say, see, and share.
Multiple states have already declared these laws unconstitutional. So why are Republicans still pushing them?
This is exactly how it started in the UK. Today, people are getting arrested for memes.
Watch @zeeemedia's report before they normalize this—and your freedom to speak anonymously disappears forever.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
Google why we no longer see crippled kids from polio. You’ll get one answer: vaccines.
But Dr. Suzanne Humphries says that’s not what the facts show—and when you dig into the history, the real story is jaw-dropping.
First off, polio never actually disappeared. “Polio is still here. Polio is still alive and well,” Humphries says.
What changed? The definition. Once the vaccine was introduced, the medical establishment redefined what counted as “polio.”
Humphries explains: “Polio is called different things today. Whereas back in the 1940s, 1950s, the criteria for diagnosing polio were completely different to the year that the vaccine was introduced. The playing field, the goalposts—everything was changed… they were able to show a complete cascading drop of paralytic polio simply because of the way they changed the definitions of what polio is and what could cause it.”
Suddenly, cases that would’ve been labeled polio were now called Guillain-Barré syndrome, coxsackievirus, echovirus—or simply chalked up to heavy metal poisoning. “They didn’t have virus, or they had coxsackievirus or echovirus, or they were lead poisoned or mercury poisoned, which was—the mercury and lead were the leading treatments of the day,” she said.
But it gets worse.
The rise of polio, she says, directly mirrored the use of toxic pesticides like DDT. “The tonnage of production of DDT absolutely mirrored the diagnosis for polio.” And even today, “the countries that still make DDT today is where we’re still seeing this paralytic polio situation happen.”
So what about the virus?
Polio virus, according to Humphries, is what’s known as a commensal—a normal virus that lives in most people without causing problems. In fact, “95 to 99% of all polio is asymptomatic.” She described a study of the Javante Indians where “98 to 99% of every person they tested… had evidence of immunity to all three strains of polio.”
When asked where all the paralyzed children were, she recalled: “They were like, ‘We don’t have any of that problem.’”
Humphries also points to a 1916 Rockefeller lab in Manhattan that, in her words, had “the specific stated goal… to try to create the most pathological, neuropathological strain of polio possible.” By injecting monkey brains and human spinal serum into monkeys, “there was a big problem with that, which was released into the public by accident. And the world experienced the worst polio epidemic on record. 25% mortality.”
Bottom line? According to Dr. Humphries, polio didn’t disappear because of vaccines. It disappeared behind a curtain of redefinitions, misdiagnoses, manmade disasters—and a whole lot of propaganda.
And if they went that far to deceive you about the polio vaccine, what else are they lying about? 🧵
Did you know the original smallpox vaccine caused serious injuries—and was often contaminated with pus, bacteria, and fungus?
We’ve been told it saved humanity from a deadly disease, but what if that’s a lie?
Dr. Suzanne Humphries explained to Joe Rogan what happened to children who received the vaccine. They developed large ulcers, high fevers, and widespread infections. With no antibiotics available, treatments were limited to mercury, arsenic, bloodletting, or isolation in dark rooms.
These severe reactions weren’t considered rare. In fact, they were referred to as “a good take.”
What made matters worse was how the vaccine was produced. According to Dr. Humphries, it was made by infecting animals and harvesting the resulting pus.
“They would take pus from other animals, scratch it into the belly of a cow, then take the pus off of the big pimples that would form,” she said. The material—called “pure lymph”—often came from cadavers, horses, or ulcerating cow udders, mixed with glycerin, and scratched into the surface of the skin.
Even decades later, contamination was an issue. “There was more bacteria and fungus in the smallpox vaccines than there was smallpox virus.” One widely used version, Dryvax, was eventually considered so problematic that health authorities ordered all remaining specimens destroyed around 2009.
Living conditions at the time were “a disaster.” Streets were filled with human and animal waste, there was no running water, and sanitation was nearly nonexistent. Poor hygiene and co-infections absolutely made smallpox far more deadly than it might have been otherwise.
Despite all this, the smallpox vaccine is still presented as a flawless triumph.
But for those who experienced the injuries firsthand, and for those who study its full history, the story isn’t so simple.
“This is the one vaccine that eliminated, eradicated a disease,” Dr. Humphries said sarcastically. “Can you believe that fairytale?”
We’ve all been taught that the smallpox vaccine was one of medicine’s greatest triumphs.
But when you read the actual clinical observations recorded by doctors who lived through its rollout, a far more unsettling picture emerges.
It’s not propaganda, and it’s not hindsight. It’s primary-source medicine.
There’s a reason doctors love pushing vaccines. The more they inject, the more money they make.
The foot traffic alone brings in big money, but there’s another perverse incentive, and once you hear it, it will make you angry.
RFK Jr. explains: “Pediatricians who vaccinate 80-85% of the kids in their office, get these giant bonuses... And that's why they throw you out of the office if you fight back…You'll lose them their bonuses.”
Sadly, these perverse financial incentives aren’t limited to vaccines but across many areas of medicine.
Dig a little deeper, and another disturbing pattern appears. Once you see it, you’re left gobsmacked by just how far the corruption runs beyond money. 🧵
The video below is haunting—not because the doctor in it is malicious, but because she genuinely believes she’s helping.
She’s an MD with a Master’s in Public Health, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a former leader at Georgetown. Her language is warm. Her intentions seem pure.
Yet this interview perfectly captures how public health has lost its way.
After conquering most deadly contagious diseases, it turned toward chronic illness—and failed.
Instead of questioning why children are getting sicker, it doubled down on vaccinating more, earlier, and without dissent, often dismissing safety concerns as heresy.
Watch this video. Then ask yourself what matters more in modern medicine: children’s outcomes—or institutional certainty.
A lawsuit filed several years ago exposed something far more disturbing than a single act of medical misconduct.
It revealed how, during COVID, core medical ethics quietly collapsed—how consent became optional, coercion was reframed as care, and vulnerable people were treated as obstacles rather than patients.
This isn’t about ideology. It’s about what happens when fear, authority, and institutional pressure override conscience.
The real cause of heart disease has been buried for decades in favor of the lie about cholesterol.
40 million Americans take statins to lower their cholesterol, thinking it’s the best way to protect their hearts.
But what doctors never tell them is that statins interfere with the body’s natural repair system, weakening the very cells that rely on cholesterol to function.
In trying to prevent disease, they’re paradoxically fueling it.
This report exposes what really happens to the body when you take a statin every day.
For years, doctors have been taught that high cholesterol causes heart attacks. They’ve passed the warning along to their patients, and most of us have believed them.
But that idea came from one man: Ancel Keys.
Keys cherry-picked data to make fat and cholesterol look deadly while ignoring the real culprit: sugar.
John Yudkin tried to warn the world that sugar—not fat—was driving heart disease. But no one listened. He was ridiculed, silenced, and erased from history.
In 2015, Scott Adams made a “crazy” prediction that most people thought was impossible.
He said Trump had a 98% chance of becoming president, and he made that call on a single observation.
The winning attribute that made Scott confident in Trump’s victory was his one-of-a-kind persuasion skills.
While political betting markets dismissed Trump’s chances, Adams argued—using his background in persuasion and hypnosis—that Trump was the most psychologically effective candidate in the race and therefore favored to win.
He built a massive following by showing how persuasion, not policy, drives political outcomes.
That insight proved correct. But it also revealed something darker. 🧵
After Trump’s victory, Adams pivoted to punditry—and during COVID, even he struggled to see the truth.
Scott strongly endorsed the vaccines, vaccinated himself, and publicly belittled followers who refused. Many later derisively called him “Clot Adams.”
In January 2023, Adams admitted—on video—that he’d been wrong and that the anti-vaxxers were correct. But he framed it as luck: the right people just happened to distrust the government, while “all the data” supposedly pointed intelligent analysts toward vaccination.
That framing matters. It reveals how even skilled observers of persuasion can mistake marketing consensus for truth—and how the same system that manufactures medical certainty also hides the limits of medicine, until reality forces a reckoning.
Last May, Scott told the world something most people never say out loud until it’s unavoidable: he had terminal, metastatic prostate cancer.
He openly stated he planned to use California’s medically assisted dying to reduce suffering.
He also shut down speculation—saying he had already tried fenbendazole and ivermectin and had no interest in continuing them.
The reaction was explosive.
People weren’t just debating treatment choices—they were watching, in real time, what a protracted, modern death actually looks like.
For many, it shattered comforting abstractions about both cancer and mortality.