/1🚨BREAKING — Our investigation has revealed that Senate staff appear to have shared sensitive FBI background investigation reports on nominees for Senate confirmation in beach of security protocols.
The background investigation process is broken and corrupted:
/2 Based on newly obtained documents from an investigation into the DOJ, we released a report for the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate concerning explosive new discoveries about the FBI’s flawed and unlawful background investigation (BI) process for nominees to positions that require Senate confirmation.
/3‼️Today’s investigative report reveals that Senate Judiciary Committee staff appear to have shared FBI background reports and personal financial information in breach of Senate security protocols. Worse, the Department of Justice appears to have shared encrypted information electronically, breaching privacy protections subject to its agreement with the White House.
/4 The improper handling of BI investigation materials is of critical importance because BIs can be weaponized against future nominees of any administration. The current practice violates the Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) between the White House and the Senate Judiciary Committee, the MOU between the White House and DOJ, as well as plain federal law prohibiting the breach of executive branch orders through the disclosure of sensitive information.
/5 The documents we obtained reveal that DOJ officials — who are not signatories to any agreement with the Senate Judiciary Committee — appear to have repeatedly shared BI and personal financial information with Senate Judiciary Committee staffers:
/6 At the same time as Senate majority staff were sending protected BI information to the executive branch, executive branch officials from the Justice Department disclosed BI information via email to Senate majority staff, thus appearing to violate the security protocols of the MOU (see e.g., the last redacted sentence below referring to an “FBI interview”):
/7 Justice Department officials also disclosed confidential financial information of nominees to Senate staff:
/8 Documents reveal that a DOJ official submitted encrypted “additional serials” regarding two nominees’ BIs:
/9 According to these new disturbing findings from our investigation, we have sent a letter to the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee @Jim_Jordan, Chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability @RepJamesComer, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee @SenatorDurbin, and Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee @SenGaryPeters demanding action by their respective Congressional committees to reform this flawed process immediately.
/10 In summary, discoveries from AFL’s investigation include the following highlights:
🚨Senate Judiciary Committee staff appear to have disclosed sensitive information outside the security process mandated in the MOU. For example, staff used non-secure Senate email systems to share FBI and financial information of nominees;
🚨Two Senate staff members appear to have electronically disclosed to executive branch officials FBI background reports, which constitute the confidential business of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, in violation of the MOU;
🚨Background investigation reports appear to have been removed from the custody of the Security Manager by non-designated Staff Members and sent electronically, in violation of the MOU’s security provisions, to executive branch officials;
🚨Senate Judiciary Committee staff appear to have failed to heed the command that “Designated Staff Members will maintain strict control of FBI background reports in their custody.”
@Jim_Jordan @RepJamesComer /11 AFL is committed to fighting this unacceptable abuse of the BI process, which has been and will be weaponized against nominees in any future administration, including the Trump Administration. aflegal.org/america-first-…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
/1🚨NEW — The Eleventh Circuit should affirm Judge Cannon’s ruling and order the destruction of Volume II of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s UNCONSTITUTIONAL investigation into President Trump.
/2 AFL’s amicus brief, filed in United States v. Knight First Amendment Institute, argues that because Volume II is the product of an unconstitutional investigation, it is not subject to the Federal Records Act and therefore does not need to be preserved under those provisions.
/3 AFL also argues that even if Volume II is subject to the Federal Records Act, it would still qualify for authorized disposition under the Records Disposal Act, and its disclosure would be prohibited by the Privacy Act of 1974.
AFL has released an updated parental opt-out template letter following SCOTUS’s decision in Mirabelli v. Bonta, reaffirming parents’ constitutional right to direct their children’s upbringing and education.
/2 AFL’s updated template letter incorporates the Supreme Court’s ruling in Mirabelli v. Bonta: schools may not facilitate a child’s “gender transition” without parental consent.
/3 Specifically, the revised template enables parents to demand notice and an opportunity to opt out of instruction or activities involving:
/1🚨NEW — AFL has partnered with @JustTheNews to reveal the Biden administration’s SCANDALOUS role in Fani Willis’s prosecution of President Trump in Fulton County, GA.
AFL and Just The News have uncovered more than 8,000 pages of unredacted records from the Fulton County DA.
/2 The documents expose extensive coordination between Willis’s office, the Biden administration’s DOJ, the White House, and Democrats on the J6 Select Committee as they pursued their criminal case against President Trump over challenges to Georgia’s 2020 election results.
/3 The records reveal what appears to be unprecedented federal assistance to a local partisan prosecution:
President Biden personally waived former Trump administration officials’ executive privilege, allowing Fulton prosecutors to interview Trump before a state grand jury.
/1🚨ROGUE REDISTRICTING — AFL is urging a federal court in Utah to reject a state judge’s congressional map.
The map was drawn by activists and partisan lawyers at the Elias Law Group and would redistrict about half a million voters from a single county into new districts.
/2 Late last year, a state judge ordered Utah’s lieutenant governor to use this new map that would redistrict approximately half a million voters and result in dramatic political point swings.
/3 AFL’s brief argues that this court-imposed congressional map violates federal law, including the U.S. Constitution’s Elections Clause, which requires courts to enforce the last map enacted by the legislature if the current one is unconstitutional.
/1🚨LITIGATION UPDATE — AFL has filed an amended complaint challenging the U.S. Census Bureau’s unlawful use of statistical methods in the 2020 Census.
The Constitution demands a complete and accurate Census.
The American people deserve nothing less.
/2 AFL’s complaint, filed in the District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, hones its claims to show that the Census Bureau’s COVID-19 pandemic-related decisions to suspend or alter standard agency procedures crossed the line and caused inaccurate results.
/3 The complaint emphasizes that the most significant COVID-19 pandemic-related change was a sharp increase in the use of imputation — a statistical method that uses someone else’s data to fill in a missing person’s information.
Accurate representation requires an accurate count.
The Trump Administration Wants White Men to Claim Discrimination. This Is What Happens When They Do
“Jeff Vaughn says it was a 2022 billboard that convinced him being White and male was becoming a liability.
The then-evening anchor at CBS’s flagship Los Angeles television station remembers seeing an ad for his news program — and realizing it didn’t feature him.”
“It did include all of his co-anchors, none of whom, he says, was a straight White man like him.
‘That was a real gut punch,’ Vaughn, 60, said in an interview.
‘If you take a look at every person that’s on the billboard, it’s somebody that CBS sees as checking the box, whether it’s a woman or a minority or LGBTQ.’”