/1🚨BREAKING — Our investigation has revealed that Senate staff appear to have shared sensitive FBI background investigation reports on nominees for Senate confirmation in beach of security protocols.
The background investigation process is broken and corrupted:
/2 Based on newly obtained documents from an investigation into the DOJ, we released a report for the U.S. House of Representatives and U.S. Senate concerning explosive new discoveries about the FBI’s flawed and unlawful background investigation (BI) process for nominees to positions that require Senate confirmation.
/3‼️Today’s investigative report reveals that Senate Judiciary Committee staff appear to have shared FBI background reports and personal financial information in breach of Senate security protocols. Worse, the Department of Justice appears to have shared encrypted information electronically, breaching privacy protections subject to its agreement with the White House.
/4 The improper handling of BI investigation materials is of critical importance because BIs can be weaponized against future nominees of any administration. The current practice violates the Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) between the White House and the Senate Judiciary Committee, the MOU between the White House and DOJ, as well as plain federal law prohibiting the breach of executive branch orders through the disclosure of sensitive information.
/5 The documents we obtained reveal that DOJ officials — who are not signatories to any agreement with the Senate Judiciary Committee — appear to have repeatedly shared BI and personal financial information with Senate Judiciary Committee staffers:
/6 At the same time as Senate majority staff were sending protected BI information to the executive branch, executive branch officials from the Justice Department disclosed BI information via email to Senate majority staff, thus appearing to violate the security protocols of the MOU (see e.g., the last redacted sentence below referring to an “FBI interview”):
/7 Justice Department officials also disclosed confidential financial information of nominees to Senate staff:
/8 Documents reveal that a DOJ official submitted encrypted “additional serials” regarding two nominees’ BIs:
/9 According to these new disturbing findings from our investigation, we have sent a letter to the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee @Jim_Jordan, Chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability @RepJamesComer, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee @SenatorDurbin, and Chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee @SenGaryPeters demanding action by their respective Congressional committees to reform this flawed process immediately.
/10 In summary, discoveries from AFL’s investigation include the following highlights:
🚨Senate Judiciary Committee staff appear to have disclosed sensitive information outside the security process mandated in the MOU. For example, staff used non-secure Senate email systems to share FBI and financial information of nominees;
🚨Two Senate staff members appear to have electronically disclosed to executive branch officials FBI background reports, which constitute the confidential business of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, in violation of the MOU;
🚨Background investigation reports appear to have been removed from the custody of the Security Manager by non-designated Staff Members and sent electronically, in violation of the MOU’s security provisions, to executive branch officials;
🚨Senate Judiciary Committee staff appear to have failed to heed the command that “Designated Staff Members will maintain strict control of FBI background reports in their custody.”
@Jim_Jordan @RepJamesComer /11 AFL is committed to fighting this unacceptable abuse of the BI process, which has been and will be weaponized against nominees in any future administration, including the Trump Administration. aflegal.org/america-first-…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
/1🚨BREAKING — AFL just sued HHS, CMS, and HRSA to expose a Biden-era DEI program that injects RACE into life-and-death organ transplants.
Race has no place in deciding who lives and who dies.
/2 Before leaving office, the Biden Administration overhauled the organ transplant system to advance its “racial equity” agenda, justified as a response to the “unbearable human costs of systemic racism.”
/3 Then-HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra said the system was “not immune to racial inequities” and pledged to reshape transplant policy around race.
/1🚨EXPOSED — Washington University in St. Louis doesn’t just indoctrinate students with DEI.
It subjects students to institutional training that redefines sex, compels speech, and enforces compliance with radical gender theory.
We have receipts.
/2 AFL has obtained class materials that show how @WashU pushes “infinite pronouns” like ze/hir and conditions students to practice “sitting in discomfort” instead of challenging the ideas being imposed.
Disagreement isn’t debated.
It’s pathologized.
@WashU /3 Students are taught that gender overrides biological sex.
Under WashU’s “trans umbrella,” gender encompasses genderqueer, agender, gender fluid, trans masculine/feminine, cross-dressers, and “Two-Spirit.”
This is ideological grooming masquerading as education.
Whistleblower audio reveals how Cherry Creek School District officials engineered policies that instruct staff to treat students differently based on race.
One educator says White students are experiencing racism.
Others say CCSD refuses to treat them the same.
/2 Staff openly question whether a mandatory “equity” training was about education — or about pushing an ideological agenda.
This training was not optional.
It came from CCSD.
/3 Staff warn that CCSD is quick to label MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS as “RACIST.”
One educator stood up for students:
➡️ “Kids say dumb stuff all the time.”
➡️ “Their frontal lobes aren’t developed yet.”
Nuance disappears when radical ideology takes over.
/1🚨NEW — AFL has sent a demand letter to Boston University over its failure to protect a student who received multiple death threats after reporting apparent violations of federal immigration law.
/2 AFL’s letter also formally notified BU that we now represent this student.
/3 Zachary Segal, a BU undergraduate, posted on X that he contacted U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to report what he believed to be violations of federal immigration law.
/1🚨LITIGATION UPDATE — AFL filed a reply brief in our landmark lawsuit seeking to stop the U.S. Census Bureau from using the flawed statistical methods from the 2020 Census.
This filing paves the way for a ruling early next year.
/2 The case has become the subject of attempts by third-party groups to stall AFL’s fight to ensure that the Census only counts actual people.
/3 AFL’s filing marks a critical stage of the litigation.
AFL’s claims in this lawsuit are now fully briefed and ready for a decision by the three-judge panel.
/1🚨BREAKING — AFL filed a federal civil rights complaint against Cherry Creek School District for branding student misconduct “culturally appropriate” and blocking student discipline based on race.
@TheJusticeDept and @usedgov must investigate.
The facts are OUTRAGEOUS.
/2 AFL’s complaint exposes a district-wide system of race-based decision making in which @CCSDK12 officials replaced equal treatment with ideological favoritism — including in student discipline.
Staff say this racial framework left them with “no ability to enforce anything.”
@CCSDK12 /3 AFL obtained whistleblower recordings revealing CCSD officials labeled disruptive misconduct by a Black student “culturally appropriate,” blamed staff concerns on the “whiteness of the school,” and used racial framing to override student discipline.