Decompressing from walking on eggshells for the past four years.
I have found the last four years to be an almost intolerable period. A very un-American period in that any questioning, any opinions, any likes or dislikes were held up to a very limited list of “permitted positions” in order to assess acceptability. 2/
I’ve never in my life known that to be an American environment. It’s an environment I have encountered in smaller groupings (a church, a private club,a clique), but never before as a national blanket. It has been suffocating. Common sense was discarded, intellectual discussion 3/
… was demonized. Only “permitted position” behavior and speech was “allowed.” Complete intolerance became almost a religion and one’s professional and social life was threatened almost constantly. Those that spoke otherwise were ruined as a warning to others.Their destruction 4/
… was displayed in the “town square” of social media for all to see. This was the #MeMeMeMeToo moment, where every effort was made to divert attention to oneself, instead of recognizing how one contributes to the whole.This was the era of trying to exercise control over those 5/
… who did not want to follow the crowd and has their own ideas about what they needed to do. This dampened our culture and innovation, bringing people to even think that generative #AI, a regurgitation of the past, was actually our cultural future. /6
When you starve a society of those called to be independent thinkers and cultural and intellectual innovators, you rob that society of any forward movement. Those that tried to impose that control maintained a kind of “hall monitor” position by threatening others with damning 7/
…labels like “Sexist,” “racist,” “homophobic,” etc, when the free-thinking and questioning was nothing of the sort. However, the mob mentality that followed caused these social convictions when there was often no evidence to support them. (See Charles McKay’s 1841 book, 8/
I am neither one extreme or the other, but am one of the millions of people who believe in common sense, and that everyone should be free to live their lives however they want, unless that freedom interferes with someone else’s freedom to live their own life.
That’s it. 10/fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#SocialMediaVideoCritique
- We again have that overhead light issue, but the director tries to counter that by putting a brimmed cap on the actor.
- Unfortunately, this causes a diffused light on the actor’s face. Better to turn off the overhead light and set a key light on 1/
-… the actor’s face.
- The footage is out of focus. We see the knit of the sweater in focus, but not our actor’s face. Be sure to rehearse beforehand to set focal distance.
- There are distracting objects in the background, one behind his head and one camera right. 2/
-… These pull the attention from the actor.
- The actor did not memorize his lines and we can see him reading from the cue cards. If this is necessary in your production, consider an earpiece through which the lines can be fed. Or shoot the scene in smaller, easy-to-memorize 3/
As a filmmaker, I want to point out the issues with these recently released projects. #SocialMediaVideoCritique
- The actress starts out 3/4 figure, but the she needs to lean over to have her 2-Ts shot in frame. Consider placing the camera higher, so she doesn’t have to 1/
-…make this effort.
- the dialogue is spoken at low volume and is difficult to hear. Perhaps the Director is adding the element of danger, and that there was someone in the house who might be dismayed by this scene. Or perhaps the location was not secured with permits, etc.. 2/
- If the former is true, we needed some indication of that. If the later was true, prep properly like we said.
- She adjusts her hair frequently and it breaks the focus of the scene. Even when working with a skeleton crew, 3/
Are you paying attention? Do you see what is creeping along, seeping into our systems and institutions? See how Altman & other tech bros are planting this “#AI religion”? That their AI models are “god,” always with you, giving you “wisdom,” and 1/
Altman suggesting God is onboard with this plan to replace our relationship with Him with a relationship with #AI models instead. Watch closely. They will say things like this more and more, so they can suck the life out of you, emotionally, 2/
spiritually, intellectually, & (their ultimate goal) financially. First, it’s something to “help you,” then it’s “AI can do it better,” then it’s “we don’t need you,” then UBI & loss of purpose, then it’s loss of identity & agency. Don’t let them steal your life from you. 3/fin
I hope people are understanding what’s being said by Sam Altman, the lunatic to whom everyone is capitulating their lives. He is lying that #AGI is “inevitable.” It’s like saying the pouring of sugar over everything you eat is “inevitable,” because he benefits from the pour. 1/
This quote is supposed to refer to OpenAI’s “safety issue.” It also reflects Altman’s refrain, insisting we need some dumb algorithmic formula to pretend to “think” for us. “Life’s too hard, you have to have #AI do it for you.”
Complete nonsense. 2/ mashable.com/article/openai…
And this quote below is code for “You must divert as much of the world’s money as possible our way.” See? If he’s convinced you of the first “learned helplessness” position, that #AI is inevitable because humans can’t handle life, then… 3/
#SAG Actors, I want to make you aware of some of the language in the #AI portion of the tentative SAG agreement.
Though SAG leadership made much effort to protect members in AI, there are many issues you should look at. I have saved the most serious issue for the end. 1/
If a “digital double” is made of you during a film, they must get your consent and inform you of their intentions for its use, EXCEPT "when the photography or sound track remains substantially as scripted, performed and/or recorded.”2/
This is going to be left up to the studios/streamers’ interpretation. And so, any subtlety regarding how you chose to look or move for the character during the shoot could potentially be changed. Your hair, your clothes, your make-up, etc. 3/
On the eve of the AMPTP #SAG negotiations resuming, I want to remind actors, particularly the most famous of you, of what’s at stake in #AI. As the AI advisor to the SAG talks, I won’t be able to speak as freely once the negotiations resume. 1/
As of now, there are no entertainment union restrictions on generative #AI models ingesting 100 years of films/series, slicing and dicing them, and then popping out patchwork spoonfuls of all that work.
I assume the AMPTP is going to try to pattern-bargain that on SAG. 2/
But while writers and directors have multiple scripts/directions, actors have just ONE face/body/voice. Once their body movements, voice, gestures, and essence is freely put in the AI blender, our business is all but finished. 3/