Nicole Lee Schroeder, PhD Profile picture
Nov 9, 2024 9 tweets 2 min read Read on X
It is a really jarring moment to be a historian. To know what might be coming is alarming. To realize that no one around you sees it or acknowledges it is a weird place to be in. Its like time traveling without time traveling. 1/8
I study the 19th century and the 2020s look a lot like 1820s. Frequent epidemics? Check. Inflation? Check. Xenophobia and deportation schemes? Check. Womens rights losses? Check. Rampant backlash against womens economic freedoms and jobs outside the home? Check. 2/8
Growth of carceral facilities? Check. Legislation to forcibly institutionalize disabled people? Check. Targeted attacks on Indigenous peoples? Check. Extreme religious fervor? Check. Efforts to shape public school curriculum with religious rhetoric? Check. Tariffs? Check. 3/8
The antebellum era was a time of progress, but it was also a time fuelled by hate. Slavery fuelled the economy, and antislavery efforts were not very radical on the whole. Hatred against immigrants was widespread and poverty was extensive. 4/8
Everything we are seeing right now happened in the early 1800s. And these choices were fuelled by white supremacy, misogyny, and xenophobia. I really wish more people understood that we've been here and done this. Life only got better for those who actively oppressed others. 5/8
Its time to learn from that history if you havent already. We cannot go back to that. For anyone despairing, its also time to learn from the radical activists who shaped resistance. 19th century activists didnt lose hope, we cannot lose hope either. 6/8
Abolitionists, womens rights organizers, workers rights unions, disability rights orgs, and pro-immigration orgs did the work under far worse circumstances with very little global solidarity. We have better tools, connections, and resources. 7/8
If youre in despair, pick up a history book. Before every win for human rights came a fight for it. We are now a part of that fight. We are not alone. We have all of these histories to guide us. 8/8
People have been asking for book recs - I will make a google sheet next week with some recs! This weekend I am resting, spending time in nature, and making crafts. The work to protect human rights never stops - carve out rest when/where you can.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nicole Lee Schroeder, PhD

Nicole Lee Schroeder, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Nicole_Lee_Sch

Mar 3
Lots of folks out here who drool over AI are just showing their (already) problematic ways of thinking about production. Claiming you dont do data cleaning, lit review, etc and just shove these off on collaborators is not something you should brag about. 1/5
You should actually form your ideas based on your own synthesis of the field. You should read enough to know youre making a contribution. And if you share this work with grad students lord I hope youre teaching them how to DO it well. 2/5
There is value in training the next generation of scholars. Theres value in letting someone shadow you. Theres value in saying "lets both clean the dataset separately, come back, and confirm we got the same results." 3/5
Read 5 tweets
Feb 26
Wow the plan is just eugenics. So much for providing healthcare for disabled people. This forces disabled people into poverty, it deprives them of mobility and access, and it harkens back to ages of forced institutionalization.
A moratorium on new suppliers when there is already a lack of suppliers will, in fact, harm disabled people who need these things. It often takes MONTHS to get these items, esp if insurance is involved, and there are not enough providers.
Not to mention AI screening is going to be used with little recourse for any mistakes made. The Trump admin wants to claim HCBS funding increades are fraud when HCBS already wildly underfunded and few disabled ppl get the respurces they deserve.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 20
Disabled people called this a mass disabling event and cautioned people on how capitalism would plow ahead with disablement and death years ago. Sorry if someone of us are tired of watching our loved ones die, lose their health, and lose their jobs. 1/4
Like I cannot stress how many loved ones are out of work because of ableism, I cannot stress how many people are dealing with long covid on top of existing disabilities. I cannot stress how demoralizing it is to constantly be discriminated against. 2/4
Its exhausting to try to give people receipts, to flag scientific research, to make that research understandable. And then to have someone turn around and go "no I dont like what youre saying fuck you." Ok I dont like this either? 3/4
Read 4 tweets
Dec 29, 2025
Im #OneOfTheTwo because Im already disabled, and I know nothing is capable of saving me in this capitalist hellscape. No govt, no partner, no family member can save me if I become too disabled to work. If I cant work, I cant get the meds I need to stay alive. 1/5
Being disabled is incredibly expensive. Securing drs, paying for scans and bloodwork, covering compounded meds, buying safe foods - I could not afford these things on disability. I literally cannot afford to become more unwell. 2/5
As a historian I know what the government does to people it does not want to care for. And as a disabled community member, I see how poverty accelerates community members towards preventable deaths. 3/5
Read 5 tweets
Jul 23, 2025
In the 1810s, economists and govt officials in Europe and the US conducted a ton of poverty investigations. They concluded that poor people were poor because they were just lazy immoral alcoholics. Officials recommended mass incarceration. 1/9
Officials complained that "foreigners" were overcrowding American hospitals, that pension recipients were "faking" disability, and that everyone out of work receiving charity should be institutionalized and forced to work by the govt. 2/9
Officials argued that people needed to feel the "fear" and "shame" of poverty (see Philly report linked below) to actually change. Officials wanted to design a system where welfare was so terrible that ppl would do anything to avoid asking the govt for help. 3/9
Read 9 tweets
Jul 23, 2025
Poverty history is wild bc youll get:

Historian #1: wealthy ppl got upset they had to pay taxes for poor relief, so they built the carceral state and passed laws to cut relief. This was bad for poor people. Costs went down bc of threats of incarceration. 1/5
Historian #2: the city was plagued with high poverty rates, so the govt passed laws to regulate relief. Costs went down bc the city hired more govt officials to screen applicants and made "better" choices about who "deserved" care. This was good. 2/5
I google these people.

#1 - history prof, multiple teaching awards, wrote extensively on childhood, poverty, crime, family

#2 - econ prof who then worked in NYC as an economist 3/5
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(