tern Profile picture
Nov 9, 2024 49 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Oh my word.
I've had a realisation about one of the sliding doors moments in the pandemic.

I had a chat with a consultant anaesthetist a couple of months ago when he asked me why I wore an ffp3 mask, and a couple of things he said in reply didn't make sense.
His words had been bouncing round in the back of my head all this time, then I saw something today that made complete sense of them.
He had been talking about the distinction between droplets and aerosols and how he had had training and briefings at which he had seen studies that had *proven* that most transmission in healthcare settings was *at close range*.
(I'm going to come back to several things in that sentence)
Based on that, he thought that surgical masks ('fluid resistant/repellant surgical masks', frsm) were adequate to stop transmission.
In his mind, 'close range' and 'short range' meant *droplets*.
He had a complete misunderstanding of the concept of droplets v aerosols.
And now I'm wondering if it applies to more people than just him.
Now let's make this clear:
This is someone extremely clever.
He has an excellent memory.
He has brilliant problem solving skills.
He is very kind and thoughtful.
It took him 14 years of training and practice to go from being a first year medical student to becoming a consultant anaesthetist.
This is someone that I respect and admire in a dozen ways.
*but*
Anaesthetists are absolute classic *team players*.
You look up team player or specialist in the book, and there's a picture of them.
They do their role in the corner of the operating theatre.
Calm, unflappable, but they are performing *their role* and leaving the other roles up to other people.
Do they keep watch over the surgeon's shoulder to see if the scalpel is going in the right place?

No.
Do they check up on what the infection control team are saying about how covid infects people?

No.
In his mind, he had filed away 'droplet' and 'close range' in the same box, and never thought about them again.
And he had filed 'droplets' and 'fluid resistant masks' in the same box and never thought about them any more either.
When the actual truth is that *close range* transmission can be by both droplets *and* aerosols.
Think of a smoker.

Do they exhale smoke as droplets in the traditional transmission sense of droplets?
In that sense, 'droplets' are thought of like little raindrops of spit and mucus that travel on a parabola, an arc, a trajectory and fall to the ground.
But a smoker doesn't produce droplets.
They produce aerosols.
If a smoker is smoking, where would you be most likely to inhale lots of smoke from them?
***** AT CLOSE RANGE *****
I am sitting here wondering how many healthcare professionals think the same as my friend.
No wonder I didn't understand what he was saying at the time, and that it took months for me to figure it out.
He was saying things that didn't make sense as well as having a different meaning to what I understood by those words as well as breaking the laws of physics.
Where are you most likely to inhale exhaled aerosols?
*** UP CLOSE ***
He has been wearing FRSMs, surgical masks, for maybe 30 years now.

He has worn them for many of his working days in that time. In his mind, they were good enough then, and they're good enough now.
But somewhere in that kind, intelligent, analytical mind of his, he has completely lost touch with the actual reality of the situation.
I wonder how many health care workers this applies to.
A complete misapprehension of the physics.
A complete lack of understanding.
A gaping chasm between something that they have been taught wrongly and the actual reality.
To summarise:

How many medical professionals think that "predominantly spread by close range transmission" means "not aerosols only droplets"?
And:

HOW COULD THEY BE THAT STUPID.
One footnote:

American presidents have predominantly been assassinated at close range.
Three quarters of American presidential assassinations have been conducted by close range assassins.
But that doesn't mean long range assassination can't take place.
And more to the point: if you're in a hospital, you have close range encounters. Everyone has close range encounters in medical care.
Of course most of the people are going to have close range exposure and pick things up by close range transmission in hospital.
But do you know what?

Even if they don't have close range exposure, they would have caught it anyway.
Do you know one of the groups in healthcare that had the *highest* rates of infection?
*cleaners*
Cleaners, who would have far less close contact than doctors or nurses.
Covid can get you up close, but actually, if it doesn't get you up close, it will have a good attempt at getting you at distance, because Covid isn't spread *primarily by droplets*, it's spread *primarily by aerosols*.
Fog not rain.
Smoke not chewed tobacco spit.
**and close range aerosols are the worst of all**.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with tern

tern Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @1goodtern

Nov 7
So... teeth eh.

I went to visit a 45 year old man in hospital today.
He's recovering from complications of his recovery from surgery after an infection... and he said that while he was ill, three of his teeth fell out.

So I thought I'd look up statistics on teeth...
Brace yourself.
No pun intended.
Read 44 tweets
Nov 7
Look out for sharp increases in the last couple of years.
Cervix. Image
Read 28 tweets
Nov 6
The five things you need to know if you're just realising that it's bad for you to keep catching Covid:
1
You can't properly reduce your risk of catching Covid and still look normal.
That may seem like an odd one to start with, but it's a truth you've got to get your head around.

You're either going to look normal and keep catching Covid endlessly, or reduce your risk of infection and not look normal.
Read 67 tweets
Nov 3
I have had another horrible realisation. It suddenly made sense of *loads* of things about the effects of covid infection itself, but it also made massive sense of why public health is missing what's going on.
🧵🙏
This is hard to articulate coherently, but I'm going to try.
They're trying to have the best of both worlds, the best of every world...

I'm fumbling for words here, but I'll get them right.

Please stay with me... ❤️🙏
Read 81 tweets
Nov 1
I just want to do a quick thread about the doubling and more of sickness absence of young doctors.

Some graphs with real genuine NHS data on them.
There is no equivalent dataset to this here in this country as far as I know.

The NHS is the largest employer in this country, about the sixth largest employer in the world.

So this database is *huge*.
It represents every single community in the country.
Read 45 tweets
Oct 31
I occasionally talk about how hideously incompetent the ukhsa is.

And, yes, it's hard to tell if it's hideous incompetence or plain malice sometimes.

Here's an example.

🧵 Image
This discussion of the autumn booster contains this piece of staggering inaccuracy: Image
This is *staggeringly wrong*:

"those who received a vaccine were around 43% less likely to be admitted to hospital with COVID-19 from 2 weeks following vaccination, compared to those who remained unvaccinated"
Read 26 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(