The main miscreants in trying to abolish other people's histories and cultures are Jews and Blacks.
They form hate-monitoring groups and put other people's flags on their hate-lists.
They want special protection for themselves, while trying to destroy other people's heritage.
Not saying you don't get white people behaving this way, but whites who do this are a minority.
Jews and Blacks who do this are a majority, at least 80% of their group behave this way. They have two priorities in life: special favors for their group and cancelling other groups.
The only reason we go along with this epic and stunning hypocrisy is that we're a society that's become accustomed to hypocrisy and we no longer see anything wrong with it.
Hypocrisy is dishonest, that's why it's wrong.
Live not by lies.
Follow the Golden Rule - do as you would be done by.
To ensure that nobody tries to destroy your group, do not try to destroy their group.
The main reason these miscreants want special protection is to shield themselves from facing the types of attacks they launch at others.
"We're a special legal protected group, that means we can attack you with impunity but if you attack us back that's racist!"
This is why they need their special legal protection - to enable them to launch attacks on others from a position of artificial safety.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
That's not counting other less high profile epic failures, like Ibram Kendi who was awarded $40 million in research funding and produced no research.
Black people are so gullible. They're offered high profile positions to showcase wokery and they just say YES!
Farcical.
Everyone is telling Kemi she's just like Mrs Thatcher.
I guess she believes them.
Like many wise men have said - Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell, Walter Williams - you should be proud of who you are. You don't have to pretend to be like Mrs Thatcher when you're not. Just say no.
When Britain banned the slave trade they sent an unarmed delegation to West Africa to inform the slaver-kings that slavery was henceforth illegal.
The slaver-kings slaughtered the British delegation in cold blood.
They didn't see why they had to stop slaving.
Look up the story of how the Benin Bronzes ended up in Britain. They were seized during a punitive expedition sent by the Royal Navy to avenge this outrage.
Slavery was a lucrative trade for West African slaver kingdoms. They'd traded slaves with Arabs for centuries. They didn't see what gave Britain the right to tell them their own business.
"Who are you to ban the slave trade? Who made you king of the world?"
"“We do not hate blacks,” Terreblanche once said. “We want to tell them to keep their feet off our land.” The survival instinct rather than strong political beliefs was his motivating force. Constitutional changes undermining apartheid alarmed him."
He was right to be alarmed.
"His convictions of white supremacy in South Africa were underpinned by religious beliefs, stemming from the Battle of Blood River in 1838 during the historic Boer trek into the hinterland. From their wagon laager between a tributary of Buffalo River and a wide ditch, a force of about 500 Voortrekkers with rifles and two cannons routed 6,000 Zulus armed with assegais and shields."
"So many Zulus were slaughtered that the water ran red and so earned the river its new name. Three whites were slightly wounded. Before the battle the Boers pledged that if God gave them victory they and their descendants would always commemorate the day. For Terreblanche that represented a covenant never to be broken or even challenged."
Yes, it is estimated that over 2000 language groups were exterminated by the Bantu during their migration eastwards and southwards across Africa from the Congo.
Oh, wait, they don't like it if you say exterminated, they prefer the words "unified" or "absorbed" by the Bantu.
Or you can use the phrase "received significant gene-flow". That's how you explain why the genes of the "unified" people are now "absorbed" by the Bantu, while avoiding the word exterminated which upsets people.
It's funny that critical race theorists accuse John Rawls of not being diverse and inclusive, because he failed to include the Third World in his wealth-redistribution concept of justice.
It's funny because Rawls used to be the god of the progressives, now they've turned on him.
His progressive defenders, who threw people out of the academic citadel for failing to venerate Rawls, won't defend him. They'll just look the other way and pretend not to see him being denounced. They're too chicken to defend him as he was a white male and thus PROBLEMATIC, haha