Equity laws in South Africa are using quotas to exclude white people from employment.

"The EEA amendment applies to all businesses who employ more than 50 people. They are to submit plans detailing how their companies will achieve stipulated equity targets." The equity targets are set by the government (minister of employment and labour) and it's mandatory for employers to comply.

Fines for non-compliance range between ZAR 1.5 million or 2% of the employer's annual turnover, up to ZAR 2.7 million or 10% of annual turnover.

Where are the bricks that were removed yesterday from the Confederate memorial in North Carolina? Where are the bricks?

And you, Georgia, where is the Lion of Atlanta? Where have you hidden him? Give him back to the families who paid for him!

So much theft and corruption!

https://twitter.com/FredBonegtr/status/1961145196395020532

This is why Asheville had the Vance memorial crushed to dust and chemically destroyed so not a single speck would remain that could be retrieved by the families.

They are corrupt, thieving, and malicious to boot. And they parade themselves as the "good" and "moral" people.

They keep telling you "not all blacks are like that".

Well, let's see the statistics 🧐 Statistics for the UK are similar

She blocked me so I can't correct her - she's wrong about this.

White farmers don't own 70% of the land in South Africa, they own 70% of FARMLAND.

That's because they cultivated it into farmland with the sweat of their own brow - it wasn't "farmland" before they cultivated it. Commies are now saying they want their "fair share" of farmland cultivated by the Boers.

It was suspected that Dred Scott was a test case, like the Rosa Parks case, where activists prepare a set of facts to challenge a law they deem to be unconscionable. The family that owned him, the Blow family, appear to have had abolitionist sympathies. They were his friends and supporters. So why didn't they just free him? That would have been the obvious thing to do. But they didn't just want to free him, they wanted to take down slavery.

Thank you, Sir!

I have the measure of these activists, they want slavery to be the always and forever topic. Whatever you say they respond with "but what about slavery?"

- South Carolinians are the truest Americans
- But what about slavery?

Even DEI lawfare is about slavery

https://twitter.com/Jeff_Davis1808/status/1896214348256919750

Filed in Alabama in January 2025

Yankees are brazenly blaming capitalism on the South. It's not a spoof, this is the actual NYT 1619 project.

America's slave traders were from New England and New York. New Yorkers illegally traded slaves until the 1860s, now they want to blame it all on the South. Yankees brazenly erasing their own role from the historical record.

They're teaching that slaves freed themselves.

As for how slaves got to America in the first place, they use the passive voice: they "were brought", they "were traded" - they don't say it was done by Yankees!

Some slaveowners were pretty lenient and left their slaves de facto free. Some like Stonewall Jackson also taught slaves to read and write.

This really aggravated the nasty slaveowners whose view was "we ALL need to follow the rules of slavery, or you'll make us look bad" "Please don't give your slaves the weekend off, as I won't be letting mine off and you'll make me look bad"

That was their reasoning. Same people as wanted to enforce Jim Crow laws when nobody else was bothered.

Such people are the total worst.

Notice the word "farm". It says FARM ownership.

The reason white farmers own most FARMS is because they created those farms. Boer = Farmer

These ignorant Bantus think farms created themselves by magic, so they're wondering why all the magic farms were "distributed" to whites.

https://twitter.com/VOIDBOURGEOISIE/status/1888541448934400474

There's not much you can say when you're dealing with people who are this stupid and ignorant.

If you build anything they'll soon come along and ask why it was "distributed" to you and demand their fair share.

She locked her replies. A Virginia politician who posted a framed picture of the destruction of the Lee memorial. She said monuments were built for the sole purposes of intimidating black people.

She was afraid of the oncoming ratio so she locked her replies. Jeff Davis was right in there with his reply, he fact-checked her

So I was right. This is really happening 👇

https://twitter.com/alincognito202/status/1883054649047228919

I was right. You can see it unfolding in real time just by googling what they're saying about the "Civil War".

Go on all the establishment-history websites and it's right there. Fairy tales recounted casually as "history" as if it's not even contested.

These girls were just children, 10, 11, 12 years old. Their parents tried to protect them, but these gang members would wait outside the school gates to pick up the girls.

Police fobbed the parents off and said it was the girls' fault for going with the men.

Poor children 💔😡 Police were ruled "institutionally racist" some years before, so their priority in the child abuse cases was not to be called racist. That's why they refused to get involved.

Police left those poor families to fend for themselves because they were afraid of being called racist.

Lincoln didn't invade South Carolina with the aim of freeing slaves. He invaded South Carolina because she seceded. Lincoln's aim was to keep the Union together by any means necessary.

Why did SC secede? She didn't want to pay for an Empire in which she could not participate. The South, especially South Carolina, were paying for Lincoln's Empire Building in the West, and Lincoln's plan was that no Southern state would be allowed to participate in the Westward expansion as that would be for white people only.

And the South had 4 million black people.

Nathan Bedford Forrest was a good man who did his duty to God and Country as he believed that duty to be.

But even if you don't agree with that, and you're upset that he took up arms to defend the South in 1861, it doesn't justify you in desecrating his and his wife's graves. Deep wounds were inflicted by BLM when they desecrated Confederate graves. No amount of disagreeing about historical events entitles anyone to do that. It's barbaric.

The main miscreants in trying to abolish other people's histories and cultures are Jews and Blacks.

They form hate-monitoring groups and put other people's flags on their hate-lists.

They want special protection for themselves, while trying to destroy other people's heritage. Not saying you don't get white people behaving this way, but whites who do this are a minority.

Jews and Blacks who do this are a majority, at least 80% of their group behave this way. They have two priorities in life: special favors for their group and cancelling other groups.

The shortest ever tenure as Harvard President was a black woman, demoted for plagiarism.

A black woman went down in history as the shortest ever tenure running John Lewis, axed for nearly bankrupting it.

A black man has the honor of the shortest stint as Chancellor of the UK.

https://twitter.com/Conservatives/status/1852669522932621535

That's not counting other less high profile epic failures, like Ibram Kendi who was awarded $40 million in research funding and produced no research.

Black people are so gullible. They're offered high profile positions to showcase wokery and they just say YES!

Farcical.

When Britain banned the slave trade they sent an unarmed delegation to West Africa to inform the slaver-kings that slavery was henceforth illegal.

The slaver-kings slaughtered the British delegation in cold blood.

They didn't see why they had to stop slaving. Look up the story of how the Benin Bronzes ended up in Britain. They were seized during a punitive expedition sent by the Royal Navy to avenge this outrage.

"“We do not hate blacks,” Terreblanche once said. “We want to tell them to keep their feet off our land.” The survival instinct rather than strong political beliefs was his motivating force. Constitutional changes undermining apartheid alarmed him."

He was right to be alarmed. "His convictions of white supremacy in South Africa were underpinned by religious beliefs, stemming from the Battle of Blood River in 1838 during the historic Boer trek into the hinterland. From their wagon laager between a tributary of Buffalo River and a wide ditch, a force of about 500 Voortrekkers with rifles and two cannons routed 6,000 Zulus armed with assegais and shields."

A childminder, arrested by police for writing angry tweets about the murdered children and charged with inciting racial hatred.

I can understand why a professional childminder would feel angry about the murders. Now she's been deregistered by Ofsted.

telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/08/0… Over 400 ordinary British people arrested and charged with racial-hatred crimes.

This is a terrible decision by the two-tier government.

If people didn't harbour racial hatred before, they sure will now.

Yes, it is estimated that over 2000 language groups were exterminated by the Bantu during their migration eastwards and southwards across Africa from the Congo.

Oh, wait, they don't like it if you say exterminated, they prefer the words "unified" or "absorbed" by the Bantu.

https://twitter.com/Adornedinterior/status/1794663384287412589

Or you can use the phrase "received significant gene-flow". That's how you explain why the genes of the "unified" people are now "absorbed" by the Bantu, while avoiding the word exterminated which upsets people.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bantu_exp…

It's funny that critical race theorists accuse John Rawls of not being diverse and inclusive, because he failed to include the Third World in his wealth-redistribution concept of justice.

It's funny because Rawls used to be the god of the progressives, now they've turned on him. His progressive defenders, who threw people out of the academic citadel for failing to venerate Rawls, won't defend him. They'll just look the other way and pretend not to see him being denounced. They're too chicken to defend him as he was a white male and thus PROBLEMATIC, haha