Labrador Skeptic Profile picture
Nov 15 4 tweets 1 min read Read on X
In other words, the source of a declining number of males fit for combat, is female elementary teachers waging a war on masculinity.

They help gets boys diagnosed with ADHD, easier to handle in classroom, but their lives are screwed up.

Two of my son's teachers suggested
1/
that he be evaluated for learning problems when he was in elementary school, that would have likely led to prescription medication.

He's an A student in high school taking a rigorous curriculum of AP & Honors courses. There's absolutely nothing wrong with him, he can
2/
can concentrate on difficult subject like Calculus & Physics for hours on end - unlike your average elementary school teacher.

But yet, they want the boys on drugs. Makes the classroom easier for them, reduces that toxic masculinity.
3/
And guess what? A nation that lets toxic women drug any boys that show signs of normal masculinity doesn't get to have future soldiers, among many other problems.

Actions have consequences. Letting these women remain in those position will continue to screw up this nation.
4/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Labrador Skeptic

Labrador Skeptic Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SaysSimulation

Nov 23
With the likely but not certain announcement of Brooke Rollins @BrookeLRollins as Ag Secretary, I decided to do a little digging. Preliminary conclusion is that while she won't make people in regenerative agriculture happy, she could be a lot worse as well.
1/
@BrookeLRollins Quick background: rural girl from TX, FFA, 4H, earned an Ag degree from Texas A&M, four children. However, she went straight from the College of Agriculture to Law School, and hasn't looked back, though she maintains contacts with some women's ag groups, and insists FFA
2/
@BrookeLRollins was a life transforming experience for her.

Big Trump insider in his first term. Current head of the America First Policy Institute👇
3/
americafirstpolicy.com/team/brookerol…
Read 8 tweets
Nov 21
To be clear, I'm not anti-European at all. We're cousins within the same larger Western civilization, and I wish you all the best.

The issue is the international "elites" who dominate both sides, and who for their own benefit, have made the decision to use Heartland Americans
1/
as the Warrior for empire, making us pay the blood price, even as the American people are taxed to pay for the military side of the Empire.

We the people of the Heartland are done with that - and we never wanted it in the first place.
2/
Wilson had to lie about WWI to get elected, and FDR had to do the same with regard to WWII.

This is something critical, that I think many Europeans simply don't see or understand.

America is the government, the multinational corporations, the large coastal cities,
3/
Read 6 tweets
Nov 21
We're living in insane times. Somebody in the US govt, we have no idea who or what is playing insane escalation games, after having just lost the elections. Sending US missiles into Russia proper is the stuff of madness.

Putin launching an ICBM right after the cables are cut
1/
in the Baltic Sea shows that Russia is prepared to escalate right back. This kind of escalation spiral can indeed end up in nuclear war, the only sure way out is to stop and walk back the escalation right now, today, this week.
2/
This should be the #1 topic of politics & elections - but it is barely noticed.

This is starting to blackpill me on Democracy. There is a certain Darwinian process here. When there is a risk of actual nuclear war, and people are voting primarily on the basis of racial
3/
Read 5 tweets
Nov 17
This is one of my more important posts (which means likely few will see it, LOL).

What is widely misunderstood about masculinity & organized violence is that it is from a genetic perspective it is primarily defensive & not offensive.

Consider the story of your Y chromosome
1/
over the last 50,00 years. With 25 year generations, that would be going back 2,000 generations.

For your Y chromosome to exist today, it had to be successfully defended 2,000 times. In the face of what is now believed to be a very long time history of organized violence
2/
between different groups & tribes - the defense had to be near perfect for you to be here today.

Yes, there were occasionally genetic wipe out events, where there were conquests & the defensive males were wiped out, and the conquerors bred the females. We all have those genes
3/
Read 8 tweets
Nov 17
While this is very different from bronzed Greek warriors - what is described below is a very real part of my Midwestern Heritage.

My ancestors were part of the 2 century push from the Atlantic seaboard through the Midwest. There were close to 2 centuries of Indian raids,
1/
that got much worse during the 3 wars, as well as rough elements with almost no law enforcement.

Communities of men banded together in small armed groups to defend their families & communities. It's why I'm here today, and it's relatively recent.
2/
As previously discussed, it's interesting how little we are taught today about that two-century process, likely for several reasons, including establishing heritage Americans as a distinct group, and colonialism.

So people talk about raiding war bands from 2 & 3 thousand
3/
Read 4 tweets
Nov 16
This is always the question when the whole Left does something remarkably stupid. Was it because:

1. They're stupid (it's accidental).
2. They're very smart but evil (it's intentional).
3. They're being paid to destroy us (it's intentional).

The default answer should be #1.
1/
Most of the population cannot properly do hypotheticals. Oh, sure maybe your peers can do so, but the overall population - not so much.

I've dealt with enough people in high level jobs to know that most do not do 2nd or 3rd order effects - UNLESS there's a common paradigm
2/
going around in the media or their industry. So, yes, if the 2nd order effect is pointed out to them, or it's trendy, then yes, they do so and proves they're one of the smart ones.

Start identifying those 2nd or 3rd effects on a completely original basis? Hey, millions of people
3/
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(