that he be evaluated for learning problems when he was in elementary school, that would have likely led to prescription medication.
He's an A student in high school taking a rigorous curriculum of AP & Honors courses. There's absolutely nothing wrong with him, he can
2/
can concentrate on difficult subject like Calculus & Physics for hours on end - unlike your average elementary school teacher.
But yet, they want the boys on drugs. Makes the classroom easier for them, reduces that toxic masculinity.
3/
And guess what? A nation that lets toxic women drug any boys that show signs of normal masculinity doesn't get to have future soldiers, among many other problems.
Actions have consequences. Letting these women remain in those position will continue to screw up this nation.
4/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My only quibble is that "industrialization" misses the mark. The Agricultural Revolution came before the Industrial Revolution, it is what created the surplus calories, and those excess calories are what allowed the Industrial Revolution. 1/
Seed drills, steel plows, threshers, combines & the like are what allowed almost all of our current civilization to come into being.
For the millennia before that, around 80% to 90% of the population always had to be involved directly in food production.
2/
The man hours to run the factories were only freed up by the excess calories created in the ~150 years of the Agricultural Revolution between the early 1700s & late 1800s.
It is only the huge excess calories that allow the mega urban centers - and 95% of modern lifestyles.
3/
This is a useful video because there is a strong element of truth to it.
If the current trajectory continues, then Trump, Hegseth & Miller may indeed be in cuffs in 2029, because they are too weak. The truth is the Dems do put their opponents in cuffs, and the Repubs don't. 1/
This is therefore an interesting taunt on several levels.
The Dems are the power party, the Repubs are the cucks. This has been the system for many years.
Trump was elected, among other reasons, to change that relationship. At this point, looking at DOJ, FBI & IC
2/
there will be no real reforms, US law enforcement will remain under near complete political control of the Dems, and the cuffs will be coming out at some point.
This is plain to see, hence the open & insulting taunt.
3/
Interesting photo, the comments are worth reading.
They are a quasigovernmental sponsored paramilitary group. The Deep State Feds encourages them, while the RW equivalent would be infiltrated & taken down immediately.
and they should probably be viewed as Death Squads, such as have been seen in many conflicts. As a paramilitary unit they would be carved up by an actual military unit, but that isn't their role, Death Squads don't fight pitched battles but create terror & intimidation
2/
through the murder of the political opposition. Death Squads are fairly lindy in civil conflicts around the world over the last century, and the Spanish Civil War in particular is worth thinking about @TheWorthyHouse .
3/
Yes, this is outrageous, yes, it compromises national security, yes, it's treason.
But, more than anything else, it is Hierarchy. the Left gets the freedom to kill, and that is forbidden the Right. Protests, on the streets - and also with the military & CIA. 1/
The whole idea is to blatantly create two standards. If Obama wants to authorize 500 fatal drone strikes, or whomever else in the Deep State, there will never be a questioning or a prosecution.
2/
So, what the Dems are attempting to do is to put all security forces on notice that if they obey the orders of the lawful President of the United States - they will be hunted down like dogs, and mercilessly prosecuted.
3/
Call me a "deranged fantasist" but there are 3 important qualifications here.
1. There will be no widespread conflict so long as the US dollar maintains reserve status, we're all too fat & happy. As discussed in the thread from 2 years ago below, 1/ x.com/SaysSimulation…x.com/curtis_yarvin/…
a major plunge in the national standard of living will set off an existential conflict of sorts on an economic & regional basis. The Dems relying on the redistribution of wealth will not settle for materially less, and a forced reduction in producer wealth leading to poverty
2/
will also not be tolerated.
2. Curtis correctly describes the world in which he lives. Major metro urbanites are entirely incapable of revolution. Us yokels in flyover country are a distinctly different culture imo, even though we're all on the net together.
3/
My most serious disagreement with Trump has to do with heritage Americans, STEM, and the knife he's putting into the heart of young Americans working in STEM - including my children. He's flipped from his base to taking directions from Silicon Valley, to screw us all over.
1/
American power was built on becoming the world's leading industrial & technological, and that was all based on STEM. Engineers, scientists & technologists built this nation & the modern world - not financiers, or real estate developers, or marketers, or lawyers.
2/
Heritage Americans were the people who did this, and we were (and are) the best in the world at it.
However, STEM education & employment in the US have been under assault for decades now, and it has gotten much worse in the last 10+ years.
3/