Atomsk's Sanakan Profile picture
Nov 17, 2024 28 tweets 27 min read Read on X
@luckytran Re: "Bhattacharya has spread disinformation on COVID"

You may want to support this claim, if you haven't already.

There are plenty of examples of him spreading misinformation.

For instance: on masking

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…
x.com/RobertoCast212…

jamanetwork.com/journals/jamap… Image
@luckytran Promoting obvious disinformation about China's COVID-19 policy.

x.com/ResidingCynic/…
x.com/doritmi/status…

web.archive.org/web/2022010218… Image
@luckytran Saying a majority of Indians had "natural immunity" when the real number was ~25%, weeks before India suffered a large COVID-19 wave

x.com/GYamey/status/…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan… Image
@luckytran Promoting paranoid misinformation on the CDC + masks, and then unfairly blaming the CDC for him falling for this misinformation.

archive.is/wNVGn

x.com/dfreedman7/sta…

x.com/Michigan_Noah/…
x.com/JonMarronMD/st… Image
@luckytran Willfully misrepresenting what experts said about average fatality rates.

"The World Health Organization chose to send out the signal that three or four percent of people would die if they got infected."
capitalismandfreedom.substack.com/p/jay-bhattach…

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

who.int/docs/default-s… Image
@luckytran Whatever evil this is:

x.com/jamesamcgee/st…
x.com/Solahmi_/statu… Image
@luckytran No, experts noted risk increased with age.

"[...] public health experts all spoke with one voice.  [...] everyone, no matter what age, is equally at risk of hospitalization and death after infection."
collateralglobal.org/article/misapp…

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

who.int/docs/default-s… Image
@luckytran No, experts' initial modeling assumed post-infection immunity strong enough to prevent all reinfections.

"[...] public health experts all spoke with one voice. [...] there is no immunity after infection"
collateralglobal.org/article/misapp…

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

cell.com/immunity/fullt… Image
@luckytran x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

His co-author John Ioannidis discussing their (erroneous) estimate for COVID-19's fatality rate that placed it on par with seasonal influenza:

[medrxiv.org/content/10.110…]

youtube.com/watch?v=jGUgrE…
archive.is/dT97F#selectio…

wired.com/story/prophet-… Image
@luckytran No, those locations did not achieved herd immunity by July 2020.

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

July 2020:
techpolicyinstitute.org/publications/m… Image
@luckytran Evading basic immunology on the benefits vaccination provides to previously infected individuals

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…
x.com/profshanecrott… Image
@luckytran No, it was not "all spoke with one voice".

The WHO had a position, but others were free to voice other positions.

who.int/news-room/comm…

cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/comme…
doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2…
doi.org/10.1007/s11845…
doi.org/10.1080/027868…

collateralglobal.org/article/misapp… Image
@luckytran It's telling when lockdown critics cite Bhattacharya as credible, since he'll falsely blame lockdowns for stuff.

For example: Andrew Cuomo's resignation

web.archive.org/web/2022052218…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan… Image
@luckytran It's almost as if Bhattacharya has an anti-lockdown bias that causes him to misinform on basic facts...

x.com/GidMK/status/1…
x.com/Planographer/s…
x.com/vsalvatordali/…

x.com/mds49/status/1…
x.com/DrKGregorevic/… Image
@luckytran Is there anything negative Bhattacharya won't blame on lockdowns, even if he has to contort logic to do it?

x.com/_johnbye/statu…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan… Image
@luckytran To folks struggling to understand why so much of the public health community doesn't take Bhattacharya seriously:

It's not because of a conspiracy.
It's not because they're silencing dissent.

It's because he says is... 🤣🙄

x.com/Kutchinbird/st…
x.com/JPSoucy/status… Image
@luckytran And another (more on the legal front than the scientific front):

x.com/GYamey/status/…

web.archive.org/web/2022090505…
[x.com/malar0ne/statu…]
x.com/WalkerBragman/… Image
@luckytran No, 'focused protection' did not lead to herd immunity within 6 months in Florida.

"Florida, which adopted a focused-protection approach"
spiked-online.com/2021/08/02/the…

x.com/GidMK/status/1…

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

gbdeclaration.org/frequently-ask… Image
@luckytran When your main non-lockdown example... has a lockdown.

"announced a ban on public events of more than eight people"
web.archive.org/web/2020120111…

"upper secondary schools are again closing"
thelocal.se/20201203/swede…

x.com/DrKatrin_Rabie…

Bhattacharya:
gbdeclaration.org/frequently-ask… Image
@luckytran Bhattacharya' NIH nomination for 2025 is reminiscent of Scott Pruitt's EPA nomination for 2017:

Position a contrarian ideologue whose views contradict published evidence + expert assessments.

x.com/_johnbye/statu…
x.com/pjavidan/statu…

cnbc.com/2017/03/09/sco… Image
@luckytran In which Bhattacharya does the intellectual equivalent of claiming vaccine denialists are being unfairly persecuted because Andrew Wakefield's blog told him so

🤢

x.com/AlastairMcA30/…

x.com/AliNeitzelMD/s…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan… Image
@luckytran x.com/AtomsksSanakan…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

Bhattacharya, November 2020:

"What they're doing is focused protection, and you can see the result. The infection rates are going up in Sweden, but the death rates are not."
edhub.ama-assn.org/jn-learning/vi…

ourworldindata.org/explorers/covi… Image
@luckytran Bhattacharya, 11 Nov 2020:

"In Sweden, 6,000 deaths to date from COVID, and only 1,800 total excess deaths. They have fewer excess deaths total, all cause, than COVID deaths"
edhub.ama-assn.org/jn-learning/vi…

🤨

nature.com/articles/s4158…
[msemburi.shinyapps.io/excessvis/]

ourworldindata.org/explorers/covi… Image
@luckytran @threadreaderapp unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Atomsk's Sanakan

Atomsk's Sanakan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AtomsksSanakan

Dec 14, 2025
@hausfath Within the uncertainty range of IPCC 1990 First Assessment Report's 1990-2025 projection.

x.com/grok/status/19…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

"predicted rise from 1990 (to 2030) of 0.7–1.5 °C with a best estimate of 1.1 °C"
nature.com/articles/nclim…

page xxii
web.archive.org/web/2019031407… Image
@hausfath 1990-2025 warming trend is ~0.25°C/decade.

psl.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/data/a…

Implies ~0.9°C of global warming for 1990-2025, i.e. close to the projected average value of 1°C.

48:40 - 55:02 :
youtube.com/watch?v=C-gdab…

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

The red arrow is 1990:
climate.metoffice.cloud/current_warmin… Image
@hausfath Still end up with ~0.25°C/decade when starting in 1995 to avoid cooling from the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption.

"1993 was the low point of the post-Pinatubo cooling"
wattsupwiththat.com/2013/01/15/mat…

x.com/mattwridley/st…

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

psl.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/data/a… Image
Read 6 tweets
Dec 7, 2025
1/F

Dr. Anthony Fauci complained about death threats to him, his family, public health experts + staff, etc.

This thread will cover some of the rhetoric that may have contributed to that, along with surrounding context.

1:43:53 - 1:47:40 :
2/F

Fauci is not alone in receiving threats.

For example, there's Dr. Nicole Kleinstreuer:

"Death threats to NIH official spark debate over aggressive campaign to end animal research"
science.org/content/articl…

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

theguardian.com/us-news/articl… Image
3/F

Threats sometimes lead to physical harm.

"of 510 researchers who had published on SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19, 38% acknowledged harassment ranging from personal insults to threats of violence"
journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/jv…

doi.org/10.1016/j.puhi…

pbs.org/newshour/natio… Image
Read 21 tweets
Nov 7, 2025
1/M

The most secure position in science is one that's both:

1) supported by an evidence-based scientific consensus
2) disputed by Matt Ridley [@mattwridley]

This thread will provide some examples.

x.com/mattwridley/st…
x.com/mattwridley/st…

archive.is/zpiYp Image
2/M

Ridley shows how one can get away with being wrong on topic after topic, as long one states the paranoid ideological narrative many conspiracy theorists want to hear.

Others made this point, such as Dave Farina.

pubpeer.com/publications/D…

youtube.com/watch?v=C-gdab…
3/M

So on to the secure positions that are:
1) supported by an evidence-based scientific consensus
2) disputed by Matt Ridley [@mattwridley]

There's an ongoing multidecadal global warming trend of ~0.3°C/decade.

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan… Image
Read 51 tweets
Oct 6, 2025
@curryja No, it's just Koonin disinforming people again.

For example, he's still misrepresenting modern sea level rise compared to sea level rise in the 1930s.

Neither of you honestly care about evidence.

x.com/AtomsksSanakan…

archive.is/50sv0#selectio… Image
@curryja Koonin repeats the same misinformation as Pielke Jr.

The National Academies' report and the DOE report cite some of the same studies.
It's just that the former accurately represents them, while the latter distorts them.

x.com/hausfath/statu…

archive.is/50sv0#selectio… Image
@curryja More like the DOE report distorts @hausfath's research.

"matching the observed global mean warming"
nap.nationalacademies.org/read/29239/cha…

x.com/hausfath/statu…

"They appear to have discarded the whole paper as not fitting their narrative"
wired.com/story/scientis…

archive.is/50sv0#selectio… Image
Read 5 tweets
Sep 14, 2025
@curryja If it's anything like Steven Koonin's 2014 op-ed in WSJ, then it's filled with ideologically-motivated misinformation and denialism.

archive.is/FTvi1

realclimate.org/index.php/arch…
realclimate.org/index.php/arch…

web.archive.org/web/2014121322…
[archive.is/v03kY] Image
@curryja About 30% more warming occurred during the first quarter of the 21st century than during the last quarter of the 20th century.

Models did fine.

agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/20…
x.com/AtomsksSanakan…
realclimate.org/index.php/clim…
x.com/hausfath/statu…

web.archive.org/web/2014121322… Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(