James Lindsay, anti-Communist Profile picture
Nov 18 11 tweets 2 min read Read on X
You've heard the saying "you don't have to care about politics, but politics cares about you." That's even more true for political warfare. You may not care about political warfare, but these days, political warfare definitely cares about you. There are psyops everywhere.
Because of mass media, the internet, and social media, at least for the time being, you live on a political warfare battlefield. You have very little choice in this matter, and whether you're a innocent bystander or an active combatant, you are by default a combatant in it.
I want you to take this description very seriously. You are a combatant in a global political warfare firefight whether you want to be or not, outside of some very difficult and narrow exceptions. That's because political warfare isn't like conventional warfare. It's everywhere.
More than its ubiquity, everyone is a combatant in political warfare environments because the nature of political warfare isn't to shoot your enemy's army so much as it is to influence your enemy's population. Therefore, the whole population is an active target and fighting.
If you were a Marine storming the beach in Normandy in WWII, you wouldn't run out there with your gear and rifle, and so you don't have the luxury of living your life unaware of propaganda, political warfare, and influence campaigns. You have to know how to protect yourself.
By far the most important "gear" needed in a political warfare environment is understanding enough about political warfare to know it's happening around you and what some of it looks like, how it works, etc. You're less likely to get taken in by operations you recognize as ops.
This means that your "gear" is spending time learning about how propaganda works and what it looks like, but it also means working to develop discernment, not just cruising through life, not just following crowds, not just trusting everything you see, or what you like.
Many of the influence campaigns we are subjected to are "reflexive" in nature. They're based on highly tuned misleading lies that incorporate some truth and then lead people astray in a way that "goes viral." Everyone's talking about it. Everyone's saying it. It's happening!
Reflexive campaigns work not just by being misleading but through crowd effects. Technically, reflexive campaigns work by getting people to believe other people believe something and getting them to follow in rapidly growing numbers, usually to make some political mistake.
It is very important in a political warfare environment where reflexive weapons are deployed that you don't just blindly follow what everyone is suddenly thinking. You have to slow down and take time and get to the bottom of some things. You cannot just go running along with.
Realize you're in a political warfare environment now all the time you're consuming media, either mass or social media. You have to have your guard up. You need to be skeptical and discerning, especially when everyone starts going a particular direction all at once.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Lindsay, anti-Communist

James Lindsay, anti-Communist Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ConceptualJames

Nov 17
After having given it some thought, I've decided to put a super-mega-thread of my recommendations for the new administration's Department of Education, et cetera. Given how these things go, I expect this will make at least everybody mad, but welcome to the jungle. 🧵🧵🧵
1) The Department of Education must be abolished before Trump's term ends, but there's a functional contradiction in this first priority. A department that doesn't exist cannot actually do anything, so it's unclear what any of the Trump Administration's ambitions in education would even mean.

The primary power over education the federal government has is monetary, but if the Department of Education shuts down, the executive apparatus for directing federal moneys in education disappears as does the executive power base for influencing education. Some decisions have to be made, then: federal or state control of education, and when?

Simply shutting the Department of Education down on Day 1 would be a serious mistake. The string-tied federal money in education is all authorized by legislation in Congress's purview, and the legislation authorizing that money and enabling its strings would not end just because the Department of Education ended. That all has to be dealt with.

If the Department ends with money (and strings) still authorized, other departments (like Treasury, and?) would have to pick up the slack, scattering the education functions around, across, and through the executive branch, making it harder to fix. The Department is also ideally poised to facilitate the process of Congress undoing much of this legislation.

In the meantime, the Department can use what power it has, even as it sunsets itself, to repair many of the most outrageous issues in education as it currently exists, which are numerous. This would allow a transition period in which states are pulled into better educational priorities and commitments before they're given full educational autonomy.

The only practical solution, then, is that the Department of Education must be wound down, not simply abolished. Its eventual abolition should be a priority it communicates to the American people and to Congress, who should have a bill prepared for it at the right time.

I would in theory recommend a two-year timeline to establish and accomplish its mission and close its own doors, but the midterms are a concern, meaning a three-year timeline might be smarter and more politically viable.

This approach cannot become an excuse to perpetuate the Department and "use the One Ring." A clear shutdown timeline with benchmarks should be planned and communicated from the start, and Department actions should only be taken such that they are consistent with the overall agenda of closing the Department down completely by the planned deadline.

Fwiw, I have recommended that Tiffany Justice from Moms four Liberty serve in the role of Secretary of Education as described above. She should have the patriotic honor of terminating the awful department in her tenure. She understands the assignment and represents the largest coalition of parents and their interests this country has ever known. That's big outsider energy of exactly the right kind.
2) The United Nations, UNESCO, International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF), and other global NGOs need to have no influence on American education whatsoever. If you don't understand that the Woke education in Alaska looks just like the Woke education in New Jersey looks just like the Woke education in Kenya, you need to get with the program: this is a global initiative in education, not an American one. That needs to end from the first possible day.

I recommend full withdrawal from all these global(ist) education initiatives—including Education for Global Citizenship, SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals) in education, Education for Sustainable Development, and Comprehensive Sexuality Education (CSE), not to mention any vestiges of Common Core–derived from the UNESCO World Core curriculum.

To effect this, not only should there be a deliberate withdrawal, etc., from official relationships with these organizations, all school districts in their own relationships with these organizations should have to disclose that information clearly and publicly.
Read 32 tweets
Nov 14
Marxism and the Nationalism Question 🧵

I spent the day carefully reading Joseph Stalin's most notable work of Marxist Theory today, "Marxism and the National Question," and it has greatly clarified our contemporary debates about nationalism under the threat of Marxism.
First, let me lay out what this thread is NOT. It is NOT an argument for or against nationalism of any kind. This thread is an explainer that explains how Marxists have been extremely savvy and effective at utilizing nationalist circumstances to their advantage for a century.
In other words, this thread is a warning that if you wish to walk a nationalistic road, which may or may not be a good idea, there is a predictable line of attack from Marxists that has proved extremely successful in many contexts that's highly refined, so be ready.
Read 22 tweets
Nov 13
I think we need a thread about "Election" and totalitarian ideologies like Communism. Communism always sells itself as being the champion of "the people" or "the oppressed," and then it speaks for them and uses them to obtain power, usually destroying them along the way. 🧵
If you don't understand Marxism/Communism as a Sociognostic (Social Gnostic) faith based on the idea that certain people have Woke up to a hidden truth that changes everything and only they can direct the affairs, you don't understand it at all, so that's first.
Originally, Marxists had Woke up to the belief that human beings are intrinsically social, by which they meant socialist. Marx was very clear that only by remembering his true social nature could man realize his true human nature. In fact, he made social(ist) and human synonyms.
Read 23 tweets
Nov 13
It's very important to understand that above all else, Marxism is a scam. This includes Woke Marxism. A lot of Woke or Woke-sympathetic people today do not realize that Marxism is a deliberate scam that uses the apparent plight of the less fortunate to gain power for itself. 🧵
Marxism sells itself by being "for the oppressed," whether that's class oppression, racial oppression, sexual oppression, or any other kind of oppression, but that's just the sales pitch. Marxism is a scam. It champions those causes to position itself to steal power. Here's how.
The mechanism of Marxism is always the same, whether Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, or any others, including the Woke today. There's some "Enlightened" group of theorists who concentrate in a Party and in committees (Soviets) who will administer the redistribution system. Always.
Read 17 tweets
Nov 4
We're hearing a ton about the political "pendulum" swinging back now that Woke Marxism is so widely reviled. It's extremely important to understand that the globalist demons who control the pendulum will make sure it swings to their advantage, not according to a natural course.🧵
I actually did a short podcast with a helpful graphic about this "pendulum" dynamic, so you should definitely check that out, but I want to add a little more color and depth to what I was saying here in this thread.
newdiscourses.com/2024/02/how-th…
The dynamic in play is not between Left and Right, as in the issue is not that Communists pull the politics way too far to the Left so it will naturally swing way too far back to the Right. That's a constructed and purposed lie meant to advance the agenda of the evil behind it.
Read 17 tweets
Nov 4
Fascism (Woke Right) is the bastard child of Communism (Woke Left). This is a visceral but real metaphor. After Communism comes along and rapes a healthy society, its bastard son, Fascism, is born, taking up most of its father's characteristics but with even less wisdom.
It's not a mystery to me at all now where Fascism comes from or how it takes root. It takes root purely in reaction to the destruction of Communism by stealing its methods and applying them with even less restraint and strategy, mostly fueled by disgust and a desire for revenge.
All true anti-Fascists must therefore be anti-Communists first, because Fascism is the bastard son of Communism. There's a twist, though, to the Communist's advantage in allowing the Fascist turn. It can't last. It never lasts. And Communism gets to pick up the pieces.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(