Indranil Roy Profile picture
Nov 18, 2024 21 tweets 7 min read Read on X
India did not enter the "hypersonic missile" group with this missile.

And that thing on the nose is an anomaly, not a feature.

Here's a quick and dirty thread on where this missile lies on the technology spectrum and what it means to India's security. Image
The easy thing first. That disc at the top is just the cover of the canister. It's supposed to rupture at launch, but it did not. It got lodged in the nose and was broken only due to aerodynamic forces as the missile achieved speed.

Undesirable, but solvable.
Now, let's come to hypersonic missiles. Hypersonic missiles are any missile that's flying above Mach 5. All missiles from the Agni series do so. All missiles from K-series also do so. Image
Let's first understand what is happening here. As you studied in high school, to throw a stone far away you must throw it at 45 degrees to the horizontal and throw it is as hard as you can.

The closer you are to 45 degrees, and the faster you throw, the further the stone goes.
That's called a minimum energy ballistic trajectory. shown by the black line here. That's fine and dandy as long as we don't take three things into account.

1. inaccuracies of manufacturing of the missile,
2. atmosphere, and
3. the chances of interception Image
Because of the first 2 aspects, inaccuracy and atmospheric interference, your projectile will deviate from its target. This deviation is typically a fraction of the range. But at thousands of kms range, you will miss your target by kms even with the slightest of deviations.
So, you need some kind of trajectory correction once you reenter. This is what you see in MARV warheads on Agni-2 and Agni-1P.

Think of them as a badminton shuttle cock. The fins are used mostly to correct for error.

Graphics by somebody else. Image
With these corrections, you can change your error from a few kms to a few 100s of mtrs in Agni2's case and to few 10s of mtrs in Agni 1P's case.

They can also maneuver the reentry vehicle to a certain extent to evade interception.
In the case of the Agni series, the enemy can see the approaching warhead for minutes. If they have a modern ABM, it can identify the best interception point and path in a few seconds.

But the MARV warheads will maneuver itself just enough to make that interception point invalid
So MARV is a hypersonic re-entry vehicle which maneuvers to increase precision and avoid interception. And India got there in the early 2000s.

But India went a step forward with the K-15 missile and its derivatives like Shaurya and Pralay. Image
The first thing that you must notice is that the while the fins of the Agni series are on the warhead, the fins of the K-15 derivatives or on the missile body.

This is because the missile body is retained at reentry to follow what DRDO calls quasi-ballistic trajectory. Image
In this quasi-ballistic trajectory or Boost-glide trajectory, the missile skips across the top of the atmosphere like a stone on a flat lake.

K-15 series uses its missile body to develop lift from the atmosphere to achieve this skip behaviour. Yes cylinders do generate lift. Image
This is better than MARV in 2 aspects. 1st, since the missile doesn't reach very high altitudes, it appears above the target horizon much later, decreasing response time significantly. Also, they can maneuver much more than an MARV thus further reducing chance of interception.
K-15's first test dates are shrouded in mystery but by the 2015, DRDO had mastered this tech. Many variants of K15 started arriving.

So what is this current missile?

While K15 series follows the skip glide trajectory, this missile follows the steady glide trajectory. Image
But why? Because they are intended to hit moving targets. Although the name is withheld, it is an open secret that it is designed to hit ships at 1500 km range.

This infographic is wrong, it is not a quasi-ballistic missile. Image
To hit a moving target like a ship, it has to 1 detect and track the ship and two hit it with extreme precision. If you miss a ship by 10 mtrs, nothing will happen to the ship!

One required CEP of <10 mtrs against a moving target at 1500 kms.

That's no joke!
You can't be skipping around at those speeds and hit a mobile target taking evasive maneuvers. You need to cruise, nice and smooth.

That's why this missile has wings. And don't think those wings are small. At those speeds they create very significant amounts of lift.
One can make many kind of gliders. DRDO has gone for the simplest one (relatively speaking). There are fancier hypersonic glide vehicles. They create lift more efficiently, but are more difficult to control.

Also, they would require fairings for boost phase. Image
Image
I love DRDO's design because of its simplicity.

I am not clear of one thing. Is the glider powered during boost or after reentry. DRDO has several publications on low power solid rocket motors which would be perfect for the latter But I think this is not the case.
I think it is a 2 stage boosted missile. and it is a hypersonic guided glide vehicle at re-entry.

This brings us to the final. A frontier for mankind. Powered hypersonic glide vehicles.

DRDO's effort in this front is called HSTDV. Image
This kind of vehicle doesn't leave the atmosphere. It flies at constant hypersonic speeds by using scramjet powered flight.

ISRO and DRDO have both shown powered flight of a 6-20 seconds. But this is the ultimate frontier. And it's a challenge of all of mankind. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Indranil Roy

Indranil Roy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Indrani1_Roy

May 16
1. There are a few inaccuracies in this explanation.
2. What has been explained here is how most missiles work. It does not explain why Brahmos is a game changer.

Here's a little explainer thread. I will keep it super simple
Let's first understand what's wrong in the explanation:
1. Increasing the speed of the air, does NOT increase it's pressure/temperature.

Bernoulli's principle states that the opposite is true. When speed increases, pressure falls. This is the reason why aircrafts can fly.
Inaccuracy 2. The wings of Brahmos are fixed. They don't move. Only the fins at the back move.

Besides these inaccuracies, every cruise missile in the world sucks air, compresses it, adds a fuel-mist, the burnt gases exhaust through the back and propels the missile forward.
Read 34 tweets
May 9
The reporting on military affairs in India is worse than a clown show. At least, a clown knows what they are talking about.

Most of our defense reporters would be poor actors for soap operas.

Here's are the basics in air defense.
To cover enormous areas, any air defense system is layered.

Just like if you have to go to your neighbors house, you walk. To go further, you take a bicycle. Further still, you take a motorcycle or car. Further still, you take a train or an aircraft.

It is the same concept.
The S400 system forms the outermost layer. It is/will be used accordingly.

If you use it to take out drones, it's the equivalent of taking an airplane to go meet your neighbor.

Believe it or not, this is what the mainstream media is jumping and screaming 24x7.
Read 13 tweets
Jan 18
Every country self-dependent on its own jets. E.g. US did it during the beginning of WWII. Prime example of today is China. Upcoming ones: S. Korea,Turkey.

Countries which've gone for "better available" options are losing their self-dependence, e.g. Japan, Germany, UK.
Let me give you a concrete example of today. USA was looking for its next advanced trainer.

"Available options" from around the world competed. Advanced Hawk from UK, Leonardo T-100 from Italy, T-50 from Korea.

Guess what they did? Image
Image
Image
They designed and developed one from scratch. The T-50 competitor is essentially the same aircraft. LM (USA) partially designed it. It uses a lot of American parts including the engine. But no!

They designed and build their own! Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 16
They not how much the current IAF chief has fought and will continue to fight for Tejas.

They don't understand the German WWII production rate either.

The Germans used wood in their planes when steel fell short. They sent young boys with 70 hrs of flight time into war.
These guys are talkers. They don't understand what it takes to build hard-tech. Hard-tech that is built on industry. Industries that need to be fostered for at least a generation.

Such talkers have always laughed at doers.

Ignore such talkers. They are worthless like their talk
For those who don't know, here's the Tejas timelines.

1983 ADA was formed
1986 funds were released to design a plane to replace MiG-21s. Dassault was chosen as consultant. SQR was futuristic. Incremental development of Marut and MiG-21 would not meet SQR requirements.
Read 15 tweets
Dec 26, 2024
Shocked? Was this not evident over the past few years?

But panic and despair is what we should not.

1. I don't know what is 6th-gen in this?
2. Time to bite the bullet was yesterday. Do it at least today: Importing a handful is a band-aid that does not work
Let's look at my first point. A lot of commentators are calling this 6th-gen. What is 6th gen in this? It's a tailless flying delta bomber. If this is 6th gen, then what gen was the B-2 bomber that flew in 1987? Image
Most commentators (6th gen definers) would barely pass Class XI physics exams. They have confused shape with "generation".

Let us understand what the Chinese have achieved. And they have achieved a lot. I am going to deliver a lot of hard pills to swallow.
Read 25 tweets
Dec 24, 2024
Today there are a lot of commentators on everything underneath the sun. Very few have the depth in any field.

@Archit_Ch is not one of them. These guesses are reasonable, and most likely correct.
@Archit_Ch DRDO's missile program is absolutely world class. It has three major classical advantages:
1. They have the design know-how, know-why and the data.
2. It has the requisite test facilities and
3. It has reliable production partners from prototypes to serial production
@Archit_Ch It has one uncommon advantage. There is hardly any other design agency in the world which has the know-how from unguided rockets to A2A missiles to ICBMs, SLBMS to now hypersonic endo/atmospheric interceptors.

They have all the building blocks under one roof!
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(