Reading a book in German about Aktion T4, about the disabled children who were the first victims of the Holocaust.
Horrifying that they were in religious, including Catholic institutions and sent to their deaths from there.
Here are some of the details.
2/ 'In the files of the Ansbach expert childcare unit, the nurses noted brief characteristics of the children who were later killed.
They were forced to die because the ward doctor Asam-Bruckmüller stated: "It is not to be expected that he/she will become a capable compatriot."'
3/ Irmgard Dörr was born in 1924 as an illegitimate child, was placed in the care of several families, from which her grandmother or mother occasionally picked her up, and according to the Youth Welfare Office she was always "brutally mistreated".
A German wartime foster system.
4/ The town doctor of Küstrin wrote about Irmgard in 1932: 'She is extremely fearful and intimidated, screams when one tries to get close to her. She bends over as if she were being hit. And in the meantime she always repeats the same question: “Are you angry?”
5/ Irmgard arrived at the institution in 1934. She received no visitors. At fourteen she was considered a “fearful girl, physically asthenic, weak intellect, with difficulty concentrating, easily irritable.”
6/ Psychologists attributed her cognitive age to 5.6 years; four years later, doctors subjected the girl to forced sterilisation at the hospital in Berlin-
Neukölln.
7/ At the end of 1939, director Heinze dictated the following diagnosis in the questionnaire for Aktion T4: “Childhood psychosis (irritation, states of excitement, negativism, blockages) and congenital deficiency.”
8/ Friedrich Seyfried was born on August 20, 1922, was profoundly Deaf and lived in the Catholic nursing home in Ursberg from 1935.
On March 25, 1941, Gekrat's staff deported him to the state hospital in Eglfing-Haar near Munich.
9/ From there, on June 20, 1941, he was sent to the gas chamber in Hartheim. In the following letter, written in good German on May 25, 1941, Friedrich Seyfried mentions his companion Josef Sporrer, who also
came from Ursberg and who also died on the same day, in the same place.
10/ Dear Head Nurse ML
[…] I have a bad life in Eglfing and Sporrer complains all the time that he is ill and that the bad smell, dust and smoke from the basket weaving are to blame, and that is why he wants to stop weaving basket weaving altogether.
11/ I too no longer show any pleasure in my work and would just like to be back in Ursberg. Unfortunately I cannot communicate any other news. How long
will it be before I can return to Ursberg? If you have any news, dear Sister L., write to me immediately.
12/ I am not happy in this institution and I really do not
want to stay here any longer. – Well, my letter is almost over, after having communicated some news to you.
13/ I conclude with the request to write to me soon and to help me by asking that I be immediately discharged from this institute and that I be sent back to Ursberg. Now I greet you and wish you a Pentecost full of grace and especially much happiness and luck for your name day,
14/ your dear student Fritz Seyfried.'
The letters are awful.
Adolf N, born on January 12, 1931, had motor disorders and delayed mental development following meningitis. He went to the toilet by himself, washed himself, knew how to dress, but not how to put on shoes.
15/ In the ward of the research department in Heidelberg he helped to wrap washed bandages and easily passed simple tests.
When the psychologist, during a test, urged him to tear a piece of paper along a folded edge, Adolf replied: "No, that's a shame. You can paint with it."
16/ 'Sometimes Adolf withdraws into himself and cries softly, when asked why he cries, he replies: 'I'm homesick.' He speaks very badly and sometimes it takes a long time before he gets a word out.'
17/ Adolf N. was examined in the research department in Heidelberg for seven weeks and then transferred to the death hospital in Eichberg, where he was killed on September 8, 1944.
His father wrote a letter to the Heidelberg clinic, asking about his son's death.
18/ The doctor in charge of the research department, Julius Deussen, replied that "Dolfi" had "died of pneumonia, without suffering [...] and will not have felt more alone than before."
There are only a few books that I can find. They do not have photographs.
We remember them.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Nobody is doing that, because our media is largely comprised of people who are not tech savvy. Which was one of the major issues for #Robodebt - these are the same kinds of issues which have been addressed in the EU by citizens rights groups.
So disabled people are being told that the NDIA want them to sign up to the app and use the identity verification protocols. I assume for data matching. However, there are privacy issues with the app and what is currently being carried out by Services Australia/NDIA.
Listen up.
2/ The my NDIS app gathers extensive personal and sensitive data, including navigation and identity verification information. It undermines privacy rights and contradict principles seen in international standards, where data collection is often more limited and specific.
3/ Data sharing with Services Australia is framed as essential for delivering services, but this broad access raises significant privacy concerns. Without strong restrictions and transparency around data use, sensitive disability information is at a heightened risk of misuse.
The transitional rule with the lists has been sent out. And there are going to be a hell of a lot of unhappy campers. #auspol
Especially those who were at AAT fighting for a support. Stay tuned for this shit to drop properly.
I can pull out an AAT decision....
2/ ...for every now banned item, the items excluded under the new NDIS lists, supported by cases where the AAT found such supports to be reasonable and necessary and which contradicts the lists.
Let me explain that.
3/ People went to COURT to fight for a support they desperately needed and the court ruled in their favour. But the government, in their keenness for a Big Surplus, has slashed the NDIS.
Here are some example from the newly dropped lists.
Yesterday, an angry Bill Shorten told a disability conference that there were '13,000 NDIS participants who had 'chosen not to reply to us for well over a year'.
Today, I was told that there were 3,000 who had NEVER ever spoken with anyone at the NDIA. #auspol
2/ He was angry. Not even a postcard, he said. And I am guessing that their funding is still being spent, because if they were dead or missing, surely, surely, they would know.
But surely he knows how many people have 'preferred method of contact, email' on their case file?
3/ Surely he knows how many people are actually Deaf or blind people who get phone calls endlessly from the NDIA? NDIS sent letters to vision-impaired and blind people in format they could not read : r/australia ()
My response to recent community criticism of Bill Shorten on 'caring'.
'My personal view is this. That Shorten did deeply care about the NDIS, for whatever reason. I do know that he was largely blindsided by the National Cabinet decision of an 8% cut (aka 'growth target').'
2/ I believe he fought for the NDIS and people with disability. Some people say that it was about it being the Cinderella portfolio, that he used it to get to where he got to, but I think that he did care about fairness and unfairness and that he was an ally for a very long time.
3/ The political journalists say that he was set up by Albo. I have no knowledge of that and that is second hand, but it would be a cruel and awful thing to do to someone who worked for a long time setting something up, commission them to tear it down.
Here are the rest of the changes to the NDIS that were discussed long before the NDIS Review dropped. They planned it before Lisa Paul, Bill Shorten's new employer at the University of Canberra, had handed down the NDIS Review.
2/ Important to remember that Albanese and National Cabinet handed down the instruction, after discussion behind closed doors, to cut the NDIS. They framed it as an '8% growth target'. After the Redbridge focus groups, they worked out how to sell it to the public.
3/ Let's look at what those focus groups say. They were held secretly (they were FOIed by a journalist, then the NDIA put it on their website - but at Estimates, the NDIA said they did not commission the 'research' so that is fun and cool too).