This month marks the final, definitive closure of the Garland Shirt Factory. If you're interested in American manufacturing, I want tell you its story. 🧵
There's a teeny, tiny town in North Carolina called Garland, which for the last 100 years or so, has had a population hovering around 500. In the 1950s, a development company erected an industrial building here with the intention of creating manufacturing jobs.
The first tenant was Fleetline Indusries, later known as the Garland Shirt Factory. As the name implies, they made button-up shirts. With time, the small workforce here became so good at making shirts that Brooks Brothers acquired the factory in 1982.
It was here where Brooks Brothers made its famous button-down shirts, which debuted at the turn of the century. Inspired by the secured collars worn by British polo players, this style was an overnight hit and became an American icon, up there with five-pocket jeans and t-shirts.
Since Brooks Brothers dressed that upwardly mobile class of Americans that saw their fortunes rise with industrial capitalism, their button-down collar was popular among their sons and daughters, including those who went to private schools that fed into the Ivy League system.
For much of the 20th century, the button-down collar was a symbol of all that is good: casualness, youth, education, trustworthiness, dependability, sport, and professionalism. Mary Mccarthy’s 1942 short story “The Man in the Brooks Brothers Shirt” is partly about its allure.
Up until about the 1990s, Brooks Brothers' button-down shirts were hardly ever discounted. They didn't need to—they were a popular perennial. Plus, their customers wore their oxford shirts until the collars frayed. Ppl paid full price for clothes they knew they'd wear forever.
If the shirts went on sale, it was just once a year—and only after Christmas.
But over time, Brooks Brothers fell into a common problem: the burden of expansion. In 1971, they had just 11 locations; in 2001, there were 155 stores and outlets in the US and Japan
During this expansion, their real estate costs grew and they became locked into long-term lease agreements. To turn a profit, they offshored more of its production, introduced trendier items, and started to hold more promotions to draw in deal-hungry customers.
By 2010 or so, it was pretty easy to get Brooks Brothers' shirts at a discount. They held mid-season sales, end-of-season sales, Christmas sales, "wardrobe event" sales, "4 for $249" sales, "3 for $109" sales, "select shirts for just $39" sales, etc.
During the time that Retail Brand Alliance owned Brooks Brothers (2001-2020), CEO Claudio del Vecchio was under a lot of pressure to offshore more of the company's manufacturing. However, he felt that styles key to Brooks Brothers' identity should be made in the US
That meant that Brooks Brothers' natural shouldered suits were made at the company's Southwick plant in Haverhill, Massachusetts; the rep striped silk ties were made at their tie-making facility in Long Island City, New York; and the button-down shirts at Garland, North Carolina
The Garland shirt factory was not without its problems. Along with making Brooks Brothers' shirts, they also made for some other clients. One told me that his orders were often riddled with quality control problems. Brooks brought consultants from TAL to help solve these issues.
When Brooks Brothers filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2020, it shuttered its US factories, unable to commit to continuing to producing in the US. For a time, it seemed like 150 in a town of 600 would now be without work. But a year later, a bit of hope emerged.
The Garland Apparel Group acquired the company in 2021 and brought back about 100 of its former 150 workers. Garland's mayor said: "After the pandemic and the many gloomy challenges that the town has faced, we finally feel a ray of sunshine and see a beautiful rainbow."
The Garland Shirt Factory plugged along for a few years, making again for Brooks Brothers, Raleigh Denim, and customers in Korea and Japan. They even made hall-of-fame coats for Ultimate Fighting Championships and opened a new facility to produce uniforms for US Navy
But after not getting enough orders to even sustain daily operations, the company put the whole factory on furlough. There was a lot of speculation on what would happen next.
Kenneth Ragland, the managing partner for Garland Apparel Group, told a newspaper bluntly: “Lots of people talk about Made in the USA as being so necessary, but when the rubber meets the road, most Americans want cheap goods, which do not make it easy for US firms to survive.”
This month marks the finale: the Garland Shirt Factory went up for auction. I'm told the building and all of its contents have been sold: machinery, buttons, trims, and an estimated 450,000 yards of fabric, including high-end Thomas Mason oxford originally used for button-downs
When Brooks Brothers filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, I interviewed a number of their executives. One told me that there were discussions within the company about how to compete with labels such as UNTUCKit and J. Crew.
I asked: "How is it possible that the company that invented the oxford cloth button-down, one of the most iconic American designs, is not be able to charge a premium over stuff found on Amazon?"
The person agreed and said "that's the million dollar question."
The final chapter of the Garland Shirt Factory proved one thing: even without the Brooks Brothers behind it (a company that had its own problems), it could not find enough orders to sustain operations. The simple reason is because at $10-14/ hour wages, a shirt is expensive.
At such prices, a company might buy a shirt from Garland at $40, sell it to a store for $80, and then the store sells it you for about $150. This distribution model is necessary for scale (and scale is important for jobs). But people don't want to pay $150 for a shirt.
Ultimately, consumers want cheap clothes.
I'm sad to see yet another American clothing factory shutter. The Garland Shirt Factory lasted for about 70 years, much of that time producing one of America's most iconic styles.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's hard to write an eBay guide because any serious coverage requires talking about the history of menswear. Which, of course, I can't adequately do on Twitter, let alone in a single thread. But I will give you some tips on how to shop for quality menswear on eBay. 🧵
As always, I *strongly* believe that you have to first develop a sense of taste. You can't just say "I want to dress nice." Nice like what? Classic tailoring? 1950s workwear? 1980s punk? 1990s streetwear? Avant-garde? Everything starts with knowing the look you want to create.
Since this thread is about how to shop on eBay, it's beyond the scope to talk about how to develop a sense of taste. But before you go into this process, you need to have a sense of aesthetics, which requires cultural knowledge. Read this post:
When it comes to tailored jacket, 90% of how a jacket fits is about how it hangs from the shoulders. Harrison Butker's jacket (left) fits well; Josh Hawley's jacket (right) does not. It's easy to see the difference because both men are wearing patterned fabrics.
There are three issues with Hawley's jacket, all interrelated.
— Jacket collar doesn't hug the side of his neck
— Lapel is buckling away from his chest
— The pattern doesn't run "true"
Yes, I've seen this ad. It's full of bad information. The company didn't deliver good pants; they simply moved to stretch materials. This is common with a lot of tailoring nowadays. Will run through some of the points in this ad. 🧵
First, and again, I have no malice to the person in this ad or anyone in this thread. I don't know who is the person in this ad, but assume they were paid to be in this commercial. I am only addressing the information in this ad, as well as the company's work.
Men with a prominent seat (tailor speak for "big butt") need certain trouser adjustments. But nearly every problem mentioned in this ad is a result of the person wearing clothes that are too tight. Such issues are only made worse by the company delivering tighter clothes.
After my tweet about athletes in suits, a few people asked for my opinion on various players. The opinion is always the same: the clothes are too small; the combos are often bad taste. I will show you a basic transformation in the next few tweets. 🧵
First, let's look at Lebron. Here he is in two different white double-breasted suits, both outfits worn similarly (with white sneakers).
Which outfit do you like better? Please choose before moving on.
If you said the first, then we share the same taste. In this case, iIwill tell you how to avoid the second.
When people get into tailoring, they often have a very clinical view of how something should fit. "Trousers should be slim" or "shoulder seam should be on shoulder bone."
Not true. I'll give you some examples of when styles crossed over from womenswear to menswear, and how men have worn straight-up womenswear or just feminine styles in cool ways. 🧵
We should first recognize that gender codes are socially constructed. Clothing is not inherently masculine or feminine—codes are contextual and can change over time. Aristocratic men once wore bright red heels. Then they became womenswear until that notion was challenged again.
Plenty of things started on the womenswear side of the aisle before crossing over into men's. Prior to the 20th century, men carried pocket watches and only women wore wristwatches. The humble t-shirt began as the top of union suits, which was once considered women's underwear.
During the early 20th century, when labor was more divided by gender, the US Dept. of Agriculture organized youth clubs orientated around developing certain skills. Chief among them were clothing clubs, which taught young girls how to cut, mend, and sew clothing.
In her book The Lost Art of Dress, historian Linda Przybyszewski estimates that more than 324,000 girls participated in clothing clubs (cooking clubs were a distant second with half as many members). The US gov also funded home economics education, which taught similar skills.