Crémieux Profile picture
Nov 25, 2024 25 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Huge new result:

Anti-racism trainings probably lead people to accuse others of racism even when they're not racist.

That's exactly the result of a new study on DEI trainings, with a special focus on the impacts of the works of Ibram X. Kendi and Robin DiAngelo.

Let's dig in🧵 Image
In the first experiment, the researchers took 324 participants and randomized them to either read an Ibram X. Kendi or Robin DiAngelo excerpt or to a racially-neutral condition where they read about corn.

Here are some excerpts from the reading materials, for your understanding:Image
After learning, for example, that western countries are compromised by virtue of their racist ideologies and pasts, participants were presented with a scenario that was totally racially neutral.

The scenario is described as follows, and everyone involved did nothing racist: Image
The participants who were exposed to the 'racism' scenario imagined more racism into existence.

They believed there was a lot more bias, tons of microaggressions and whatnot, even though there was nothing.Image
What's worse, the participants who read the DEI passages also wanted to punish the "offenders" who—I'll remind—literally did nothing racially biased.

They were more likely to want to harm people who did nothing due to their own imaginations.Image
These findings were so shocking and forceful that the authors immediately sought to replicate them.

They gathered a nearly three-times larger sample and found... the same results! Image
But this wasn't the last study. We know that people exposed to DEI racism trainings invent racism out of thin air, but what about other -isms?

Next up is Islamophobia.

The 2,017 participants in this study read either anti-Islamophobia materials or stuff about corn.
After either reading about corn or materials from the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding (ISPU), participants were then asked to evaluate identical trials, for either the clearly-Muslim Ahmed Akhtar or the clearly-just-White George Green.Image
Participants though the trial of Ahmed was considerably more unfair after they "learned" about Islamophobia.

But once again, there was no bias. They just read the DEI materials and invented the bias in their minds. Image
But why? Mechanistically, it does not seem that learning about (and seemingly believing in) Islamophobia increased tolerance for Muslims.

What it did was just to increase the perception of bias. Islamophobia materials did not boost positive sentiment towards Muslims:Image
A final major point of DEI trainings nowadays is caste.

I am referring not to "involuntary caste" stuff a la scholars like Ogbu, but to the Indian caste system.

As the timeline shows, its supposed importance has rapidly gained acknowledgement across the U.S.Image
Despite institutional acceptance that caste matters, and in particular because of bias against members of low castes, most Americans probably still don't understand caste.

So in this experiment, participants were exposed to caste oppression information, or to neutral caste info: Image
Participants were then exposed to a totally caste-neutral scenario in which an Indian admissions officer at an elite East Coast university interviews Raj Kumar and, ultimately, Raj gets rejected. Image
As you might predict from the other results, the nearly 850 respondents who read about casteism invented a lot more caste bias into the scenario than people who read about caste in general. Image
Not only that, but the people exposed to casteism reading material were more likely to see Hindus as racists and to want to punish the admissions officer.Image
What was really alarming was that, after the casteism readings, people were considerably more likely to agree with explicitly anti-Brahmin statements that were really rough, like "Brahmins are parasites", "Brahmins are a virus".

These seem like damaging ideas to promote!Image
Turning back to the original sample, we see something interesting: the people who scored higher on Left-Wing Authoritarianism were more likely to want to punish the people they believed were being racist.

Keep that in mind. Now let's review. Image
All these large-scale studies, with their simple designs, and direct and conceptual replications, with all of their results, support several conclusions.

First, DEI training introduces narratives that lead people to assume certain groups are oppressors and others are victims.
Second, DEI trainings lead to hostile attribution biases, leading participants to see discrimination when there is none.

DEI trainings ironically promote racial prejudice, hostility, suspicion, and division.
Third, DEI trainings lead to demands for punishment again perceived oppressors, as well as the ideologically impure.

This happens despite the perception of being an oppressor always being wrong in these studies.
Fourth, heightened suspicion of "oppressors" and the "impure" triggers people with authoritarian tendencies to endorse surveillance, purity testing, strict social control, and ever-increasing responses that range from corrective to coercive.

Authoritarians want to punish.
And fifth, the heightened punitive atmosphere generated by DEI trainings feeds into demands for more anti-oppression trainings, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of totally needless suspicion and intolerance.
DEI trainings have been noted to be ineffective at promoting tolerance and productivity, and plenty of people have noticed backfiring.

This adds a new dimension that teaches us about feelings and perceptions of oppression more generally.
With these results in mind, we now know that people are more than willing to totally invent racism and other forms of bias in their heads and to want to harm people because of fully-imagined bias on those people's parts.

The era when everyone was colorblind was better.
Future studies replications with fake groups would be neat, but these probably got close enough using unfamiliar groups and with these large trials due to the nature of them being randomized

These are strong results worth keeping in mind

Here's the link: networkcontagion.us/wp-content/upl…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Crémieux

Crémieux Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cremieuxrecueil

Oct 27
Wow!

Across basically all of Europe, people at higher income levels are now *more likely* to become parents!

This is a stunning shift! Image
Among men, this relationship goes a while back now, and in several places, the income gradient has gotten more extreme. Image
Among women, there are some recent crossover events, where the low-income used to be more likely parents than the rich, but now it's different. Image
Read 6 tweets
Oct 26
Wolf packs are remarkably good at respecting each other's established borders. Image
The project this data is from sometimes releases videos of how this plays out.

For example, here's a video of this playing out for a few wolves over a single day in Spring.
Alternatively, about 10-20% of wolf populations lack a pack. They're "lone wolves" and they're more likely to just wander across the territory of different packs

But this isn't permanent! Apparently this one eventually joined a pack and changed his long-distance traveling habit!
Read 6 tweets
Oct 22
The story of peanut allergy is entering its final chapter.

Nowadays, we are beating back both peanut and other food allergies, and all it took was telling parents the right thing to do🧵 Image
The story begins in 2000, when the American Academy of Pediatrics decided to issue some simple advice to parents: Have your kids avoid peanuts early in life. Don't expose them until they're at least three!Image
Parents complied. It turns out, they do that. They just follow advice from professional associations that appear to have authority.

So peanut allergy rates rose, from 0.4% in 1997 to 1.4% in 2008, to 2% in 2015.

But if the advice was right, the opposite should've happened!
Read 13 tweets
Oct 21
The CEOs managing Sweden's biggest companies tend to be smarter, taller, and to have better personalities. Image
The highest-paid CEOs in Sweden also tend to be taller, smarter, and to have better personalities. Image
To connect these things, CEO pay and firm size are considerably connected. Image
Read 4 tweets
Oct 21
Individuals with higher genetically predicted intelligence tend to end up working more prestigious jobs. Image
They tend to be more emotionally stable, healthier, satisfied with life, richer, and educated too. Image
Additionally, they tend to be happier and to have fewer psychiatric problems.

They're more likely to be go-getters! Image
Read 4 tweets
Oct 19
Boobtech is amazing.

It's an area that the rest of medicine could look to as an example.

The professionals making bigger, more realistic breast implants are simultaneously improving affordability, safety, and quality at a rapid rate🧵 Image
Consider one of the most recent improvements in boobtech: the Mia.

The Mia is the first successful "injectable" breast implant.

It cuts down scarring, complications, surgery time and cost, and it looks and feels more realistic than earlier implants. Image
The Mia is installed with a small armpit incision about 2 centimeters in length.

This is a significant reduction from earlier generations, which were regularly closer to 7 centimeters, or almost 3 inches. Image
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(