Why would Israel sign a ceasefire with Lebanon when it has reduced Hezbollah from a mighty army to a disjointed rabble? Why not "finish the job"? The reason is simple: Israel’s primary goal—neutralizing Hezbollah as a strategic threat and thereby leaving Iran exposed—has been achieved to its satisfaction. The extra benefit is not worth the marginal cost—to Israel, but not to Lebanon.
Most Israelis oppose the decision and would prefer that Israel finish the job. The Lebanese—many of whom, including a significant number of Shia, now want Hezbollah gone—seem even more disappointed.
Hezbollah posed four major threats to Israel. Let’s break them down and examine if and how they’ve been neutralized. (1/6)
1. The Most Serious Threat: Border Breach and Mass Infiltration
Hezbollah had the capability to secretly amass up to 15,000 fighters near the border, ready to breach it in a surprise attack akin to the events of October 7. Such an operation, while suicidal for most attackers, would have inflicted massive damage on Israel. Tens of thousands of civilians could have been killed, and military bases overrun.
This threat has been completely eliminated. Hezbollah’s infrastructure in the first-line border villages, as well as its main forward bases in Khiam and Bint Jbeil, has been captured and systematically destroyed. These installations, which took 25 years to build, have been rendered unusable. Under total surveillance, Hezbollah has no chance of rebuilding them, making an asymmetric invasion impossible. (2/6)
2. The Short-Range Rocket Threat
Hezbollah was believed to have approximately 100,000 short-range rockets capable of harassing northern Israel. However, most of these rockets—and the personnel trained to operate them—have been neutralized. Hezbollah has been reduced to firing small, sporadic volleys of around 25 rockets per day.
While some rockets remain hidden in garages or under shrubbery, they no longer pose a strategic threat. These rockets are highly inaccurate, guided only by rudimentary tools like compasses and protractors. They miss their targets by an average of 1,000 meters and have minimal blast radius. Unable to overwhelm Israel’s defenses, they have proven ineffective. For every 1,000 rockets fired, only one civilian is killed on average. (3/6)
3. The Long-Range Missile and Drone Threat
Hezbollah was thought to have around 20,000 long-range missiles and drones, most stored and launched from the Bekaa Valley, over 100 kilometers from Israel’s borders.
The majority of these have been destroyed. The remaining missiles are highly inaccurate, with a circular error probable (CEP) exceeding 1,000 meters, meaning half land more than a kilometer from their intended target. Unless fired in massive volleys to overwhelm the Iron Dome, these missiles never posed a strategic threat. Launching such large barrages is a highly visible process, allowing Israel to detect and preemptively strike. Even if fired in large quantities, these missiles are primarily terror weapons; destroying a strategic target like a power station would require firing thousands due to their inaccuracy.
While the drones are accurate, Israel has quickly ramped up its countermeasures. (4/6)
4. Hezbollah as a Deterrent for Iran
The combined threats outlined above constituted Hezbollah’s primary raison d’être: serving as Iran’s deterrent against Israeli or American attacks on its strategic assets. With the first threat completely eradicated and the second and third reduced to mere nuisances, this deterrent has been rendered impotent.
This became glaringly obvious in October when Israel struck numerous Iranian sites, and Hezbollah was unable to mount a meaningful response. (5/6)
While eradicating Hezbollah entirely would be desirable, doing so would require Israel to conquer and occupy most of Lebanon—a costly endeavor that would benefit Lebanon far more than Israel. Instead, Israel can return to its pre-invasion strategy of attrition, where Hezbollah, as the weaker party, will always lose in the long run.Hezbollah has been reduced by 80–90% in strength, and its masters in Tehran have been humiliated. Rebuilding will be a slow and difficult process, especially given Israel’s intelligence capabilities. Meanwhile, Israel continues to widen its strategic advantage.Hezbollah’s propaganda machine will undoubtedly spin this catastrophe as a victory, and victory celebrations will likely take place in the ruins of Dahiyeh. However, Israel has eliminated the parts of Hezbollah that posed a threat. It is now up to Lebanon to take a stand and reclaim its future.While eradicating Hezbollah entirely would be desirable, doing so would require Israel to conquer and occupy most of Lebanon—a costly endeavor that would benefit Lebanon far more than Israel. Instead, Israel can return to its pre-invasion strategy of attrition, where Hezbollah, as the weaker party, will always lose in the long run.
Hezbollah has been reduced by 80–90% in strength, and its masters in Tehran have been humiliated. Rebuilding will be a slow and difficult process, especially given Israel’s intelligence capabilities. Meanwhile, Israel continues to widen its strategic advantage.
Hezbollah’s propaganda machine will undoubtedly spin this catastrophe as a victory, and victory celebrations will likely take place in the ruins of Dahiyeh. However, Israel has eliminated the parts of Hezbollah that posed a threat. It is now up to Lebanon to take a stand and reclaim its future. (6/6)
So, while we can expect Hezbollah to fire off piles of weapons in the next hours to make a big show of how they are "the victor", and Ali Mortada will be saying "Hello my enemies, we destoryed 500 tanks..." ignore it all.
Here is a useful chart of 1,720 Hezbollah death posters from the last 55 days of the ground incursion alone. The real number is far higher since many are dead in the field, others under rubble, and not everyone gets a poster. At least 3,000 Hezbollah fighters died.
During the same period, the IDF lost 56 men. Meaning, Israel—the attacking force who would usually be expected to die at a 3-1 ratio or more—inflicted 60-1 kills on Hezbollah.
Oh, and despite the Hezbollah claims of destroying 100 tanks, they haven't produced a single image of a destoeyed tank.
Tldr—it's because the left has been hijacked by a stultifying orthodoxy that forces its adherents to say things they don't believe, and nobody wants to listen to the obviously disingenuous. And insincerity kills charisma.
It's not for want of of billionaires, as billionaire-employed Taylor Lorenz argues, and the Republicans certainly didn't "build Joe Rogan" as she implies. (1/5)
The left can't do long form because their ideology is an orthodoxy. Orthodoxies don't function via discussion and debate—the lifeblood of podcasting—it works via rules and creeds witch-hunts and heresies. There is nothing to talk about, just people to praise and others to pillory. (2/5)
Even the core of the woke religion is dull.
Judaism also has an orthodoxy—I know Orthodox Judaism intimately—but in contrast to the far-left's cult, it is based on the accrued writings of 3,000 years. And while it has hard limits on what can be discussed, it has fun myths and legends, allegory and vibrant internal debate. (3/5)
Why, I wondered, was every blood-hungry antisemite and Hamas fan on this site suddenly citing a junior educator at a third-rate London college, claiming to be a "scholar of pogroms," Brendan McGeever?
Turns out it’s because the Pears family generously showers him with money to write books nobody reads about the "sociology of antisemitism." How strange, then, that he has become an overnight hero to antisemites! Why?
Unlike his newly found claque of jew-haters, I actually read his long, windy thread so you don’t have to.
TL;DR: What happened in Amsterdam wasn’t a pogrom, wasn’t antisemitic, and saying that it was is actually rrrrr-racist! (1/8)
This is the argument:
1. Certain academics have (arbitrarily) defined the word "pogrom" in Marxist terms, such that the victim must be a racial minority "structurally exploited" by an oppressor racial/religious group. (You see, it’s settled: sociologists agree, that’s what the word means.)
2. The victims were Israeli Jews, not good—I mean, "vanilla" Jews! (In reality, it was explicitly a "Jew hunt," and people from dozens of nations were attacked as "suspected Jews.") (2/8)
3. A group of Maccabi Tel Aviv fans pulled down a flag; another group sang a racist song. This is "context"—a weasel word for "justification," which it certainly wasn’t, and the attack was planned before this happened. (See below how our hero also laments the UN not being able to offer "context" for October 7.)
4. Jews in 2024 are powerful and rich! Unlike the "good Jews" in the good old days of pogroms when they were perfectly helpless victims. Oh, what wonderful Jews they were—poor and hopeless, bleeding and dying virtuously. So, using the word "pogrom" here almost defiles the word and mocks those sainted victims. They didn’t have it coming like the powerful, rich Israeli Jews in Amsterdam did. (3/8)
Will the 1,000s of American troops and CIA agents stationed in Qatar just stand idle as arch-terrorists with the blood of hundreds of Americans on their hands drive past the their embassy and step into their private jets and fly off into the sunset?
Qatar isn't expelling the Hamas leadership because the Biden administration asked them to, but because they correctly suspect that the incoming Trump administration will demand their arrest and extradition.
They must be arrested, extradited, tried and hopefully executed. Anything less is a humiliation for the USA.
A reminded that Qatar is a fake country, with a tiny actual population, served by an army of foreign workers.
Even their police force and parts of their paltry military is staffed by foreigners.
This is why they hold their noses and invite the Kuffar USA (that they fund Al Jazeera to propagandize against) onto their little appendage to the Arabian Peninsula, since otherwise they would soon be overrun by the Saudi rivals.
Qatar needs the USA far more than the other way round. The USA could pack up its toys in weeks and Qatar would be gone within months.
So hey @SecBlinken, @JoeBiden, @KamalaHarris and the rest: Are you going to let arch terrorists with the blood of hundreds of Americans just openly fly off from under your noses?
When Trump publicly told Israel to attack Iran's nuclear sites a few weeks back, he set up the next 10 weeks as peak danger time for the Middle East if he won, and he has won, so here we are.
1. Iran has lost Hamas and Hezbollah, proxies it used to deter Israel. (1/5)
2. Iran has lost control of its airspace along with much of its air defence network.
3. Iran is still reeling from finding out how deeply their elites are penetrated by spies. They are likely very busy chasing their own tails.
4. They are losing their influence agents and fellow travellers who have held positions of power in the USA since 2008, and ensured that the US is hamstrung and appeasement-focused in everything relating to Iran. (2/5)
All this has made them much weaker, and more vulnerable, and the only thing that could flip this situation around for them are nukes.
If they actually are able to go for nuclear breakout, and it could be that they are not, it's probably now or never for them. They have 10 weeks. And if true, their enemies also have 10 weeks to stop them.
Israel and the USA also obviously know this, which likely explains the transfer of the B-52s to Qatar as a detternet. (3/5)
Why is Israel destroying so many buildings in these border villages? Random vengeance?
The truth is accidentally revealed by anti-Israel researcher Evan Hill: The blank patch (i.e., almost no buildings are damaged) between Ayta al-Shab and Yaroun is Rmaich. (1/4)
Despite the negligence of the Lebanese government and UNIFIL, the citizens of this Christian village fought all attempts to turn the bucolic mountain township into a terror base to destroy Israel. They bravely defied Hezbollah, unlike their neighbors. (2/4)
When a village adjacent to an international border is made into a swiss cheese of tunnels and dungeons filled with weapons—ready for an invasion at the beep of a pager—that infrastructure needs to be destroyed.
Its destruction is good, the tragedy is that it was built. (3/4)
Even as the main story in the Middle East has been the Turkish revenge carpet bombing of Kurds in Syria and Iraq, Sky News' Turkey based "Special Correspondent" Alex Crawford has only been writing about Gaza on X.
In fact, amazingly for a truth-seeking journalist who actually lives in Turkey where 20-25% of the people are from the heavily oppressed Kurdish minority, it's now more than 5 years since she used the word "Kurd" in any over her 1,000s of X post.
Surely she is terribly moved by the plight of the Kurds in the country she calls home, at least as much as she is by the Hamas "fighters" and Hezbollah "activists" she seems to so love?
Imagine a foreign correspondent who lived in Israel, who never managed to find the opportunity to use the word "Palestinian" or "Arab" over 5 years.
Wouldn't that seem odd?
And seeing as Alex Crawford is so agitated about the safety of her fellow journalists in Gaza (even as copious evidence points to them being Hamas terrorists) surely she is equally distressed about the suffering of brave journalists, Nedim Turfent is one of many, persecuted in the Turkey, the state where she lives. Right???