The news that MSNBC may soon have a new owner (and that it might be a certain X power user) compelled me to finally open my “MSNBC conspiracy theories” screenshot folder and, woo boy, there are a lot.
If you’d like to revisit them, buckle up, and follow along. ⤵️
There’s nowhere better to start than with Russiagate.
Do you remember the promotion from @chrislhayes, @MalcolmNance, @maddow and others at @MSNBC that perhaps Donald Trump was a Russian agent?
I, for one, will not be forgetting.
But there was plenty of other insanity from the gang at MSNBC about Russiagate.
Here are just a couple.
The first seems apropos with Trump again picking a cabinet.
And MSNBC managed to cover seemingly every aspect of the fraudulent story.
Remember the Steele Dossier? It imploded, but not before @MSNBC and its staff did everything they could to promote it. @KatyTurNBC
All to darken the public’s view on Trump.
This was on of my favorite threads, revisiting Steele
Another angle of Russiagate that I think folks may have already forgotten was the claim that Trump was willfully ignoring bounties placed on US troops in Afghanistan by Russia.
@MSNBC’s coverage really touched on every topic tied to Russiagate.
Remember when they ran interference for the illicit wire tapping of Carter Page?
Again: all of this was in service of political aims.
And then, to hear @MSNBC tell it, there were Trump’s taxes.
Remember when those were going to finally reveal the smoking gun of all the Russia stuff?
And of course there was Hunter Biden’s laptop.
@MSNBC was one of the most vocal advocates that it was “Russian disinformation” rather than an albatross for the president on the eve of an election.
But it isn’t just Russia-related conspiracies that @MSNBC has pushed.
Early in Trump’s first term, they were instrumental in promoting a conspiracy that border agents had used “whips” on migrants.
@joyannreid even had @IlhanMN on to shake their heads.
It was bogus.
I did a whole story about the “whips” story too
@MSNBC and @maddow almost single handedly created a conspiracy theory about ivermectin overdoses supposedly leading to overwhelmed hospitals during the heat of the pandemic.
Again. It wasn’t real. Just anti-Trump propaganda.
Do you remember when the FCC was going to end the internet? @chrislhayes had one of the best headlines. @MSNBC was petrified.
Did any of my followers survive Net Neutrality? (at least @BrendanCarrFCC did)
Back when election denial was a left-wing occupation, @MSNBC led the charge that Trump wasn’t a legitimate president.
No, really. Their words.
Or what about Covington Catholic. Remember when those kids in MAGA hats were supposedly harassing a Native American elder?
That story was bogus too. @MSNBC ran one of the most unhinged op-eds of that cycle (no small feat!). @amjoyshow
My all-time favorite of course remains @MSNBC’s (and Joy Reid’s in particular) promotion of the Jussie Smollett hoax.
And those conspiracy theory claims cut in the opposite direction to, when @MSNBC wrote off actual, important news as supposedly without merit.
Remember the “conspiracy” of a COVID lab leak?
Did @TomCottonAR ever get his apology?
Perhaps most consequential of all have been the claims from @MSNBC, @maddow, @NicolleDWallace and beyond that Biden’s cognitive functioning is totally fine.
They actively worked to cover up the mental decline of the guy with the nuclear codes. (H/t @townhallcom & @rcpvideo)
And then there was the promotion of grifters and other ne’erdowells.
From @MichaelAvenatti and Lisa Page to Fani Willis and Michael Cohen, there hasn’t been a voice they haven’t been willing to promote if said voice opposes Trump.
This side by side on masking just cracks me up.
Then there are just the ridiculous headlines. I don’t have the energy to go through all of these, but I promise you, they’re all real.
Including this one from last week.
Do they have any shame at @MSNBC?
My hunch is that they don’t, and that that’s part of the reason why they find themselves potentially up for purchase.
If @elonmusk is the one to do that, I sure hope he puts the network to better use.
In fairness, I don’t see how it could be worse than what @MSNBC is today.
@elonmusk @MSNBC Okay, a couple more because it seems like you guys liked this one and there’s more in the vault.
Remember “Jim Crow 2.0”? @MSNBC helped brand and promote that nonsense too.
@elonmusk @MSNBC Few outlets worked as hard as @MSNBC to promote Dr. Fauci and help him coverup the U.S. funding at labs in Wuhan.
Speaking of apologies, did @RandPaul ever get his?
Accusing Sen. Paul of “slander” sure sounds to me like…slander.
And where conspiracy theories go, @JoeNBC is rarely far behind. Doesn’t seem right to leave him off the @MSNBC thread.
From promoting Biden’s supposed mental competence to spreading disinfo on the pandemic and Trump (h/t @tomselliott & @kylenabecker), he’s been part and parcel.
@JoeNBC @MSNBC @tomselliott @kylenabecker @MSNBC has taken a special interest in promoting conspiracy theories tied to Trump’s health, from claiming he didn’t have Covid to claiming that maybe he wasn’t actually shot (h/t @EndWokeness)
@JoeNBC @MSNBC @tomselliott @kylenabecker @EndWokeness Oh and @MSNBC has pushed conspiracy theories about Israel, too, treating the Hamas-laden UNRWA as an authority, including blaming Israel for a hospital in Gaza that Hamas blew up. @mitchellreports
@JoeNBC @MSNBC @tomselliott @kylenabecker @EndWokeness @mitchellreports I almost forgot. @MSNBC was instrumental in pushing the false narrative that COVID was so dangerous to kids that schools needed to shut.
They had @rweingarten on to talk her book on it, without pushback.
If you like revisiting what the media gets wrong, check out my newsletter, @Holden_Court.
With the news that Trump freed the hostages and brokered an Israel/Hamas ceasefire, I thought it would be a good time to check in on the folks who compared the president to Hitler over the last few years, for reasons that I hope are obvious to you.
Remember? ⤵️
You may think the “Trump is literally Hitler” phrase is just a silly joke.
But for years, media outlets and left-wing voices on the internet have insisted that, no, really, Trump is just like Hitler.
Few have done so with as much gusto as @CNN.
Back in 2016, @CNN alleged that Trump rallies were just like Hitler rallies because…Trump had attendees raise their right hands.
A newly declassified CIA report on Joe Biden & Ukraine blows the doors off claims from the legacy press, in the lead up to the 2020 election and beyond, that Trump was pushing a “conspiracy theory” about Biden’s corruption.
Remember how the press buried Burisma? ⤵️
First, the facts. The report unearths how Biden blocked the release of intel from Ukrainian sources validating allegations of bribery tied to Biden’s diplomatic push to oust a prosecutor there in 2015, tied to his son Hunter’s work with the gas company Burisma.
You may remember this story because Biden’s having helped oust a prosecutor in a foreign country to allegedly protect his family’s corruption came up in the 2020 election.
To hear @ABC tell it, that was a “debunked Ukraine conspiracy theory.”
The media are melting down about former FBI director Jim Comey’s indictment, calling it Trump’s “retribution.”
But if prosecuting a political rival is such an outrage, why’d they cheer along when Biden went after Trump, Bannon & Navarro?
Some side-by-sides ⤵️
I want you to help me spot the difference in tone.
With Comey, @CNN put five — five! — reporters on the byline to declare the indictment was an “escalation” in “Trump’s effort to prosecute his political enemies.”
Where was that when Biden’s DOJ indicted Bannon? “A victory”
And @CNN wasn’t any better on Peter Navarro, another Trump aide indicted under Biden.
Rather than an “effort to prosecute…political enemies,” CNN quoted the prosecutor to tell the story.
Why is the claim of the government the framing of the piece under Biden? I have a guess.
The outrage over Kimmel’s canning is incredibly stupid, but it’s also enormously rich coming from the same media outlets who have cheered the government actually censoring people, particularly during COVID.
Let me know if you can spot the difference in tone? ⤵️
This @CNN headline made me think this story needed a thread.
Kimmel’s suspension is “straight from a European strongman’s playbook,” per @CNN’s @brianstelter.
When Biden cracked down on free speech during Covid, CNN hyped up the effort.
Few promoted the government’s actual attack on free speech more aggressively than the same @brianstelter now calling a comedian’s shelving evidence of autocracy, or something.
I know there’s a lot going on but we just had a media conspiracy implode that I think captures something important about the corporate press.
Did you hear about how Trump was allegedly going after John Bolton as retribution for his criticism?
Well…follow along ⤵️
We saw a week straight of media suggestions that Trump was abusing the powers of the state to deal out “retribution” to John Bolton following the news that the FBI (“Trump’s DOJ!” headlines rang out) raided his house.
We were in “unsettling” times, to hear @nytimes tell it.
The *Editorial Board* at @nytimes put out an even more dramatic statement, asking who Trump’s next payback victim after Bolton would be.
A single poll has bootstrapped a media narrative that DC residents are outraged by Trump’s takeover.
I poked around the cross tabs of the poll — of 600 or so of DC’s more comfortable residents — and I think it’s pretty suspect.
How come? Follow along: ⤵️
Let’s start with the poll. The @washingtonpost talked to 604 people, of whom 90% — 90%! — self-described as living in “very good” or “good” neighborhoods.
So, fine. 80% of people who like where they live in DC are upset.
But even beyond that, it’s worth asking whether this poll really captures DC’s opinion.
In the poll, only 31% describe crime as a “serious” or “very serious” problem in DC.
When @washingtonpost asked this same question in May, *50%* said it was a serious problem.