Drew Holden Profile picture
Nov 26, 2024 • 32 tweets • 19 min read • Read on X
🧵THREAD🧵

The news that MSNBC may soon have a new owner (and that it might be a certain X power user) compelled me to finally open my “MSNBC conspiracy theories” screenshot folder and, woo boy, there are a lot.

If you’d like to revisit them, buckle up, and follow along. ⤵️
There’s nowhere better to start than with Russiagate.

Do you remember the promotion from @chrislhayes, @MalcolmNance, @maddow and others at @MSNBC that perhaps Donald Trump was a Russian agent?

I, for one, will not be forgetting. Image
Image
Image
But there was plenty of other insanity from the gang at MSNBC about Russiagate.

Here are just a couple.

The first seems apropos with Trump again picking a cabinet. Image
Image
And MSNBC managed to cover seemingly every aspect of the fraudulent story.

Remember the Steele Dossier? It imploded, but not before @MSNBC and its staff did everything they could to promote it. @KatyTurNBC

All to darken the public’s view on Trump. Image
Image
Image
Image
This was on of my favorite threads, revisiting Steele
Another angle of Russiagate that I think folks may have already forgotten was the claim that Trump was willfully ignoring bounties placed on US troops in Afghanistan by Russia.

@maddow was a huge promoter. @MSNBC ran with it.

The story was a bust. @SteveSchmidtSES Image
Image
Image
Image
I did a whole thread on this one too.
@MSNBC’s coverage really touched on every topic tied to Russiagate.

Remember when they ran interference for the illicit wire tapping of Carter Page?

Again: all of this was in service of political aims. Image
Image
And then, to hear @MSNBC tell it, there were Trump’s taxes.

Remember when those were going to finally reveal the smoking gun of all the Russia stuff? Image
Image
And of course there was Hunter Biden’s laptop.

@MSNBC was one of the most vocal advocates that it was “Russian disinformation” rather than an albatross for the president on the eve of an election. Image
Image
Image
Image
But it isn’t just Russia-related conspiracies that @MSNBC has pushed.

Early in Trump’s first term, they were instrumental in promoting a conspiracy that border agents had used “whips” on migrants.

@joyannreid even had @IlhanMN on to shake their heads.

It was bogus. Image
Image
I did a whole story about the “whips” story too
@MSNBC and @maddow almost single handedly created a conspiracy theory about ivermectin overdoses supposedly leading to overwhelmed hospitals during the heat of the pandemic.

Again. It wasn’t real. Just anti-Trump propaganda.

I’ve got a whole thread on that one, too:
Do you remember when the FCC was going to end the internet? @chrislhayes had one of the best headlines. @MSNBC was petrified.

Did any of my followers survive Net Neutrality? (at least @BrendanCarrFCC did) Image
Image
Back when election denial was a left-wing occupation, @MSNBC led the charge that Trump wasn’t a legitimate president.

No, really. Their words. Image
Image
Or what about Covington Catholic. Remember when those kids in MAGA hats were supposedly harassing a Native American elder?

That story was bogus too. @MSNBC ran one of the most unhinged op-eds of that cycle (no small feat!). @amjoyshow Image
Image
My all-time favorite of course remains @MSNBC’s (and Joy Reid’s in particular) promotion of the Jussie Smollett hoax. Image
Image
Image
And those conspiracy theory claims cut in the opposite direction to, when @MSNBC wrote off actual, important news as supposedly without merit.

Remember the “conspiracy” of a COVID lab leak?

Did @TomCottonAR ever get his apology? Image
Image
Image
Perhaps most consequential of all have been the claims from @MSNBC, @maddow, @NicolleDWallace and beyond that Biden’s cognitive functioning is totally fine.

They actively worked to cover up the mental decline of the guy with the nuclear codes. (H/t @townhallcom & @rcpvideo) Image
Image
Image
Image
And then there was the promotion of grifters and other ne’erdowells.

From @MichaelAvenatti and Lisa Page to Fani Willis and Michael Cohen, there hasn’t been a voice they haven’t been willing to promote if said voice opposes Trump. Image
Image
Image
Image
This side by side on masking just cracks me up. Image
Image
Then there are just the ridiculous headlines. I don’t have the energy to go through all of these, but I promise you, they’re all real. Image
Image
Image
Image
Including this one from last week.

Do they have any shame at @MSNBC? Image
My hunch is that they don’t, and that that’s part of the reason why they find themselves potentially up for purchase.

If @elonmusk is the one to do that, I sure hope he puts the network to better use.

In fairness, I don’t see how it could be worse than what @MSNBC is today.
@elonmusk @MSNBC Okay, a couple more because it seems like you guys liked this one and there’s more in the vault.

Remember “Jim Crow 2.0”? @MSNBC helped brand and promote that nonsense too. Image
Image
Image
@elonmusk @MSNBC Few outlets worked as hard as @MSNBC to promote Dr. Fauci and help him coverup the U.S. funding at labs in Wuhan.

Speaking of apologies, did @RandPaul ever get his?

Accusing Sen. Paul of “slander” sure sounds to me like…slander. Image
Image
Image
And where conspiracy theories go, @JoeNBC is rarely far behind. Doesn’t seem right to leave him off the @MSNBC thread.

From promoting Biden’s supposed mental competence to spreading disinfo on the pandemic and Trump (h/t @tomselliott & @kylenabecker), he’s been part and parcel. Image
Image
Image
Image
@JoeNBC @MSNBC @tomselliott @kylenabecker @MSNBC has taken a special interest in promoting conspiracy theories tied to Trump’s health, from claiming he didn’t have Covid to claiming that maybe he wasn’t actually shot (h/t @EndWokeness) Image
Image
@JoeNBC @MSNBC @tomselliott @kylenabecker @EndWokeness Oh and @MSNBC has pushed conspiracy theories about Israel, too, treating the Hamas-laden UNRWA as an authority, including blaming Israel for a hospital in Gaza that Hamas blew up. @mitchellreports Image
Image
@JoeNBC @MSNBC @tomselliott @kylenabecker @EndWokeness @mitchellreports I almost forgot. @MSNBC was instrumental in pushing the false narrative that COVID was so dangerous to kids that schools needed to shut.

They had @rweingarten on to talk her book on it, without pushback. Image
Image
If you like revisiting what the media gets wrong, check out my newsletter, @Holden_Court.

You can subscribe here: open.substack.com/pub/drewholdenImage
@Holden_Court And if you’d like to buy me a beer for spending all this time with MSNBC so you don’t have to, I’ve got a better idea.

I’m running a turkey trot on Thanksgiving for a great charity that feeds those in need. You can donate here: zippy-reg.com/fundraise/2077…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Drew Holden

Drew Holden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrewHolden360

Mar 12
When it’s a D // When it’s an R Image
Image
Oh there are a lot of these.
@mcmurphy_pat Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 5
🧵Thread🧵

If you missed Trump’s address to Congress last night, I wouldn’t rely on media stories to explain it.

Rather than report on a speech viewers found “inspiring,” the corporate press played PR for Democrats.

Wanna know why trust in the press is underwater? Look. ⤵️
A @CBSNews poll of viewers found “A large majority of viewers approve” of Trump’s message, overwhelmingly describing it as “inspiring,” rather than “divisive.”

The speech was certainly partisan - and viewers skewed right.

But the press’s own view appears to slant their takes. Image
Image
What leads me to claim that? Well, just look at how @CBSNews decided to report on the speech.

They tweeted out that “there was a horribly tense feeling,” and it was “filled with drama.”

Why focus on how their reporter felt, rather than viewers? Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
Feb 6
Having worked on the Hill I get the ubiquity of Politico Pro and its cost.

But I think it takes an enormous suspension of disbelief to call it a conspiracy theory to look askance at the millions of dollars the Biden admin paid the paper that ran this hatchet job on his opponent. Image
Image
Which, to be clear, is exactly what outlets like @CNN are doing. Image
Image
@CNN This from @axios seems particularly unreasonable.

It isn’t a “fake theory” to say that Politico is “funded by the government.” It is, to the tune of $8 million. That isn’t in dispute. Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 25
Quick 🧵 revisiting corporate media claims on the Covid lab leak theory then (a “conspiracy theory,” “misinformation,” etc.) vs. now (“okay the CIA even admits it”).

@nytimes then // @nytimes now Image
Image
@washingtonpost then // now Image
Image
@USATODAY then // now Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
Jan 25
Okay quick 🧵 on the bogus claims that ICE went into a school in Chicago to deport students. Starting with @GovPritzker

More ⤵️ Image
@RepMikeQuigley why are you promoting misinformation? Image
@chicagotribune why are you deceiving your readers? Image
Read 12 tweets
Jan 23
🧵Thread🧵

Trump’s return to the Oval Office has me reflecting on some of the worst “journalism” during his first term.

Of that long list, one in particular jumps out: the corporate press hype around the Steele dossier.

Do you *really* remember how bad it was? Follow along. ⤵️
Before I dive in, would really encourage you to read my full piece at @Holden_Court, because there’s too much to fit in a thread.

That said, surely you remember the dossier, a bunch of dramatic claims about Trump that even @nytimes now calls “discredited” open.substack.com/pub/drewholden…Image
But before that, there was the hype: the hero worship of Christopher Steele, the spy who was going to save American from Trump, the Russian puppet.

I mean, @washingtonpost put “hero” right in the title.

The rest of the piece is worse. WaPo repeats the claims — that the Russians had kompromat on him for engaging with prostitutes! Maybe Trump was compromised — verbatim without mentioning in the first instance that there’s no evidence these claims are true! Look at the highlights.

An unthinkable breach of journalistic ethics. There was plenty more.Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(