The news that MSNBC may soon have a new owner (and that it might be a certain X power user) compelled me to finally open my “MSNBC conspiracy theories” screenshot folder and, woo boy, there are a lot.
If you’d like to revisit them, buckle up, and follow along. ⤵️
There’s nowhere better to start than with Russiagate.
Do you remember the promotion from @chrislhayes, @MalcolmNance, @maddow and others at @MSNBC that perhaps Donald Trump was a Russian agent?
I, for one, will not be forgetting.
But there was plenty of other insanity from the gang at MSNBC about Russiagate.
Here are just a couple.
The first seems apropos with Trump again picking a cabinet.
And MSNBC managed to cover seemingly every aspect of the fraudulent story.
Remember the Steele Dossier? It imploded, but not before @MSNBC and its staff did everything they could to promote it. @KatyTurNBC
All to darken the public’s view on Trump.
This was on of my favorite threads, revisiting Steele
Another angle of Russiagate that I think folks may have already forgotten was the claim that Trump was willfully ignoring bounties placed on US troops in Afghanistan by Russia.
@MSNBC’s coverage really touched on every topic tied to Russiagate.
Remember when they ran interference for the illicit wire tapping of Carter Page?
Again: all of this was in service of political aims.
And then, to hear @MSNBC tell it, there were Trump’s taxes.
Remember when those were going to finally reveal the smoking gun of all the Russia stuff?
And of course there was Hunter Biden’s laptop.
@MSNBC was one of the most vocal advocates that it was “Russian disinformation” rather than an albatross for the president on the eve of an election.
But it isn’t just Russia-related conspiracies that @MSNBC has pushed.
Early in Trump’s first term, they were instrumental in promoting a conspiracy that border agents had used “whips” on migrants.
@joyannreid even had @IlhanMN on to shake their heads.
It was bogus.
I did a whole story about the “whips” story too
@MSNBC and @maddow almost single handedly created a conspiracy theory about ivermectin overdoses supposedly leading to overwhelmed hospitals during the heat of the pandemic.
Again. It wasn’t real. Just anti-Trump propaganda.
Do you remember when the FCC was going to end the internet? @chrislhayes had one of the best headlines. @MSNBC was petrified.
Did any of my followers survive Net Neutrality? (at least @BrendanCarrFCC did)
Back when election denial was a left-wing occupation, @MSNBC led the charge that Trump wasn’t a legitimate president.
No, really. Their words.
Or what about Covington Catholic. Remember when those kids in MAGA hats were supposedly harassing a Native American elder?
That story was bogus too. @MSNBC ran one of the most unhinged op-eds of that cycle (no small feat!). @amjoyshow
My all-time favorite of course remains @MSNBC’s (and Joy Reid’s in particular) promotion of the Jussie Smollett hoax.
And those conspiracy theory claims cut in the opposite direction to, when @MSNBC wrote off actual, important news as supposedly without merit.
Remember the “conspiracy” of a COVID lab leak?
Did @TomCottonAR ever get his apology?
Perhaps most consequential of all have been the claims from @MSNBC, @maddow, @NicolleDWallace and beyond that Biden’s cognitive functioning is totally fine.
They actively worked to cover up the mental decline of the guy with the nuclear codes. (H/t @townhallcom & @rcpvideo)
And then there was the promotion of grifters and other ne’erdowells.
From @MichaelAvenatti and Lisa Page to Fani Willis and Michael Cohen, there hasn’t been a voice they haven’t been willing to promote if said voice opposes Trump.
This side by side on masking just cracks me up.
Then there are just the ridiculous headlines. I don’t have the energy to go through all of these, but I promise you, they’re all real.
Including this one from last week.
Do they have any shame at @MSNBC?
My hunch is that they don’t, and that that’s part of the reason why they find themselves potentially up for purchase.
If @elonmusk is the one to do that, I sure hope he puts the network to better use.
In fairness, I don’t see how it could be worse than what @MSNBC is today.
@elonmusk @MSNBC Okay, a couple more because it seems like you guys liked this one and there’s more in the vault.
Remember “Jim Crow 2.0”? @MSNBC helped brand and promote that nonsense too.
@elonmusk @MSNBC Few outlets worked as hard as @MSNBC to promote Dr. Fauci and help him coverup the U.S. funding at labs in Wuhan.
Speaking of apologies, did @RandPaul ever get his?
Accusing Sen. Paul of “slander” sure sounds to me like…slander.
And where conspiracy theories go, @JoeNBC is rarely far behind. Doesn’t seem right to leave him off the @MSNBC thread.
From promoting Biden’s supposed mental competence to spreading disinfo on the pandemic and Trump (h/t @tomselliott & @kylenabecker), he’s been part and parcel.
@JoeNBC @MSNBC @tomselliott @kylenabecker @MSNBC has taken a special interest in promoting conspiracy theories tied to Trump’s health, from claiming he didn’t have Covid to claiming that maybe he wasn’t actually shot (h/t @EndWokeness)
@JoeNBC @MSNBC @tomselliott @kylenabecker @EndWokeness Oh and @MSNBC has pushed conspiracy theories about Israel, too, treating the Hamas-laden UNRWA as an authority, including blaming Israel for a hospital in Gaza that Hamas blew up. @mitchellreports
@JoeNBC @MSNBC @tomselliott @kylenabecker @EndWokeness @mitchellreports I almost forgot. @MSNBC was instrumental in pushing the false narrative that COVID was so dangerous to kids that schools needed to shut.
They had @rweingarten on to talk her book on it, without pushback.
If you like revisiting what the media gets wrong, check out my newsletter, @Holden_Court.
Whatever happened to Harris and Biden’s “strongest economy ever” that the media spent so much time hyping up in the lead up to the election?
I revisit the claims, and explain why they were off the mark about the economy all along, in my latest @AmerCompass.
Quick🧵thread🧵⤵️
It can be easy, in the wake of an election, to forget just how dominant a media narrative was.
One that’s already fading from view was how “great” the economy was, and why it would benefit Harris on Election Day. americancompass.org/its-still-the-…
As a refresher, check out this headline from @axios about the data.
@YahooFinance upgraded Biden’s economic grade to an A. That captures the press sentiment at the time quite well.
In recent days, the mainstream media has taken nakedly ridiculous claims about the tattoos of @PeteHegseth, Trump’s SecDef nominee, to spin up a story alleging he’s an extremist.
It’s an egregious example of politically driven “journalism.” I unpack why. ⤵️
The story really started with @AP, who ran an article claiming that two tattoos that @PeteHegseth has have ties to extremism, citing an extremely thin (and downright suspect) report.
They used that to label him a potential “insider threat” in their headline.
It wasn’t until 3 paragraphs in that a reader was told what that claim rested on: a tattoo of a Latin phrase. They’d go on to mention “concerns” about a cross tattoo as well.
Would be great if Trump’s unconventional picks for his cabinet inspire the media to consider a nominee’s credentials.
They might want to look at the current HHS Secretary, Xavier Becerra, who brings to the table the medical experience of being in Congress for 12 terms.
Or perhaps Obama’s former HHS Secretary, Sylvia Matthews Burwell, who had just finished her stint lobbying for Walmart.
Or Donna Shalala, Clinton’s former head of HHS, whose credentials were as a university administrator and feminist.
I know it seems silly, but the media meltdown about Trump working at a McDonald’s is clarifying about why trust in the press has cratered.
Before we get to that, let’s revisit some of the most deranged takes. ⤵️
The press’s response to Trump deciding to troll Harris for her unsupported claims that she worked at McDonald’s by working at the chain himself sent the media into a tizzy.
Here’s @CNN, suddenly apologetic about a corporation in the political limelight.
My favorite take came from @nytimes, who appeared outraged that…Trump didn’t wear a hairnet.
The media is already trying to memory-hole the (first) attempted assassination of former President Trump.
I suspect many of you have felt it happening, but I walked through the details for The Spectator, and wanted to share some of them here.
Follow along ⤵️
First, I just want to level-set to make sure I’m not crazy.
Someone tried to kill the former POTUS, who, according to a variety of polls, is the odds-on favorite to return to that office. Tons of details didn’t make sense.
Seems like the press story of the year, right?
Well…
So far, the press doesn’t seem to think so.
It started as soon as the shots rang out. Do you remember how bad & unhelpful the headlines were?
I’ve got screenshots. @USATODAY @NBCNews (“popping noises”) @CNN (“injured in incident”) @latimes (“loud noises want through the crowd”)