Chris Cillizza Profile picture
Nov 27 11 tweets 2 min read Read on X
🧵
1/ The election ended 3 weeks ago. Enough time has passed.

We -- or I -- can now safely pronounce that the Tim Walz VP pick was a dud.

Let me explain: Image
2/ Before I get into it, let me say two things.

One: Tim Walz did not lose Harris the race (or even close to it)

Two: Josh Shapiro would not have made Harris win -- or even win Pennsylvania.
3/ That said, I just don't think the Walz pick made a ton of sense for Harris.

I genuinely think Walz was the pick because he called Trump/Vance "weird" on MSNBC in late July and instantly went viral.
4/ Remember that Harris had an incredibly compressed timeline to choose a VP. From the day Joe Biden dropped out to the day Harris picked Walz was 16(!) days.

That's it.
5/ And Walz peaked at the exact right time. Just as Harris was looking around for a VP, Walz was the hottest thing in politics.

He had cracked the code on how to attack Trump! He was plain spoken! He was a football coach!
6/ To be clear: I think Harris genuinely liked Walz and felt a rapport with him.

And that she and her strategists convinced themselves that Walz’s “big dad energy” might help her appeal to critical voters in the upper Midwest.
7/ But, without “weird,” Walz is never on her radar. Period.

And, he never really found a 2nd act after "weird."
8/ Yes, there was excitement about the ticket after the pick.

But in retrospect that looks to me a LOT like excitement that Biden wasn't the nominee anymore.

Like, if Harris had picked Shapiro or Gretchen Whitmer would the energy have been less?

I don't think so.
9/ Walz was mediocre (at best) in the VP debate.

His tendency to exaggerate/misremember details about his past turned into a national story.

And toward the end of the campaign, he was just a nonentity.
10/ Add it up and you get this: Walz was a mediocre pick based, largely, on a viral moment.

And with hindsight being 20-20 there were clearly better VP picks available to Harris.
11/ I broke it all down in my FREE nightly newsletter. Read the whole thing -- and subscribe -- via the link in my bio!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chris Cillizza

Chris Cillizza Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChrisCillizza

Nov 12
🧵
1/ I've been posting charts/graphs/maps that I think tell the story of the election (and where we are headed) over the last week.

Decided to put them all in a single place.

You can see all 15 for FREE! Link in my bio!

Let's go through them:
2/ Donald Trump won 33% of non-white voters Image
3/ The two parties’ voting coalitions have totally flip-flopped, part 1 Image
Read 16 tweets
Nov 7
🧵
1/ I asked a prominent D strategist to help me diagnose what went so wrong for Kamala Harris and what the party needs now.

He wrote an incredible autopsy.

You can read it for FREE. Link in my bio.

A few key thoughts from it: Image
2/ It all began on March 14, 2020 -- when Biden, in a debate with Bernie Sanders -- pledged he would pick a woman to be his VP.

As the strategist wrote: "With this transactional appeal to the progressive left, Biden traded his responsibility to choose the most qualified potential heir for, instead, a smoother path to the nomination that was likely his before the promise was even made."
3/ Of Biden picking Harris as VP, the strategist wrote:

"It was a choice born in the woke politics of our time (a triggering denunciation, I am sure, with those on the left) that was part and parcel of why the Democratic Party has been shedding voters in middle America over the last decade."
Read 6 tweets
Oct 9
🧵
1/ Kamala Harris stepped in 💩 today.

In an interview with @TheView, she was asked if she would have done ANYTHING different than Joe Biden.

She said: "There is not a thing that comes to mind"

WHOOPS. Image
2/ Remember that Biden's approval rating has been in the high 30s or low 40s for 18 months straight.

And that a majority of the public does not approve of how he has handled issues like immigration or the economy.
3/ I don't even think Harris would have had to make a major break with Biden though.

Just say something like: “I don’t agree with anyone 100% of the time. And the times that I disagreed with President Biden, I made sure he knew my views. But as president he had the final say.”
Read 6 tweets
Oct 3
🧵
1/ The more I look at the electoral map, the more I am convinced that the election comes down to MI, PA and WI.

If Harris wins all three, she is president -- no matter what happens in AZ, GA, NV or NC.

But... Image
2/ If she loses any ONE of those Blue Wall states, her path gets much harder.

Like, if she loses WI, she would then need GA, NC or AZ to win.

If she loses PA she would need two of GA, NC and AZ or one of them + NV
3/ The good thing for Harris is, at least right now, polling averages put her ahead in all three Blue Wall states -- albeit by no more than 3 points.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 22
🧵
1/ I didn't really *get* the Tim Walz thing before last night.

I knew of him when he was a Congressman. And when he got elected governor.

But the political world never touted him as a rising star. Not "someone to watch."

So, I underestimated him...
2/ When Kamala Harris picked Walz, I thought it was a mistake.

Josh Shapiro made much more sense in terms of raw political considerations.
3/ But what Walz has -- and it's rare in politics these days -- is that he's totally comfortable in his own skin. He knows who he is. He's authentic. And he doesn't try to be someone else.

And authenticity is the coin of the realm. He oozes it.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 14
🧵
1/ I wanted to distill my thoughts on Kamala Harris’ no-media strategy into a single piece.

The essence: Democrats are engaged in a massive game of whataboutism on the issue. Harris should talk to the media because it’s the right thing to do for democracy.

Let me explain. Image
2/ The first response from any Democrat when you mention the fact that Harris has done ZERO media interviews and held ZERO press conferences as the presidential nominee is something like:Trump is way worse!

They note, rightly, that Trump has worked to undermine the press. That he mostly gives interviews to friendly outlets. And that he lies all the time.
3/ I don’t dispute ANY of that.

But, Democrats have insisted since Trump emerged on the scene that the way he behaves – including how he treats the media – is a threat to democracy. And that their party is better and more committed to democratic ideals than Trump and Republicans.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(