🧵 1/ The election ended 3 weeks ago. Enough time has passed.
We -- or I -- can now safely pronounce that the Tim Walz VP pick was a dud.
Let me explain:
2/ Before I get into it, let me say two things.
One: Tim Walz did not lose Harris the race (or even close to it)
Two: Josh Shapiro would not have made Harris win -- or even win Pennsylvania.
3/ That said, I just don't think the Walz pick made a ton of sense for Harris.
I genuinely think Walz was the pick because he called Trump/Vance "weird" on MSNBC in late July and instantly went viral.
4/ Remember that Harris had an incredibly compressed timeline to choose a VP. From the day Joe Biden dropped out to the day Harris picked Walz was 16(!) days.
That's it.
5/ And Walz peaked at the exact right time. Just as Harris was looking around for a VP, Walz was the hottest thing in politics.
He had cracked the code on how to attack Trump! He was plain spoken! He was a football coach!
6/ To be clear: I think Harris genuinely liked Walz and felt a rapport with him.
And that she and her strategists convinced themselves that Walz’s “big dad energy” might help her appeal to critical voters in the upper Midwest.
7/ But, without “weird,” Walz is never on her radar. Period.
And, he never really found a 2nd act after "weird."
8/ Yes, there was excitement about the ticket after the pick.
But in retrospect that looks to me a LOT like excitement that Biden wasn't the nominee anymore.
Like, if Harris had picked Shapiro or Gretchen Whitmer would the energy have been less?
I don't think so.
9/ Walz was mediocre (at best) in the VP debate.
His tendency to exaggerate/misremember details about his past turned into a national story.
And toward the end of the campaign, he was just a nonentity.
10/ Add it up and you get this: Walz was a mediocre pick based, largely, on a viral moment.
And with hindsight being 20-20 there were clearly better VP picks available to Harris.
11/ I broke it all down in my FREE nightly newsletter. Read the whole thing -- and subscribe -- via the link in my bio!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 1/ I asked a prominent D strategist to help me diagnose what went so wrong for Kamala Harris and what the party needs now.
He wrote an incredible autopsy.
You can read it for FREE. Link in my bio.
A few key thoughts from it:
2/ It all began on March 14, 2020 -- when Biden, in a debate with Bernie Sanders -- pledged he would pick a woman to be his VP.
As the strategist wrote: "With this transactional appeal to the progressive left, Biden traded his responsibility to choose the most qualified potential heir for, instead, a smoother path to the nomination that was likely his before the promise was even made."
3/ Of Biden picking Harris as VP, the strategist wrote:
"It was a choice born in the woke politics of our time (a triggering denunciation, I am sure, with those on the left) that was part and parcel of why the Democratic Party has been shedding voters in middle America over the last decade."
In an interview with @TheView, she was asked if she would have done ANYTHING different than Joe Biden.
She said: "There is not a thing that comes to mind"
WHOOPS.
2/ Remember that Biden's approval rating has been in the high 30s or low 40s for 18 months straight.
And that a majority of the public does not approve of how he has handled issues like immigration or the economy.
3/ I don't even think Harris would have had to make a major break with Biden though.
Just say something like: “I don’t agree with anyone 100% of the time. And the times that I disagreed with President Biden, I made sure he knew my views. But as president he had the final say.”
🧵 1/ I didn't really *get* the Tim Walz thing before last night.
I knew of him when he was a Congressman. And when he got elected governor.
But the political world never touted him as a rising star. Not "someone to watch."
So, I underestimated him...
2/ When Kamala Harris picked Walz, I thought it was a mistake.
Josh Shapiro made much more sense in terms of raw political considerations.
3/ But what Walz has -- and it's rare in politics these days -- is that he's totally comfortable in his own skin. He knows who he is. He's authentic. And he doesn't try to be someone else.
And authenticity is the coin of the realm. He oozes it.
🧵 1/ I wanted to distill my thoughts on Kamala Harris’ no-media strategy into a single piece.
The essence: Democrats are engaged in a massive game of whataboutism on the issue. Harris should talk to the media because it’s the right thing to do for democracy.
Let me explain.
2/ The first response from any Democrat when you mention the fact that Harris has done ZERO media interviews and held ZERO press conferences as the presidential nominee is something like:Trump is way worse!
They note, rightly, that Trump has worked to undermine the press. That he mostly gives interviews to friendly outlets. And that he lies all the time.
3/ I don’t dispute ANY of that.
But, Democrats have insisted since Trump emerged on the scene that the way he behaves – including how he treats the media – is a threat to democracy. And that their party is better and more committed to democratic ideals than Trump and Republicans.