MASSIVE: 11 State Attorneys General led by @KenPaxtonTX are *SUING* BlackRock, Vanguard, and State Street for anti-trust violations.
The Big 3 asset managers abused their market power to drive up the nation's energy prices, according to the lawsuit.
"The lawsuit argues that the big 3 asset managers have used their substantial holdings in American energy companies to artificially suppress the supply of coal, which in turn has driven up the price of coal, resulting in higher end costs for consumers nationwide," @WillHild reported on X.
"According to the lawsuit, there is verifiable proof that the big 3 asset managers have worked in tandem to leverage their combined ownership power to pressure coal companies into submitting to their Net-Zero goals (like reducing carbon emissions from coal by more than 50%)," he continued.
"If the allegations in the lawsuit are true (which I believe they are), it would mean @BlackRock, @Vanguard_Group and @StateStreet are not only guilty of violating antitrust law, they are also guilty of massive fraud by continually misleading investors," he added.
The Biden administration had been heavily influenced by Larry Fink's BlackRock, so this represents a titanic shift in policy towards these asset managers.
This lawsuit could also lead to lower energy prices for consumers, when combined with an America First, all-of-the-above energy strategy and the deregulation expected to come through @DOGE recommendations under the forthcoming Trump administration.
This is a massive lawsuit with huge implications for the relationship of the U.S. government towards these huge asset managers.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Revolver News is willing to address the matter directly in the following three questions:
- In the year leading up to 1/6 and during 1/6 itself, to what extent were the three primary militia groups (the Oath Keepers, the Proud Boys, and the Three Percenters) that the FBI, DOJ, Pentagon and network news have labeled most responsible for planning and executing a Capitol attack on 1/6 infiltrated by agencies of the federal government, or informants of said agencies?
- Exactly how many federal undercover agents or confidential informants were present at the Capitol or in the Capitol during the infamous “siege” and what roles did they play (merely passive informants or active instigators)?
- Finally, of all of the unindicted co-conspirators referenced in the charging documents of those indicted for crimes on 1/6, how many worked as a confidential informant or as an undercover operative for the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, etc.)?"
Here is the intellectually dishonest piece in question.
There is no recanting of Piker's NUMEROUS unmistakable calls for violence against people who simply disagree with him about politics. nytimes.com/2025/09/13/opi…
"The United States of America is still reeling from the worst border invasion in its history.”
“This invasion could not have been accomplished without a colossal partnership with the NGO community."
The Biden regime led the biggest human trafficking operation in history.
This was nothing less than a state-led foreign invasion of the United States.
It was absolutely criminal. We are all still waiting for basic accountability.
Video credit: @WallStreetApes
The human misery caused by child trafficking. Thousands of fentanyl deaths. Drug cartels taking over entire neighborhoods. Foreign nationals from enemy regimes pouring across our border.
A nightmare for national security. All of it was known "collateral damage" to the Biden regime.
The human suffering went ignored because the only thing the Democrats care about is political power. Monstrous.
Here are the names of journalists assessed as laundering classified information in the Russia Hoax.
The New York Times. Washington Post. The Wall Street Journal.
All had reporters who appear to have participated in recycling the Democratic Party's talking points based on faulty and misleading intel dumps.
This is not "journalism." This is being an accomplice to state propaganda.
These "journalists" are partly responsible for dividing the nation for years and seeking to overturn the will of the people as determined by a free and fair election.
This is Russia Hoax ground zero. And it was all part of an operation to carry out a "coup" against a duly elected president.
The New York Times piece was particularly egregious in rehashing a "scoop" on Carter Page and repeating baseless innuendo about Roger Stone.
This publication won "Pulitzers" for its "journalism."
This is nothing less than state propaganda. It isn't "reporting."
"Page has publicly said that he was a source for the CIA, which would provide an innocent explanation for his Russian contacts."
You might recall that Clinesmith lied about this subject.
No, he did not go to jail. Judge Boasberg, who was on the FISA court, and approved illegal renewals, thought 'no harm, no foul.'