💚 The Green Party have published a new policy calling for urgent action to tackle the ongoing waves of Covid which are causing so much harm to the nation’s health & economy.

Huge thanks to everyone involved in making this happen.

@AdrianRamsay @carla_denyer @ZackPolanski
The Green Party are absolutely right.

We cannot continue to ignore Covid.

Covid has not gone away, nor has it settled into a seasonal pattern.

The endless waves continue to batter the nation throughout the year - and even in the dips, remains at a relatively high level. Image
Last Winter, the government briefly reinstated their ‘gold standard’ ONS Covid Infection Survey…

The data revealed that, at the peak of last Winter’s wave (Dec 2023), 1 in 24 people across England were infected with Covid.

Sadly, the survey has not been reinstated this winter. Image
All this additional illness, on top of the usual respiratory viruses like flu & RSV, is having a huge impact on economic productivity across the nation.

According to the IPPR, the cost of staff sickness soared by 41% to £103 BILLION in 2023 (compared to 2018). Image
You can read the full IPPR report at the link below.

This report clearly shows how the increased level of illness amongst employees is having a HUGE cost to businesses.

And the majority of this cost is caused by employees attempting to work when sick.

ippr-org.files.svdcdn.com/production/Dow…Image
One of the workplaces most affected by this is HEALTHCARE settings…

The chart below shows sickness absence rates for all NHS staff from Jan 2011 - May 2024.

It’s clear to see just how much more sickness absence there is since the start of the pandemic.

(Chart: @1goodtern) Image
SCHOOLS are feeling the impact too.

Nearly half of all pupil absences are due to illness…

…and pupil absences purely due to illness are still 40% higher than the pre-pandemic rate. Image
But short-term illness is only the tip of the iceberg.

The other big problem is long-term illness resulting from Covid infections.

The latest GP-Patient Survey (July 2024) shows that 4.6% of the population now have LONG COVID.

That equates to 3.1 MILLION people across the UK! Image
As explained in this superb article, Long Covid is a complex multi-systemic disease with sequelae across almost all organ systems.

It can affect people of all ages, and over 90% of LC cases occur in those who only had a mild initial infection.

science.org/doi/10.1126/sc… x.com/zalaly/status/…Image
According to the latest ONS Covid Infection Survey (March 2024), 29% of those currently suffering from Long Covid reported that their symptoms started within the last 12 months.

In other words, nearly A THIRD of people suffering from Long Covid are NEW cases since March 2023. Image
And, of those affected by Long Covid, data from both the UK and the US suggests that roughly 1 in 5 will be SEVERELY debilitated, with their ability to undertake basic day-to-day activities limited a LOT.

Tragically, many of these people end up bedridden for much of the time. Image
Now what happens if we combine this 1 in 5 estimate for those severely affected with the GP-Patient survey data which showed that 3.1M (4.6%) across the UK now have Long Covid…

20% of 3.1M = 620,000

That’s an estimate of the number of people SEVERELY impacted by Long Covid.
Now guess how many people are no longer able to work DUE TO LONG-TERM SICKNESS since the start of the pandemic?

Wow! Look at that… it’s almost exactly the same number!

630,000 more working age people are not working due to long-term sickness since the start of the pandemic. Image
This finding is further supported by the UK LOCOMOTION study which revealed that:

🚨28% of those suffering from Long Covid have been forced to stop working altogether.

🚨A further 23.5% of Ling Covid sufferers had had to reduce their working hours.

evidence.nihr.ac.uk/alert/how-much…Image
A recent Economist Impact analysis estimated that:

🚨More than 251.8 MILLION work hours may be lost due to long Covid in 2024.

🚨The economic cost resulting from this is estimated to be over US$15.5 BILLION - that’s equivalent to 0.5% of the UK’s GDP.

impact.economist.com/perspectives/h…Image
An IFS report published earlier this year showed that:

🚨Overall spending to support people with long-term health conditions had increased from £65 billion in 2020-21 to £78 billion in 2023-24.

That’s a 20% rise in just 3 years…

ifs.org.uk/publications/c…Image
And the official forecasts suggest that spending to support people with long-term health conditions will continue to grow by a further £22 BILLION (28%) over the next five years…

…reaching a staggering £100 BILLION by 2028-29. Image
The official forecast shows the rise in spending to support people with long-term health conditions levelling off over the next 5 years.

I hope that’s true, but I’m not so optimistic that this is going to happen, unless something major changes in terms of prevention…
An article in The Times recently summarised some of these shocking stats:

🚨By 2029, HALF of all Universal Credit claims will be for LONG-TERM HEALTH CONDITIONS (up from 31% in 2023).

Read the full article here:
thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…

(Paywall free: archive.ph/GYeAM) Image
It is high time for the government to step up & start taking Long Covid seriously.

That’s why it’s such brilliant news that @TheGreenParty have put together this policy calling on the government to IMMEDIATELY introduce simple measures to protect us all from Covid.

💚💚💚💚💚💚 THE GREEN PARTY ACTION ON COVID AND LONG COVID We call on the Government to follow expert advice and immediately introduce simple measures to protect us all from Covid. Air quality improvements in public indoor spaces, e.g. schools, hospitals, public transport, workplaces • NHS that is safe for patients and staff • Free lateral flow tests • Sick pay for supported isolation • Research into improved vaccines and therapeutics • Post-viral chronic illness research task force for better understanding of and treatments for Long Covid, ME and Chronic Fatigue Syndromes • Comprehensive, safe, eviden...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Cat in the Hat 🐈‍⬛ 🎩 🇬🇧

Cat in the Hat 🐈‍⬛ 🎩 🇬🇧 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_CatintheHat

Feb 18
⚠️ IPC GUIDANCE

Newly-appointed Health Minister @AshleyDalton_MP has just responded to a question from MP @_Chris_Coghlan.

Chris asks when the NHS IPC manual will be updated to reflect the latest science on AIRBORNE transmission.

Let’s take a closer look at Ashley’s reply… Image
The key bit is highlighted in yellow here:

“Should new evidence emerge that warrants updates, the guidance will be reviewed & revised accordingly by NHS England & UKHSA to ensure the highest standards of infection prevention & control are maintained across healthcare settings.” Image
Well @AshleyDalton_MP, new evidence HAS emerged.

It’s not even new news as we’ve known about it since 2020!

There’s not a single credible scientist who still denies that Covid is transmitted via the AIRBORNE route.

Please listen to independent expert witness Prof Beggs here ⬇️
Read 27 tweets
Feb 13
“WHY ARE YOU STILL MASKING?”

The folks at the @TheWHN have put together a really excellent set of science-based answers to various questions about why you’re still wearing a mask.

(Even if you’re not still masking, you might be interested in the answers).

Let’s take a look…🧵 Image
1. “Isn’t the pandemic over?”

Short Answer: The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the emergency phase over, but that doesn’t mean the pandemic itself has ended.

(h/t @TheWHN) Image
2. “But you’re not high-risk, so why bother wearing a mask?”

Short Answer: Because preventing transmission matters for everyone, not just people in vulnerable groups.

(h/t @TheWHN) Image
Read 12 tweets
Jan 30
I’ve been reflecting on this letter from Minister @GwynneMP ⬇️

The letter which says the government supports Dr Lisa Ritchie’s view that “Covid is not predominantly transmitted through the airborne route”.

I suspect there may be a little more to it than meets the eye… 🧐

/1 Image
You see, here’s the thing:

Letters like that don’t get written in a vacuum.

Letters like that are usually drafted on behalf of Ministers by a civil servant who has expertise in the subject matter.

So I’m left wondering: who drafted it?

Who is advising Mr Gwynne?

/2
Dr Ritchie’s testimony at the Covid Inquiry has been widely criticised as her views conflicted so starkly with scientific evidence presented by independent experts like Prof Beggs.

So it seems odd that the letter is written in a way which so emphatically supports her stance.

/3
Read 24 tweets
Jan 19
UK COVID INQUIRY

In this video, I’ve compiled crucial evidence from expert witness Prof Clive Beggs where he confirms:

🔎 Covid is airborne
🔎 Covid is predominantly spread via airborne aerosols (not droplets)
🔎 Breathing & talking generate significant amounts of aerosols.
Here’s a little more detail from Prof Beggs’ testimony where he again confirms that the BULK of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is carried in the small airborne aerosols, NOT in the larger droplets which rapidly fall to the ground.

This is CRUCIAL for infection control purposes.
@CliveBeggs The role of those in charge of infection control in hospitals is to “translate scientific evidence […] into practical IPC guidelines”.

The scientific evidence is clear that Covid is AIRBORNE…

…so why does the IPC guidance STILL not protect against airborne transmission?
Read 10 tweets
Jan 14
As Module 4 of the @CovidInquiryUK begins, attention turns to the Covid vaccines…

And it just happens that UKHSA’s annual accounts for 2023/24 have recently been published, revealing that a staggering £1.09 BILLION were wasted on unused vaccines during 2023/24.

🧵 Image
For me, one of the most shocking things was in Autumn 2023, when the govt bought enough vax doses for ALL over-50s…

…but then decided to restrict eligibility, denying millions of people under the age of 65 the chance to be protected.

theguardian.com/society/2023/a…Image
The reason given for restricting vaccine eligibility was because it would not be “cost-effective” to offer it more widely.

However, a detailed analysis of their ‘bespoke cost-effectiveness analysis’ revealed a number of flaws in the methodology ⬇️

Read 31 tweets
Jan 9
This is the Chief Exec of @NHSEngland ⬇️

She’s “really worried about the toll that flu & other viruses are taking on our patients and on services across the NHS.”

Yet, despite the fact these viruses are mostly AIRBORNE, there are NO airborne infection controls in hospitals. 🧵 Image
Make it make sense!!

The Covid Inquiry module which specifically investigated the impact of Covid on healthcare systems ended just before Christmas and some very clear recommendations emerged…

WHY on earth have these not been made the absolute top priority and implemented?
For further details on the flawed chain of decisions which led to the utterly inadequate infection control guidance we have in hospitals today, please have a read of my thread below where I walk you through the key evidence which emerged from module 3 of the Covid Inquiry ⬇️
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(