The Ruble doesn't find support. It entered into a fee fall. Now Russia has stopped trading. This means that the exchange rate will just SEEM to have stabilised, but that's not the case. The Ruble has become a 'black market only' currency.
What's a free fall?
1/ pic: Moscow
It means the value goes down and nothing stabilises it, nothing moves it up. It means the Ruble is not supported anymore. Not by foreign buyers who need Rubles to buy Russian exports. And not by short term measures of the Russian Central Bank.
For instance [..]
2/
[..] the Russian Central Bank buying Rubles with Dollars. Bank president Nabiullina doesn't anymore.
Maybe the coffers are empty, maybe she just decided that throwing good money after a collapsing Ruble makes no sense.
So what did they do?
3/
Nabiullina is highly regarded in the West as a central banker who knows what she is doing. She could keep up appearances of a Russian economy doing fine, even if everyone knew this was impossible.
But the means for her to do so are being exhausted increasingly rapidly.
4/
Russia stopped free trading of the Ruble on the exchange. It means the Ruble is now predominantly a 'black market' currency.
The exchange rate remains sort of frozen there but most people can't sell Rubles there anymore.
You want Dollars or Euros?
Black market is you goto.
5/
We are looking at the monetary collapse of Russia.
Russians brought their money to Cyprus, but the 'Golden Passports' have been withdrawn.
pic: putting your money in real estate in Cyprus
6/
Or Almaty, Kazachstan
7/
Or Turkey, where Russians are now the predominant buyers of real estate (not even the Turkish people themselves)
The Russian economy, including the Ruble, is collapsing. Capital flight... The oligarchs had long since fled, now the middle class follows suit.
Collapse.
8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Normally, what is produced continues to play a further role in the economy. Industry makes an electric drill. A builder makes a shop with it. The shop sells boots. Farmers buy the boots and produces butter. Value makes more value.
War production does not make such a chain.
1/4
In war, governments pay to produce bombs.
They explode and the value is gone.
Especially true in a war of attrition. The government makes dead-end-payments.
Economists do not make this distinction, they say Russia's GDP last year was great.
2/4
Why is this a mistake?
It's money gone and you can foresee that it will have no positive result because of what the war looks like.
You can see that other production suffers. No boots, no butter.
Can't bombs be seen as thief's tools in the hands of an empire builder?
The 'Russian imperial mindset' is very strongly present in many Russians. It is not a 'stand-alone' kind of thing. Jung might have described it as a 'complex' accompanied by a few other peculiarities.
Here's a list:
[..]
1/
Elements of the Russian Imperial Mindset:
- a sense of how big Russia is
- an assumption of invincibllity, based on sheer size
- that the size of Russia needs a strongman to be governed
- that this requires a hierarchy with the strongman at the top holding absolute power
2/
- that only one law applies to those lower in the hierarchy: loyalty (and obedience) or death
- that resistance is futile
- that individuals are dispensible/disposable
- individuals lower in the hierarchy deserve contempt
And why does Putin orchestrate all these war crimes and advertise them so much?
Because he thereby displays his fascist philosophy that it's neither international law, nor agreements, nor moral values or human rights that dictate or limit his behaviour, but power only. Why?
2/
Because power is more power when it's on display.
Putin's onslaughts are senseless in the real world of objects, of people's lives, of Russia's (or anyone's) economy. It's senseless in terms of Russia's military might. It's only damaging to all of it.
[..] told about the work of the MAGURA V5 maritime attack drone.
✔️ The article about the newest Ukrainian weapon for fighting enemy ships and other targets describes its technical characteristics: length 5.5 meters, speed over 80 kilometers per hour, payload 250 kilograms.
2/
💥 Ukrainian Magura, recognized as the most effective naval strike drone: during the full-scale Russian invasion, the DIU's military intelligence successfully hit 18 Russian ships with this weapon, 9 of which were completely destroyed.
3/
🧵
What is the US afraid of when it comes to giving Ukraine what it needs to win?
The US mentioned 'escalation' but that's the wrong word. They probably chose it because they thought it was a non-technical word that the general public would understand.
What is it then?
1/
I suspect the US actually wanted to avoid what is called a 'runaway feedback loop'.
The concept originates from the field of engineering and involves mathematics and schematic descriptions. Many might find that too specialistic.
Let's apply it to Ukraine:
2/ pic: Russian bomb
Imagine this list repeating itself:
1. Ukraine get weapons that strike farther -> 2. Russia withdraws out of range, but continues bombing -> 3. Ukraine asks its friends for the next weapon -> 4. Initial hesitation causes public pressure -> 5. Governments give in -> back to 1
🧵It is getting more simple by the day to fight Russia in Ukraine.
Ukraine's allies must use their overwhelming economic and technical potential to help Ukraine.
Europe alone is 10 times larger than Russia in terms of technical and economic potential.
What does that mean?
1/
Let's look at it systematically:
Why simpler?
Because many alternatives have fallen away for Russia.
Before february 2022, Russia did large scale exercises near Ukraine's borders. They played out a large scale tank battle with their more modern equipment.
All gone now.
2/
Russia is now unable to wage a major tank battle. They now repair old T62 tanks for front line service, some of which cannot even shoot. Russia lost 8152 tanks amongst which almost all of their modern ones. No tank battles for Russia anymore.