In today’s #vatniksoup, I’ll introduce a Romanian politician and conspiracy theorist, Călin Georgescu (@calin_georgescu). He’s best-known for his pro-Kremlin and conspiratorial views, running for president of Romania, and doing it by only campaigning on TikTok.
1/25
Georgescu has a doctorate in pedology (a branch of soil science), and held various positions in Romania’s environment ministry during the 90s.
Between 1999-2012, he was a representative for Romania on the national committee of the United Nations Environment Program.
2/25
He was proposed as Romania’s prime minister in 2011, 2012 and 2016 by Romanian far-right parties, but he rose to international infamy in 2024, when he ran for president of Romania independently and obtained the most votes (22,95%) out of all candidates in the first round.
3/25
This was totally unexpected, as he outperformed most surveys, shocking Romania’s political establishment. Romanian political consultant Cristian Andrei stated that Georgescu’s popularity appears to be a “large protest or revolt against the establishment.”
4/25
Like in many other Western countries, Romania’s large budget deficit, relatively high inflation, and economic challenges may have pushed mainstream candidates towards populist rhetoric, offering quick and easy solutions for complex, global problems.
5/25
Georgescu’s policies are typical for a populist candidate - supporting Romanian farmers, reducing dependency on imports, and ramping up energy and food production. But his massive success can be accounted to one important factor - his campaign on TikTok.
6/25
Călin is extremely popular on TikTok - his first account had accumulated 1,7 million likes before it was deleted, and his current official account has 440 000 followers & +5 million likes. It is also clear that these numbers have been manipulated and are by no means organic.
7/25
After taking a closer look, Georgescu appears to be a regular vatnik conspiracy theorist. His previous pro-Russian statements were so extreme, that some even considered him a representative of Kremlin’s interests in Romania. As is tradition, he’s also a harsh critic…
8/25
…of EU and NATO, even calling the ballistic missile defense system based in Deveselu, a Romanian NATO base, a “shame of diplomacy”. He’s also claimed that NATO wouldn’t protect its members in case of a Russian invasion.
9/25
He’s also praised Vladimir Putin as “a man who loves his country” and stated that Romania should abide by “Russian wisdom”. He has referred to Ukraine as “an invented state”. Of course, he’s said he’s not “pro-Russian” but merely wants to “engage in a dialogue” with them.
10/25
He used to be a member of the nationalist conservative Alliance for the Union of Romanians (AUR) party, but left the group after he was accused of being pro-Kremlin and too critical of NATO. Previously, Georgescu had invited the Russian fascist Aleksandr Dugin…
11/25
…to visit Romania. Recently, Dugin praised Călin during an interview, claiming that “Călin Georgescu is an outstanding politician, he is useful for us. He cannot be called pro-Russian, but he is similar to Orban.”
12/25
As was mentioned, Călin is also a raging conspiracy theorist. He doesn’t believe in the moon landing, claims that carbonated drinks contain nanochips which “enter you like into a laptop”, and says that climate change is “a global scam” that has “nothing to do with reality”.
13/25
And there’s more:he claims that the Pyramids in Egypt are powerful energy centers that haven’t been activated yet.He’s also said that while working for the UN, he took part in “some very serious discussions” with other, non-human species. And of course there’s the classics…14/25
…such as promoting the idea of a “New World Order” planned by the World Economic Forum and its founder, Klaus Schwab. Georgescu claims that Schwab and his oligarch allies are trying to turn the UN into the World Oligarch System.
15/25
Incidentally, Georgescu’s team kept all this information hidden during the first round of the elections, and even his Wikipedia page both in English and in Romanian seemed quite presentable (until GeorgescuFan1488 came along!) right before the elections.
16/25
Romanian law states that all candidates have to declare the funds they’ve used for their campaign. Călin declared absolutely nothing (and still clings to that), despite his paid political ads on TikTok amounting to several million dollars.
17/25
Romanian war correspondent and political consultant @RaduHossu accounted Georgescu’s success to several factors, including “the decades-long failure of the state education system coupled with the moral bankruptcy of the political class in recent years.”
18/25
According to him, social frustration coupled with a lack of understanding of the national and international context (lack of education), combined with a massively manipulated social media campaign have led to the creation of this political product:
Until now, Romania has staunchly supported Ukraine, even allowing its neighbour to use the Romanian port of Constanta on the Black Sea to export its grain. Romania is also a home to the largest American military base in Europe. The country has also signed…
20/25
…a strategic partnership agreement with Ukraine. But if Georgescu wins, we may see a dramatic change in these policies, and we’ve already seen similar political successes based on populist rhetoric in Hungary, Austria and Slovakia. These elections should be seen as…
21/25
…yet another “canary in the coal mine” warning of how much of a powerful tool social media can be in politics. We already saw this with Elon buying Twitter & turning it into his personal MAGA megaphone, and now Team Georgescu won the first round basically with TikTok.
22/25
Georgescu’s opponent, @ElenaLasconi, a journalist-turned-mayor, is also relatively unknown. She and the party supporting her have little to no political background & she’s been criticized for her lack of experience in foreign policy. She’s staunchly pro-NATO & pro-Ukraine.
23/25
To complicate things even more, the Constitutional Court is now likely demanding a recount of the votes, which would probably eliminate Elena Lasconi, who barely managed to get to the second round by a thin margin, from the race.
24/25
The second round of the presidential election between Călin Georgescu and Elena Lasconi will be held on 8 Dec 2024.
Sources: @RaduHossu, @Daractenus (do give them a follow!)
25/25
My book titled “Vatnik Soup - The Ultimate Guide to Russian Disinformation” has been published, you can order it here:
In this 5th Debunk of the Day, we’ll discuss something that sounds great in theory, but was completely turned upside-down by the tankie kind of vatnik: anti-imperialism. More consistent anti-imperialists call this the “anti-imperialism of idiots”. 1/5
“Anti-imperialism” was popularized by Lenin, who saw imperialism as the ultimate stage of capitalism. Ironically, the largest empire is now… Putin’s Russia, proud heir to both Lenin’s Soviet Union and to the Tsarist Empire. 2/5
Indeed, Russia is an empire that is still ruled by a de facto all-powerful Tsar, that still proudly flies its imperial flag, that still dreams of expanding its already huge territory through brutal conquest and colonization. 3/5
In this 4th Debunk of the Day, we’ll refute an absolute classic of vatnik BS, the crown jewel of peak dishonesty: whataboutism.
Now, not everything that looks like whataboutism is wrong. Seeking consistency or comparing actions or responses is normal. 1/5
But when someone pulls some completely unrelated event, that happened to completely different people, a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, you know what you’re dealing with: a crass denial of the problem at hand, a bad-faith attempt to derail the topic. 2/5
Logic or chronology plays no role here, nor your opinion on these other topics. You could be the staunchest critic or supporter of these other actions thrown into the discussion, it doesn’t matter. It is irrelevant whether these other things are true or not, or bad or not. 3/5
In this 3rd Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “ending” the war by surrendering or ceding territory.
Nearing four years of the 2-day “special military operation”, Russia is desperate to obtain through other means what they failed to conquer on the battlefield. 1/5
An endless army of vatniks therefore tries to demoralize both Ukrainians and supporters.
They sound noble: “anti-war” or concerned about the fate of Ukraine’s civilians, soldiers and cities. They claim that if we just stop fighting or helping, this horror would magically end. 2/5
What they never mention is… WHO started the war, WHO murders Ukrainians, WHO destroys Ukrainian cities: the same monsters they suggest Ukrainians be at the mercy of. Surrendering wouldn’t end the atrocities of the occupation, it would enable them. Surrendering wouldn’t even…3/5
In today’s Debunk of the Day (2), we’ll look at… nuclear blackmail. Vatniks love using Russia’s nuclear threats as a reason for surrendering or for not lifting a finger to help Ukraine: “see, they have nukes, we have to give them whatever they want”.
The argument is absurd: 1/5
Nuclear deterrence has been a reality for decades. Both the US and Russia have lost wars without resorting to nukes. We are not submitting to the whims of Pakistan or North Korea either. For vatniks, it’s just an insidious way of siding with Putin. 2/5
We can’t just give in to the Kremlin’s nuclear blackmail, to the threats their officials and propagandists make five times a day to scare us into letting them have something they know perfectly well is not theirs, with no limit to their appetite. 3/5 vatniksoup.com/en/nuclear-thr…
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we introduce a Ukrainian “scholar” and social media activist, Marta Havryshko (@HavryshkoMarta). She’s best known for spreading anti-Ukraine and pro-Kremlin narratives online, along with a habit of spotting neo-Nazis everywhere in Ukraine.
1/20
Marta hails from Ukraine, where she studied history at Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. She received her PhD in history in 2010. Her academic work focused on gender-based violence and wartime atrocities, including publications on sexual crimes in occupied Ukraine.
2/20
She is currently working as a visiting Assistant Professor at the Strassler Center for Holocaust & Genocide Studies at Clark University in the US. According to the center’s website, Marta teaches courses on antisemitism, racism, and gender-based violence in armed conflicts.
In today’s (first) Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “realistic expectations”.
Russia has the GDP of Italy. NATO — which Russia claims to be fighting — has 20 times their GDP, and a much stronger and more modern military. 1/5
Russia’s full scale invasion was supposed to take 2 days, but we’re nearing 4 years. They’ve lost a million men. Their economy is in shambles.
And yet we're letting them set their red lines instead of massive sanctions, strong support for Ukraine, and an immediate sky shield. 2/5
Russia thought their war was “realistic” because we’d let them get away with it. It wouldn’t be “realistic” to invade a European nation and redraw borders by force if the West had a strong and united response.
What’s “realistic” is what public opinion tolerates and accepts. 3/5