Sometime during the early 20th century, American outdoorsman Leon Leonwood Bean faced a problem: how do you keep your feet dry while hunting in wilderness of western Maine? Waders are fine in the water but you don't always want to be wearing those on dry land.
So he came up with a hybrid: a hunting boot that had the flexibility of a traditional leather upper but with the water-resistance of rubber footwear. First made in his basement, the two parts were combined with triple-line stitching to ensure they'd never separate.
Leon Leonwood Bean debuted his Maine Hunting Shoe through his company LL Bean in 1912. They were a hit with sportsmen; even Babe Ruth was a fan. "Thank you for those wonderful shoes, they fit perfect," Ruth wrote Bean in a letter. "I remain your friend."
Over the next 50 years or so, LL Bean—much like other outdoor clothing brands—expanded and became more of a lifestyle company, a dynamic that environmental and cultural historian Rachel Gross brilliantly explores in her book Shopping All The Way to the Woods.
That means the boots were no longer just part of the standard kit for Maine hunters, but rather preppy students across the Midwest and Northeast. In his book Ametora, David Marx calls this style Rugged Ivy, as it was the outdoorsy counterpart to academic tweeds and blazers.
Yes, much of this look was based on outdoorsy apparel built for function, but the styles were now about semiotics. They were worn for cultural identity, often signaling that the person aspired to have a connection with the outdoors. LL Bean boots were part of this look.
After about the 1980s, a lot of classic American style died in the US. I'm talking about classic tailoring, workwear, 1970s outdoor style, Rugged Ivy, and the like. Americans moved on to other trends. But the style lived on in Japan, where it became part of menswear culture.
So it's no surprise that the best Americana brands nowadays are not based in the US, but rather Japan. That's where you find both a true commitment to the original spirit of that mid-century look, as well as innovation. See how Engineered Garments riffs off American workwear.
Visvim, the company that made the boot in the original tweet, is one of the many Japanese brands focused on heritage American styles. To be honest, sometimes I think the brand runs a little on how cool the founder, Hiroki Nakamura, looks. Everyone wants to look like him.
Visvim's prices are a running joke in menswear circles because prices seem to go up every year. They are stratospherically high and seem to only be getting more out of reach. But I will say: when you actually get to handle the items, there's a lot of impressive detailing.
Some fabrics are handwoven, hand-dyed, and hand screen printed. One can squabble about the value of these methods. I've argued on forums that their "handmade Goodyear welt" doesn't add much bc it still has gemming. But there's still a craft element in their collections.
So yes, these shoes are "ugly." They look alien, bulbous, and bulky. But they're an offbeat Japanese version of a classic American hunting shoe. To me, they tell a story about how classic American style has been preserved by enthusiasts in Japan who love the look more than us.
I also think they can look great in the right outfits: chore coats, deck jackets, fatigues, wide legged jeans, duffle coats, and Cowichan knits. The chunkier proportions play better if all the other things in your outfit are similarly riffs on classic Americana.
For guys who love that style but don't want to look preppy, Visvim's decoy duck boot can be a fun alternative to the original (pic 1). Their have more of a streetwear/ workwear/ fashiony feel. They also do a version with a thicker sole, although that's more directional (pic 2)
someone trying to be friendly at a party: "what are thooossee?"
me: "i'll tell you what are these. 🧵"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Someone asked if I could tell them where to buy a pair of good chinos. In this thread, I will tell you, but my answer is not simple. On the upside, I think this is a better approach when shopping for clothes and you can apply it to any kind of item. 🧵
A simple answer will go something like this: "Such-and-such makes the highest quality chinos." Or "this brand provides the best value." While potentially useful in some respects, I don't think this gives you the fullest picture.
Instead, let's start at the beginning.
During the 1898 Spanish-American War, US troops stationed in the Philippines wore sand-colored pants made from a heavy cotton twill woven in China. Since the Philippines had been under Spanish colonial rule at this time, the locals call these "pantalones chinos" (Chinese pants).
One day, "It" will happen, by which I mean sudden and unexpected news that you want to celebrate. In such cases, you will want the right outfit. 🧵
What do I mean by "It?" I mean that joyous moments are not always something you can plan for. Perhaps you received a pay raise or got accepted at a waitlisted school. Perhaps a loved one is now cancer-free. Such moments can be sudden and unexpected — and you want to be prepared.
Of course, you can always celebrate in the same clothes you wear to bed. But IMO, this diminishes the moment. Thus, it's nice to special outfits for "It," even if you don't wear them all the time. It's similar to toasting a special glass of champagne and drinking water.
In the 1950s, Irving Penn traveled across London, Paris, and NYC to take portraits of workers in their work clothes. These clothes at the time were not considered glamorous — they would not have shown up on fashion runways — but they demonstrate a simple aesthetic principle 🧵
Consider these outfits. How do you feel about them? Are they charming? Repulsive? Stylish?
If you consider them charming and stylish, as I do, then ask yourself: what makes them charming and stylish? Why are you drawn to the outfits?
As I've mentioned before, I think outfits look better when they have "shape and drape." By shape, I mean the outfit confers a distinctive silhouette. If these men took off their clothes, we can reliably guess their bodies would not be shaped like this:
If you're just dipping your toes into tailored clothing, start with a navy sport coat. This is something you can wear with a button-up shirt and pair of trousers, or something as casual as a t-shirt and some jeans. It's easily the most versatile jacket.
Key is to get something with texture so it doesn't look like an orphaned suit jacket. Spier & Mackay has great semi-affordable tailoring. Their navy hopsack Moro is made from pure wool and a half-canvas to give it shape. Classic proportions and soft natural shoulder
There's a pervasive belief that we no longer produce clothes in the United States. This is not true. In this thread, I will tell you about some great made-in-USA brands — some that run their own factories, while others are US brands contracting with US factories. 🧵
I should first note this thread focuses on well-made, stylish clothes produced in ethical conditions. For me, producing in the US is not enough. It means nothing if the clothes are ugly, crappy, or produced in sweatshop conditions. My article for The Nation below.
JEANS
Gustin produces MiUSA jeans using raw Japanese denim. "Raw" means the fabric hasn't been pre-distressed, allowing it to naturally fade with use, reflecting your actual body and lifestyle. I like their fuller 1968 Vintage Straight fit. They also do lots of other stuff.
Let's first establish good vs bad ways to think about style. The first pic is correct — style is a kind of social language and you have to figure out what type of person you are. The second pic is stupid bc it takes style as disconnected objects ("this is in" vs "this is out").
I should also note here that I'm only talking about style. I'm not here to argue with you about ergonomics, water bottle holders, or whether something accommodates your Dell laptop. I'm am talking about aesthetics.