I should note that I know not everyone can afford a $500 sweater. That's why my Black Friday post includes things such as this $80 J. Crew sweater. In the past, I've also written guides on how to to get top-of-the-line vintage Scottish cashmere knits on eBay for ~$50.
But since I appreciate craft and wish to see craftspeople be able to earn a living, I'm also happy to promote things that I think help keep these traditions alive.
So, why is this Chamula sweater $500? It's because of how it was made.
Most sweaters are made on flat bed or circular knitting machines. If the manufacturer is good, they'll hand-link the panels together so the finished product doesn't have a bumpy seam. When shopping, look for something called a "fully fashioned" sweater. It's a sign of quality.
The amount of industrial technology in this process allows you to buy a pretty good sweater for $200 or less. But there are also companies that produce sweaters the old fashioned way: by hand.
Chamula is one of those companies. Here is the brand's founder, Yuki Matsuda
Chamula uses Merino yarns sourced from pure bred sheep grazing on mountains in Mexico. These fibers are then hand-spun on spinning wheels and then hand-dyed into rich colors. The resulting yarns are given to indigenous Mexican knitters who hand-knit them into sweaters.
Does the amount of handwork make for a better sweater? Well, it depends on what you mean by "better."
Depending on the design, hand-knitting a sweater can sometimes produce intricate stitches not possible on a machine. Depending on the process, you can also get customization.
Flamborough Marine is one of my favorite producers for handknit sweaters. They make in a fisherman style known as the guernsey (sometimes spelled gansey), which has identical panels from front-to-back and features a high neck collar and dropped shoulder seams.
Daniel Day-Lewis once had a sweater made here. He said it was inspired by a fisherman knit once owned by his late father, Cecil Day-Lewis, and had a similar design made through Flamborough Marine. Rajiv Surendra also owns a sweater from the company.
These knits are itchy, dense, and wonderful. They function like windproof outerwear. Since each sweater is fully handmade and knitted upon order, you can ask for anything you want. When delivered, the sweater comes with a little card signed by your knitter.
Cost? About $625.
Chamula's sweaters are ready-made, not custom, and they're not as dense or windproof as Flamborough Marine's guernseys. Instead, the yarns are extremely plush and spongey; the low gauge means you get a slightly looser, more open knit.
I treat mine a little more delicately than I would, say, a standard machine-knit Shetland. But I love the unique texture they bring to an outfit. I also love that these were made by hand from start to finish by indigenous Mexican knitters carrying a craft tradition forward.
The $500 price reflects the time and skill that goes into these garments. Is hand-knitting better? Not necessarily, but if you fall in love with the process, perhaps you'll love and treat the knit with more care. And be more likely to repair and wear the sweater for a long time.
That said, I think you can appreciate something without wanting to own or purchase it. The price alone should not be reason for ridicule. Workers deserve fair pay, and even if you can't afford to buy something, you can appreciate that someone is laboring to keep a craft alive.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One day, "It" will happen, by which I mean sudden and unexpected news that you want to celebrate. In such cases, you will want the right outfit. 🧵
What do I mean by "It?" I mean that joyous moments are not always something you can plan for. Perhaps you received a pay raise or got accepted at a waitlisted school. Perhaps a loved one is now cancer-free. Such moments can be sudden and unexpected — and you want to be prepared.
Of course, you can always celebrate in the same clothes you wear to bed. But IMO, this diminishes the moment. Thus, it's nice to special outfits for "It," even if you don't wear them all the time. It's similar to toasting a special glass of champagne and drinking water.
In the 1950s, Irving Penn traveled across London, Paris, and NYC to take portraits of workers in their work clothes. These clothes at the time were not considered glamorous — they would not have shown up on fashion runways — but they demonstrate a simple aesthetic principle 🧵
Consider these outfits. How do you feel about them? Are they charming? Repulsive? Stylish?
If you consider them charming and stylish, as I do, then ask yourself: what makes them charming and stylish? Why are you drawn to the outfits?
As I've mentioned before, I think outfits look better when they have "shape and drape." By shape, I mean the outfit confers a distinctive silhouette. If these men took off their clothes, we can reliably guess their bodies would not be shaped like this:
If you're just dipping your toes into tailored clothing, start with a navy sport coat. This is something you can wear with a button-up shirt and pair of trousers, or something as casual as a t-shirt and some jeans. It's easily the most versatile jacket.
Key is to get something with texture so it doesn't look like an orphaned suit jacket. Spier & Mackay has great semi-affordable tailoring. Their navy hopsack Moro is made from pure wool and a half-canvas to give it shape. Classic proportions and soft natural shoulder
There's a pervasive belief that we no longer produce clothes in the United States. This is not true. In this thread, I will tell you about some great made-in-USA brands — some that run their own factories, while others are US brands contracting with US factories. 🧵
I should first note this thread focuses on well-made, stylish clothes produced in ethical conditions. For me, producing in the US is not enough. It means nothing if the clothes are ugly, crappy, or produced in sweatshop conditions. My article for The Nation below.
JEANS
Gustin produces MiUSA jeans using raw Japanese denim. "Raw" means the fabric hasn't been pre-distressed, allowing it to naturally fade with use, reflecting your actual body and lifestyle. I like their fuller 1968 Vintage Straight fit. They also do lots of other stuff.
Let's first establish good vs bad ways to think about style. The first pic is correct — style is a kind of social language and you have to figure out what type of person you are. The second pic is stupid bc it takes style as disconnected objects ("this is in" vs "this is out").
I should also note here that I'm only talking about style. I'm not here to argue with you about ergonomics, water bottle holders, or whether something accommodates your Dell laptop. I'm am talking about aesthetics.
Watch these two videos. Then answer these two questions:
— Which of the two men is better dressed?
— How does each come off?
I think Carney is better dressed, partly because his clothes fit better. Notice that his jacket collar always hugs his neck, while Pierre Poilievre's jacket collar never touches him.