There is a difference between who skim the surface and people who dig into the legal filings of the numerous cases.
Some of you think we will not see any 'return' of John Durham or his report.
Many still think I was wrong about Sessions and Rosenstein.
I was not and I am not.
So, several questions for the surface skimmers who are going to be completely caught surprise at what the Bondi DOJ / Kash FBI starts doing around February of 2025. Let's see who was paying attention and hasn't forgotten.
1. How do you penetrate an ongoing RICO criminal conspiracy involving treason via a recusal of the Trump loyalist Jeff Sessions? Who do you drop into the middle of the ongoing plot that began back in 2015?
2. Who sells himself as the crooked Johnny "I'll Allow It!" as the conspirators around him continue their conspiracy?
3. Who was leading the leak hunting unit that Sessions and Rosenstein formed that had 24 open cases by 2018?
4. Who was leading the grand jury that was subsequently investigating Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell and 70+ other persons inside/around the US Congress, an investigation that lasted three years?
5. What is the statute of limitations on treason?
6. Just how much of a vindictive son of a bitch is Donald J. Trump? Does he relish revenge?
7. Since you are not really **required** or **compelled** to announce you've appointed a Special Counsel to lead a grand jury to investigate actual treasonous leaking of classified material, how do you know Jack Smith, Robert Hur and ol' Bob Mueller were the ONLY Special Counsels appointed without Senate Confirmation hearings?
8. How do you know Sessions/Rosenstein didn't appoint a Special Counsel who was never publicly declared to BE a Special Counsel? And who's grand jury worked in utter and complete and total silence and secrecy? And we didn't find out about this until that Special Counsel decided not to renew the federal gag order on Apple for a fourth year?
IYKYK
And if you don't know... you will. Just keep watching.
Some of you think we will not see any 'return' of John Durham or his report.
Many still think I was wrong about Sessions and Rosenstein.
I was not and I am not.
So, several questions for the surface skimmers who are going to be completely caught surprise at what the Bondi DOJ / Kash FBI starts doing around February of 2025. Let's see who was paying attention and hasn't forgotten.
1. How do you penetrate an ongoing RICO criminal conspiracy involving treason via a recusal of the Trump loyalist Jeff Sessions? Who do you drop into the middle of the ongoing plot that began back in 2015?
2. Who sells himself as the crooked Johnny "I'll Allow It!" as the conspirators around him continue their conspiracy?
3. Who was leading the leak hunting unit that Sessions and Rosenstein formed that had 24 open cases by 2018?
4. Who was leading the grand jury that was subsequently investigating Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell and 70+ other persons inside/around the US Congress, an investigation that lasted three years?
5. What is the statute of limitations on treason?
6. Just how much of a vindictive son of a bitch is Donald J. Trump? Does he relish revenge?
7. Since you are not really **required** or **compelled** to announce you've appointed a Special Counsel to lead a grand jury to investigate actual treasonous leaking of classified material, how do you know Jack Smith, Robert Hur and ol' Bob Mueller were the ONLY Special Counsels appointed without Senate Confirmation hearings?
8. How do you know Sessions/Rosenstein didn't appoint a Special Counsel who was never publicly declared to BE a Special Counsel? And who's grand jury worked in utter and complete and total silence and secrecy? And we didn't find out about this until that Special Counsel decided not to renew the federal gag order on Apple for a fourth year?
IYKYK
And if you don't know... you will. Just keep watching.
I forgot one.
9. Was in the ROOM with Trump and Mueller when ol' Bob was **supposedly** 'interviewing' for the FBI Director job?
And everybody knows at this point that's NOT why ol' Bob was there.
Think CAREFULLY about that one.
9. Was in the ROOM with Trump and Mueller when ol' Bob was **supposedly** 'interviewing' for the FBI Director job?
And everybody knows at this point that's NOT why ol' Bob was there.
Think CAREFULLY about that one.
I fully realize it's going to take about a year from now for most of you to break your programming. You've been programmed by surface skimmers who ignore the filings, don't see the obvious, and are captive to the present news cycle. They don't remember all too well what happened 7 years ago.
I do.
It's OK.
I too am a very patient man.
I do.
It's OK.
I too am a very patient man.
And another one:
10. If 70+ people inside the US Congress and around it were targets of a federal grand jury investigation that was done in complete and total and utter secrecy for over three, almost 4 years...and several dozen current members of Congress were about to be charged for treason due to leaking classified material, some of it to our 'allies' overseas [think Ukraine/Israel door swinging wide the fuck open], how politically sensitive is that investigation? How important would it be?
What if all the evidence was gathered and it's just SITTING THERE right now, waiting for someone with BALLS big enough to use it?
Kind of like the Durham report?
How about some of you start asking yourselves the RIGHT questions for once?
latimes.com/politics/story…
nypost.com/2023/01/25/kev…
10. If 70+ people inside the US Congress and around it were targets of a federal grand jury investigation that was done in complete and total and utter secrecy for over three, almost 4 years...and several dozen current members of Congress were about to be charged for treason due to leaking classified material, some of it to our 'allies' overseas [think Ukraine/Israel door swinging wide the fuck open], how politically sensitive is that investigation? How important would it be?
What if all the evidence was gathered and it's just SITTING THERE right now, waiting for someone with BALLS big enough to use it?
Kind of like the Durham report?
How about some of you start asking yourselves the RIGHT questions for once?
latimes.com/politics/story…
nypost.com/2023/01/25/kev…
There's a reason there was SEVENTEEN rounds of voting before we got to Speaker Johnson.
The deal has been done.
Even as you're about to undergo 50 days of UniParty shrieking that they'll NEVER EVER ALLOW any of Trump's picks to be confirmed, certainly not the Bondi or Kash picks?
It's irrelevant.
Trump's going to get his recess appointments and he's going to appoint ALL OF THEM for a two year period.
And there won't be a fucking thing Mitch McTurtle can do to stop it. It's right THERE in the US Constitution.
The idea that the SENATE has firm and total control over the Executive Branch's personnel decisions is a fucking LEGAL FICTION that needs to die in a fire.
The Biden administration was stupidly maneuvered in to making the case FOR what Trump is about to do.
And yes, Trump has balls big enough to strike the match. And burn that legal fiction to the ground and then gleefully pee on the ashes.
And he will.
Ain't life grand?
The deal has been done.
Even as you're about to undergo 50 days of UniParty shrieking that they'll NEVER EVER ALLOW any of Trump's picks to be confirmed, certainly not the Bondi or Kash picks?
It's irrelevant.
Trump's going to get his recess appointments and he's going to appoint ALL OF THEM for a two year period.
And there won't be a fucking thing Mitch McTurtle can do to stop it. It's right THERE in the US Constitution.
The idea that the SENATE has firm and total control over the Executive Branch's personnel decisions is a fucking LEGAL FICTION that needs to die in a fire.
The Biden administration was stupidly maneuvered in to making the case FOR what Trump is about to do.
And yes, Trump has balls big enough to strike the match. And burn that legal fiction to the ground and then gleefully pee on the ashes.
And he will.
Ain't life grand?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
