In research projects about detailed granular events attached to corruption in Washington DC, eventually you reach a point where you have identified the specific people involved. Things get sketchy.
When doing these research projects, you discover that certain DC "insiders," media people and current/former silo staff, names most of you know very well, are also aware of the information you are discovering.
The "insiders" are generally positioned in such a manner as most of the information-aware public consider them "Truth Tellers."
Alternative media gives the Truth Tellers a larger influence voice. This is where it gets interesting.
When you have nailed down the story with direct, irrefutable evidence against the bad actors, you start to notice a pattern emerge about how the Truth Teller media types consistently stay away from certain names.
If you do this long enough, and find the same outcome frequently enough, you realize most of these "Truth Tellers" are not that at all; they are, instead, Truth Managers.
The DC Truth Managers are willfully blind to the activity of certain people they have identified as what can only be reasonably assumed to be CIA operators.
There are bad actors in DC that I can believe are "CIA operators." Why? Because earnestly after years of doing this, I cannot think of any other reason why they would be protected.
Be careful about assigning the label "Truth Teller" toward any alternative media DC insider who is a "reformed journalist" or "former staff member" of the machine.
There are well known voices from inside the system, that exit the corporate media world, and enter the alternative media world, only to carry on the same purpose.
I see the information managers frequently now and identify them easily by who they *do not* talk about.
When a current or former information manager comes across a story of corruption that involves a "CIA designated bad actor," they never discuss that person in their information reveal. They continue the protection.
A good rule of thumb is never to think of anyone from inside the DC information system, regardless of their disposition, as a Truth Teller.
Every Information Manager was matriculated, and are compromised, by the system around them that is entirely based on corrupt activity.
Hang around a one-legged tribe long enough, and inherently you begin limping.
2/ Let me give you a great example using this video shared yesterday.
Listen carefully to what Kash Patel says at the 01:23 moment about the "Russiagate report" that was written, and how the "ICA" (Intelligence Community Assessment) was constructed with fraudulent information from the CIA.
As Patel notes, "Gina buried it." That's Gina Haspel, the Trump CIA Director who replaced Mike Pompeo.
Now, you might think that Patel is a Truth Teller in this segment but stand back and think about it with fresh eyes, non-pretending eyes.
Patel knows, because he (with others) created a report that highlights a fraudulent CIA operation. A report that was absorbed by the CIA and buried.
Put another way, Patel is talking about a body that he knows is buried. Ergo, people might say, "Patel knows where the body is buried," right?
But ask yourself, with the known stakes to the nation as an outcome of horrific fraud, why didn't this self-identified "#2 in the Intelligence Community" bring this information forward regardless of outcome?
Is Patel a "Truth Teller," or is he a "Truth Manager," obeying the Silo rules out of self-interest?
New Eyes - Use them.
What is the difference between Kash Patel and Edward Snowden?
One is a Truth Teller the other is a Truth Manager.
Do you guys even understand how amazing this Kash appointment is?!
4/ The "continuing central power" that Patel talks about already exists.
This is part of the problem with people who come from inside the system; and it is a problem for those who cannot spend thousands of hours understanding it.
The IC Silo rules, are followed by people who matriculate surrounded by the IC Silo rules.
The "central power" needed to fracture the system is the physical person of the President of the United States.
The President is, well, Snowden-proof. The President, not the office, the actual physical person, is the power of the system. The epicenter of the system where the atom splits, is the physical President.
Acting in his "official duty," the President of the United States can take a document (any document) and walk into the Brady Room, hand it to a journalist and that document is automatically declassified.
He doesn't need a stamp on it. He doesn't need anyone else's approval or permission. He, the physical person, the President, can simply say, "I view this in my official capacity as President of the United States to be a vital interest to the American public," and hand it to anyone he chooses. That's the central power.
Knowing this, knowing the factual reality of it, is exactly why the concentric circles around the President, intentionally and forcefully stop him from doing it. The silo system, self-protects.
If it can be done this way, then why wasn't it done this way?
Kash Patel, Devin Nunes, Ric Grenell, etc etc. all know this to be true. So why wasn't it done?
Go ask Edward Snowden.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1.) Notice how the FBI reviewed the President's cell phone data, during their process to request search warrants to review the President's cell phone data. This is ex post facto and against the law.
2.) This brings us back to the central point I have been making for years.
The modern FBI is the police agency of a weaponized U.S government, with a direct and purposeful mandate to keep the American people under control through strict surveillance and a violent police state.
3.) Every member of the FBI is a participant in the weaponization of power and government. The members are jackboots recruited from ideological college campuses for exactly the purpose of supporting a Stasi-like police state.
Through the past several years, we have discovered how the FBI worked inside Twitter, Facebook and social media to control information, remove content and manipulate opinion on behalf of the U.S. government – all activity political.
We have also learned the FBI took active measures to suppress information about the Hunter Biden laptop and control any negative consequences for the Biden regime – again, political. These are not disputed realities.
The U.S. Dept of Justice and FBI are now political institutions that have abandoned their originating mission in order to become the domestic equivalent of the Soviet-era FSB. Their joint targeting mechanisms have been redesigned to support the interests of corrupt DC politicians, specifically the interests of Democrats.
This parseltongue cracks me up. However, it actually ends up playing well for President Trump.
Notice how the media and global IC will only use the word "intelligence" when saying the U.S. is cutting off Ukraine from "intelligence sharing."
You know what that "intelligence sharing" consists of? That's the targeting system being used in Ukraine.
You know why the media and global IC cannot say "targeting system"? .... Because if they did, they would be admitting the USA has been the military force shooting the drones and missiles against Russia.
3. “Asked whether it is correct that the US has stopped sharing intelligence, the source said: “Unfortunately, yes, but not completely. It is selective. On the possibility of damage on the territory of the Russian Federation”.
1) If you are concerned about "privacy" in government, consider this....
Office of Inspector General Michael Horowitz testified April 27, 2023, that more than 3.4 million search queries into the NSA database took place between Dec. 1st, 2020 and Nov. 30th, 2021, by government officials and/or contractors working on behalf of the federal government.
2) Approximately 30% of those 3.4 million search queries were outside the rules and regulations that govern warrantless searches, what the politically correct government calls “non-compliant searches.” That means more than 1 million searches of private documents and communication of Americans were illegal and outside the rules.
3) Additionally, IG Horowitz also stated that somewhere north of 10,000 federal employees have access to conduct these searches of the NSA database; a database which contains the electronic data of every single American, including emails, text messages, social media posts, instant messages, direct messages, phone calls, geolocation identifiers, purchases by electronic funds, banking records and any keystroke any American person puts into any electronic device for any reason.
1. Do you really want to see the JFK, RFK and MLK assassination files?
Here's the direct way to get them using the plenary power of the Executive in combination with the Unitary application of govt recently affirmed by SCOTUS.
WARNING: This is extremely NON-Traditional.
2. Understanding the ordinary process of declassifying documents is a request and authorization to the executive officers and stakeholders of classified information; and understanding the current authorization is not ordinary because the intelligence community stakeholders are averse to the interests of the office of the president; here is a process to cut through the chaff and countermeasures.
The background here is that any unilateral declassification request, demand or authorization by President Trump puts him opposition to a variety of corrupt interests.
As a direct result the executive office of the president will be facing legal action, likely from unified democrats and republicans in the legislative branch. With that accepted, here is the most strategic approach.
3. President Trump informs the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, that he wishes to have a full intelligence briefing on the following documents (more may be added), all documents are to be presented without a single redaction:
The full and complete records relating to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
The full and complete records relating to the assassination of Senator Robert F. Kennedy and the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
The President selects a date for this briefing and through direct orders to his chief of staff, Susie Wiles and National Security Advisor, Mike Waltz, informs the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, to advise and coordinate with all executive branch intelligence officials, who were/are stakeholders in the compartmented intelligence products as described above, of their request be present for the briefing.
The White House counsel’s office is not to be informed of the intent or purpose of the meeting; however, the Presidents’ White House counsel is requested to attend. Further, all of the compartmented intelligence is to be collectively assembled by the ODNI (Gabbard) into one volume of a singular Presidential Daily Briefing (PDB) although each set might be file boxes. There are to be eighteen printed copies of the PDB material assembled and secured for the briefing, post haste.
Additionally, the office of the president personally informs the ODNI (Gabbard) of the executives’ request to invite for the briefing each member of the legislative branch Intelligence Community oversight known as the Gang-of-Eight.
2) Just to be clear. I genuinely don't care, what the crew do.
What I find a little funny is how my account survived several of the pre-Musk "big purges" and the whole COVID ban hammer, but now that "free speech" Elon is in control I'm tenuously at risk.
3) For the sake of clarity. I have never modified, changed, or adjusted any setting on Twitter since signing up for it about 13 years ago.
I don't even look at the settings, nor have I done any adjustments since the very first day of signing up.
I literally have done nothing, ever, to change or engage on any feature or system on this platform.
2. ♦ Nikki Haley directly blamed President Trump for the violent events during January 6, 2021, and said, “I don’t think [Trump’s] going to be in the picture,” she said, matter-of-factly. “I don’t think he can. He’s fallen so far.” […] “We need to acknowledge he let us down,” she said. “He went down a path he shouldn’t have, and we shouldn’t have followed him, and we shouldn’t have listened to him. And we can’t let that ever happen again.”