In research projects about detailed granular events attached to corruption in Washington DC, eventually you reach a point where you have identified the specific people involved. Things get sketchy.
When doing these research projects, you discover that certain DC "insiders," media people and current/former silo staff, names most of you know very well, are also aware of the information you are discovering.
The "insiders" are generally positioned in such a manner as most of the information-aware public consider them "Truth Tellers."
Alternative media gives the Truth Tellers a larger influence voice. This is where it gets interesting.
When you have nailed down the story with direct, irrefutable evidence against the bad actors, you start to notice a pattern emerge about how the Truth Teller media types consistently stay away from certain names.
If you do this long enough, and find the same outcome frequently enough, you realize most of these "Truth Tellers" are not that at all; they are, instead, Truth Managers.
The DC Truth Managers are willfully blind to the activity of certain people they have identified as what can only be reasonably assumed to be CIA operators.
There are bad actors in DC that I can believe are "CIA operators." Why? Because earnestly after years of doing this, I cannot think of any other reason why they would be protected.
Be careful about assigning the label "Truth Teller" toward any alternative media DC insider who is a "reformed journalist" or "former staff member" of the machine.
There are well known voices from inside the system, that exit the corporate media world, and enter the alternative media world, only to carry on the same purpose.
I see the information managers frequently now and identify them easily by who they *do not* talk about.
When a current or former information manager comes across a story of corruption that involves a "CIA designated bad actor," they never discuss that person in their information reveal. They continue the protection.
A good rule of thumb is never to think of anyone from inside the DC information system, regardless of their disposition, as a Truth Teller.
Every Information Manager was matriculated, and are compromised, by the system around them that is entirely based on corrupt activity.
Hang around a one-legged tribe long enough, and inherently you begin limping.
When doing these research projects, you discover that certain DC "insiders," media people and current/former silo staff, names most of you know very well, are also aware of the information you are discovering.
The "insiders" are generally positioned in such a manner as most of the information-aware public consider them "Truth Tellers."
Alternative media gives the Truth Tellers a larger influence voice. This is where it gets interesting.
When you have nailed down the story with direct, irrefutable evidence against the bad actors, you start to notice a pattern emerge about how the Truth Teller media types consistently stay away from certain names.
If you do this long enough, and find the same outcome frequently enough, you realize most of these "Truth Tellers" are not that at all; they are, instead, Truth Managers.
The DC Truth Managers are willfully blind to the activity of certain people they have identified as what can only be reasonably assumed to be CIA operators.
There are bad actors in DC that I can believe are "CIA operators." Why? Because earnestly after years of doing this, I cannot think of any other reason why they would be protected.
Be careful about assigning the label "Truth Teller" toward any alternative media DC insider who is a "reformed journalist" or "former staff member" of the machine.
There are well known voices from inside the system, that exit the corporate media world, and enter the alternative media world, only to carry on the same purpose.
I see the information managers frequently now and identify them easily by who they *do not* talk about.
When a current or former information manager comes across a story of corruption that involves a "CIA designated bad actor," they never discuss that person in their information reveal. They continue the protection.
A good rule of thumb is never to think of anyone from inside the DC information system, regardless of their disposition, as a Truth Teller.
Every Information Manager was matriculated, and are compromised, by the system around them that is entirely based on corrupt activity.
Hang around a one-legged tribe long enough, and inherently you begin limping.
2/ Let me give you a great example using this video shared yesterday.
Listen carefully to what Kash Patel says at the 01:23 moment about the "Russiagate report" that was written, and how the "ICA" (Intelligence Community Assessment) was constructed with fraudulent information from the CIA.
As Patel notes, "Gina buried it." That's Gina Haspel, the Trump CIA Director who replaced Mike Pompeo.
Now, you might think that Patel is a Truth Teller in this segment but stand back and think about it with fresh eyes, non-pretending eyes.
Patel knows, because he (with others) created a report that highlights a fraudulent CIA operation. A report that was absorbed by the CIA and buried.
Put another way, Patel is talking about a body that he knows is buried. Ergo, people might say, "Patel knows where the body is buried," right?
But ask yourself, with the known stakes to the nation as an outcome of horrific fraud, why didn't this self-identified "#2 in the Intelligence Community" bring this information forward regardless of outcome?
Is Patel a "Truth Teller," or is he a "Truth Manager," obeying the Silo rules out of self-interest?
New Eyes - Use them.
What is the difference between Kash Patel and Edward Snowden?
One is a Truth Teller the other is a Truth Manager.
Listen carefully to what Kash Patel says at the 01:23 moment about the "Russiagate report" that was written, and how the "ICA" (Intelligence Community Assessment) was constructed with fraudulent information from the CIA.
As Patel notes, "Gina buried it." That's Gina Haspel, the Trump CIA Director who replaced Mike Pompeo.
Now, you might think that Patel is a Truth Teller in this segment but stand back and think about it with fresh eyes, non-pretending eyes.
Patel knows, because he (with others) created a report that highlights a fraudulent CIA operation. A report that was absorbed by the CIA and buried.
Put another way, Patel is talking about a body that he knows is buried. Ergo, people might say, "Patel knows where the body is buried," right?
But ask yourself, with the known stakes to the nation as an outcome of horrific fraud, why didn't this self-identified "#2 in the Intelligence Community" bring this information forward regardless of outcome?
Is Patel a "Truth Teller," or is he a "Truth Manager," obeying the Silo rules out of self-interest?
New Eyes - Use them.
What is the difference between Kash Patel and Edward Snowden?
One is a Truth Teller the other is a Truth Manager.
Do you guys even understand how amazing this Kash appointment is?!
— Defender of the Republic 🇺🇸 (@realdefender45) x.com/realdefender45…">December 1, 2024
Let me remind you t.co/nLo4aIFuDF">pic.x.com/nlo4aifudf
4/ The "continuing central power" that Patel talks about already exists.
This is part of the problem with people who come from inside the system; and it is a problem for those who cannot spend thousands of hours understanding it.
The IC Silo rules, are followed by people who matriculate surrounded by the IC Silo rules.
The "central power" needed to fracture the system is the physical person of the President of the United States.
The President is, well, Snowden-proof. The President, not the office, the actual physical person, is the power of the system. The epicenter of the system where the atom splits, is the physical President.
Acting in his "official duty," the President of the United States can take a document (any document) and walk into the Brady Room, hand it to a journalist and that document is automatically declassified.
He doesn't need a stamp on it. He doesn't need anyone else's approval or permission. He, the physical person, the President, can simply say, "I view this in my official capacity as President of the United States to be a vital interest to the American public," and hand it to anyone he chooses. That's the central power.
Knowing this, knowing the factual reality of it, is exactly why the concentric circles around the President, intentionally and forcefully stop him from doing it. The silo system, self-protects.
If it can be done this way, then why wasn't it done this way?
Kash Patel, Devin Nunes, Ric Grenell, etc etc. all know this to be true. So why wasn't it done?
Go ask Edward Snowden.
This is part of the problem with people who come from inside the system; and it is a problem for those who cannot spend thousands of hours understanding it.
The IC Silo rules, are followed by people who matriculate surrounded by the IC Silo rules.
The "central power" needed to fracture the system is the physical person of the President of the United States.
The President is, well, Snowden-proof. The President, not the office, the actual physical person, is the power of the system. The epicenter of the system where the atom splits, is the physical President.
Acting in his "official duty," the President of the United States can take a document (any document) and walk into the Brady Room, hand it to a journalist and that document is automatically declassified.
He doesn't need a stamp on it. He doesn't need anyone else's approval or permission. He, the physical person, the President, can simply say, "I view this in my official capacity as President of the United States to be a vital interest to the American public," and hand it to anyone he chooses. That's the central power.
Knowing this, knowing the factual reality of it, is exactly why the concentric circles around the President, intentionally and forcefully stop him from doing it. The silo system, self-protects.
If it can be done this way, then why wasn't it done this way?
Kash Patel, Devin Nunes, Ric Grenell, etc etc. all know this to be true. So why wasn't it done?
Go ask Edward Snowden.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
