Roger Wang Profile picture
Dec 2 16 tweets 5 min read Read on X
We all know BlackBerry fell to Apple. But that’s not the full story.

Behind their rapid rise, there was a fatal flaw. A single decision that sparked the collapse.

And here’s the shocking truth—BlackBerry could have saved themselves. But didn’t.

Here's why: Image
In January 19, 1999, the first BlackBerry pager, BlackBerry 850, was released. It was a game-changer.

Portable, wireless internet, and a unique keyboard that made emailing a breeze.

Business professionals swore by it. Everyone loved it.
By 2002, BlackBerry’s 5810 model added calls, color screens, and insane battery life.

They had gone from making phones to creating a lifestyle.

This is the point where the smartphone king emerged.

The difference was clear now. BlackBerry was on top. Image
Celebrities, CEOs, and even President Obama were proud to carry their BlackBerrys.

By 2009, the company behind it, Research in Motion (RIM), was Fortune's #1 fastest-growing company.

Apple? Ranked 39th. Google? 68th.

BlackBerry was untouchable. Or so they thought. Image
Then came 2007, and Steve Jobs changed everything.

The iPhone was introduced.

It was sleek, had a touchscreen, and was user-friendly— a complete revolution.

The iPhone had features that redefined what a phone could do.
When iPhone launched, Lazaridis (co-CEO of BlackBerry), grabbed his co-CEO Jim Balsillie at the office and pulled him in front of a computer.

“Jim, I want you to watch this,” he said, pointing to a webcast of the iPhone unveiling. Image
“They put a full Web browser on that thing.” “These guys are really, really good. This is different.”

“It’s OK—we’ll be fine,” Balsillie responded.

Spoiler alert: They weren’t fine. Apple had something far more powerful than BlackBerry ever anticipated. Image
But BlackBerry didn’t see the iPhone as a threat to its core business.

They dismissed it as a “lousy” product with poor security and battery life.

In 2008, Apple sold 11.6M iPhones.

By 2010, that number jumped to 20.73M. Image
By 2011, Apple had already started chipping away at BlackBerry's market share, and the gap only grew.

The solution was clear: BlackBerry needed to pivot and embrace the new technology. Image
But BlackBerry stuck to its guns, betting its loyal customers would choose the physical keyboard over the iPhone’s touchscreen.

They were wrong.

Their market share shrank from 33% in 2011 to just 2.31% in 2016.

By 2021, BlackBerry’s market share had hit 0%. Image
The company, once untouchable, was irrelevant.

The iPhone may have taken most of BlackBerry’s market share, but BlackBerry also made moves that made it worse.

They ignored the power of touchscreens and, in doing so, ignored the future.

But that’s not all. Image
The launch of iPhone shook BlackBerry so much that they started making mistakes:

– A global outage in 2011 left BlackBerry users in the dark for 3+ days.

– Their PlayBook tablet launched with no email, calendar, or notes apps—basic functions that BlackBerry users expected. Image
And they kept rushing products without understanding market needs.

By 2012, co-chairs Lazaridis and Balsillie stepped down, and Apple dominated.

In 2017, BlackBerry stopped manufacturing phones altogether.
To put this in perspective,

In 2009, BlackBerry controlled 50% of the smartphone market.

Five years later, in 2014, that number was less than 1%. Image
The BlackBerry story is a cautionary tale.

1. Innovation waits for no one—touchscreen tech already existed, but BlackBerry ignored it.

2. Never underestimate your competition. The iPhone turned out to be a revolution.

3. Loyalty fades fast if you don't evolve.
If you liked this thread, follow @RogerWang11 for more business insights.

Comment what other content you're interested in - and I'll write about it.

DM me for tips to go viral :)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Roger Wang

Roger Wang Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RogerWang11

Nov 26
In 1975, Pepsi started the biggest war in beverage history.

They stole millions of Coca-Cola customers using one simple trick.

Coca-Cola's response? A big mistake that nearly handed their empire to Pepsi.

Here’s the full story of the greatest marketing battle in history: Image
Image
Pepsi was losing to Coke in the Cola Wars.

Coca-Cola's empire seemed untouchable. Their brand was dominating the soda market.

Pepsi needed a huge disruption to stand a chance.
Soon, they discovered something intriguing…

Between two unlabeled bottles of both sodas, People preferred Pepsi’s taste.

They choose Pepsi over and over again.

Attach the Coca-Cola label? They choose Coke.
Read 15 tweets
Nov 21
In 2010, Google and Oracle went head-to-head in the biggest copyright case in history.

Oracle sued Google for $9B, claiming Google copied 11,000 lines of code to develop Android.

Google took a bold stance and argued that its code copying was fair.

Here's the full story: Image
Image
When a company pays you hundreds of millions, you often stay on good terms.

But Oracle CEO Larry Ellison has never been a fan of Google and its CEO, Larry Page

In 2010, he sued Google $9 billion for using Java.

Ellison claimed Google CEO Larry Page acted "absolutely evil"
Oracle’s lawsuit plan dates back to early 2009 when they bought Sun Microsystems.

The original creator of Java.

Facing massive losses, Sun became a takeover target.

Despite being battered by the 2008 crisis, their IP, especially Java, made them an appealing acquisition. Image
Read 14 tweets
Nov 15
In the 1970s and '80s, Coors wasn’t just beer—it was a status symbol.

People on the East Coast were smuggling it across state lines.

Even President Gerald Ford had some flown to the White House!

Here’s how Coors became the ultimate forbidden brand 🧵👇 Image
In the early 1970s, Coors limited its distribution to just 11 western states.

For people on the East Coast, this turned Coors into an elusive prize.

Fans and even celebrities began smuggling it across state lines—Burt Reynolds even made it a plot point in Smokey and the Bandit!
This scarcity gave Coors a “forbidden fruit” allure.

Not only was it hard to find, but Coors was unpasteurized, which meant it had a fresher, more authentic taste.

For those who couldn’t get it locally, sneaking Coors in felt like being part of an exclusive club. Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(