Advocates of "gender-affirming care" made at least 6 false and dubious claims in the Supreme Court oral arguments for U.S. v. Skrmetti today.
Transgender medical interventions are so grotesque, advocates use euphemistic terms like "gender-affirming care" to hide their true nature. The arguments today illustrated once again that gender ideology considers natural puberty to be unhealthy for some minors and prefers the artificial facsimile of puberty created by Big Pharma products...💉
2⃣ACLU's Chase Strangio claimed it's “clearly established in the science” that "gender-affirming care" reduces "depression, anxiety, & su*cidality." Yet a pro-trans FDA official admitted a study showed "puberty blockers" increased su*cidal thoughts. 3/9
3⃣Puberty as Harm:
“If you’re thinking about this from the standpoint of, ‘There’s no harm in just making them wait until they’re adults,’ I think you have to recognize that the effect of denying this care is to produce irreversible physical effects that are consistent with their birth sex, because they have to go through puberty before they turn 18,” Prelogar argued.
Prelogar’s argument flips the natural course of biology on its head. She and others are suggesting that the natural process of puberty is somehow harmful and that it is better for males who say they identify as female to undergo a chemically induced artificial facsimile of the natural process than it is for them to develop naturally. 4/9
4⃣THE SAME CONDITION?
Sotomayor said doctors would give "puberty blockers" to a boy w/precocious puberty but not a girl who ID'd as trans: "The medical condition is the same."
Elena Kagan said the TN law aims to enforce gender conformity b/c it opposes procedures that "might encourage minors to become disdainful of their sex."
This isn't about gender conformity, but accepting biological reality. 6/9
Ketanji Brown Jackson claimed at least three times that a law protecting kids from transgender medical experiments was somehow similar to a ban on interracial marriage. Yes, seriously. Here's the first time. 7/9
Here's the second time. ACLU attorney Chase Strangio agreed with Jackson👀 8/9
TN AG Matt Rice debunked her claim, saying it relies on equating "fundamentally different medical treatments."
"Giving testosterone to a boy w/a deficiency is not the same treatment as giving it to a girl who has psychological distress w/ her body." 9/9
In 2020, I wrote "Making Hate Pay" about the SPLC's corruption. I knew they scammed donors by inflating "hate," and I suspected they were planting racists...
Now @FBIDirectorKash and @DAGToddBlanche confirmed my suspicions.
As I testified before @JudiciaryGOP last year, the SPLC publishes a "hate map" that it claims reveals the "infrastructure of white supremacy" in America.
The hate map includes:
1⃣ random people with no impact
2⃣mainstream conservatives
3⃣people on SPLC payroll.
🧵2/9
I've been analyzing this hate map for years, noting that the SPLC pads the numbers, partly by including groups for no reason other than their disagreement with the SPLC's hard-left agenda, and partly by listing every single chapter of an org as a "hate group."
The paid informant at the "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville didn't just tip SPLC off. The SPLC supervised his r*cist postings and helped coordinate transportation, boosting the white nationalist side. SPLC paid him $270K between 2015 and 2023.
🧵2/8
2⃣NATIONAL ALLIANCE
SPLC paid a neo-Nazi leader more than $1M between 2014 and 2023.
This story is familiar to me because it involves the case of Glen Keith Allen, because the SPLC used the stolen documents to destroy his reputation.
The indictment includes six counts of wire fraud, because the SPLC claimed that it aims to "dismantle white supremacy" but it actually funded a broad swath of white nationalist groups.
🧵2/12
Beginning in the 1980s—the decade when SPLC's offices got firebombed—the SPLC cultivated a network of informants with violent extremist groups. It maintained those informants as recently as 2023, according to the indictment. SPLC funneled more than $3 million to them.
Bryan Fair, the SPLC's CEO, was kind enough to mention my congressional testimony in his video. He also mentioned my exclusive on @FBIDirectorKash separating the FBI from the SPLC last year.
As a piece of damage control, Fair's announcement is very interesting.
He acknowledges that SPLC paid informants to monitor "extremely violent groups." He claims this program is over. He frames it in terms of the civil rights movement and the 1984 bombing of SPLC HQ.
One of the strongest defamation lawsuits against the Southern Poverty Law Center has a new lease on life. The Dustin Inman Society legal team—@todd_mcmurtry @libertycounsel & more—filed an appeal at the 11th Circuit
DA King founded the Dustin Inman Society to oppose illegal immigration, but his sister is a legal immigrant and legal immigrants are on the society's board.
Even so, SPLC said the group "focuses on vilifying all immigrants." King sued for defamation.
The American Medical Association should face an investigation and potentially lose its tax-exempt status, @donoharm says in an official complaint to the IRS.
“Based on the evidence in our complaint, we believe the IRS should revoke the AMA Foundation’s tax-exempt status for operating a racially discriminatory program,” Dr. Kurt Miceli told me.
The problem?🤔 The AMA Foundation offers scholarships on a racial basis.
🧵2/10
That may not sound bad at first, but let's remember what Supreme Court precedent and President Donald Trump's executive orders say about racial discrimination, particularly in education.