Advocates of "gender-affirming care" made at least 6 false and dubious claims in the Supreme Court oral arguments for U.S. v. Skrmetti today.
Transgender medical interventions are so grotesque, advocates use euphemistic terms like "gender-affirming care" to hide their true nature. The arguments today illustrated once again that gender ideology considers natural puberty to be unhealthy for some minors and prefers the artificial facsimile of puberty created by Big Pharma products...💉
2⃣ACLU's Chase Strangio claimed it's “clearly established in the science” that "gender-affirming care" reduces "depression, anxiety, & su*cidality." Yet a pro-trans FDA official admitted a study showed "puberty blockers" increased su*cidal thoughts. 3/9
3⃣Puberty as Harm:
“If you’re thinking about this from the standpoint of, ‘There’s no harm in just making them wait until they’re adults,’ I think you have to recognize that the effect of denying this care is to produce irreversible physical effects that are consistent with their birth sex, because they have to go through puberty before they turn 18,” Prelogar argued.
Prelogar’s argument flips the natural course of biology on its head. She and others are suggesting that the natural process of puberty is somehow harmful and that it is better for males who say they identify as female to undergo a chemically induced artificial facsimile of the natural process than it is for them to develop naturally. 4/9
4⃣THE SAME CONDITION?
Sotomayor said doctors would give "puberty blockers" to a boy w/precocious puberty but not a girl who ID'd as trans: "The medical condition is the same."
Elena Kagan said the TN law aims to enforce gender conformity b/c it opposes procedures that "might encourage minors to become disdainful of their sex."
This isn't about gender conformity, but accepting biological reality. 6/9
Ketanji Brown Jackson claimed at least three times that a law protecting kids from transgender medical experiments was somehow similar to a ban on interracial marriage. Yes, seriously. Here's the first time. 7/9
Here's the second time. ACLU attorney Chase Strangio agreed with Jackson👀 8/9
TN AG Matt Rice debunked her claim, saying it relies on equating "fundamentally different medical treatments."
"Giving testosterone to a boy w/a deficiency is not the same treatment as giving it to a girl who has psychological distress w/ her body." 9/9
Michigan Sec of State Jocelyn Benson was on the SPLC board when it was funding white nationalists. She’s touted her history with SPLC while running for governor. I asked her campaign for comment: no response.
According to the DOJ, SPLC sent $3M to KKK members, neo-Nazis, a Charlottesville “Unite the Right” organizer, and more. SPLC didn’t deny this-it claimed these people were “informants,” helping SPLC foil violent plots.
While the KKK firebombed the SPLC’s offices in 1983, the indictment covers 2014-2023. During that time, SPLC exaggerated hate by putting mainstream conservatives and Christians on a “hate map” with Klan chapters.
Multiple race-based scholarships have disappeared from the American Medical Association Foundation's website after @donoharm sent a letter to the IRS warning about potential racial discrimination.
“The AMA Foundation appears to have removed the discriminatory scholarships at the heart of our IRS complaint—a tacit admission that our concerns were warranted,” Do No Harm Chief Medical Officer Dr. Kurt Miceli told me.
🧵2/6
Most scholarships are still on the website, but the ones Do No Harm flagged have disappeared.
The Association of Black Cardiologists Scholarship is now gone.
In 2020, I wrote "Making Hate Pay" about the SPLC's corruption. I knew they scammed donors by inflating "hate," and I suspected they were planting racists...
Now @FBIDirectorKash and @DAGToddBlanche confirmed my suspicions.
As I testified before @JudiciaryGOP last year, the SPLC publishes a "hate map" that it claims reveals the "infrastructure of white supremacy" in America.
The hate map includes:
1⃣ random people with no impact
2⃣mainstream conservatives
3⃣people on SPLC payroll.
🧵2/9
I've been analyzing this hate map for years, noting that the SPLC pads the numbers, partly by including groups for no reason other than their disagreement with the SPLC's hard-left agenda, and partly by listing every single chapter of an org as a "hate group."
The paid informant at the "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville didn't just tip SPLC off. The SPLC supervised his r*cist postings and helped coordinate transportation, boosting the white nationalist side. SPLC paid him $270K between 2015 and 2023.
🧵2/8
2⃣NATIONAL ALLIANCE
SPLC paid a neo-Nazi leader more than $1M between 2014 and 2023.
This story is familiar to me because it involves the case of Glen Keith Allen, because the SPLC used the stolen documents to destroy his reputation.
The indictment includes six counts of wire fraud, because the SPLC claimed that it aims to "dismantle white supremacy" but it actually funded a broad swath of white nationalist groups.
🧵2/12
Beginning in the 1980s—the decade when SPLC's offices got firebombed—the SPLC cultivated a network of informants with violent extremist groups. It maintained those informants as recently as 2023, according to the indictment. SPLC funneled more than $3 million to them.
Bryan Fair, the SPLC's CEO, was kind enough to mention my congressional testimony in his video. He also mentioned my exclusive on @FBIDirectorKash separating the FBI from the SPLC last year.
As a piece of damage control, Fair's announcement is very interesting.
He acknowledges that SPLC paid informants to monitor "extremely violent groups." He claims this program is over. He frames it in terms of the civil rights movement and the 1984 bombing of SPLC HQ.