DanielR Profile picture
Dec 5, 2024 18 tweets 7 min read Read on X
1. A curious Ukrainian drone that crashed in September, 2024 was widely reported in russian media. Although various folks claimed this wreckage showed the remains of a jet engine, things did not look right. Image
2. Here is a closer view of this object. The trouble is that most jet engines used in drones do not look like this. If not an engine, what is this? The following photographs will (partially) explain what this is. Image
3. This is a rare photo showing an intact example of this jet-powered drone. Wing span is roughly 3 m (10 feet). The airframe is made from carbon fibre. The overall design is really intriguing. Image
4. With covers removed, the right bay holds a flight controller & radios. Note the 2 adjacent antenna connectors. Left bay holds fuel & engine management systems. The jet engine is in the middle and has extra thermal insulation. Image
5. The engine is a model SW400pro made by the Chinese company Swiwin. It’s about 15 cm (5.8”) in diameter, giving an estimate of the drone’s size. In some photos it looks like the smaller SW300pro (possibly both are used). It burns 12 L (3.2 US gallons) of fuel in 10 minutes so cannot fly very far.Image
6. The thing that some folks thought was an engine appears to be a warhead. It is about 28 cm long and 11.5 cm in diameter. Curiously, two hoses lead from the warhead to the pitot tubes. Image
7. The boot in this photo provides a better sense of the warhead’s size. The tubes are colour-coded: likely one is total pressure and one is static pressure. There are wires but it is hard to sort them out from this photo. The “not sure” part may be a switch. Image
8. The warhead has a nice casting containing electro-mechanical components. Two 9-volt batteries provide power. An electrical connector likely goes to the external wires. Unexpectedly there is a wind-up timer switch, model MI2, made by Faucigny Instruments. Image
9. Here is a better view of the mechanical timer. Also shown is a differential pressure switch, model DesignFlex PSF100A, by World Magnetics. This connects to the pitot tubes and switches at pressure of 3” water, possibly to arm only once the drone is flying. Image
10. One of the drone’s bays holds the battery and a Swiwin engine control unit. Other than a Taoglas (possibly Iridium) antenna, there is nothing obviously unusual. The opposite bay is a different story. Image
11. There is a lot going on here. The flight controller is a common CubePilot Orange+ that is connected to a (fancy) PowerBox SR2. GPS is a Sparkfun (really?) u-blox NEO M9N. There is also a Matek magnetometer. Hidden in the rear is a heap of power-management stuff. Image
12. There is no sign of a camera on this drone. Curiously, there are two communication systems. There is a common RFD900 long-range radio modem. There is also a RockBlock Iridium satellite modem but it’s not clear how this would be used given its very low data rate. Image
13. There are no custom electronics. Zero. Everything inside this drone can be bought from hobby stores. All of it. Regardless, whoever, put this drone together really liked their CAD software. Everything is nicely planned, well-made and labelled. Image
14. A recent photo shows the wiring harness from this jet drone along with a flight controller made by the American company, Aevex Aerospace. It is extremely unlikely the jet drone is made by Aevex. These components are almost certainly from different crashes. Image
15. So then, who made this jet? One hint is the modem case & pitot tube mount look like they were printed on a powder-bed 3D printer. It’s someone who likes mechanical engineering and knows how to work with carbon fibre but are less keen on designing circuit boards. Image
16. Mechanically, this is a very interesting drone. However, its maker remains a mystery.
If you liked this thread, please bookmark it and repost as a quote. Also, please see my previous threads listed under “highlights”. Respectful comments are always appreciated. Image
17. (ps) Please comment if you know more about the warhead. Regarding Aevex not being the maker of this jet, it is difficult to imagine an American maker of military drones using a Chinese engine. Also, labelling & general design of the jet is very different from the Disruptor.
18. (ps) For completeness, the thing labelled “not sure” in #8 is likely a detonator like those shown here. This warhead also resembles (roughly) the warhead used in a Hellfire missile. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with DanielR

DanielR Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DanielR33187703

Oct 21, 2025
1. This wreckage is Ukraine's secretive Bars (Snow Leopard) cruise missile that was first mentioned by Minister of Strategic Industries, Herman Smetanin in April 2024. The pieces in this photo are not arranged correctly but still give an idea what it looks like. Image
2. This jet-powered missile was spotted attacking Donetsk on September 14. The fuselage appears to be more curved than the common cylinder shape. There are no obvious winglets. The tail is consistent with a dual tail (H-tail). Image
3. One crashed in July and is shown here upside down and missing its nose. The jet engine has broken free. It clearly has an H-tail and a complex shape (non-cylindrical) fuselage. Visible are 3 supports for catapult or rocket-assisted takeoff. Image
Read 25 tweets
Sep 8, 2025
1. This soldier was very excited because he scored a jet engine. A big question is, what drone is this a part of? Cutting up a drone before taking photos is common, and makes identification a more interesting challenge. Image
2. The engine is mounted on a pylon but there are no markings to work with. It is hard to even be sure if this a Ukrainian or a russian drone. It is common for drones to have been cut up to remove the warhead & useful components. Image
3. The engine is most likely made in China and has a "360" label, which is probably its size. But this is an unusual size so it could be a knock off. Note the four mounting straps. Image
Read 5 tweets
Aug 14, 2025
1. It is beautiful but is this reconnaissance drone too good to use in a war? The various reconnaissance drones flown in Ukraine are well made and usually expensive. But are they too expensive? Image
2. At the start of the war, Ukraine obtain several Penguin-C military drones made in Latvia by UAV Factory (now called, Edge Autonomy). Image
3. This aircraft is fairly small but has a number of fancy design elements. The wing and tail are removed for transport. The red triangles show where the fasteners go. Image
Read 26 tweets
Aug 8, 2025
1. Here is something a little unusual. It is a Zlin Z137T agricultural aircraft (crop duster) equipped with two R-73 air-to-air missiles for shooting down drones. There is no obvious gun so this is likely only for large drones like the Geran-2 (Shahed 136). Image
2. For reference, here is a Z137T in its tradition role of applying chemicals to a crop. A maximum cruise speed of 252 km/h will be a constraint as a drone hunter. Image
3. The R-73 missile uses infrared homing and has a maximum range of about 30 km. It is not clear how many of these are in inventory. Image
Read 5 tweets
Jun 20, 2025
1. What would have been unthinkable a few years ago is now routine. Several Ukrainian drones successfully attacked a russian drone factory located in Dubna, only 115 km from the kremlin. This is a smart move by Ukraine, and there may be more to this attack than at first seems. Image
2. Importantly, one video showed several drones attacking, one after the other. Oddly, there was remarkably little air defence heard as each drone approached over a lake. What happened to russia’s air defence? Image
3. This shows the factory with the lake on the left (west) side. This building is very large. The camera operator (for #1) was quite close and was almost hit by shrapnel. Image
Read 24 tweets
Apr 23, 2025
1. Developing a new weapon is hard so why not just copy another company’s design? Fibre optic drones are a hot product and part 4 of this series looked at a company (Skywalker) who developed their own. Other companies have rushed to make similar weapons. Image
2. Here are two fibre optics kits made by the Chinese company, Skywalker. Opening the boxes is the likely owner of PGI Technology, which operates in China but is effectively russian. Initially, this photo was confusing. Was Skywalker collaborating with PGI Technology? Nope. Image
3. PGI bought these two Skywalker kits with the goal of copying the technology and selling their own version. The following photos are very unusual since they show the design process. Here is the Skywalker canister with a large drone frame. Image
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(