D. Alec Zeck Profile picture
Dec 6 12 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Conversations with META AI regarding virus isolation and the existence of viruses. You’re gonna wanna read this. 😁
Enjoy!

🧵

/1
2/ Image
3/ Image
4/ Image
5/ Image
6/ Image
7/ Image
8/ Image
9/ Image
10/ Image
FINAL/ Image
Update: I used the same line of questioning with ChatGPT. It took a little more time and pointing out its inconsistencies and contradictions, but it eventually agreed with everything Meta AI said here Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with D. Alec Zeck

D. Alec Zeck Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Alec_Zeck

Sep 27
There is no empirical evidence that healthy people can become ill by being exposed to sick people or their bodily fluids.

In his recent book, 𝘊𝘢𝘯 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘊𝘢𝘵𝘤𝘩 𝘢 𝘊𝘰𝘭𝘥?, Daniel Roytas scours the historical scientific literature attempting to find studies in which healthy people can become sick when exposed to sick people or their bodily fluids.

He looked at over 200 papers that attempted to demonstrate this.
Here’s what he found:
The overwhelming majority of these studies failed to demonstrate contagion.

• There are several examples of contagion (social contagion and mass psychogenic
illness)that have nothing to do with particles/microbes.

• The modal (most frequently occuring) result was 0 contagion.

• The nocebo effect is a well-established, strong factor in disease.

• In the studies wherein healthy people became sick after being exposed to sick people or their bodily fluids, any one or more of the following occured:

• the study did not include a placebo control group

• the study was not blinded

• unnatural methods of attempted transmission occurred (like injecting blood from a sick patient)

• theplacebo/nocebo effect was likely a factor

• the symptoms were not consistent with the disease in question

In every case, no Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial (DBPCRT) was conducted, and no infectious agent was discovered in the fluids of the sick person
One of set of studies Daniel documents brilliantly occurred during the Spanish Flu.

First, let’s go over some up front context on the Spanish Flu (also covered in Daniel’s book):

• Occurred primarily between 1918 - 1919

• Alleged outbreak began in Kansas in March 1918

• Allegedly caused by an H1N1 influenza A virus

• Est. 50 - 100 million people died

• Est. 180 - 600 million people developed severe illness

• Nearly half of the deaths occured in men ages 20-40

• Occured during WW1

• During WW1, 150,000 tons of chemical weapons were produced
—125,000 tons were deployed on the battlefield

• Doctors were prescribing patients between 8,000 - 15,600 mg of aspirin per day to “treat” the flu
—This is equivalent to consuming 25 aspirin tablets per day
Read 13 tweets
Jun 13
I hope people understand the implications of what we’ve done.

With multiple independent labs, we’ve conducted the exact same experiments as are conducted by virologists — wherein they claim the results of the experiment demonstrate both the presence and pathogenicity of a virus, except we DID NOT have any human sample (meaning no possible source of a virus) and we achieved the same results, repeatedly.

Think about what that means for virology’s foundational “evidence.”
We conducted the exact same cell-culture isolation technique EXCEPT we DID NOT include a human sample (which they say contains viruses).
We used one of the most robust cell lines — Human Embryonic Kidney Cells, with the exact same antibiotic and serum concentration.

We achieved the exact same cytopathic effect (CPE, or cellular breakdown). This CPE is what virologists point to as proof of viruses. And we did it multiple times, without any human sample — meaning no possible source of a “virus”— and got the exact same results.
A separate independent lab then conducted Transmission Electron Microscopy on the samples after CPE.

In the TEM images, we found:

-HIV (exact size, shape)
-SARS-CoV-2 (exact size, shape)
-Measles (exact size, shape)

Again, this is without ANY human sample at all, which means no possible source of any “virus.”
Read 4 tweets
Jan 20
“The idea that we get sick because of energy is woo-woo nonsense”

Is it really “woo-woo nonsense”?

We have measurable and observable (through instrumentation) electromagnetic fields that surround our bodies — the human biofield.

Electromagnetic fields interact and share information. That’s how the technology you’re reading this on works. Is it *really* that far-fetched to think our bodies are communicating information, possibly in a more sophisticated and intelligent way, through our biofields?
Maybe it seems “woo-woo” because we’ve been conditioned to believe in the disproven, materialistic germ paradigm while overlooking the metaphysical aspects of who we are.

I can confidently say disproven because there are over 60 experimental attempts to demonstrate fluids from a sick person cause disease in a healthy person and all of them failed.

I also acknowledge that the energetic explanation has not been thoroughly explored. It is but one of MANY other explanations for the phenomenon of two or more people experiencing symptoms in the same space.
Before we proceed we need context for where I’m coming from:

I think that what we refer to as “sickness” is simply our body intelligently detoxifying and/or our body intelligently responding to something in its internal/external environment, and that (in the overwhelming majority of cases) if we just get the hell out of the way and/or change the conditions of the external environment, our body will do exactly what it’s supposed to do to heal.

There is much more to be said about this (and some nuance), but we’ll save it for another time.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 17
Layer one:

Okay, I was wrong. In hindsight, the health measures were a little excessive and the health authorities and governments of the world freaked out a little too much, and so did I. The vaccines weren’t as effective as they’d originally planned for, but it’s because they’re using a new technology. Those people saying the shots are killing people and the virus came from a lab are crazy.
Layer two:

Okay, I was wrong. It’s even deeper. The health measures were an explicit act of government overreach and were based in little actual science or data. The COVID shots are killing people, but it’s because they rushed a new technology. Those other people saying the COVID shots were an intentional bioweapon are crazy. Oh, and the virus might have accidentally come from a lab — I’m not sure.
Layer three:

Okay, I was wrong. It’s even deeper. There is a clear worldwide agenda at play, and this was clearly NOT about health. The COVID shots were a bioweapon that was planned off of the other bioweapon — the virus. This has pulled back the curtain on the entire pharmaceutical industry, and it’s clear that there is a major problem with the efficacy and safety of all shots, not just the COVID shots. I still think that the other vaccines are generally good, though.
Read 8 tweets
Sep 26, 2023
“If there is no evidence 🦠 exist, how do you explain Johnny getting sick after Sally?”

Likely exposure to similar environment, eating habits, etc., but if not that, let’s think—

What causes women’s menstrual cycles to sync?

What causes me to yawn after you yawn?

What causes you to just *feel* when someone has bad/good vibes?
We have measurable and observable (through instrumentation) electromagnetic fields that surround our bodies— the human biofield.

Electromagnetic fields interact and share information, in ways materialism-based science will never find a thorough explanation for.

But there’s more…
We are comprised primarily of water.

Over 99% of our molecular makeup is water.

Per the work of Gilbert Ling, Gerald Pollack, Masaro Emoto, Veda Austin and several others, there is a strong indication that water stores information, can produce its own energy, and can communicate information to other bodies of water.

Now apply that to your body and the bodies of those around you.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 17, 2023
I don’t know how else I can effectively communicate this—

The lab leak/gain of function narrative being shared amongst mainstream talking heads *seems* to be an admission of “the truth”, and it’s totally false.

This is a setup for the agenda to continue.
I remember reading several Reddit subs in December 2019 that were discussing the “lab leak.” I fell for the initial Chinese propaganda of people “dropping dead” in the streets. I saw that the mainstream media wasn’t covering it, and because I was already aware of the corruption… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Luckily, I came to my senses via leaning on my own observations early in 2020; the lab leak thing and the Chinese propaganda made no sense. There didn’t seem to be anything new going on at all. This is where I began exploring the pseudoscience of virology. Thank goodness I did.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(