The biggest false-flag psyop of the last five years is the idea that “COVID came from a lab” — and it's unfortunate that the increasingly popular alternative movement is championing this idea.

COVID doesn't exist. The WHO defines COVID as "an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus." SARS-CoV-2 has never been shown to exist, and, in fact, the methods by which virologists claim to isolate and demonstrate the pathogenicity of viruses have been falsified numerous times. Consider which has scarier implications: viruses being made in labs with higher lethal potential or the off-chance of a naturally occurring cross-species virus? Neither is true or proven, but unfortunately, the freedom community is championing the former, which has much scarier implications and a much greater likelihood for fear-based psychological manipulation and propaganda tactics.

There's a third option: virology is unproven pseudoscience.

Are you confused by those who say "COVID doesn't exist"? Let me help you out.

Virology 101. A refresher.

🧵

/1 I do not say this lightly: the foundations for virology, and thus the entire field of virology, are fraudulent and pseudoscientific.

Pseudoscience is anything claiming to be scientific that doesn’t follow the scientific method. In every single "viral isolation" paper — which is the foundational evidence for the field of virology (of which both all other pieces of virology and the field of vaccinology are built upon), a variation of this procedure is followed:

/2

Conversations with META AI regarding virus isolation and the existence of viruses. You’re gonna wanna read this. 😁
Enjoy!

🧵

/1 2/

There is no empirical evidence that healthy people can become ill by being exposed to sick people or their bodily fluids.

In his recent book, 𝘊𝘢𝘯 𝘠𝘰𝘶 𝘊𝘢𝘵𝘤𝘩 𝘢 𝘊𝘰𝘭𝘥?, Daniel Roytas scours the historical scientific literature attempting to find studies in which healthy people can become sick when exposed to sick people or their bodily fluids.

He looked at over 200 papers that attempted to demonstrate this.
Here’s what he found: The overwhelming majority of these studies failed to demonstrate contagion.

• There are several examples of contagion (social contagion and mass psychogenic
illness)that have nothing to do with particles/microbes.

• The modal (most frequently occuring) result was 0 contagion.

• The nocebo effect is a well-established, strong factor in disease.

• In the studies wherein healthy people became sick after being exposed to sick people or their bodily fluids, any one or more of the following occured:

• the study did not include a placebo control group

• the study was not blinded

• unnatural methods of attempted transmission occurred (like injecting blood from a sick patient)

• theplacebo/nocebo effect was likely a factor

• the symptoms were not consistent with the disease in question

In every case, no Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial (DBPCRT) was conducted, and no infectious agent was discovered in the fluids of the sick person

I hope people understand the implications of what we’ve done.

With multiple independent labs, we’ve conducted the exact same experiments as are conducted by virologists — wherein they claim the results of the experiment demonstrate both the presence and pathogenicity of a virus, except we DID NOT have any human sample (meaning no possible source of a virus) and we achieved the same results, repeatedly.

Think about what that means for virology’s foundational “evidence.” We conducted the exact same cell-culture isolation technique EXCEPT we DID NOT include a human sample (which they say contains viruses).
We used one of the most robust cell lines — Human Embryonic Kidney Cells, with the exact same antibiotic and serum concentration.

We achieved the exact same cytopathic effect (CPE, or cellular breakdown). This CPE is what virologists point to as proof of viruses. And we did it multiple times, without any human sample — meaning no possible source of a “virus”— and got the exact same results.

“The idea that we get sick because of energy is woo-woo nonsense”

Is it really “woo-woo nonsense”?

We have measurable and observable (through instrumentation) electromagnetic fields that surround our bodies — the human biofield.

Electromagnetic fields interact and share information. That’s how the technology you’re reading this on works. Is it *really* that far-fetched to think our bodies are communicating information, possibly in a more sophisticated and intelligent way, through our biofields? Maybe it seems “woo-woo” because we’ve been conditioned to believe in the disproven, materialistic germ paradigm while overlooking the metaphysical aspects of who we are.

I can confidently say disproven because there are over 60 experimental attempts to demonstrate fluids from a sick person cause disease in a healthy person and all of them failed.

I also acknowledge that the energetic explanation has not been thoroughly explored. It is but one of MANY other explanations for the phenomenon of two or more people experiencing symptoms in the same space.

Layer one:

Okay, I was wrong. In hindsight, the health measures were a little excessive and the health authorities and governments of the world freaked out a little too much, and so did I. The vaccines weren’t as effective as they’d originally planned for, but it’s because they’re using a new technology. Those people saying the shots are killing people and the virus came from a lab are crazy. Layer two:

Okay, I was wrong. It’s even deeper. The health measures were an explicit act of government overreach and were based in little actual science or data. The COVID shots are killing people, but it’s because they rushed a new technology. Those other people saying the COVID shots were an intentional bioweapon are crazy. Oh, and the virus might have accidentally come from a lab — I’m not sure.

“If there is no evidence 🦠 exist, how do you explain Johnny getting sick after Sally?”

Likely exposure to similar environment, eating habits, etc., but if not that, let’s think—

What causes women’s menstrual cycles to sync?

What causes me to yawn after you yawn?

What causes you to just *feel* when someone has bad/good vibes? We have measurable and observable (through instrumentation) electromagnetic fields that surround our bodies— the human biofield.

Electromagnetic fields interact and share information, in ways materialism-based science will never find a thorough explanation for.

But there’s more…

I don’t know how else I can effectively communicate this—

The lab leak/gain of function narrative being shared amongst mainstream talking heads *seems* to be an admission of “the truth”, and it’s totally false.

This is a setup for the agenda to continue. I remember reading several Reddit subs in December 2019 that were discussing the “lab leak.” I fell for the initial Chinese propaganda of people “dropping dead” in the streets. I saw that the mainstream media wasn’t covering it, and because I was already aware of the corruption… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

If I told you I’d sequenced the full genome of a unicorn with lasers for eyes, what would you say? You’d say “show me the unicorn.”

Then I say, “well, there’s a problem— unicorns have a cloaking mechanism that turns on in the presence of a human. But I have the sequence, I assure you.”

Again, you’d say “show me the unicorn first.”

There is no proof that strictly adheres to the scientific method, or to logic, that viruses exist, or that viruses cause disease.
Virology is pseudoscientific.
In this thread, I’ll explain why.
/1 Virtually every “virus isolation” paper— oftentimes the foundational paper claiming to have both discovered a virus and proved pathogenicity— for any given “virus”, goes something like this:
/2