Russia continues to advance and achieve local successes in the areas of Pokrovsk and Kurakhove. However, it is difficult to call this a success, as it comes at a huge cost in Russian losses. In this sense, the report differs little from previous ones from this section of the
1/22
front. But the main events of recent days are, of course, in Syria. The regime of Bashar al-Assad has fallen, and it took only a few days for this to happen. Bashar al-Assad was the last dictator from the era of the Arab Spring. Ben Ali, Hosni Mubarak, Abdelaziz Bouteflika,
2/22
Muammar Gaddafi – for various reasons, they are no longer in power. Among all the countries of the Middle East and North Africa, Syria saw the highest number of casualties and destruction. Protests, which escalated into a civil war, began in 2011. Losing power and control,
3/22
Assad turned to Russia and Iran for help. The rapid advance of ISIS and the seizure of significant territory in Syria and Iraq in the summer of 2014 provided a pretext for U.S. military intervention. From September 2014, the U.S. and its allies began conducting airstrikes
4/22
against Islamist positions in Syria and also provided weapons and training to so-called "moderate opposition" forces. On September 30, 2015, with the agreement of President Bashar al-Assad, the Russian Aerospace Forces launched a military operation in Syria, operating in
5/22
close coordination with government forces. In October 2015, with the support of the U.S.-led international coalition, the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) military alliance was formed to fight ISIS, with Kurdish self-defense units forming its core. The war became one of the
6/22
main causes of the European migration crisis, triggering a mass exodus of refugees from Syria. The conflict was marked by fierce fighting, indiscriminate shelling of settlements, mass killings, and numerous war crimes against civilians. The country's economy and
7/22
infrastructure suffered colossal damage. By the time Assad’s regime fell, the number of victims had exceeded 300,000 people. Unlike in 2011 and 2015, this time Russia and Iran were unable to come to Assad's aid, as they were preoccupied with their own problems — Russia
8/22
with Ukraine and Iran with Israel. The fall of Assad's regime is a severe blow to Russia, and it's not just about the loss of equipment, military bases, ports, and soldiers, some of whom were surrounded and unable to evacuate from Syria. Of course, the fall of Assad's regime
9/22
does not mean the victory of democracy in the country. The rebels who defeated the government army consist of former ISIS militants, but it is unlikely that extremists ever truly become "former." It is quite possible that one dictatorship will simply be replaced by another,
10/22
but the fall of Assad's regime is a signal to the world that Russia is weak and a reminder that dictatorships, built over years, can collapse in a matter of days. It also signals that Putin is not eternal. Russia's intervention in Syria was not only aimed at maintaining
11/22
access to the region's oil and gas resources but also at demonstrating strength and influence on the international stage. The inability to save Assad's regime, though Russia apparently did manage to rescue Assad and his family by granting them asylum, reveals Russia's lack
12/22
of serious resources beyond those it deploys in Ukraine. This means that Moldova, Abkhazia, and South Ossetia — all these regions may break away from Moscow's influence if sufficient pressure is applied. Currently, the people of Georgia are engaged in a struggle for
13/22
parliamentary control and independence. Although they have not yet won, "Georgian Dream" is also unable to suppress the protests, and Russia cannot help them with anything other than hiring local "titushki". Russia still has currency reserves, which it can use to support
14/22
its candidates in Georgia and Romania, but at this stage, Russian allies are increasingly facing resistance. Elections in Romania have been rescheduled, and in Georgia, it's too early to declare a victory for "Georgian Dream." However, once again returning to Syria, with
15/22
sufficient resources and proper organization, everything can change in a matter of hours or days. The same applies to Ukraine. Russia is weak and unable to withstand superior forces. The Armed Forces of Ukraine do not have superiority, and if the West had not delayed
16/22
the supply of weapons, the war would have long since ended. The collapse of the front in Syria did not prompt Russia to use nuclear weapons, even though U.S. aviation assisted certain anti-Assad forces. Similarly, Russia is unlikely to resort to nuclear weapons if the front
17/22
in Ukraine collapses. Putin's regime was already hanging by a thread from collapse when Prigozhin marched on Moscow. Prigozhin lacked the courage to finish what he started, but a Syrian-style scenario was possible back in 2023. If Ukraine had had the resources to
18/22
simultaneously pressure Russian forces in Ukraine, we would have seen Russians fleeing. As soon as Ukraine has the necessary amount of weaponry to launch a serious offensive, there will be a repeat of the Kherson scenario, and Ukrainians will only see the flashing heels of
19/22
fleeing Russian soldiers. In December, the Central Bank of Russia will once again raise the key interest rate. The Russian economy is slowing down, and it has no means to replenish the resources being consumed in the offensive near Kurakhove. Once the Russian offensive
20/22
runs out of steam, there is a high chance that they will lack the resources to defend what they have already captured. The end of Russia is near. Closer than they think, but Ukraine is still far from victory.
21/22
Ukraine needs weapons, and perhaps the flight of Russians from Syria will serve as another signal to increase support for Kyiv.
22/22
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Seven German journalism students tracked Russian-crewed freighters lurking off the Dutch and German coast and connected them to drone swarms over military bases. Using public tracking tools, their own drones and even driving 2500 kilometers while following a ship, they produced🧵
a far more coherent picture of the Germany and Netherlands drone mystery than months of official hand-wringing and coordinated stonewalling. “Our trail leads to Russia,” the team concludes. “Not beyond doubt, but it’s currently the most probable explanation. We systematically
laid both things side by side: the secret reports about drone incidents and the routes of the ships. You can at least recognize a pattern.” They did not find a drone on any ship and they cannot prove causation, but they established the following: ships with Russian crews showed
Brussels has found a way to make decisions on blocking Russian assets without the consent of all EU member states, the Financial Times reports. This would allow the assets to be frozen indefinitely rather than having the blockade renewed every six months as is currently 1/9
the case. According to the publication, this is made possible by one of the EU treaty provisions stating that unanimous approval is not required in situations of economic shocks, which Brussels considers the war in Ukraine to be. Until now, when extending the freeze, there 2/9
was a risk that one EU country, for example Hungary, could oppose it, and without unanimous agreement the assets would be unfrozen. In early December, the European Commission approved two options for financing Ukraine for 2026 and 2027. The first plan involves providing 3/9
Russia is laying the groundwork to make the 1990s look like a walk in the park. Everyone says Russia is returning to the nineties, but what does that mean? The collapse of the Soviet Union was driven by many factors. Economic problems had already begun in the 1970s. The USSR
1/16
economy was built on the export of energy resources (oil and gas), metals, timber and grain. Most of the revenue went into the arms race of the Cold War. This is very similar to Russia today, whose military budget has reached record levels. The 1973 oil crisis initially
2/16
worked in the USSR's favor by increasing export revenues, but soon an event occurred that had a greater impact on the crisis of the 1990s than anything else - the war in Afghanistan. Although the Soviet Union spent about $20 billion on the war, this was negligible compared
3/16
US-Russia negotiations will not lead to peace. Diplomacy with Russia does not work and this truth is something the Trump administration refuses to see. The more we learn about the details of the US-Russia deal on Ukraine, the clearer it becomes that this administration 1/9
is pursuing only personal gain, both in the form of stakes in Russian business and in the form of a share of the frozen Russian assets whose unfreezing after a peace deal the US administration insists on. Russia is not striving for any peace and has never done so - this is 2/9
obvious to anyone who truly understands the issue. Russia uses the same old Soviet negotiation tactics that Kaja Kallas described when she quoted Andrei Gromyko. Three things: first demand the maximum. Do not ask but demand something that has never been yours. Secondly, 3/9
In mid-October, Putin introduced a moratorium on the cancellation of the fuel damper. This mechanism provides that if the export price of gasoline and diesel fuel is higher than the conditional domestic one, the state compensates companies for part of this difference. 1/8
It is intended to curb fuel prices, but prices continue to rise and have reached record highs not seen in the last 30 years. In September alone, oil companies received more than 30 billion rubles in compensation despite failing to keep their promises not to raise prices. 2/8
The reason is that Putin himself is also a beneficiary of oil companies through various schemes. These companies are the main source of his personal wealth and the financial backbone of Russia’s war machine, and he will keep them afloat at any cost. These payments are an 3/8
The new talks between Trump, Putin, and Zelensky are likely to end in yet another deadlock. This time, Putin has softened his illegal demands and is now “ready to give up” the Zaporizhzhia region in exchange for a ceasefire and control over the rest of Donetsk region. These
1/16
“concessions” have probably signaled to Trump that Putin is ready for negotiations, and that maybe, finally, he can strike a peace deal and get his long-coveted Nobel Prize - since it didn’t work out with Israel, where Hamas opened fire again. The White House rhetoric has
2/16
once again shifted sharply, from “Tomahawks are already on their way to Kyiv” to “Donbas should be Russian.” It’s the same old Kremlin ploy - when things go badly, start pushing for negotiations. All this commotion began after Putin’s call with Trump and has now turned into
3/16