1/ The promised laughs/tears of the day have arrived!
Buckle up y'all! Remember that incel loser who came at me the other day (image below, top left)? 👇🤠
Let's talk about it. Signals indicate the account belongs to Vladislav "Artem" Klyushin, a convicted hacker who was recently traded back to Moscow (Artem is a common diminutive for Vladislav).
He's wealthy and well-connected, is an associate of a GRU operative already indicted by the U.S. for interference in the 2016 election, runs cybersecurity firm "M-13" which does IT work for Putin's office, and was–and may still actively be–one of Putin's "Musketeers" (bodyguards, somewhat akin to the Secret Service) in the Federal Protective Service (FSO), which is reportedly assigned some level of responsibility over information warfare.
ARTEM_KLYUSHIN represents a high-level Kremlin influence actor who combines cyber and info warfare capabilities, financial operations, and direct policy influence through social media channels owned by his partners to achieve the goals of the man to whom he is loyal.
KEY FINDINGS
> Direct operational connection to GRU through indicted business partner Yermakov
> Demonstrated ability to predict and potentially influence major U.S. policy decisions
> Pre-arranged platform access on X
> Evidence of active, long-running coordination with Trump world + Musk
> Visible systematic strategy to degrade U.S. institutional safeguards
I apologize if images are a bit fuzzy, as the size limit on X is 10mb–I can also mirror these elsewhere later.
2/ Klyushin's cyber capabilities and social media operations likely stem from FSO training/connections rather than just GRU links. His relative ease of access to both Putin and elite western figures fits the operational pattern of FSO based on what is publicly known.
> FSO training/connection explains combination of technical and social capabilities
> Part of Putin's "Musketeers" system of trusted operators in strategic positions
> Activities mirror FSO's evolution from protection to Active Measures
> Uses FSO-style elite access patterns (ex. social events)
> Demonstrates FSO's characteristic focus on info warfare and institutional penetration
FSO officers being "elevated to ministerial posts and regional leadership positions" as described in the article below contextualizes Klyushin's focus on U.S. personnel appointments and institutional restructuring in his recent social media activity.
3/ Following his August 2024 release in a prisoner swap with the Kremlin in which he was exchanged for Evan Gershkovich, Paul Whelan, and others, he has publicly demonstrated a coordinated strategy of malicious targeting of U.S. institutions in collusion with domestic elected officials and unelected actors from the safety of his newly Russian digs.
Klyushin's post-release strategy shows three phases:
Each phase demonstrates increasing operational boldness–but who really needs a covert channel when you can publicly direct your men Donald Trump and Elon Musk from the safety of the platform and administration they purchased and own?
OPERATIONAL METHODS
Info Ops
> Multi-phase messaging strategy progressing from cryptic to explicit
> Uses accurate predictions to build credibility
> Coordinates timing of releases with official announcements
> Maintains parallel Russian/English messaging tracks
Platform Manipulation
> Direct communication channel with platform ownership
> Sophisticated understanding of engagement metrics
> Strategic use of reposting and amplification
> Extremely low engagement relative to bot/follower activity
Network Activation
> Direct tagging of key figures (realDonaldTrump, elonmusk)
> Interaction with Trump Jr. regarding nominations
> Signs of coordinated messaging with other platform actors
> Strategic amplification of specific proposals
4/ Below is a sample of aligned and/or coordinated messaging with a known-bad actor, Felix Sater.
5/ His personnel predictions and public behaviors suggest a potentially high level of access to Trump's policy and decision making.
In 2018, he ordered John Kelly's firing, calling for "more compromising person."
Within 24 hours, Kelly was out.
In 2020, he directed Amy Coney Barrett's Supreme Court nomination–implemented within days.
6/ This year, same pattern with Kash Patel for FBI.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
Institutional Degradation
> Disable FBI counterintelligence capabilities
> Bypass State Department security protocols
> Install compromised individuals in key positions
> Create parallel power structures outside oversight
Network Establishment
> Position trusted actors in key roles
> Create direct communication channels
> Bypass traditional diplomatic protocols
> Establish family-based foreign policy apparatus
7/ Klyushin represents a new model of open influence operations–one in which cover for direct institutional targeting is barely required.
His operation demonstrates planning, integration, sophisticated understanding of America's vulnerabilities, and unprecedented boldness in openly proposing their exploitation.
His success rate in directing US personnel changes suggests sophisticated network of influence requiring immediate counterintelligence focus.
"The systematic combination of crusader ideology, restorationist symbolism, and anti-government themes creates a visual manifesto that advocates for religious warfare, revolutionary action [...], and military authority superseding civilian democratic institutions."
🚩🚩🚩 There are major red flags in this story about an "ex-spy" who helped stop Iran from building a nuclear weapon. It is a very interesting piece—and I love The New Yorker—but please don't buy stories about intelligence professionals hook, line, and sinker 🎣
Believing that a story relitigating the success of previous CIA operations against Iran's nuclear program in public at the exactly moment when we are engaged in kinetic action against those same facilities is simply biographical stretches credulity.
Chalker claims he hasn't made a penny since the Broidy coverage. But his quantum cryptography startup Qrypt is HQ'ed at 1 World Trade Center, signed a major tech integration with NVIDIA in March, and added a former CIA Senior Exec to its board last year.
1/8 🧵 Right now, PHANTOM WAKE is showing 16 ships behaving very suspiciously near the underwater cables that carry ~95% of the world's internet traffic. These detections happened in a 19-hour window across 4 different oceans. Clustering here very likely not a coincidence #OSINT
2/8 First, what ARE these cables?
They're fiber-optic cables laid on the seafloor connecting every continent. When you video call someone in Europe from the US, your data travels through one. There are about 500 of them worldwide, and they're shockingly easy to damage
3/8 Here's the dirty secret: Easiest way to cut one is to drag an anchor over it. Slow a ship down to almost zero knots directly above the cable, drop the anchor, and let it scrape. Almost impossible to prove it was intentional! Russia & China have done it repeatedly since 2022
Let's do the *actual math* on @ThisWillHold2's "irrefutable" Amendment 4 fraud claim because the numbers they cite are publicly available and tell a totally different story.
2/ They claim 6,371,645 R+D early votes "coincidentally" equals the 60% threshold for Amendment 4, which got 6,070,758 YES out of 10,619,137 votes cast. The actual 60% bar was 6,371,482.
Their magic number is off by ~163 votes from the threshold. That's their "irrefutable" math.
3/ @ThisWillHold2 says 6,371,645 was used as a ceiling so Amendment 4 would land exactly at 60%. But the real 60% threshold was 6,371,482, and Amendment 4 only got 6,070,758 YES. That is a 300,724 vote gap.
Do you want to know how I tweeted that we did the attack on the school before it was confirmed? 'Twas a strong hunch based on TikTok comments posted to videos showing immediate aftermath of the event, like, "that doesn't look like Iran" to confuse viewers and avoid attribution.
By the time the news started filtering out internationally, Hegseth already knew DoD had made a mistake, and (U.S. or Israeli) bots started covering for the crime pretty much immediately using the deescalation tactics I further describe in the linked thread above.
On X, the bots covering had an Israeli vibe based on profile content and feed (like this one below). In hindsight, they may have been sent to confuse attribution but seemed more concerned with avoiding the world thinking Israel had been the one to bomb the school.
I have established that Donald Trump's statement of war against Iran which was broadcast in the wee hours of this morning is an AI deepfake.
1/🧵 How can we know it's a fake? 👀👇
2/ There is a complete absence of natural breathing patterns, spontaneous illustrators, or small fluctuations in Trump's facial musculature. His delivery remains highly monotonous in rhythm. Facial expressions are limited to rhythmic brow lowering and lip tightening and...
3/ ...lack natural spontaneous variation. His visual presentation shows a lack of natural breathing pauses or any of the shifts in weight that are typical of a live speech. Trump maintains a rigid, forward-facing posture with minimal body movement throughout.