This is the REAL STORY of how COVID started in the U.S.—Don't let Deep State shills like Kash Patel gaslight you (1/17 - supporting evidence in thread)
"[COVID wasn't] a pandemic. It [was] a military attack. It [was] a deployment of chemical [and] maybe radiological weapons."
Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Mic Meow (@MicMeowed) how the COVID "pandemic" was actually pulled off in the U.S., highlighting the U.S. military's involvement in the release of a biological (and potentially radiological) weapon, the lack of evidence supporting the existence of a patient zero in the U.S. (or even China), and the rollout of "hospital murder protocols," which were used to generate the deaths needed to make it look like there was a "pandemic" occurring.
"The Department of Defense quickly took over the response to the supposed public health event [i.e., the COVID-19 'pandemic']," Latypova notes at the beginning of the clip, before delving into the timeline of events—which is strongly supported by the available evidence. "The [supposed SARS-CoV-2 'virus'] sequence was posted into GenBank on January 9th, 2020, ostensibly from a Chinese patient[, for whom there is no evidence supporting their existence]." (See tweet 5/17 for supporting evidence of Latypova's claim here.)
"The [supposed SARS-CoV-2 'virus'] sequence was posted into GenBank on January 9th [2020]. On January 30th [2020], the CDC claimed that we have a first person in the United States, in Washington State, who was, again, infected with this virus. Again, [there was no] evidence of this person ever existing." (See tweet 4/17 for supporting evidence of this claim.)
(For reference, GenBank is a comprehensive public database that contains annotated collections of all publicly available nucleotide and DNA sequences.)
"On February 4th, there's a phone call—and this is...leaked audio from AstraZeneca executives. There was a phone call placed from the Department of Defense. I believe the person making the phone call was Colonel Matt Hepburn from DARPA," Latypova says. "And he called the consortium of pharmaceutical companies telling them to switch from previously funded pan-influenza ['vaccine'] models to COVID ['vaccine'] models because, and I'm quoting him, 'COVID was declared a national security threat.'" (See tweet 16/17 for supporting evidence.)
"So my question is," Latypova says, "[from] January 30th [2020] to February 4th [2020], we only have one ostensible patient having COVID. [But it's not] clear. Are they ill? Did they die? What happened?"
Latypova goes on to ask rhetorically: "We have maybe 11 cases—PCR cases—of COVID in the United States [but] somehow, Colonel Matt Hepburn decides to...to say to the entire pharmaceutical consortium, which is over 300 companies, to start working on COVID products because it's a national security threat. Based on what? That's my question: How do you know that?"
Latypova goes on to note:
"What's more interesting...we have a whole series—hours—of Department of Defense press conferences at the Pentagon with media, over the 2020/2021 timeframe, when they were working on Operation Warp Speed. And so they would do these periodic press updates, and they're hilarious and very interesting....I don't recall the date exactly right now, but it was somewhere [in] February, early March, there [was] a press event where, there's Colonel Wendy Sammons-Jackson and a few others. So there's General [Michael J.] Talley, who leads the presentation from the DOD, and there are two or three [other] participants from Fort Detrick, the biolab and, the US Army infectious disease research. And they're all discussing this stuff. And so she [Sammons-Jackson] says specifically, 'Oh, we've received...the pathogen, meaning the COVID virus... and we [meaning the DOD] are growing the stocks of it." (See tweet 2/17 for supporting evidence.)
"At that time...I remind you," Latypova adds, "we only had maybe one case; maybe 10 cases or 20 [PCR] cases of this, meaning there was no COVID virus in the US. Yet Colonel Wendy Sammons-Jackson is growing stocks of it. And guess what happens after she's growing stocks of it? We have an explosion of cases and illness in the United States. So how is this a pandemic when nothing happens before they announce it, after they announce it, and tell you we're growing stocks of it, we have a pandemic?"
Latypova concludes:
"So it's [COVID] not a pandemic. It's a military attack. It's a deployment of chemical, maybe radiological weapons. I don't know what they deployed, but they deployed something. There was some weird illness that was going around. [But] it's a deployment. And a majority of the deaths...were caused by, we know, hospital murder protocols—killing people in the hospitals with the protocol that I can walk you through because they tried it on my on my mother-in-law, unsuccessfully. We rescued her." (See tweets 9/17 and 10/17 for supporting evidence of the "hospital murder protocols.")
"And, so I can walk you through that protocol....[I've been] with people testifying [as to] how their loved ones were killed in the exact same manner...[with] remdesivir and with ventilators and, dehydration, starvation, cruelty...Isolation...So those are the deaths. That's how they caused the deaths. They simulated illness with something [else]—some chemical weapon or something. And, the main point of this was to deploy these biological weapons, which are the shots [the COVID injections]."
(2/17) "There has been receipt of the [SARS-CoV-2] virus, um, in one of our laboratories, and they're currently culturing, um, growing that virus so that we can have stocks available for a number of things to test products with." — Army Col. Wendy Sammons-Jackson, March 5, 2020
Here is the conference to which Latypova refers in the clip from her Mic Meow interview. A transcription of Sammons-Jackson's remarks regarding "growing" the SARS-CoV-2 "virus" to have "stocks available" is below:
"There has been receipt of the virus, um, in one of our laboratories, and they're currently culturing, um, growing that virus so that we can have stocks available for a number of things to test products with. That's, um, they're also doing, um, characterization of the virus to try to understand, learn more of what we know about the virus and how the virus, um, impacts, um, our the host and our immune response to that virus. The scientists in our other subordinate laboratories are, yes, test tubes, pipettes. They're dealing with mice. They're they're running, um, cell cultures, and and I can let the scientists here that are doing the hands on work talk a little bit."
Also note that Army Brig. Gen. Michael J. Talley, commander of the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command, who led the March 5, 2020 conference, references the film Outbreak. (I note this because that film was clearly used as propaganda in order to prime people for the COVID scamdemic.)
(3/17) Note that when one reporter asks at the March 5, 2020 DOD conference, "Where did the [SARS-CoV-2] sample come from?"—that is, the one Sammons-Jackson says was being used for the "stocks"—Sammons-Jackson replies "the CDC."
Then, in a series of hugely mealy-mouthed responses:
Dr. Kayvon Modjarrad, director of Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, says, "It came from a U.S. patient."
Dr. Nelson Michael, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, adds, "I think [the patient was from] Washington State."
Sammons-Jackson and Michael then fumble all over themselves as they desperately move the conversation onto the next topic without providing a clear answer, nor a name for the patient.
(4/17) Note that, as Latypova says, "patient zero" in the U.S. (who supposedly came from Wuhan to Seattle, Washington) was never confirmed—by anyone.
The U.S. Army reported in September of 2020 that the "master stock" (what Sammons-Jackson referred to), was received in February 2020 from "a patient in Washington State."
(5/17) As Latypova notes, the COVID-19 "patient zero" in Wuhan was also never identified.
Live Science, for example, says "A 55-year-old individual from Hubei province in China *MAY* have been the first person to have contracted COVID-19, the disease caused by the new coronavirus spreading across the globe." (Emphasis added.)
Live Science references The South China Morning Post, which reported in March 2020 that "Government records suggest first person infected with new disease *MAY* have been a Hubei resident aged 55, but 'PATIENT ZERO' HAS YET TO BE CONFIRMED." (Emphasis added.)
(7/17) Note that the CDC says that IT NEVER ISOLATED SARS-COV-2 for its PCR "test."
Source:
This confirms the U.S. never had an isolated virus—only a gene sequence uploaded to GenBank by China.fda.gov/media/134922/d…
(8/17) On March 5 & 6 of 2020, the day of and day after the DOD press conference featuring Sammons-Jackson saying they were "growing" "stocks" of SARS-CoV-2, there were only ~200–300 "cases" in the entire country.
(9/17) Regarding what Latypova says about the hospital "murder protocols," note that analysis based off death certificates points to 500,000+ Americans killed by the protocols between 2020 and 2024. Full thread, featuring medical whistleblowers:
(10/17) Medical whistleblower, author, and former medical coder Zowe Smith has also brought to light how the remdesivir+ventilator murder protocols were used to slaughter hospital patients, who were then labeled as COVID deaths:
(11/17) Furthermore, note that the WHO **LITERALLY** refers to COVID as a "FAKE." They pronounce the acronym for "Public Health Emergency of International Concern (or PHEIC)" (what COVID was) as a FAKE.
(12/17) Also note that the National Security Council (NSC) was ****in charge of**** COVID-19 policy. Not HHS or any of its subsidiaries.
(13/17) The NSC took a reasonable pandemic response plan—PanCAP—and requested an "updated" plan—PanCAP-A.
PanCAP-A, which set COVID policy for the U.S., *****IS NOT A PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DOCUMENT.*****
(14/17) Here is Professor Emeritus of Epidemiology at Yale Dr. Harvey Risch (@DrHarveyRisch) describing how "the U.S. security state...took command of the pandemic on day five after the [COVID] emergency was declared in 2020."
(15/17) Army Genral Gus Perna was the Chief Operation Officer of Operation Warp Speed. DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, developed the tech for the COVID injections starting more than a decade prior to 2020.
WOW! The legendary Rosa Koire, author of Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21, said that the U.S. and China were working in conjunction on a "sterilization vaccine" in 2012(!!!).
She knew they were going to launch a depopulation "vaccine" 8 years before Covid kicked off!
For reference, the evidence proving the Covid injections are depopulation jabs is overwhelming. See thread:
The biggest story in history is unfolding right now, but few know about it: Dr. Francis Boyle died mysteriously right before he was set to testify against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, et al saying the Covid jabs are bioweapons
This case is about the extermination of our species!
Boyle—the eminent lawyer who drafted the legislation for the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989—was set to testify in a lawsuit Dutch attorney Peter Stassen has brought against "the architects of The Great Reset."
Dr. Francis Boyle—the eminent lawyer who drafted the legislation for the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989—calls out Bill Gates as a eugenicist and says the Covid jabs are "franken-shots" that have killed millions of people:
Few know how incredible @PhdSansone is. He's the one who got Dr. Francis Boyle—the eminent lawyer who drafted the legislation for the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989—to submit a signed affidavit claiming that the Covid jabs are literal bioweapons (See tweets 2/3/4)
@PhdSansone Francis Boyle's signed affidavit claiming that, in his expert opinion, the Covid jabs "meet the criteria of biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction...."
@PhdSansone Francis Boyle, referencing Sansone's case in Florida (for which he submitted the above signed affidavit), refers to the Covid injections as "Nazi Covid Franken-shots":
Former medical coder and whistleblower Zowe Smith:
"A program called Tiberius... was provided by Palantir... the same Tiberius program that we believe is used in Gaza to identify targets... for... Operation Warp Speed, to assign people behavior scores... So did you go and get your vaccines? Did you volunteer? Did you put on your mask? Did you do distancing? They [could] tell all of that. They could tell location data, they could tell ethnicity, they could tell what's your [financial situation], they could tell who you've been around. And the Tiberius program would use that to assign you a behavior score.
"They [used] that to target their countermeasure strikes. So where [they sent] their ventilators, where [they sent] the remdesivir, and where [they sent] the vaccines that people [weren't] taking. That was the program that informed those decisions... [the] Palantir Tiberius program."
This clip of Smith (@Zowe_TKMC), who is also the author of The Covid Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult, is taken from a conversation with The Real Natureboy (@NBNNatureboy) posted to Rumble on December 5, 2025.
----------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
"Then I found Whitney Webb's article talking about HHS Protect and how that was a pro—There was a program called Tiberius built into that that was provided by Palantir. This is the same Tiberius program that we believe is used in Gaza to identify the targets, the Hamas targets for drone strikes. Same program, but it was used for a military operation, Operation Warp Speed, to assign people behavior scores.
"So did you go and get your vaccines? Did you volunteer? Did you, put on your mask? Did you do distancing? They can tell all of that. They could tell location data, they could tell ethnicity, they could tell what's your finance, they could tell who you've been around. And the Tiberius program would use that to assign you a behavior score.
"They also use that information since hospitals had to send, things like their, their case mix index, how many patients were there, how many ventilators. They use that to target their countermeasure strikes. So where do they send their ventilators, where do they send the remdesivir, and where do they send the vaccines that people aren't taking? That was the program that informed those decisions, was this Palantir Tiberius program. And the reason it's so nefarious is as you mentioned earlier, they have drones here in America. Our police are already using them. I checked in my state, in my county, they've had contracts since 2011 to get drones here, and they're already using them. They're saying that they're using them for, people that have firearms.
"So it's like a firearms response team, I think it's called. F.I.T. is their acronym. And so it's any person who's suspected of having a firearm, they'll send a drone out instead of a police officer because it would be dangerous for a police officer to go and get shot, but not as bad for a drone to go and get shot.
"So that's how they're framing it. Are these armed drones or are these just observational drones? I think they're just observational at this moment in time. But there is an article, peer-reviewed article actually, talking about how to deploy different Covid measures, countermeasures, and having drones deliver packages, like having drones deliver vaccines.
"It's not going to be that hard. I mean, our military already has what's called LMAMs, which are, that's their acronym for like a individually autonomous flying drone, like a swarm of them. And those are the ones that could have, I forget what their military term is. But it could be a weapon or it could be a drug."
Straight from the Palantir website:
"Palantir was commissioned in mid-2020 by [HHS] to build Tiberius, a software platform it uses to track vaccine production, distribution, and administration across the United States." palantir.com/newsroom/press…
Recall that we now know the Covid injections are actually bioweapons.
Palantir wasn't tracking the distribution of "vaccines," it was tracking the distribution of bioweapons, which were maiming, slaughtering, and sterilizing Americans.
This is the real reason America is headed toward civil war, and almost nobody understands what's happening (1/3):
"We're headed toward civil war, and this is what caused it: We can't get resolution in the courts. There's nowhere else to go. The courts refuse to do their jobs."
Electrical engineer and independent investigator John Beaudoin, Sr. (@JohnBeaudoinSr) describes for Cornelia Rose (@FlashlightsPod) how two rulings from 2007 and 2009—Bell Atlantic Corp. v Twombly and Ashcroft v Iqbal—have severely hamstrung plaintiffs' ability to argue their cases in U.S. courts—particularly in regard to civil rights and discrimination lawsuits.
Now, because people with legitimate grievances can't get their proverbial day in court, justice is seeping out onto the streets. Ultimately, Beaudoin says, this will lead to civil war for America.
For reference, per Grok (asked to provide an overview of Ashcroft v Iqbal in simple language aimed at a lay population):
"In 2009, the Supreme Court decided a big case called Ashcroft v. Iqbal. A man named Javaid Iqbal sued top government officials, saying they put him in harsh detention after 9/11 because of his religion and race. The Court (in a close 5–4 vote) said that to keep a lawsuit alive, you can’t just make vague accusations or repeat legal buzzwords. You need clear, specific facts that make the claim seem realistic—not just possible, but plausible. If the complaint looks mostly like conclusions without solid facts to back them up, the judge can throw the case out early, before any evidence is gathered."
"This ruling (together with a similar 2007 case called Twombly) gave judges much more power to dismiss cases right at the start. Before, many lawsuits could move forward to the evidence stage; after Iqbal, dismissal rates jumped from around half to two-thirds or more, especially in civil-rights and discrimination cases. Courts also started using the same tough 'plausibility' test when checking if a plaintiff was actually harmed and can trace that harm to the defendant (this is called 'standing'). As a result, thousands of cases now get thrown out early for sounding too weak or speculative, making it much harder for regular people to sue the government or big companies."
---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
"You've got a lot of things happening in the United States and around the world. One is climate change. You bring a case. Climate change dismissed. Elections in 2020. Sixty cases were brought on behalf of the Trump campaign. Sixty. All 60 were dismissed without a substantive hearing. They didn't get to discovery. They were dismissed on the procedural stage."
"And for an example, not only my three cases, they used Ashcroft versus Iqbal, right? They used these cases against me, in all three of the cases I brought. But also from me, little old me, pro se litigant, not a lawyer, representing myself, all the way up to the— the, the states, Texas and Missouri, brought a case against Pennsylvania for the elections, saying that Pennsylvania broke its own laws. It automatically goes to the Supreme Court because it's two states against another state.
"They call it original jurisdiction. So it goes to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court said, dismissed, you don't have standing. And they cited Ashcroft versus Iqbal. So not only was it my cases, but all the way up to The President, and 60 cases, all dismissed. They all say you don't have standing.
"So it's elections, it's climate, it's trans in kids, it's Covid. Covid vaccines. Whatever social issue it is, you don't get any resolution in the courts. The courts are not doing their job of dispute resolution.
"So what happens, Cornelia, is civil society breaks down. You have people dividing into camps because the issues are not being settled or adjudicated. And so you leave it to society to fight amongst each other, fight on social media, fight in the streets. So we're devolving as a civil society based on what's happened with, with these two cases and the way the courts are operating extremely inefficiently, dismissing righteous cases that should be heard.
"So, anyway, the summation is— This graph is the problem with the United States. And everybody's looking at the executive and legislative branches trying to solve it. That's not where the problem is. You can fix those two branches if the courts will actually hear the cases. They're not hearing them."
(2/3) "We're headed toward civil war, and this is what caused it. We can't get resolution in the courts. There's nowhere else to go. The courts refuse to do their jobs... The most foundational right you have is being abridged by this idea of standing doctrine...."
----------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
We're headed towards civil war, and this is what caused it. We can't get resolution in the courts. There's nowhere else to go. The courts refuse to do their jobs. And what I didn't mention here, I could go through the whole history of it back to the Magna Carta, but the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, the last line is you have the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances. That is the most foundational right.
If you want to uphold your right to freedom to exercise your religion, if you want to uphold your right of freedom of speech, what are you going to do about it? You're going to go to court and sue somebody, and then the court says, nope, you don't have standing. So your foundational right, that upholds all others other than the Second Amendment that we don't want to get to. Right? We don't want to talk about violent, you know, using guns to support your right to freedom.
But if we set that aside, then the most foundational right before that is the right to petition for redress of grievances and your right to due process of law in the 14th Amendment, equal protections under the 14th Amendment, and your right to dispute resolution in the courts in Article 3, Section 2. The most foundational right you have is being abridged by this idea of standing doctrine that derives authority from this very attenuated path of authority that says Article 3, Section 2 says you have a right to go to court if you have a valid complaint against somebody in another state or if it has to do with a federal law.
(3/3) "Covid comes in in 2020, [and there are] 180,000 more cases than normal—180,000. How does the court system handle that? ... There's only one way to do this: You have to start dismissing cases and not hearing them. It's the only way to manage this."
In this last clip, Beaudoin describes how courts used Ashcroft v Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v Twombly to dismiss legitimate cases concerning U.S. citizens who were having their constitutional rights trampled thanks to the (so-called) Covid public health policy measures.
----------------Partial transcription of clip---------------
"This is the— This is the US District courts. And so you have the graph going from 1995 to 2024. It's every other year. So the blank on the far right side is 2024. So that's 30 years. You have 30 years, and you're going along 1995, '6, '7. You see, these are all the differences each year. This is difference from, say, average. It's really linear least squares approximation trend line. I don't want to explain that. Let's just say this is the excess cases.
"In 1995, you know, it's like minus 6,000. Actually easier for me to read mine. And then 1996 was 13,000. 14. Minus 2,000. Near zero at 16 cases. It goes along. So you've got a range from 14,000 at the highest to minus 18,000 at the lowest. And then even in 20— What was that? 2019, 10,000.
"But then in 2020, so Covid hits, right? Covid comes in in 2020, 180,000 more cases than normal. 180,000. How does the court system handle that? If you look at the graph in the below, I just used a percentage. Okay? Percentage more than expected. And, you know, you've got the. The most is 5.7%, and the least is minus 6.3%. So your range for 25 years, your range is 5.7% max and minus 6.3% deficit. And then all of a sudden, you have a 62% increase. That's that, 180,000 extra cases.
"Did you hire 62% more people to handle those cases? No. Did everybody in the court system, all the judges and all the clerks, did they work 62% more hours? Like 14 hours a day, every day for a year? No. There's only one way to do this. You have to start dismissing cases and not hearing them. It's the only way to manage this."
The most important point re: Covid and the real reason MAHA is just a psyop–failure:
"Over 90% of [the health freedom movement] is...talk about the safety and efficacy of these vaccines...[but that's] a dead end...[because the Covid jabs] are weapons."
See 🧵 for evidence
This clip is of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) taken from a conversation with Debbie Lerman and Children's Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) CEO Mary Holland (@maryhollandnyc) posted to Rumble on November 11, 2025.
----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------
"One of my large points of frustration is the whole health freedom movement. 90% of it, over 90% of it, is people just talk about safety and efficacy of these vaccines. In my opinion, it's a dead end. And it was set up as a dead end for everyone to walk in and march in place. Until they continued the constructed digital cage and everything else that Debbie was talking about.
"The safety and efficacy discussion, as I said, is inapplicable to EUA countermeasures. It is not possible to even conduct clinical trials for EUA countermeasures because according to the law, these products are non-investigational. This is a very, very important categorization of substance of these products. If it's non-investigational, it's not possible to clinical trial it. Because clinical trial in humans is an investigation. That's how the law treats it.
"Since it's non-investigational. And in addition to being non- investigational chemical substance, the chemical substance can be freely adulterated with any poison. It is also okay to lie about it. If you are covered person using it as a covered countermeasure, meaning you following HHS and DOD orders when using it, then, as Debbie said, it's a license to kill. You can kill as many people as you want or don't want, as many as they tell you, and be fully absolved from liability. And the whole sovereign immunity of the state will be applied to absolve you from liability.
"So I just explained to you that these products are weapons. There is only one conclusion that arise from it. If it's a non-investigational can be adulterated as poison. Anybody who is injuring or killing people with them absolved from liability, they are weapons. There's no other space into which all of this falls other than it's a weapon and it's used as a weapon and the people who are using it as a weapon, are absolved from liability. Just like the soldiers in the combat field. If they kill or injure anyone."
(2/8) This video essay outlines the overwhelming evidence that shows the Covid jabs are bioweapons.
They make you more likely to get Covid and can otherwise only maim, injure, or kill.