This is the REAL STORY of how COVID started in the U.S.—Don't let Deep State shills like Kash Patel gaslight you (1/17 - supporting evidence in thread)
"[COVID wasn't] a pandemic. It [was] a military attack. It [was] a deployment of chemical [and] maybe radiological weapons."
Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Mic Meow (@MicMeowed) how the COVID "pandemic" was actually pulled off in the U.S., highlighting the U.S. military's involvement in the release of a biological (and potentially radiological) weapon, the lack of evidence supporting the existence of a patient zero in the U.S. (or even China), and the rollout of "hospital murder protocols," which were used to generate the deaths needed to make it look like there was a "pandemic" occurring.
"The Department of Defense quickly took over the response to the supposed public health event [i.e., the COVID-19 'pandemic']," Latypova notes at the beginning of the clip, before delving into the timeline of events—which is strongly supported by the available evidence. "The [supposed SARS-CoV-2 'virus'] sequence was posted into GenBank on January 9th, 2020, ostensibly from a Chinese patient[, for whom there is no evidence supporting their existence]." (See tweet 5/17 for supporting evidence of Latypova's claim here.)
"The [supposed SARS-CoV-2 'virus'] sequence was posted into GenBank on January 9th [2020]. On January 30th [2020], the CDC claimed that we have a first person in the United States, in Washington State, who was, again, infected with this virus. Again, [there was no] evidence of this person ever existing." (See tweet 4/17 for supporting evidence of this claim.)
(For reference, GenBank is a comprehensive public database that contains annotated collections of all publicly available nucleotide and DNA sequences.)
"On February 4th, there's a phone call—and this is...leaked audio from AstraZeneca executives. There was a phone call placed from the Department of Defense. I believe the person making the phone call was Colonel Matt Hepburn from DARPA," Latypova says. "And he called the consortium of pharmaceutical companies telling them to switch from previously funded pan-influenza ['vaccine'] models to COVID ['vaccine'] models because, and I'm quoting him, 'COVID was declared a national security threat.'" (See tweet 16/17 for supporting evidence.)
"So my question is," Latypova says, "[from] January 30th [2020] to February 4th [2020], we only have one ostensible patient having COVID. [But it's not] clear. Are they ill? Did they die? What happened?"
Latypova goes on to ask rhetorically: "We have maybe 11 cases—PCR cases—of COVID in the United States [but] somehow, Colonel Matt Hepburn decides to...to say to the entire pharmaceutical consortium, which is over 300 companies, to start working on COVID products because it's a national security threat. Based on what? That's my question: How do you know that?"
Latypova goes on to note:
"What's more interesting...we have a whole series—hours—of Department of Defense press conferences at the Pentagon with media, over the 2020/2021 timeframe, when they were working on Operation Warp Speed. And so they would do these periodic press updates, and they're hilarious and very interesting....I don't recall the date exactly right now, but it was somewhere [in] February, early March, there [was] a press event where, there's Colonel Wendy Sammons-Jackson and a few others. So there's General [Michael J.] Talley, who leads the presentation from the DOD, and there are two or three [other] participants from Fort Detrick, the biolab and, the US Army infectious disease research. And they're all discussing this stuff. And so she [Sammons-Jackson] says specifically, 'Oh, we've received...the pathogen, meaning the COVID virus... and we [meaning the DOD] are growing the stocks of it." (See tweet 2/17 for supporting evidence.)
"At that time...I remind you," Latypova adds, "we only had maybe one case; maybe 10 cases or 20 [PCR] cases of this, meaning there was no COVID virus in the US. Yet Colonel Wendy Sammons-Jackson is growing stocks of it. And guess what happens after she's growing stocks of it? We have an explosion of cases and illness in the United States. So how is this a pandemic when nothing happens before they announce it, after they announce it, and tell you we're growing stocks of it, we have a pandemic?"
Latypova concludes:
"So it's [COVID] not a pandemic. It's a military attack. It's a deployment of chemical, maybe radiological weapons. I don't know what they deployed, but they deployed something. There was some weird illness that was going around. [But] it's a deployment. And a majority of the deaths...were caused by, we know, hospital murder protocols—killing people in the hospitals with the protocol that I can walk you through because they tried it on my on my mother-in-law, unsuccessfully. We rescued her." (See tweets 9/17 and 10/17 for supporting evidence of the "hospital murder protocols.")
"And, so I can walk you through that protocol....[I've been] with people testifying [as to] how their loved ones were killed in the exact same manner...[with] remdesivir and with ventilators and, dehydration, starvation, cruelty...Isolation...So those are the deaths. That's how they caused the deaths. They simulated illness with something [else]—some chemical weapon or something. And, the main point of this was to deploy these biological weapons, which are the shots [the COVID injections]."
(2/17) "There has been receipt of the [SARS-CoV-2] virus, um, in one of our laboratories, and they're currently culturing, um, growing that virus so that we can have stocks available for a number of things to test products with." — Army Col. Wendy Sammons-Jackson, March 5, 2020
Here is the conference to which Latypova refers in the clip from her Mic Meow interview. A transcription of Sammons-Jackson's remarks regarding "growing" the SARS-CoV-2 "virus" to have "stocks available" is below:
"There has been receipt of the virus, um, in one of our laboratories, and they're currently culturing, um, growing that virus so that we can have stocks available for a number of things to test products with. That's, um, they're also doing, um, characterization of the virus to try to understand, learn more of what we know about the virus and how the virus, um, impacts, um, our the host and our immune response to that virus. The scientists in our other subordinate laboratories are, yes, test tubes, pipettes. They're dealing with mice. They're they're running, um, cell cultures, and and I can let the scientists here that are doing the hands on work talk a little bit."
Also note that Army Brig. Gen. Michael J. Talley, commander of the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command, who led the March 5, 2020 conference, references the film Outbreak. (I note this because that film was clearly used as propaganda in order to prime people for the COVID scamdemic.)
(3/17) Note that when one reporter asks at the March 5, 2020 DOD conference, "Where did the [SARS-CoV-2] sample come from?"—that is, the one Sammons-Jackson says was being used for the "stocks"—Sammons-Jackson replies "the CDC."
Then, in a series of hugely mealy-mouthed responses:
Dr. Kayvon Modjarrad, director of Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, says, "It came from a U.S. patient."
Dr. Nelson Michael, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, adds, "I think [the patient was from] Washington State."
Sammons-Jackson and Michael then fumble all over themselves as they desperately move the conversation onto the next topic without providing a clear answer, nor a name for the patient.
(4/17) Note that, as Latypova says, "patient zero" in the U.S. (who supposedly came from Wuhan to Seattle, Washington) was never confirmed—by anyone.
The U.S. Army reported in September of 2020 that the "master stock" (what Sammons-Jackson referred to), was received in February 2020 from "a patient in Washington State."
(5/17) As Latypova notes, the COVID-19 "patient zero" in Wuhan was also never identified.
Live Science, for example, says "A 55-year-old individual from Hubei province in China *MAY* have been the first person to have contracted COVID-19, the disease caused by the new coronavirus spreading across the globe." (Emphasis added.)
Live Science references The South China Morning Post, which reported in March 2020 that "Government records suggest first person infected with new disease *MAY* have been a Hubei resident aged 55, but 'PATIENT ZERO' HAS YET TO BE CONFIRMED." (Emphasis added.)
(7/17) Note that the CDC says that IT NEVER ISOLATED SARS-COV-2 for its PCR "test."
Source:
This confirms the U.S. never had an isolated virus—only a gene sequence uploaded to GenBank by China.fda.gov/media/134922/d…
(8/17) On March 5 & 6 of 2020, the day of and day after the DOD press conference featuring Sammons-Jackson saying they were "growing" "stocks" of SARS-CoV-2, there were only ~200–300 "cases" in the entire country.
(9/17) Regarding what Latypova says about the hospital "murder protocols," note that analysis based off death certificates points to 500,000+ Americans killed by the protocols between 2020 and 2024. Full thread, featuring medical whistleblowers:
(10/17) Medical whistleblower, author, and former medical coder Zowe Smith has also brought to light how the remdesivir+ventilator murder protocols were used to slaughter hospital patients, who were then labeled as COVID deaths:
(11/17) Furthermore, note that the WHO **LITERALLY** refers to COVID as a "FAKE." They pronounce the acronym for "Public Health Emergency of International Concern (or PHEIC)" (what COVID was) as a FAKE.
(12/17) Also note that the National Security Council (NSC) was ****in charge of**** COVID-19 policy. Not HHS or any of its subsidiaries.
(13/17) The NSC took a reasonable pandemic response plan—PanCAP—and requested an "updated" plan—PanCAP-A.
PanCAP-A, which set COVID policy for the U.S., *****IS NOT A PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DOCUMENT.*****
(14/17) Here is Professor Emeritus of Epidemiology at Yale Dr. Harvey Risch (@DrHarveyRisch) describing how "the U.S. security state...took command of the pandemic on day five after the [COVID] emergency was declared in 2020."
(15/17) Army Genral Gus Perna was the Chief Operation Officer of Operation Warp Speed. DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, developed the tech for the COVID injections starting more than a decade prior to 2020.
DON'T LET MAHA GASLIGHT YOU: It's not the food, water, or air: the chronic disease epidemic is due to the bloody "vaccines" (1/9)
"['Vaccines' are] ticking time bombs...you inject something that turns the immune system against your own body, and it's progressive."
Inventor, scientist, and author of the seminal "Control Group study" Joy Garner describes during an interview with Vaccine Choice Canada (@VaccineChoiceCA) how "vaccines" are responsible for the chronic disease epidemic in the U.S. In this clip, Garner highlights the association of "vaccines" with a wide range of diseases and conditions, including autism, diabetes, heart disease, arthritis, etc.
Critically, Garner notes that these diseases occur at a rate of less than 1% in "unvaccinated" Americans, despite the fact they still partake in unhealthy habits, including eating junk food, using cell phones, and consuming alcohol.
Firstly in the clip, Garner notes that babies who receive the "Vitamin K shot"——an injection **supposedly** given to newborns to prevent a rare but serious bleeding disorder by aiding in blood clotting—are associated with a rate of autism of 2%; when babies receive both the K shot and "pregnancy vaccines" via their mother, however, that rate shoots up to "over 5%."
Garner notes that in adults (aged 18 and over) is where she and her colleagues "saw [a] really extreme variation in long-term health outcomes, because ['vaccines'] are like ticking time bombs." She notes that when a person receives a "vaccine," they "inject something that turns [their] immune system against [their] own body, and it's progressive."
"It can get very aggressive if you continue to vaccinate, and you can suddenly end up with something that's gonna kill you right away or that disables you right away," Garner adds. She notes, for example, that she and her colleagues "could not find a single arthritic person over the age of 18 who was entirely unvaccinated."
"This means...that cancer, arthritis, diabetes, things like this, severe diseases, are non-existent [in the 'unvaccinated'] because we just couldn't find them in our sample."
Garner notes, "We had a very robust sample of that population of interest [the 'unvaccinated']...[And] the risk of any of these diseases could not possibly be more than...well under 1%. [For diseases like] heart disease, cancer, diabetes, arthritis."
"That's the baseline what our natural health is supposed to look like, even if we're eating bad food, even if we're drinking and smoking," Garner adds. She goes on to say:
"I got to know these entirely unvaccinated families. Just because they knew that vaccines in particular were a bad idea, and they didn't trust their doctors, they didn't trust the government, they didn't trust the FDA or the CDC, doesn't mean they weren't enjoying themselves. They're having a beer. Their kids are running around with sugary popsicles and candy bars and cell phones. And I'm like, they're so healthy, and the explanation was, you know, 'I don't worry about their diet. I don't worry [because] they don't have allergies...I'm not worried about whether or not there might be few fumes coming out of my new flooring or, you know, the wrong clothing or whatever. They're not fragile. They're so robust. They never get sick. Or when they do, it lasts for 24 hours and they're all better.'"
(2/9) Pharma insider Sasha Latypova has found the explanation for why "vaccines" are so detrimental: they work exactly IN THE OPPOSITE WAY we're told they do.
Instead of priming our immune systems to protect us, they prime our bodies for disease:
(3/9) Latypova highlights the work of Nobel Prize–winner Charles Richet, who found that when you inject things into the bloodstream—even benign proteins—you prime the body to have severe reactions to whatever was injected:
"Our immune system protects us from attacks by microorganisms and poisonous substances. After experiencing an attack, the immune system learns to defend itself against new attacks—we become immune. One of the ways this is used is with vaccinations, when a low dosage of an infectious substance provides immunity. Through studies involving dogs, Charles Richet demonstrated an opposite effect in 1902. After an initial low dose of a substance, a new dose some weeks later could produce a severe reaction. He called the phenomenon anaphylaxis. The result had important implications for our understanding of allergies."
THE FATAL FLAW OF THE HEALTH FREEDOM MOVEMENT—it must admit the C19 op is planned genocide largely executed by the US military-industrial complex (1/9)
"We've uncovered the scheme of the crime...it has nothing to do with science or medicine or public health. It's...genocide."
Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Mic Meow (@MicMeowed) how much of the health freedom movement still refuses to admit that the COVID operation (my term) was premeditated genocide and not just a public health response rife with supposed mistakes. Latypova notes that while many of the members of the health freedom movement are willing to say COVID was a "mismanaged health event," they won't come out and espouse the truth: that the COVID operation was, in fact, a "crime" and a "genocide."
"My biggest frustration today, and over the years, is with all sides of [the health freedom movement] trying to position this whole situation as a scientific debate or medical issue or even a public health issue. The deluded side thinks it's a virus and it's a pandemic. The side that's ostensibly health freedom side says...'Oh, yeah, it's a pandemic, but [it's just a] mismanaged public health issue.'"
"[But] it's an intentional poisoning," Latypova notes, referencing the COVID injections. "Even in 2021, I knew it was an intentional poisoning. [And] since then we've uncovered the whole scheme of the crime, the whole nature of the crime, and it has nothing to do with science or medicine or public health. It's a...genocide."
Latypova goes on to say that "if you're a truth-seeker...you have to move as the new data comes in; you have to make additional conclusions...[and yet]...the health freedom [movement]...will come to a certain point, but [go] no further." The pharma insider notes, "that's a hallmark of brand building to get political power versus seeking the truth....They [somehow] can't get past this point that this is a mismanaged health event."
Describing a key part of how the COVID genocide was committed, Latypova notes the following:
"We used to have a public health policy prior to 2018, 2019. We had a public health policy, which dealt with things like pandemics. Now, assume that this is a valid point—I personally believe pandemics do not exist, but even if you assume that this is a valid point and the government should have a policy for such situations... the policy said that Department of Health and Human Services is in charge of the policy, which is reasonable. And it also [called for] fairly reasonable public health measures, such as masking wasn't advised. There was... some quarantine measures or some advisory to stay home if you're sick, you know, some normal... public health advice. [But there were] no mandates of vaccines or anything like that.
"Now that policy was documented. [But] somehow in 2020, or maybe late 2019 or 2020, it's not clear when, [a] switch happened; that policy was replaced by a brand new policy....[one] that all of a sudden put the National Security Council in charge of pandemic policy. And that's a shocking switch. And still, only a few authors have commented on it."
Latypova goes on to say:
"The first person who identified this was Debbie Lerman, to my knowledge, and she is a journalist writing [for the Brownstone Institute]. And so she wrote several articles about it. I found the documents...referenced. She and I also found additional documents after that. So, in charge of the whole policy is the National Security Council. [And the] National Security Council is an advisory body to the President of the United States, and consists of heads of military and intelligence; it does not have any representatives from Health and Human Services on the council...[And] this has been known now for at least two or three years.
"[Yet still] everybody is pinning [the COVID crimes] on Anthony Fauci. And I'm not defending him. He's a Mengele type, and he should be prosecuted for what he did both during the AIDS [crisis] and all the years that he's done similar crimes. But he wasn't in charge of this [COVID] policy. He [was at] NIH, NIAID, and, again, had nothing to do with the policy...He was part of designing certain things, and he was an advisor; HHS played an advisory role. So, obviously, he was involved in designing certain things, and he is clearly the spokesperson for the cabal. But it's not his policy. It's the [policy of the] National Security Council [and U.S.] military and intelligence."
(2/9) The National Security Council (NSC) was indeed ****in charge of**** COVID-19 policy. Not HHS or any of its subsidiaries.
(3/9) The NSC took a reasonable pandemic response plan—PanCAP—and requested an "updated" plan—PanCAP-A.
PanCAP-A, which set COVID policy for the U.S., *****IS NOT A PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DOCUMENT.*****
"Now we have excess deaths and potentially lower fertility rates...and [for] South Korea, we looked at preliminary data: It looks like an extinction-level event going on there [and] that, over time, the economy will collapse." (1/6)
Former BlackRock fund manager and founding partner at Phinance Technologies Edward Dowd (@DowdEdward) describes for Dr. Kelly Victory (@DrKellyVictory) on Ask Dr. Drew (@AskDrDrew) how the COVID injections' association with excess deaths and "potentially lower fertility rates" are contributing to an "extinction-level event" happening in South Korea.
"Now we have excess deaths and potentially lower fertility rates...and [in] South Korea, we looked at preliminary data, [and] it looks like an extinction-level event going on there [and] that over time the economy will collapse," Dowd says.
"[And] sure enough," he adds, "South Korea is in the news: they declared martial law. We suspect that was to cover up a currency crisis and a collapsing stock market because their central bank came out immediately and provided as much liquidity as needed."
Dowd goes on to say that the effects of the COVID injections "have real-world consequences long-term for a lot of these economies; they don't collapse overnight, but it's definitely not good."
Providing her own point of view on the issue of the COVID injections having negative effects on fertility, Victory says that "we have we clear pathophysiology that explains why these mRNA injections might be the cause. With regard to men, we know that males who receive the injections show lower sperm counts and lower sperm motility, for example." She adds, "We know that...the shots cause you to form antibodies that [are] very, very similar—almost identical—to a protein that is critical for the formation and development of the placenta."
Dr. Victory adds, "if you get one of these shots and you develop antibodies to the spike protein, at the same time, you are developing antibodies to a forming placenta, which may well explain why we're seeing increased rates of miscarriage or failures of women to be able to get pregnant in the first place."
(2/6) South Korea "vaccinated" ~88% of its total population with the COVID injections by August 2023; for ages 18 and up, rates were between ~90 and ~99%.
(3/6) On Dec. 3, S.K. President Yoon Suk Yeol ostensibly declared martial law in order to "eradicate 'shameless pro-North Korean anti-state forces.'" As Dowd mentions, central bankers have used the "brief" declaration of martial law as an excuse to "provide 'unlimited liquidity' to stabilize the markets."
"My speculation on [UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson's murder] is he was either going to testify or was compelled to testify as part of [an ongoing DOJ investigation], and it was going to bring down some very powerful individuals who are behind his company." (1/6)
Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) speculates on a recent episode of The Shannon Joy Show (@ShannonJoyRadio) as to the real reason UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was recently murdered. Highlighting a gargantuan ransomware attack that targeted the health insurance and benefits corporation—which is a subsidiary of UnitedHealthcare Group—earlier this year, Latypova notes that "there's ongoing...litigation about that," which has already cost the company "several billion dollars"—not including whatever forthcoming settlement there may be.
"[Thompson's] the CEO of the company that processes most of the Medicare and Medicaid claims, all kinds of insurance claims, in the United States," Latypova notes. "About a year ago, there was a breach of data. They got hijacked, ransomware. They had to pay a ransomware bribe and that also went sideways. There was a data breach exposed, about hundred million Americans [had] their healthcare data, their Social Security numbers [exposed]. And so there's litigation ongoing about that. They already spent several billion dollars on that litigation, and that's before even the settlement."
Latypova goes on to say that UnitedHealthcare is "also under investigation by the Department of Justice, which [is] also looking into all of this. And so [Thompson] was meeting with the investors, walked out in the morning, and then was gunned down right after that." The pharma insider adds, "my speculation on this is he was either going to testify or was compelled to testify as part of this, and it was going to bring down some very powerful individuals who are behind his company."
"Because it's such a huge company, such huge data that they're processing, they have to be connected to the same cabal...that's running this whole global thing," Latypova adds, referencing the ongoing global COVID operation (my term).
(2/6) In May of this year, UnitedHealthcare Group CEO Andrew Witty testified before Congress regarding the ransomeware attack. Change Healthcare, the hacked division of UNH, processes $1.5 TRILLION in medical claims annually.
Witty—the CEO of the company that had revenues of $324 billion in 2023—apologized over the attack, which took place because one or more employees was/were not using two-factor authentication and had their credentials stolen by the hackers.
(3/6) UNH paid the hackers $22 million, but face untold billions in damages for many reasons, including customer-support costs, record-holder class-action settlements, HIPPA fines, state fines, etc.
UNH may also have to give up its (hacked) Change unit entirely.
🔥🔥"All chronic diseases today, especially in people under, let's say, 50, are because of vaccines. It's not because of what you eat...We have to stay focused on the shots because that's how they poison us and our children."🔥🔥 (1/5)
Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Michael Farris (@CoffeeandaMike) how it is LITERALLY NOT POSSIBLE TO VACCINATE people—against anything, for any reason. Latypova highlights the work of Nobel Prize winner—and eugenicist—Charles Richet, which showed conclusively that anytime a protein—of any type—is injected into a person's bloodstream, it primes their body for an anaphylactic reaction the next time they're injected with (or even, possibly, consume) that protein.
Richet "quickly realized that you don't have to inject a toxin to produce [anaphylaxis]," Latypova says. "You can inject safe things like milk, like, corn, soy derivatives, albumins, gelatin. So anything that you think is safe to eat, if you inject it, a protein directly into the bloodstream, you can produce this effect."
Latypova notes: "This is how people have lactose intolerance. All the peanut allergies are because of this. The Alpha-gal, this effect [meat allergies] it's another type of allergy that's because of the gelatin injections. And so there's a variety of different reactions. They all boil down to the same thing: You got injected with the protein directly into the bloodstream."
"So all chronic diseases today, especially in people under, let's say, 50, are because of the vaccines. It's not because of what you eat," the retired pharma executive adds. She goes on to say:
"To produce the same damage through food, you need decades, and you need really bad habits. And you sometimes you might not even get But with one shot of a newborn, you can produce this effect for life. So that's why I'm saying, all this debate about food, throw it out of the window doesn't matter. We have to stay focused on the shots because that's how they poison us and our children through this. The food effects are secondary."
Furthermore, Latypova says that "the work of Charles Richet and his Nobel Prize definitively says that it's not possible to vaccinate. Vaccination is not possible. There are no safe vaccines." She adds:
"You can't do it because we have this fundamental law of nature that works against it. You can't inject proteins directly into the bloodstream. And everybody denies it. The whole medical establishment denies that this exists, that this knowledge is available. They deny it. They call it different names. They give it different categories. They hide the data. They ban us everywhere. They say we're cranks and anti-vaxxers, and we're just crazy, and we're killing grandma. And so this whole establishment is working as one unit to suppress this information."
This is why food is the new focus among the (usurped) freedom health movement, Latypova notes.
"That's why they're telling you, 'Oh, it's food...you need to ban corn syrup ban dyes or you know? And that's why in California, they label everything with proposition 65 so that you think that everything around you causes cancer. And that's not true. Cancer is caused by injections through the same mechanism. So, anyway, so that's what I want people to understand. And I wrote several articles about it. I linked Richet's work...As I said, you can find his book and you can read about it and it will become extremely clear what's going on. And that's why, you know, it's so important to stay on the vaccines and not get into these diversions of, you know, let's ban different types of food."
(2/5) Indeed, when we look at "vaccinated" vs. "unvaccinated" Americans, we find that the "unvaccinated" are FAR healthier—in every respect. This would not be the case if food were the problem re: chronic diseases.
(3/5) Re: the Charles Richet work highlighted by Latypova:
"Richet demonstrated an opposite effect in 1902. After an initial low dose of a substance, a new dose some weeks later could produce a severe reaction."
"In 1913, [Richet] was awarded the Nobel Prize for his researches on anaphylaxis. He invented this word to designate the sensitivity developed by an organism after it had been given a parenteral injection of a colloid or protein substance or a toxin (1902)."
(Parenteral drug administration is drug administration by intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous injection.)
"They [hospitals] murdered a lot of people. MORE THAN A MILLION [1,000,000] PEOPLE. The CARES Act...is basically a solicitation of fraud." (Emphasis added.)
In this clip from a recent Vaccine Safety Research Foundation Live (@VacSafety) video electrical engineer and independent investigator John Beaudoin, Sr. (@JohnBeaudoinSr) describes for a Special Committee on COVID Response Efficacy in New Hampshire how deadly COVID "treatment" protocols implemented by the CARES Act—signed into law by President Trump in March 2020—resulted in the deaths of more than a million (1,000,000) Americans.
Note this testimony was given in April of 2024 and that the deadly COVID protocols continue to this day in the hospitals.
---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------
"I can look at CMS(.)gov. Okay? You go to CMS(.)gov and look for NCTAP. That's a COVID payout plan, and you'll find that Olumiant, which is baricitinib, or Veklury, which is remdesivir, has a 20% adder to the entire hospital bill," Beaudoin tells the NH COVID committee. "They murdered a lot of people. More than a million people.
So the CARES Act...is basically a solicitation of fraud.
Walter E. Williams said it, but probably also said by Thomas Sowell, Milton Friedman, if you subsidize something, you'll get more of it. And since they subsidized COVID being put on a death certificate, thinking somehow they're convincing the people that that's gonna save people. How is that gonna save somebody? But that's what they did.
"People being put on ventilators, that's an 86% kill rate. 86% of people die, get put on ventilators. And they did it to people who whose vital signs were normal, and they died."
@VacSafety As Beaudoin notes in the clip, hospitals are rewarded a 20% "add-on payment" if they use VEKLURY (remdesivir) or Olumiant (barcitinib).
Remdesivir is known to be wildly toxic—see tweet after next.